Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of asphalt concrete rutting mechanisms by X-ray computed tomography imaging and micromechanical finite element modeling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper systematically investigates the changes in asphalt concrete (AC) microstructure caused by full-scale accelerated pavement testing with a heavy vehicle simulator (HVS), using X-ray computed tomography images taken before and after HVS rutting tests. A viscoelastic micromechanical finite element modeling was also used to investigate effects of bitumen mastic and aggregate skeleton properties on shear resistance. The primary purpose was to determine the reasons behind the earlier failure of the rubberized gap graded AC mix used in the test compared to the polymer modified dense graded mix also included in the experiment. Shear related deformation appears to control the long term rutting performance of the test sections while densification was primarily an initial contributor at the very early stages of trafficking. A high concentration of aggregate interlock in the polymer modified mix, as a result of the dense gradation and larger aggregate sizes, appears to have resulted in greater dissipation of shear stresses and therefore greater shear resistance. The lack of this interlocking effect for the rubberized gap graded mix is proposed to have caused the earlier failure on HVS test sections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Association of State Highways Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2003) Standard method of test for determining the permanent shear strain and stiffness of asphalt mixtures using the Superpave shear tester (SST): Designation T320. AASHTO provisional standards, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Association of State Highways Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2009) Bulk specific gravity and density of compacted asphalt mixtures using automatic vacuum sealing method. AASHTO T-331

  3. Arramon YP, Mehrabadi MM, Martin DW, Cowin SC (2000) A multidimensional anisotropic strength criterion based on Kelvin modes. Int J Solids Struct, 37, 2915–2935

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Azari H, McCuen R, Stuart K (2005) Effect of radial inhomogeneity of shear properties of asphalt mixtures. J Mater Civ Eng; 17(1): 80–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bejarano M, Jones D, Morton B, Scheffy C (2005) Reflective cracking study: Initial construction, phase 1 HVS testing, and overlay construction. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Research and Innovation by the University of California Pavement Research Center, Davis and Berkeley. Rep. No. UCPRC-RR-2005-03

  6. Braz D, Motta LMG, Lopes RT (2000) Computed tomography: Evaluation of stability tests and indirect tensile strength of field asphaltic mixtures. Non-Destr Test Eval Int 33(8): 517–522

    Google Scholar 

  7. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) (2006a) Highway design manual 2006 update chapter 630 flexible pavement. Caltrans, Sacramento

  8. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) (2006b). Use of rubberized asphalt concrete for new construction. Memorandum, Caltrans

  9. Coleri E, Tsai BW, Monismith CL (2008) Pavement rutting performance prediction by integrated Weibull approach. J Transport Res Rec 2087: 120–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Coleri E, Wu R, Signore JM, Harvey JT (2011a) Rutting performance evaluation of rubberized gap-graded and polymer modified dense graded mixes under HVS testing. J Transp Res Board (in press)

  11. Coleri E, Harvey JT, Yang K, Boone JM (2011b) A micromechanical approach to investigate asphalt concrete rutting mechanisms. J Cons Build Mater 30: 36–49. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Coleri E, Harvey JT, Yang K, Boone JM (2011c) Development of micromechanical finite element model from computed tomography images for shear modulus simulation of asphalt mixtures. J Cons Build Mater 30: 783–793. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gauff N (2010) Tire management: rubberized asphalt concrete. http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Tires/RAC/Default.htm. Accessed July, 2011

  14. Metcalf J (1996) Application of full-scale accelerated pavement testing. National Cooperative Highway Program, Synthesis of Highway Practice Rep. No. 235

  15. Simpleware (2010a) ScanIP and +ScanFE software developed by Simpleware Ltd, Innovation Centre, Rennes Drive, Exeter. http://www.simpleware.com

  16. Simpleware (2010b) Converting 3D images into models: ScanIP Software +FE Module +CAD Module Tutorial Guide. Simpleware LTD. Innovation Centre Exeter, Exeter

  17. Sousa JB, Deacon JA, Weissman SL, Leahy RB, Harvey JT, Paulsen G, et al. (1994) Permanent deformation response of asphalt aggregate mixes. SHRP Rep. No. A-415, Strategic Highway Research Program, Washington, DC, p 437

  18. Synolakis CE, Zhou Z, Leahy RM (1996) Determination of internal deformation field in asphalt cores using X-ray computer tomography. J Transport Res Rec 1526: 135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tashman L, Masad E, Peterson B, Saleh H (2001) Internal structure analysis of asphalt mixes to improve the simulation of Superpave gyratory compaction to field conditions. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 70: 605–645

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tashman L, Masad E, Zbib H, Little D, Kaloush K (2005) Microstructural viscoplastic continuum model for permanent deformation in asphalt pavements. J Eng Mech 131(1):48–57. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2005)131:1(48)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ullidtz P, Harvey JT, Tsai BW, Monismith CL (2006) Calibration of incremental-recursive flexible damage models in CalME using HVS experiments. California Department of Transportation Rep. No. UCPRC-RR-2005-06

  22. Wang Y, Wang L, Harman TP, Li Q (2005) Noninvasive measurement of three-dimensional permanent strains in asphalt concrete with X-ray tomography imaging. J Transp Res Rec 2007: 95–103

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weissman SL (1997) The mechanics of permanent deformation in asphalt-aggregate mixtures: A guide to laboratory test selection. Symplectic Engineering Corp

  24. Weissman SL, Harvey JT, Monismith CL (2003) Rutting characterization of asphalt concrete using simple shear tests. Chapter prepared for ASCE Publication, Modeling of Asphalt Concrete

    Google Scholar 

  25. White T, Haddock J, Hand A, Fang H (2002) Contributions of pavement structural layers to rutting of hot mix asphalt pavements. NCHRP Rep. No. 468, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transport Res Board, National Academy Press, Washington, DC

  26. Williams ML, Landel RF, Ferry JD (1955) The temperature dependency of relaxation mechanisms in amorphous polymers and other glass forming liquid. J Am Chem Soc 77(14): 3701–3707

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper describes research activities that were requested and sponsored by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Division of Research and Innovation. The test section construction and HVS testing were funded by SHRP II Project R21. Caltrans and SHRP II sponsorship is gratefully acknowledged. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors and do not reflect the official views or policies of the State of California, the Federal Highway Administration or the SHRP II program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erdem Coleri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleri, E., Harvey, J.T., Yang, K. et al. Investigation of asphalt concrete rutting mechanisms by X-ray computed tomography imaging and micromechanical finite element modeling. Mater Struct 46, 1027–1043 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9951-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-012-9951-x

Keywords

Navigation