Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T20:38:59.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal Biomass and Starch Allocation of Common Reed (Phragmites australis) (Haplotype I) in Southern Alabama, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ryan M. Wersal ,
John D. Madsen  and
Joshua C. Cheshier
Ryan M. Wersal*
Affiliation:
Geosystems Research Institute and Department of Plant and Soils Science, Mississippi State University, Box 9627, Mississippi State, MS 39762
John D. Madsen
Affiliation:
Geosystems Research Institute and Department of Plant and Soils Science, Mississippi State University, Box 9627, Mississippi State, MS 39762
Joshua C. Cheshier
Affiliation:
Geosystems Research Institute and Department of Plant and Soils Science, Mississippi State University, Box 9627, Mississippi State, MS 39762
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: ryan.wersal@lonza.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Common reed (Phragmites australis) is a nonnative invasive perennial grass that is problematic in aquatic and riparian environments across the United States. Common reed often forms monotypic stands that displace native vegetation which provide food and cover for wildlife. To help maintain native habitats and manage populations of common reed in the United States, an understanding of its life history and starch allocation patterns are needed. Monthly biomass samples were harvested from sites throughout the Mobile River delta in southern Alabama, USA from January 2006 to December 2007 to quantify seasonal biomass and starch allocation patterns. Total biomass of common reed throughout the study was between 1375 and 3718 g m−2 depending on the season. Maximum aboveground biomass was 2200 ± 220 g m−2 in October of 2006 and 1302 ± 88 g m−2 in December of 2007. Maximum belowground biomass was seen in November of 2006 and 2007 with 1602 ± 233 and 1610 ± 517 g m−2 respectively. Biomass was related to ambient temperature, in that, as temperature decreased aboveground biomass (p = 0.05) decreased. Decreases in aboveground biomass were followed by an increase in belowground biomass (p < 0.01). Starch comprised 1 to 10% of aboveground biomass with peak temporary storage occurring in July and August 2006 and September to November of 2007. Belowground tissues stored the majority of starch for common reed regardless of the time of year. Overall, belowground tissues stored 5 to 20% of total starch for common reed with peak storage occurring in December 2006 and October 2007. Starch allocation to belowground tissues increased as temperatures decreased. Understanding seasonal life history patterns can provide information to guide management strategies by identifying the vulnerable points in biomass and starch reserves in common reed.

Keywords

Common reed, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud PHRCOCarbohydrateinvasive specieslife historyhaplotype
Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 140 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Aquatic Plant Scientist, Lonza Microbial Control, 1200 Bluegrass Lakes Pkwy, Alpharetta, GA 30004

377 SW McFadden Ave, Chehalis, WA 98532

References

Literature Cited

Asaeda, T., Manatunge, J., Roberts, J., and Hai, D. N. 2006. Seasonal dynamics of resource translocation between the aboveground organs and age-specific rhizome segments of Phragmites australis . Environ. Exp. Bot. 57 :9–18.Google Scholar
Center, T. D. and Van, T. K. 1989. Alteration of waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms) leaf dynamics and phytochemistry by insect damage and plant density. Aquat. Bot. 35 :181–195.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. M., Meyerson, L. A., and Saltonstall, K. 1999. Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America. Aquat. Bot. 64 :261–273.Google Scholar
Cheshier, J. C., Madsen, J. D., Wersal, R. M., Gerard, P. D., and Welch, M. E. 2012. Evaluating the potential for differential susceptibility of common reed (Phragmites australis) haplotypes I and M to aquatic herbicides. Invas. Plant Sci. Manage. 5 :101–105.Google Scholar
Čížková, H. and Bauer, V. 1998. Rhizome respiration of Phragmites australis: effect of rhizome age, temperature, and nutrient status of habitat. Aquat. Bot. 61 :239–253.Google Scholar
Čížková, H., Istvánovics, V., Bauer, V., and Balázs, L. 2001. Low level of reserve carbohydrates in reed (Phragmites australis) stands of Kis-Balaton, Hungary. Aquat. Bot. 69 :209–216.Google Scholar
Čížková, H., Lukavaská, J., Přibáň, K., and Kopecký, J. 1996. Carbohydrate levels in rhizomes of Phragmites australis at an oligotrophic and a eutrophic site: a preliminary study. Folia Geobotan. 31 :111–118.Google Scholar
Clayton, W. D. 1967. Studies in the Gramineae: XIV. Kew Bull. 21 :111–117.Google Scholar
Cross, D. H. and Fleming, K. L. 1989. Control of Phragmites australis or Common Reed. USFWS Leaflet 13.4. 2 :1–5.Google Scholar
Derr, J. F. 2008. Common reed (Phragmites australis) response to postemergence herbicides. Invas. Plant Sci. Manage. 1 :153–157.Google Scholar
Fiala, K. 1976. Underground organs of Phragmites communis, their growth, biomass, and net production. Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon. 11 :225–259.Google Scholar
Godfrey, R. K. and Wooten, J. W. 1979. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Southeastern United States: Vol. 1. Monocotyledons. University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA. 712 p.Google Scholar
Granéli, W., Weisner, S. E. B., and Sytsma, M. D. 1992. Rhizome dynamics and resource storage in Phragmites australis. Wetl. Ecol. Manage. 1 :239–247.Google Scholar
Hauber, D. P., White, D. A., Powers, S. P., and De Francesch, F. R. 1991. Isozyme variation and correspondence with unusual infrared reflectance patterns in Phragmites australis (Poaceae). Plant System. Evol. 178 :1–8.Google Scholar
Hellings, S. E. and Gallagher, J. L. 1992. The effects of salinity and flooding on Phragmites australis . J. Appl. Ecol. 29 :41–49.Google Scholar
Hodgson, R. H. 1966. Growth and carbohydrate status of sago pondweed. Weeds 14 :263–268.Google Scholar
Kilmeš, L., Klimešová, J., and Čížková, H. 1999. Carbohydrate storage in rhizomes of Phragmites australis: the effects of altitude and rhizome age. Aquat. Bot. 64 :105–110.Google Scholar
Kimbel, J. C. and Carpenter, S. R. 1981. Effects of mechanical harvesting on Myriophyllum spicatum L. regrowth and carbohydrate allocation to roots and shoots. Aquat. Bot. 11 :121–127.Google Scholar
League, M. T., Colbert, E. P., Seliskar, D. M., and Gallagher, J. L. 2006. Rhizome growth dynamics of native and exotic haplotypes of Phragmites australis (Common reed). Estuar. Coasts 29 :269–276.Google Scholar
Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., Wolfinger, R. D., , R. D., and Schabenberger, O. 1996. SAS for mixed models, 2nd Ed. Cary, NC : SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Lissner, J. and Schierup, H. H. 1997. Effects of salinity on the growth of Phragmites australis . Aquat. Bot. 55 :247–260.Google Scholar
Madsen, J. D. 1993. Allocation of biomass and carbohydrates in waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): pond-scale verification. Information Exchange Bulletin A-93-3, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. 42 p.Google Scholar
Madsen, J. D. 1997. Seasonal biomass and carbohydrate allocation in southern populations of Eurasian watermilfoil. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 35 :15–21.Google Scholar
Madsen, J. D. and Owens, C. S. 1998. Seasonal biomass and carbohydrate allocation in dioecious hydrilla. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 36 :138–145.Google Scholar
Mauchamp, A., Blanch, S., and Grillas, P. 2001. Effects of submergence on the growth of Phragmites australis seedlings. Aquat. Bot. 69 :147–164.Google Scholar
Painter, D. S. 1988. Long-term effects of mechanical harvesting on Eurasian watermilfoil. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 26 :25–29.Google Scholar
Painter, D. S. and Waltho, J. I. 1985. Short-term impact of harvesting of Eurasian watermilfoil. Pages 187–201 in Proc. 1st International Symposium on watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and related Haloragaceae species. Aquat. Plant Manage. Soc.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, D. and Hauber, D. P. 1999. Isozome variation among populations of the clonal species Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin ex. Steudel. Aquat. Bot. 63 :241–259.Google Scholar
Pennington, T. G. and Sytsma, M. D. 2009. Seasonal changes in carbohydrate and nitrogen concentrations in Oregon and California populations of Brazilian egeria (Egeria densa). Invasive Plant Sci. Manage. 2 :120–129.Google Scholar
Perkins, M. A. and Sytsma, M. D. 1987. Harvesting and carbohydrate accumulation in Eurasian watermilfoil. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 25 :57–62.Google Scholar
Poovey, A. G., Skogerboe, J. G., and Owens, C. S. 2002. Spring treatments of diquat and endothall for curlyleaf pondweed control. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 40 :63–67.Google Scholar
Rolletschek, H. and Hartzendorf, T. 2000. Effect of salinity and convective rhizome ventilation on amino acid and carbohydrate patterns of Phragmites australis populations in the Neusiedler Sea region of Austria and Hungary. New Phytol. 146 :95–105.Google Scholar
Rolletschek, H., Rolletschek, A., Kühl, A., and Khol, J. G. 1999. Clone specific differences in Phragmites australis stand II. Seasonal development of morphological and physiological characteristics at the natural site after transplantation. Aquat. Bot. 64 :247–260.Google Scholar
Roman, C. T., Niering, W. A., and Warren, R. S. 1984. Salt marsh vegetation change in response to tidal restriction. Environ. Manage. 8 :141–150.Google Scholar
Saltonstall, K. 2002. Cryptic invasion by non-native genotypes of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99 :2445–2449.Google Scholar
Soetaert, K., Hoffmann, M., Meire, P., Starink, M., van Oevelen, D., Van Regenmortel, S., and Cox, T. 2004. Modeling growth and carbon allocation in two reed beds (Phragmites australis) in the Scheldt estuary. Aquat. Bot. 79 :211–234.Google Scholar
Tylová, E., Steinbachová, L., Votrubová, O., and Gloser, V. 2008. Phenology and autumnal accumulation of N reserves in belowground organs of wetland helophytes Phragmites australis and Glyceria maxima affected by nutrient surplus. Environ. Exper. Bot. 63 :28–38.Google Scholar
Weldon, L. W., Blackburn, R. D., and , R. D. 1698. Herbicidal treatment effect on carbohydrate levels of alligatorweed. Weed Sci. 16 :66–69.Google Scholar
Wersal, R. M., Cheshier, J. C., Madsen, J. D., and Gerard, P. D. 2011. Phenology, starch allocation, and environmental effects on Myriophyllum aquaticum . Aquat. Bot. 95 :194–199.Google Scholar
Woolf, T. E. and Madsen, J. D. 2003. Seasonal biomass and carbohydrate allocation patterns in Southern Minnesota curlyleaf pondweed populations. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 41 :113–118.Google Scholar