Not logged in
PANGAEA.
Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science

Legagneux, Pierre; Gauthier, G; Berteaux, D; Bêty, Joël; Cadieux, M-C; Bilodeau, F; Bolduc, E; McKinnon, L; Tarroux, Arnaud; Therrien, Jean-François; Morissette, Lyne; Krebs, Charles J (2012): (Table A1) Annual biomass of plants and animals recorded on Bylot Island between 1993-2009 [dataset]. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.815273, Supplement to: Legagneux, P et al. (2012): Disentangling trophic relationships in a High Arctic tundra ecosystem through food web modeling. Ecology, 93(7), 1707-1716, https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1973.1

Always quote citation above when using data! You can download the citation in several formats below.

RIS CitationBibTeX CitationShow MapGoogle Earth

Abstract:
Determining the manner in which food webs will respond to environmental changes is difficult because the relative importance of top-down vs. bottom-up forces in controlling ecosystems is still debated. This is especially true in the Arctic tundra where, despite relatively simple food webs, it is still unclear which forces dominate in this ecosystem. Our primary goal was to assess the extent to which a tundra food web was dominated by plant-herbivore or predator--rey interactions. Based on a 17-year (1993-2009) study of terrestrial wildlife on Bylot Island, Nunavut, Canada, we developed trophic mass balance models to address this question. Snow Geese were the dominant herbivores in this ecosystem, followed by two sympatric lemming species (brown and collared lemmings). Arctic foxes, weasels, and several species of birds of prey were the dominant predators. Results of our trophic models encompassing 19 functional groups showed that <10% of the annual primary production was consumed by herbivores in most years despite the presence of a large Snow Goose colony, but that 20-100% of the annual herbivore production was consumed by predators. The impact of herbivores on vegetation has also weakened over time, probably due to an increase in primary production. The impact of predators was highest on lemmings, intermediate on passerines, and lowest on geese and shorebirds, but it varied with lemming abundance. Predation of collared lemmings exceeded production in most years and may explain why this species remained at low density. In contrast, the predation rate on brown lemmings varied with prey density and may have contributed to the high-amplitude, periodic fluctuations in the abundance of this species. Our analysis provided little evidence that herbivores are limited by primary production on Bylot Island. In contrast, we measured strong predator-prey interactions, which supports the hypothesis that this food web is primarily controlled by top-down forces. The presence of allochthonous resources subsidizing top predators and the absence of large herbivores may partly explain the predominant role of predation in this low-productivity ecosystem.
Coverage:
Latitude: 73.133300 * Longitude: -80.000000
Date/Time Start: 1993-08-15T00:00:00 * Date/Time End: 2009-08-15T00:00:00
Event(s):
Sirmilik_NP * Latitude: 73.133300 * Longitude: -80.000000 * Date/Time: 2007-01-01T00:00:00 * Location: Bylot Island, North West Territories, Canada * Method/Device: Biology (BIO)
Comment:
Animal biomass was estimated by multiplying density estimates/records with body mass. For some species, estimates were made only once and then applied to all years. Biomass in dry kg/km**2. Data extracted in the frame of a joint ICSTI/PANGAEA IPY effort, see http://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.150150
Parameter(s):
#NameShort NameUnitPrincipal InvestigatorMethod/DeviceComment
1DATE/TIMEDate/TimeGeocode
2AbundanceAbundLegagneux, Pierreof lemmings
3Bryophyta, annual biomassBryophyta ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, PierrePolytrichum spp. and Meesia triquetra
4Forbs, annual biomassForbs ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, PierreLuzula spp., Saxifraga spp., Oxytropis maydelliana, Polygonum viviparum
5Shrubs, annual biomassShrubs ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, PierreSalix spp., Cassiope tetragona, Dryas integrifolia, Vaccinium uliginosum
6Grass and sedges, annual biomassGrass+sedges ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, PierreCarex aquatilis, Eriophorum scheuchzeri, Dupontia fisheri, Arctagrostis latifolia
7Chen caerulescens atlantica, annual biomassC. caerulescens atlantica ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, Pierre
8Lemmus trimucronatus, annual biomassL. trimucronatus ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, Pierre
9Dicrostonyx groenlandicus, annual biomassD. groenlandicus ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, Pierre
10Arthropoda, annual biomassArthropoda ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, PierreChironomidae, Muscidae, Aranea, Lepidoptera, Ichneumonidae, Carabidae
11Aves, annual biomassAves ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, Pierreshorebirds: Calidris bairdii, C. fusciollis, C. melanotos, Pluvialis dominica, P. squatarola, Phalaropus fulicarius
12Aves, annual biomassAves ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, Pierrepasserines: Calcarius lapponicus, Plectrophenax nivalis, Eremophila alpestris, Anthus rubescens
13Mustela erminea, annual biomassM. erminea ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, Pierre
14Vulpes lagopus, annual biomassV. lagopus ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, Pierre
15Bubo scandiacus, annual biomassB. scandiacus ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, Pierre
16Buteo lagopus, annual biomassB. lagopus ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, Pierre
17Larus hyperboreus, annual biomassL. hyperboreus ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, Pierre
18Stercorarius longicaudus, annual biomassS. longicaudus ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, Pierre
19Stercorarius parasiticus, annual biomassS. parasiticus ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, Pierre
20Falco peregrinus, annual biomassF. peregrinus ann biomkg/km2Legagneux, Pierre
Size:
323 data points

Download Data

Download dataset as tab-delimited text — use the following character encoding:

View dataset as HTML