Volcaniclastic rocks and reconstruction of a volcanosedimentary paleoenvironment in Campos Basin, SE Brazil

Abstract Santonian-Campanian tuffaceous siltstone, epiclastic siltstone, arkose, and fossiliferous mudstone occur in a 45-m-thick section of well 1-BRSA-37-RJS drilled in the southern Campos Basin, offshore SE Brazil. Well log data and petrographic and lithogeochemical data obtained from cutting samples were used to propose a schematic model of the volcano's sedimentary paleoenvironment. The volcaniclasts in the tuffaceous siltstone and epiclastic siltstone are scoria basalts, typical of spatter cones associated with monogenetic fields worldwide. The combination of these features with the petrographic ones of the arkoses found in the same well interval is likely to be related to volcaniclastic processes taking place on the continental shelf. Ratios between the immobile trace elements of the volcaniclastic rocks can be explained by mixing between sources in the upper continental crust adjacent to southern Campos and the scoria basalts extruded in the monogenetic fields. The little differentiated, olivine-rich basalts extruded from the scoria and spatter cones suggest a rising asthenosphere mantle extending from hundreds of kilometers eastwards till southern Campos in the Santonian-Campanian. This may have resulted in regional discordances in the Santonian, both in the Campos and Santos basins, and also places the petroleum systems in the southern Campos Basin under the thermal influence of such a rising asthenosphere in the Santonian-Campanian.


INTRODUCTION
Volcaniclastic processes are difficult to understand because fragmentation, transport, and depositional processes may be rather complex due to interactions between magmatic and sedimentary mechanisms, requiring an interdisciplinary approach (Manville et al. 2009).Complexities defy even classification proposals (Fisher 1961, Cas and Wright 1987, McPhie et al. 1993, Critelli and Ingersoll 1995, White and Houghton 2006, Di Capua and Groppelli 2018, Sohn and Sohn 2019, Di Capua et al. 2022), even though volcaniclasts can provide valuable information about processes occurring in continental and marine environments and for reconstructing the tectonic and palaeogeographical evolution of sedimentary basins and related volcanic and geodynamic settings (Dickinson 1985, Valloni 1985, Zuffa 1987, Ingersoll 1990, Garzanti et al. 2007, Critelli and Criniti 2021, Critelli et al. 2022).
The post-Aptian magmatism is widespread in the southern Campos and northern Santos basins and has peaks at the Santonian and Eocene (Caddah et al. 1994, 1998, Alves 2006, Moreira et al. 2006, Oreiro 2006, Oreiro et al. 2008, Rangel 2006, Winter et al. 2007, Correia et al. 2019, Louback et al. 2021, Matos 2021, Mohriak et al. 2022).Volcaniclastic processes have been described in the Campos and Santos basins (Alves 2006, Moreira et al. 2006), but reconstructions of sedimentary paleoenvironments have been proposed for the Campos Basin, mostly on the basis of sequence stratigraphy and geophysical data (Alvarenga et al. 2021, Armelenti et al. 2021, Mohriak et al. 2021;Pandolpho et al. 2021).However, previous works have not discriminated against the volcanic setting of such volcanosedimentary paleoenvironments.
Works with volcaniclastic rocks elsewhere have demonstrated that combined petrographic and lithogeochemical data can be used to assess their provenance, which can be reasonably constrained based on trace element and isotope data (Graham et al. 1997, Gill et al. 2018).This article presents new petrophysical, petrographic, and lithogeochemical data for a Santonian-Campanian volcaniclastic section sampled by a well drilled in an area with prominent volcanism in the southern Campos Basin, SE Brazil.Petrophysical data were used to discriminate different log-facies that were further correlated with petrographic data, allowing the proposal of possible structures within volcaniclastic beds.The interpretation of the petrographic and lithogeochemical data combined with previously published geophysical data presented in this article may contribute to the understanding of volcaniclastic processes in general and the evolution of the Campos Basin.

GEOLOGICAL SETTING
The Campos Basin is located on the continental margin of SE Brazil (Fig. 1) and covers an area of more than 100,000 km 2 (Dias et al. 1988).The borders of the basin are the Vitória Structural High, to the north, and the Cabo Frio Structural High, to the south, respectively, with the Espírito Santo and Santos basins.The igneous and metamorphic rocks of the Upper Proterozoic Ribeira and Araçuaí collisional orogens (e.g., Heilbron et al. 2020, Caxito et al. 2022) constitute the western border and the crystalline basement of Campos Basin (Winter et al. 2007;Fig. 1).
The Campos Basin is a rift basin that evolved into an intraplate continental margin sedimentary basin because of the fragmentation of West Gondwana in the Lower Cretaceous and further opening of the South Atlantic Ocean (Chang et al. 1992).The largest oil reserves in Brazil were found in Campos Basin prior to the discovery of the giant pre-salt reservoirs in Santos Basin (Mello et al. 2021), both located offshore SE Brazil (Fig. 1).Still, Campos accounts for 22% of the oil production and 16% of the gas production in Brazil (ANP 2022).Magmatic processes may affect the petrophysical parameters of potential oil and gas reservoir sedimentary rocks (e.g., Armelenti et al. 2021) and played a role during the sedimentation of the reservoir turbidites (Caddah et al. 1998, Fetter et al. 2009) in the major post-salt hydrocarbon fields in Campos, such as Roncador and Marlim Sul (Fig. 1), that produce more than 111,000 boe/d in Brazil (ANP 2022).
The chronostratigraphic chart of the basin (Winter et al. 2007) records magmatic events related to its rift (Fodor andVetter 1984, Mizusaki et al. 1992), post-rift (Dani et al. 2017), and drift (Rangel 2006) sedimentary megasequences (Fig. 2).The drift sedimentary sequence in Campos Basin records marine sedimentation due to the connection between the South Atlantic, North Atlantic, and Indian oceans at the Upper Cretaceous and open sea conditions (Guardado et al. 1989, Chang et al. 1992).The marine sedimentation was controlled by halocinesis and a progressive increase in bathymetry (Winter et al. 2007).The Macaé Group (Lower Albian; Fig. 2) represents the deposition under hot and dry climate conditions in a shallow hypersaline marine environment (up to 200 m deep; Guardado et al. 1989).The siliciclastic-carbonate sedimentation resulted from the progressive drowning of the carbonate platform (Winter et al. 2007).A transgressive marine sedimentary environment under a hot, wet climate is recorded at the basal sequence of the Campos Group (Fig. 2).Water depths varied from upper (200-1,000 m) to lower (1,000-4,000 m) bathial levels and reached 2,000 m in the central areas of Campos Basin (Guardado et al. 1989, Winter et al. 2007).The hemipelagic, near-shore, fine-grained sedimentation of marls and shales of the Ubatuba Formation is interbedded with the sandstones of the Carapebus Formation.The latter represents turbiditic debris flows along large canyons whose main source was the Serra do Mar mountain range (Fig. 1) on the continent (Guardado et al. 1989, Winter et al. 2007, Castro and Picolini 2014).Turbidites are the main hydrocarbon reservoir rocks in the Campos Basin, particularly in its central parts, such as in the Roncador and Marlin petroleum fields.
Alkaline basalts, diabases, and gabbros ranging from ca.  event in Campos Basin (Fig. 2; Mizusaki et al. 1992, Winter et al. 2007).The bentonites were formed from the alteration of volcanic ash deposits related to subaerial Plinian volcanism of trachytic affinity that occurred in the continental area (Caddah et al. 1994).These bentonites are a stratigraphic marker bed in the basin, similarly to the radioactive pelitic rocks formed by reworked volcanoclasts and basal detrital sediments coming from the dismantling of the proximal deposits of volcanoes adjacent to the basin (Alves 2006).The turbiditic sedimentation in Campos Basin during the Santonian-Maastrichtian may have been controlled by volcanism and related seismicity in the continental margin, triggering turbidity currents (Caddah et al. 1998).The contemporaneity between the Santonian-Campanian volcanic processes on the continent and turbidite sedimentation is indicated by the presence of volcanic fragments in deepwater turbidite reservoirs in Campos Basin (Caddah et al. 1998, Fetter et al. 2009).
Magmatic structures were discriminated in the Campos and Santos basins, particularly along the Cabo Frio Structural High, based on seismic facies (Moreira et al. 2006, Oreiro 2006; Table 1).Lava flows of amygdaloidal basalts in depositional depressions with volcanoclastic breccia at the base, as well as pyroclastic deposits, occur in the Santonian-Campanian depositional sequence in the Cabo Frio Structural High area (Moreira et al. 2006).Cones are preferentially aligned along an E-W trend and have average dimensions of 25 km 2 in area and 700 m in height, being fed by subvertical to vertical dykes, associated ring dykes, and sills, according to the interpretation of seismic data obtained in southern Campos (Mohriak 2003, Moreira et al. 2006, Oreiro et al. 2008).Paleogeographic studies suggest that the volcanism was subaerial in the proximal portions and subaqueous in the distal portions of the basin.Various different intrusive and extrusive structures were discriminated by the interpretation of seismic data in the southern Campos and northern Santos (Rancan et al. 2018, Ren et al. 2019) and were included in the Santonian-Campanian volcanic phase of these basins (Schattner and Mahiques 2020).Previous works (Moreira et al. 2006, Oreiro 2006) have characterized the Santonian-Campanian volcanism in the area near the Cabo Frio Structural High (K90 sequence between unconformities at 88.5 Ma and 79.2 Ma) as subaerial and subaqueous, whose volcanic cones and intrusive and effusive rocks provided crystals and lithoclasts to the siliciclastic sedimentary rocks.The biostratigraphy of the sediments within sequence K90 has also given Santonian-Campanian ages (Moreira et al. 2007).Table 1 summarizes the main features of the Santonian-Campanian volcanism in these areas based on seismic facies, log-facies, and lithological studies.
The Eocene alkaline magmatism in Campos (Oreiro 2006, Rangel 2006, Oreiro et al. 2008, Mohriak and Fainstein 2012) is well recorded in the Cabo Frio Structural High area (Fig. 1).The Eocene magmatic rocks were included in the Cabo Frio Member as part of the Emborê Formation (Fig. 2), which is characterized by a thick volcano-sedimentary sequence interbedded with alkaline basaltic intrusions and lava flows (Oreiro 2006, Ren et al. 2019) dated at 53 Ma and 43 Ma (Mizusaki andMohriak 1993, Winter et al. 2007).Epiclastic rocks, autoclastic breccias, pyroclastic tuffs, and hyaloclastites interbedded with shales, siltstones, and calcisiltites compose the volcaniclastic sequence and record periods of quiescence alternating with volcanic activity.Hyaloclastites were formed in a subaqueous environment at depths of up to 500 m (Mizusaki and Mohriak 1993, Rangel 2006, Mohriak 2020).Vertical to subvertical feeder, dykes and volcanic edifices are structures frequently observed in the seismic sections of the Eocene sequence at the Cabo Frio Structural High area (Mizusaki and Mohriak 1993, Mohriak 2003, Rangel 2006, Oreiro et al. 2008, Marcondes 2010), the latter being often conical but also top planar as a result of subaerial exposure from water depths of around 600 m (Oreiro 2006).In addition, "saucer-shaped" sills and basaltic flows were also recognized in the Eocene section of seismic profiles (Moreira et al. 2006, Oreiro et al. 2008), and alkaline lamprophyre and phonolite shallow intrusions with 38.62 ± 0.02 Ma and 41.06 ± 0.02 Ma, respectively, occur in the presalt section of the Cabo Frio Structural High area (Louback et al. 2021).

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Well 1-BRSA-37-RJS was drilled in the south area of Campos Basin, nearby the Cabo Frio Structural High area.Well section and cutting samples, as well as gamma-ray, resistivity, neutrons, density, and sonic profiles data obtained during drilling, were made available by the National Petroleum Agency of Brazil (ANP).Cutting samples obtained at 3-m intervals were chosen for selection, with an exception made for depths 6, 9, and 12 m from the top, whose samples were not made available by ANP (Fig. 3).Paleontological studies of nanofossils in the sedimentary rocks of the studied well allow us to relate this sampled interval with the Santonian magmatic event recorded Table 1.Main features of the Santonian-Campanian volcanism in NE Santos (Caddah et al. 1994, Alves 2006, Moreira et al. 2006, Oreiro 2006).

VC
Individual cones are 500-800 m high (average 700 m) and cover 25 km 2 .Cones with no internal seismic reflections and cones with strong contrasts in seismic amplitude (implying the presence of rocks with different densities).Seismic 3D visualization shows a relationship between volcanic cones formed by different lava pulses and basaltic flows, the latter filling topographic lows in the basin.Volcanic conduits extend down to the basement of the basin.Volcanic ashes interbedded with Santonian shales (Marco 3-Dedos) are ash falls from subaerial volcanism in the adjoining continental area.

F
Sampled in wells drilled in Santos (e.g., well SAN-1).Amigdaloidal basalts (high Ti contents) interbedded with siliciclastic rocks.Strong contrast of negative acoustic impedance.Log-facies: low gamma-ray values, high resistivity, and high density (4,500 m/s).Sampled greenish-gray, coarse-grained, volcaniclastic breccias were related with low gamma-ray values, low resistivity, and low density (3,400 m/s) and associated with pyroclastic flows.

I
Dikes display inclined strong positive and negative acoustic impedance.Extensions can reach 1,500 m.Sills are saucershaped and samples were dated at 48.9 Ma (younger than the Santonian-Campanian magmatism).Log-facies are indistinguishable from flows (F).
in Campos Basin (Winter et al. 2007).Samples were sieved, and the fraction above 14# was set aside.This fraction was washed first under tap water and then dried in the air.After drying, the cutting samples were divided into aliquots according to textural and color criteria using a binocular stereoscope, reaction under 6M HCl, and magnetic attraction.A total of 15 thin sections were done with 21 aliquots of selected cutting samples.The thin sections were then described under the transmitted light microscope (ZEISS) of the Department of Petrology and Geotectonics at UFRRJ and photomicrographs were taken.The petrographic descriptions allowed the selection of two aliquots of cutting samples from the studied interval to be powdered for whole-rock geochemical analysis.The criteria for this selection were the low degree of alteration and the representativeness of the samples.Before comminution, the cutting samples were washed in an ultrasonic cleaning device, the Yaxun YX-2050, to eliminate any remaining drilling fluid or other contaminant materials.Washing was done at room temperature for a variable time depending on the control through the inspection under the stereoscope.t being total iron as ferric iron) were performed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) in a Thermo Jarrell Ash ENVIRO II apparatus.Calibration was performed using 14 prepared USGS and CANMET-certified reference materials.One of the 14 standards was used during the analysis for every group of 10 samples.The selected trace elements (Ba, Rb, Sr, Zr, Y, Nb, Ni, Cr, V, Co, U, Th, Hf, Ta, and Pb), including the whole set of rare earth elements (La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu), were determined (in ppm) by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) in a Perkin Elmer Sciex ELAN 9000.Three blanks and five controls (three before the sample group and two after) were analyzed per group of samples.Duplicates are fused and analyzed every 15 samples.The loss on ignition was measured by percentual weight loss after heating at 1,100°C for two hours.The detection limits for the major elements were 0.01 wt.% except for MnO (0,001 wt.%).The detection limits for the trace elements were as follows: Ni (20 ppm), Cr (20 ppm), Sc (1 ppm), Co (1 ppm), V (5 ppm), Ba (2 ppm), Rb (1 ppm), Sr (2 ppm), Y (0.5 ppm), Zr (1 ppm), Nb (0.2 ppm), U (0.01 ppm), and Th (0.05 ppm).The detection limits for the whole set of rare earth elements (REE) were below chondrite values.Accuracy and precision for major elements were below 3% and below 1.5%, respectively.Accuracy values for Ni, Cr, Sc, Co, and V were between 2.9 and 8.8%, whereas Y and Nb were 8.4 and 5.1%, respectively.Values for Rb and Sr were 4.8 and 1.4%, respectively, whereas Zr and Ba were 16.1 and 11.6%, respectively.Accuracy values for REE were between 1.8 and 9%, except for La (10.6%).The values for U and Th were 3.8 and 4.2%, respectively.Precision values for Cr, Sc, Co, and V were between 0.5 and 9.1%, except for Ni (11.1%), whereas Y, Zr, and Nb were below 1.9%.Values for Rb, Ba, and Sr were between 0.5 and 8.8%.Precision values for the REE were between 2.1 and 8.7%, except for Eu (12.1%).Values for U and Th were 5.4 and 3%, respectively.

Well data and log-facies discrimination
The volcaniclastic succession observed in well 1-BRSA-37-RJS is 45-m thick (Fig. 3).Coherent variations of geophysical borehole data (gamma-ray, resistivity, neutron, density, and sonic) were qualitatively evaluated so that they could be further related to petrographic data obtained from samples of the representative lithologies in the studied interval.The sets of variations in borehole data comprise the hereafter-called log-facies.
The rocks were described as tuff in the well log.Shale and calcilutite of the Carapebus Formation occur at the base and top of the Santonian-Campanian interval (Fig. 3).Four distinct lithologies were identified by selecting and describing cutting samples from the magmatic interval.These lithologies are non-magnetic and react differently in the presence of HCl (6 mol/L).The mudstone is composed of mafic minerals and micas within a greenish-grey clay matrix (sample C 0 _C, Fig. 3).The sandstone is composed of quartz and mafic minerals cemented by carbonate (sample C 0 _D, Fig. 3).Two types of volcaniclastic rocks occur in this section.Black lithoclasts occur in a white carbonate matrix in a well-sorted volcaniclastic rock (samples C 15 _A and C 39 _A, Fig. 3).Another volcaniclastic rock comprises lithic fragments of the previously described volcaniclastic rock and lamite cemented by carbonate (samples C 21 _B and C 39 _B, Fig. 3).Paleontological studies of nanofossils in the sedimentary rocks allow for the correlation of this magmatic section with the Santonian magmatic event recorded in Campos Basin (Winter et al. 2007).
Three log-facies were discriminated in the volcaniclastic interval (Fig. 4).Log-facies I is at the base (15 m), log-facies II is at the middle portion (20 m), and log-facies III is at the top of the volcaniclastic section (10 m).The gamma-ray values of the three log-facies are low, with symmetrical and boxshaped patterns (Fig. 4).Log-facies I is characterized by a low amplitude and low wavelength oscillation in the resistivity, neutron, density, and sonic data combined with the highest gamma-ray values.Log-facies II displays slightly higher amplitude oscillations with higher neutron and sonic values combined with lower resistivity and density values when compared with log-facies I. Log-facies III is opposite to log-facies I and II, displaying the highest amplitude and wavelength oscillations that combine high values in the resistivity and density profiles with low values in the neutron and sonic data (Fig. 4).

Petrography
There is a sizeable lithological variety in the volcaniclastic interval analyzed in well 1-BRSA-37-RJS.The rocks were classified by following, as much as possible, the recommendations proposed by the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS) (Le Maitre et al. 2002).However, slight modifications to the IUGS classification of the mixed deposits were necessary.The classification used in this work (Table 2) is non-genetic and based only on grain size and the presence of any material of volcanic origin (rock or individual crystal fragment), regardless of the fragmentation and deposition mechanism.The term GR: gamma-ray log; RD: resistivity log; CNC: neutron log; DT: sonic log; ZDEN: density log.tuffaceous is added as a qualifier to the grain size nomenclature (i.e., breccia, conglomerate, sandstone, siltstone, and mudstone) for rocks containing between 50 and 25% by volume of material of volcanic origin.Similarly, the term epiclastic is added to the grain size nomenclature for rocks with less than 25% by volume of material of volcanic origin.This classification does not take into account the volume of matrix or cement.
Four lithotypes were classified from 15 thin sections of 21 selected aliquots of cutting samples from the studied well (Fig. 3).Cutting samples of predominant volcaniclastic rocks (deeper than C15; Fig. 3) were obtained at the base and middle portions of the section, corresponding to log-facies I and II (Fig. 4).On the contrary, sedimentary rocks (shallower than C15; Fig. 3) prevail at the top of the interval and correspond to log-facies III (Fig. 4).
The volcaniclastic rocks are a tuffaceous siltstone and an epiclastic siltstone (Table 2).The tuffaceous siltstone is composed of subangular grains of quartz, carbonate, opaque minerals, and olivine, as well as subangular to subrounded volcanic rock fragments dispersed in a microcrystalline carbonate (Fig. 5A).The volcanic rock fragments are hypohyaline, inequigranular, very fine (< 0.1 mm), with euhedral to subhedral prismatic, columnar and hexagonal minerals, and a glassy aphanitic groundmass (Fig. 5B).The tuffaceous siltstone is well sorted, and the partial dissolution of the matrix generated a secondary porosity in this rock.
The epiclastic siltstone is well sorted and composed of subangular grains of carbonate, quartz, feldspar, mica, opaque minerals, rutile, zircon, and olivine (Fig. 5C); bioclasts; and rounded lithic fragments of tuffaceous siltstone and fossiliferous mudstone (Fig. 5D), all cemented by carbonate.At the top of the section, sedimentary rocks predominate, comprising arkose and fossiliferous mudstone.The arkose is well sorted and composed of subangular grains of quartz, feldspar (microcline and plagioclase), mica, opaque minerals, rutile, and zircon, as well as subangular to subrounded sedimentary rock fragments cemented by silica-and carbonate-rich material (Fig. 5E).
The presence of microclines indicates a provenance related to the Proterozoic basement (Fig. 1), mostly composed of gneisses of granitic composition.The fossiliferous mudstone (Fig. 5F) consists of a clay mineral-rich matrix and subangular to subrounded grains of quartz, carbonate, feldspar, opaque minerals, mica, rutile, and zircon.Allochemical grains that include bioclasts and pellets occur in abundance in this rock.

7/14
Lithogeochemistry Two aliquots of cutting samples from well 1-BRSA-37-RJS were analyzed for whole-rock geochemical analysis (Table 3).The criteria for this selection were the low degree of alteration and the representativeness.The analyzed samples have very high loss on ignition (LOI) values, as expected for volcaniclastic and epiclastic rocks.The high CaO values and, to a lesser extent, the low LOI values are consistent with the high amount of carbonate in the matrix of those rocks.The very high Ba contents are may be due to contamination by drilling fluids, despite the careful cleaning procedures adopted during sample preparation.
The trace element patterns of the tuffaceous siltstone and epiclastic siltstone in the studied well display peaks at K, Sr, and P in chondrite-normalized multi-element diagrams (Fig. 7A).The epiclastic siltstone is more enriched in the whole set of mobile and immobile trace elements than the tuffaceous siltstone, including the rare earth elements (REE; Fig. 7B).Both rocks are richer in the light REE than the heavy REE (e.g., [(La/ Yb) N ] > 8), although the tuffaceous siltstone and the epiclastic siltstone can be distinguished by their different [(La/Eu) N ] ratios (4.6 and 7.4, respectively; Fig. 7B).The enriched trace element patterns of the tuffaceous siltstone and epiclastic siltstone indicate a provenience from continental crust sources, despite the fact that mixing processes must be considered in their petrogenesis.

Correlations between log-facies and petrography
Three log-facies (I, II, and III) were discriminated in the magmatic-related interval of well 1-BRSA-37-RJS (Fig. 4).Volcaniclastic (tuffaceous siltstone and epiclastic siltstone) and sedimentary rocks (arkose and fossiliferous mudstone) comprise the volcaniclastic section.Log-facies I and II are consistent with the physical and chemical properties of the volcaniclastic rocks that occur in the studied well (Rider 1996, Schön 2015).For instance, the low and fairly constant values of the gamma-ray data are in agreement with the presence of carbonate matrix and cement in the tuffaceous siltstone (Figs.5A and 5B) and epiclastic siltstone (Figs.5C  8/14 and 5D), respectively.The low values of the gamma-ray profile can also be associated with the presence of subangular grains of olivine and subangular to subrounded fragments of volcanic rock, suggesting a mafic composition for the igneous source.These mineral grains and fragments may be the result of erosion and transport of erupted basalts from subaerial volcanic edifices discriminated in the southern Campos Basin based on geophysical data (Mohriak 2003, Moreira et al. 2006, Winter et al. 2007, Oreiro et al. 2008), given the well-sorted texture of volcaniclastic rocks.Oscillation at different scales in the resistivity, neutron, density, and sonic profiles of log-facies I and II indicates interlayering of materials with different properties (e.g., Zou et al. 2013).The low resistivity and density values, associated with the high values in the neutron and sonic profiles, indicate that the rock is porous and not very dense.These properties were observed in the tuffaceous siltstone throughout macroscopic analysis (Fig. 3) and petrography (Figs.5A  and 5B).The high values of resistivity and density, combined with low values in the neutron and sonic profiles of log-facies I compared to log-facies II, indicate that the rock at the bottom of the section is massive and consists of more resistive minerals such as carbonate (Schön 2015).These properties were observed in the epiclastic siltstone (Figs.5C and 5D).
According to log-facies and petrographic interpretation, it is possible to suggest a stratigraphy represented by the interbedded tuffaceous siltstone and epiclastic siltstone, the latter prevailing at the bottom of the volcaniclastic section on the studied well (Fig. 3).In addition, the presence of fragments of tuffaceous siltstone in the epiclastic siltstone (Figs.5C and  5D) suggests that these lithologies were deposited at different times and that the epiclastic siltstone corresponds to a subaerial reworking of the volcanoclastic deposit itself and, to a lesser extent, also of the magmatic source region.
The main drawback regarding correlations between petrographic and well log data is seen at the top of the studied section (log-facies III), particularly with the resistivity data.For instance, low neutron and sonic data associated with high density values are not often related to siliciclastic sequences.In addition, resistivity values are just too high in the top, siliciclastic portion of the well.However, despite its successful use for correlation, resistivity data is influenced by changes in formation pressure and interstitial water salinity, which are non-stratigraphic, post-depositional elements that tend to obliterate the original depositional features (Rider 1996).

Volcanosedimentary paleoenvironment
Subaerial and subaqueous volcanic cones were distinguished in the area and were related to shallow-and deep-sea water system tracts, respectively.The fragments of basaltic rocks and olivine in the tuffaceous siltstone identified in cutting samples of the studied interval from well 1-BRSA-37-RJS indicate the sole contribution from a subaerial volcanic source.No fragments of hydroclasts and hyalloclastites that could be related to the provenience of a subaqueous volcanic source have been described in the analyzed volcaniclastic rocks.Parts of the lithoclasts in the tuffaceous siltstone are highly vesicular, being classified as scoria basalts, implying either subaerial volcanism or shallow-water volcanism since high hydrostatic pressure prevents vesiculation in lavas.No lithoclasts of evolved lithotypes were found, nor were felsic minerals of volcanic origin, such as high-temperature alkaline feldspar or quartz.More likely, the volcanic and mineral fragments in the volcaniclastic rocks seem to be associated with subaerial scoria and spatter cones similar to the Paricutin volcano (Inbar et al. 1994;Fig. 8) rather than hydrovolcanic tuff rings, tuff cones, or maars.Scoria cones comprise both volcaniclastic (small explosions) rocks and restricted lava flows, the latter effused mostly from fissure zones at the base of the cone (Fig. 8; Table 1).They are small, poorly stratified structures (< 200-700 m high; bases with ~500 m in diameter) underlain by long feeder conduits, usually aligned along fault systems where they group as tens or hundreds of cones in monogenetic volcanic fields (Hasenaka and Carmichael 1985, Németh 2010, Kereszturi and Németh 2012).These features are similar to those described for the volcanic cones in northern Santos (Table 1).Subaerial volcanism must have occurred in a near-shore setting under shallow water depths.The siliciclastic rocks associated with the volcaniclastic are arkose and fossifiliferous mudstone.The subangular shape of siliciclasts in the arkose, whose feldspars are mostly microcline, indicates a proximal source such as the granites and orthogneisses that crop out along the Serra do Mar mountain range in the continental area adjoining the southern Campos Basin.The petrographic features of the sedimentary and volcaniclastic rocks in the study area indicate a volcanosedimentary paleoenvironment located in a near-shore area such as the continental shelf, as opposed to the continental slope or rise where subaqueous volcanism and turbiditic processes would have taken place in the Santonian-Campanian in southern Campos Basin (Fig. 9).

Volcaniclastic rocks as probes of the mantle
In general, volcaniclastic rocks can be taken as the products of volcanic rocks by weathering, transportation, and redeposition that are mixed with sedimentary debris (e.g., Fisher 1961, McPhie et al. 1993, Le Maitre et al. 2002, White and Houghton 2006, Manville et al. 2009).As such, the lithogeochemical composition of the volcaniclastic rocks may inherit those of their contributing sources.Major element compositions are more suitable to be modified by diagenetic and post-magmatic processes.The same applies to the large ion lithophile trace elements such as Rb, Ba, and Sr.On the contrary, the highfield-strength trace elements such as Zr, Y, Ti, and Nb and most of the REE are immobile during post-magmatic processes and retain the characteristics of their sources.The REE are insoluble, transported as particulates, and occur in low concentrations in seawater and river waters.Weathering can modify REE concentrations, but they are promptly precipitated at the weathering site.Diagenesis is also unlikely to change REE concentrations because it would require a high water/rock ratio setting.On the contrary, psammitic, quartzrich sediments tend to dilute the REE concentrations, as do carbonate-rich rocks.In addition, the REE concentrations are erratically modified due to the concentrations of REE-rich minerals such as zircon, monazite, and allanite.The HFSE and REE smooth patterns of the tuffaceous siltstone and epiclastic siltstone, free of peaks and valleys (Fig. 7), indicate that their compositions were not dramatically changed during post-magmatic, diagenetic or alteration processes.Thus, the HFSE and REE contents of sediments and volcaniclastic rocks can provide good information on provenance.In particular, it is the clay-and silt-sized fraction of the sedimentary and volcaniclastic rocks that are likely to better represent their sources (Nesbitt 1979, Fleet 1984, Cullers et al. 1987, McLennan 1989, Nesbitt et al. 1990).
The tuffaceous siltstone is composed of fragments of olivine and volcanic rock, whereas the epiclastic siltstone bears  4.
fragments of mafic minerals as well as fragments of the tuffaceous siltstone itself.In general, these petrographic features are consistent with at least a contribution from a mafic, probably basaltic source.This is broadly consistent with the previously stated proposition that the studied volcaniclastic environment is related to basaltic scoria cones in monogenetic fields (Fig. 9).Possible basaltic sources for the volcaniclastic rocks are to be found in the oceanic crust (e.g., typical N-MORB or OIB; Sun and McDonough 1989) or in the continental tholeiitic basalts of the rift-related Cabiúnas Formation (Fig. 2) in Campos Basin (Fodor andVetter 1984, Mizusaki et al. 1992).The other likely source to be involved in the formation of the volcaniclastic rocks is the continental crust (e.g., Taylor andMcLennan 1985, Weaver andTarney 1981).
Binary mixing calculations (Faure 1986) were done in order to derive the likely source components and their respective amounts in the volcaniclastic rocks C-1 and C-2 in the studied interval (Table 4).Modeling was done using immobile trace element ratios.Results of modeling (Fig. 10) have shown that C-1 and C-2 compositions would have to involve a contribution from the upper continental crust rather than the lower or average crust.The Campos basalts are not a suitable end-member in the mixing process.Interestingly, the mafic end-member is well represented by the compositions of mantle sources related to the oceanic crust (N-MORB and OIB).Smaller and greater amounts of the upper continental crust would have been involved in the formation of the tuffaceous siltstone and the epiclastic siltstone, respectively.It is unlikely that the amounts of end-members derived from modeling represent exact proportions in the mixing processes that led to the formation of the studied volcaniclastic rocks.Nevertheless, it seems relevant that continental and oceanic compositions have taken part in the process.Most probably, the oceanic crust was some hundred kilometers eastward in the southern Campos and could not contribute to the volcaniclasts found in the tuffaceous siltstone and epiclastic siltstone analyzed in this work.The modeling indicates that the mantle underlying the southern Campos area in the Santonian-Campanian was probed by the less differentiated scoria basalts that contributed to the volcaniclastic rocks.

CONCLUSION
Tuffaceous and epiclastic siltstones are volcaniclastic rocks that occur together with arkose and fossiliferous mudstone in a 45-m-thick interval of well 1-BRSA-37-RJS drilled in the southern Campos Basin, offshore SE Brazil.Petrographic and lithogeochemical data obtained for carefully selected and cleaned cutting samples were combined with previous geophysical data that discriminated the volcanic structures in the area to propose that the mafic sources of volcaniclasts found in the tuffaceous siltstone and epiclastic siltstone are related to subaerial, basaltic scoria cones.These volcanic edifices were distributed along lineaments in monogenetic fields located in the continental shelf of Campos Basin in the Santonian-Campanian.Two main sources provided lithoclasts and crystalloclasts to the volcaniclastic rocks: the upper continental crust, granites, and orthogneisses found in the Serra do Mar mountain range in the continental area adjoining Campos Basin, and possibly hundreds of scoria and spatter cones within the monogenetic field.It should be noted that paleoreconstructions based on scarce data are difficult to perform, leading to ambiguity.For instance, rounded grains are to be expected in the reworked continental sediments as opposed to the subangular ones found in the arkoses studied in the area since they were related to a shelf staging area.As such, the basaltic cones could be located at least in part on the continental basement adjoining Campos Basin.In this scenario, continental sediments and volcaniclastic material would have been transported throughout proximal canyons located near river mouths near the coastline.This would be broadly supported by the uplift of the coastal range as a result of the uprising of the asthenosphere Table 4. Selected trace element contents (in ppm) of samples C-1 (tuffaceous siltstone) and C-2 (epiclastic siltstone) in well 1-BRSA-37-RJS as well as in the upper continental crust (UC), the average continental crust (AC), the lower continental crust (LC), N-MORB (normal mid-ocean ridge basalt), OIB (oceanic island basalt), and Campos basalts (Fm.Cabiúnas, Winter et al. 2007).UC and AC compositions from Taylor and McLennan (1985).LC composition from Weaver and Tarney (1981).N-MORB and OIB from Sun and McDonough (1989).Campos is the average composition (30 samples) from Fodor and Vetter (1984) and Mizusaki et al. (1992).as proposed in this article.Regarding mantle probing, it is suggested that the less differentiated basaltic clasts of the spatter cones may have probed the mantle underlying the area, attesting to the presence of the same sources that were giving rise to the MORB-like oceanic crust some hundreds of kilometers eastward in the southern Campos Basin.As such, this area of the basin may have been located above the melting, uprising upper mantle that could have also imparted regional discordances at the Santonian in the Campos and Santos basins, as suggested by other authors (Moreira et al. 2007).Petroleum systems in southern Campos may also have been affected by the thermal influence of the uprising asthenosphere in the area.

Zr
85 to 80 Ma and minor hyaloclastites and bentonites are the representative lithotypes of the Santonian-Campanian magmatic Source: modified from Almeida et al. (2021).

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Location of well 1-BRSA-37-RJS in Campos Basin in the continental margin of SE Brazil.Roncador and Marlim Sul oil fields and Cabo Frio Structural High that separate Campos from Santos (to the south) basins are indicated.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Volcaniclastic section of well 1-BRSA-37-RJS in Campos Basin.Sedimentary rocks below and above the volcaniclastic section are also shown.Lithologies taken from the drilling section of well 1-BRSA-37-RJS provided by ANP.
Finally, samples were washed a final time under distilled water and put to dry in the air.Whole-rock geochemical analyses were obtained at Activation Laboratories Ltd. (Actlabs, Canada) on fused samples.Major element concentrations (SiO 2 , TiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , Fe 2 O 3 t , MnO, MgO, CaO, Na 2 O, K 2 O, and P 2 O 5 ; in wt.%; Fe 2 O 3

Table 2 .
Terminology for volcaniclastic rocks used in this work.

Table 3 .
Lithogeochemical data of tuffaceous siltstone (sample C-1) and epiclastic siltstone (sample C-2) in well 1-BRSA-37-RJS in Campos Basin.Fe 2 O 3 (T) is total iron, also known as ferric iron.LOI is loss on ignition.Oxides in wt.%.Elements in ppm.b.d.l. is below the detection limit.