Potential of elephant grass genotypes silages as exclusive roughage on tissue composition and meat quality of lambs: a preliminary study

ABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate the effects of diets containing elephant grass genotypes silages as exclusive roughage on leg tissue composition, and physicochemical characteristics of meat of lambs. Twenty-four crossbred male lambs with an average initial body weight of 20.29±2.66kg were distributed in a complete randomized design with three treatments and eight replicates. The treatments consisted of three silages of elephant grass genotypes (IRI-381, Elephant B or Mott), without additives or wilting, as the only roughage. The diets did not affect (P>0.05) the dry matter (898.70±60.10 g/day), crude protein (128.93±6.91g/day), total digestible nutrients (690.20±91.82g/day) intakes, body weight at slaughter (24.83±2.79kg), and carcass yields (P>0.05). The tissue composition of the leg did not differ significantly between silages of elephant grass genotypes (P>0.05). No difference (P>0.05) for the physicochemical characteristics of meat from lambs fed diets tested was observed. Therefore, our results indicate that diets containing 50% elephant grass genotypes silages (IRI-381, Elephant B or Mott), harvested at 60 days of growth, have potential for use in lambs feeding.


INTRODUCTION
The lamb meat production does not meet Brazilian demand, mainly regarding the qualitative characteristics of meat, and thus, imported lamb is needed (Abreu et al., 2021).Lamb feedlot is an alternative to reduce the influence of the tropical climate on sheep meat production and to increase productivity rates (Lima et al., 2021), and to meet the demand for sheep meat, with positive effects on the quality and product offering in the off-season (Ferreira et al., 2009).According to Santos-Cruz et al. (2013), lamb production can be improved in quality and profitability, using alternative feeding resources with considerable nutritional value, allowing positive changes in meat physicochemical composition.
Tropical grass silages, despite not having high quality, when compared to traditional silages, such as corn, become important sources of fiber for the adequate functioning and health of the rumen environment.Considering that roughage foods can represent 20 to 60% of the diets of animals in feedlot, the amount of forage to be produced must be high, which suggests the use of forage plants with high productive potential.In this scenario, elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum.)presents itself as one of the main options for forage production, given its potential to produce forage mass, combined with its nutritional value and acceptability by ruminant animals (Dubeux Jr. and Mello, 2010;Cunha et al., 2011;Dourado et al., 2019;Souza et al., 2021).This forage grass is grown in tropical, subtropical, and even in semiarid zones worldwide (Pereira et al., 2017).
According to Silva et al. (2021), when investigating which grass would be most recommended for cut-and-carry: tall-sized  or dwarf (Taiwan A-146 2.37 and Mott) elephant grass cultivars for sheep feeding, concluded that animals fed dwarf elephant grass have greater weight gain.However, few studies have evaluated the effects of the use of elephant grass genotypes silages, of different sizes, on lamb finish, carcass traits and meat quality.One of the important steps in breeding programs of forage cultivars is the evaluation of the productive performance and quality of the products of the animals that receive the material as a dietary ingredient, which highlights the need for scientific investigations on the subject.
We hypothesized that diets containing dwarf or tall elephant grass genotypes silages as the only roughage do not compromise the carcass characteristics and meat quality of sheep.Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effects of diets containing elephant grass genotypes silages as exclusive roughage on leg tissue composition, and physicochemical characteristics of meat of lambs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study was conducted according to ethical standards and approved by the Animal Use Ethics Committee of the Federal Rural University of Pernambuco (UFRPE) (License N o .010/2010).The experiment was conducted at the research station of Agronomy Institute of Pernambuco (IPA), in Itambé, located in the coastal region of Pernambuco State, Brazil (7º23'S and 35º10'W).
Twenty-four crossbred male lambs, uncastrated, with an initial weight of 20.29 ± 2.66kg and aged 8 months, were distributed in a complete randomized design with three treatments and eight replicates.The animals were allocated in individual stalls, provided with feeders and drinkers.Before starting the experiment, the animals were identified, vaccinated against clostridial diseases, and treated against endoparasites and ectoparasites.The experiment (a preliminary study) lasted for 38 days, being 15 days for adaptation to the diets and installations, and 23 days for data and sample collection.
The levels of non-fibrous carbohydrates (NFC) were estimated according to Hall (2000).Total carbohydrates (TC) were estimated according to Sniffen et al. (1992).The lignin was determined by treating the acid detergent fiber residue with 72% sulfuric acid (Silva and Queiroz, 2002).To estimate the total digestible nutrients (TDN), samples of feed, leftovers and feces were collected.To estimate the production of fecal dry matter, indigestible dry matter was used (Soares et al., 2011).For the TDN estimation, the equation described by Weiss (1999) was used: TDN = DCP + DEE x 2.25 + DNFC + DapNDF.Average daily gain was calculated according to the following formula = (total weight gain/days of the experimental period).
At the end of the experimental period, the lambs were randomly distributed in a slaughter order, submitted to solid fast for 16h, to obtain body weight at slaughter (BWS), and slaughtered following the current recommendations (Brasil, 2000).The animals were stunned by nonpenetrative brain percussion with the aid of a pistol, suspended by the hind limbs and bled.The body of the slaughtered, bled, skinned, and gutted animal, free of the limbs, kidneys, and perirenal fat, was the hot carcass weight (HCW), to determine the hot carcass yield [HCY (%) = HCW/BWS × 100].The gastrointestinal tract was weighed full, then emptied, washed, and reweighed to obtain the gastrointestinal tract content (GITC).The empty body weight (EBW) was calculated using the formula EBW = (BWS − GITC), and the biological yield (BY) was calculated using the formula BY (%) = HCW/EBW × 100.After weighing, the carcasses were taken to a cold chamber at 4ºC, where they remained suspended by hooks for 24 h.After this period, the carcasses were weighed again to obtain the cold carcass weight (CCW).To determine the commercial yield, the formula was used: CY (%) = CCW/BWS × 100 (Cezar and Sousa, 2007).
The left leg of each animal was weighed, identified, packed in high-density polyethylene bags, and stored at −20°C for evaluation of tissue composition.The legs were previously stored and thawed gradually, being maintained at a temperature of about 4°C for 24 h.Throughout the dissection of leg, the weight of the five muscles that covered the femur (Biceps femoris, Semimembranosus, Adductor, Semitendinosus and Quadriceps femoris) were obtained.The leg muscle index (LMI) was calculated according to Purchas et al. (1991).
The qualitative analyzes of the meat were performed using the right loins of each animal.
The chemical composition of the meat was performed in the Semimenbranosus muscle, according to methodologies recommended by AOAC (Official…, 2000).Cooking losses, shear force and color were determined according to the methodologies described by Wheeler et al. (1993).The water holding capacity was determined according to Sierra (1973).

DISCUSSION
The silages used in the present study had a much lower DM content than the 30% recommended by literature (Table 1).However, as they accounted for 50% in the diet of feedlot sheep, they did not provide a reduction in DM intake, since sheep that received silages from tall sizes (IRI-381 and Elephant B) consumed 3.9% of BW and those that consumed the short size (Mott), 4% of BW.These results reflected positively on the values of average daily gain (0.195kg), which were higher than predicted in the diet formulation.Productive performance is a direct function of digestible DM intake, so that 60 to 90% of performance results from variation in intake, and 10 to 40% depends on fluctuations in digestibility.Therefore, intake is considered the most important factor in determining animal performance (Mertens, 1994;Gomes et al., 2017).
The animals' body weight at slaughter also did not differ (P>0.05) as a function of the silages they received, a fact that reflected in the similarity of hot, commercial, and biological carcass yields (Table 3).The variables related to the leg tissue composition of the lambs were similar, regardless of the silages (Table 4), which can be explained by the lack of difference in the DM, CP and TDN intakes.Possibly, the high TDN intake contributed to the efficiency of utilization of available dietary protein for muscle growth.In addition, young and fully growing animals were used, a phase characterized by greater deposition of muscle tissue in relation to adipose tissue, which may have contributed to the results observed.The muscle:fat ratio is considered an important attribute of carcass quality, so diets can contribute to increasing this ratio.However, there was no dietary effect on muscle:bone and muscle:fat ratios, indicating that tissue deposition did not occur only by the addition of muscle tissue, but by the deposition of all tissues together.The leg tissues accompanied the carcass weight development of animals, result also observed by Cardoso et al. (2021).
According to Silva Sobrinho et al. (2005), the LMI suggests the amount of muscle present in each cut, and the higher this index, the higher the yields.The diet is a determining factor to characterize possible variations in the carcass and in the tissue and chemical composition of commercial cuts.Thus, among the factors that can determine variation in these compositions are the roughage:concentrate ratio (Kumari et al., 2013) and the feeding system, exclusively in grazing or in feedlot (Panea et al., 2011).Considering these, it is understood the similarity found in the chemical composition parameters of the Semimembranosus muscle recorded between the animals receiving the different silages as exclusive roughage (Table 5).
The silages did not provide differences in the qualitative aspects of the meat (Table 5).However, it should be noted that the color of sheep meat is more influenced by the production system than by the diet (Perlo et al., 2008).Animals in feedlot, as in the present study, are less susceptible to physical activities than those raised in extensive systems, which induces a lower synthesis of myoglobin, in view of the lower need for muscle oxygenation, favoring a less intense staining in the meat (Vestergaard et al., 2000).
According to Schmidt et al. (2013), meats that have shear force values lower than 2.75kg/cm 2 can be classified as tender.Other parameters indicating meat quality (water holding capacity, color and tenderness) can also be considered adequate.On the other hand, the water holding capacity (WHC) determines the meat's ability to retain water after the application of external forces (Muchenje et al., 2009), so that the higher the WHC of the meat, the greater its firmness and consistency, more uniform is the texture, due to the greater turgor of the fiber.In the same relationship, the cooking loss is associated with the meat yield at the time of intake, being a characteristic influenced by the WHC in the meat structures.The cooking process is a determining factor in the WHC of the meat (juiciness) and during the of the meat up to temperatures of 71ºC, higher values of WHC also contributed to lower losses of exudate, which can vary from 25 to 40% (Gomide et al., 2013).Thus, in view of the physicochemical results of the meat (Table 5), it can be inferred that sheep fed diets containing silages of elephant grass genotypes had meat without compromising color, tenderness, and juiciness.
It is important to highlight that there is difference between the nutritional value of the different elephant grass genotypes (Silva et al., 2021).However, this variation did not impact the carcass and meat characteristics of sheep used in the present study.On the other hand, the length of the experimental period may have caused the non-significant results.Furthermore, it is recommended that a negative control (a lower quality standard forage) and/or a positive control (better quality forage or an additive) be tested.

CONCLUSIONS
Diets containing 50% elephant grass genotypes silages (IRI-381, Elephant B or Mott), harvested at 60 days of growth, have potential for use in lambs feeding.Additionally, future research is encouraged to assess the effects of diets containing elephant grass genotypes silages (tallsized or dwarf) for a long-term, aiming to establish the real impact of silages on carcass characteristics and meat quality of lambs.

324-332, 2023 RESULTS
standard error of the mean; b total digestible nutrients.Averages in rows followed by different letters are statistically different by the Tukey's test at 5% probability.

Table 4 .
Leg tissue composition of lambs fed diets containing elephant grass genotypes silages

Table 5 .
Physicochemical characteristics of meat from lambs fed diets containing elephant grass genotypes silages a standard error of the mean.Averages in rows followed by different letters are statistically different by the Tukey's test at 5% probability.