Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Peptides DLL37-1 and LL37-1, an alternative to inhibit biofilm formation in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis have microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM) adhesion proteins that enhance their biofilm formation ability, as well as virulence factors that influence morbidity and mortality in hospital settings. In this work, four peptides analogous of the peptide LL-37 that were evaluated to inhibit biofilm formation and its action potential on the expression of MSCRAMM proteins in clinical isolates through different tests, such as crystal violet, PCR and qPCR. In total, 96.8% of S. aureus were strong in biofilm formation in contrast to 48.4% of S. epidermidis. sdrG and sdrF genes were present in 100% of S. epidermidis strains and in all isolates. In S. aureus, specific genes that code for MSCRAMM proteins were detected: clfA (89%), clFB, sdrC and fnBA (94%). The peptides did not show hemolytic or cytotoxic activity. In this study, it was evidenced that of the peptides DLL37-1 at a 5 µM concentration was an efficacious antimicrobial agent and depicted greater biofilm inhibition in both bacterial species. Exhibiting a significant inhibition rate in S. aureus, this peptide caused a negative regulation in the expression of the genes clfA and sdrC, showed greater biological activity.

Key words
Biofilms; MSCRAMM; Peptides; S. epidermidis

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus is part of the human microbiota and a common agent in blood infections, specifically in the attachment and colonization of biotic and abiotic surfaces (Cervantes-Garcia et al. 2014CERVANTES-GARCÍA E, GARCÍA-GONZÁLEZ R & SALAZAR-SCHETTINO P. 2014. Características generales del Staphylococcus aureus. Rev Latinoam Patol Clin Med Lab 61: 28-40., Wertheim et al. 2005WERTHEIM HF, MELLES DC, VOS MC, VAN LEEUWEN W, VAN BELKUM A, VERBRUGH HA & NOUWEN JL. 2005. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis 5: 751-762.). This microorganism has the capability to acquire resistance to multiple antibiotics of clinical use, and has led to the development of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (Vestergaard et al. 2019VESTERGAARD M, FREES D & INGMER H. 2019. Antibiotic Resistance and the MRSA Problem. Microbiology Spectrum 7: 1-23.). Likewise, S. epidermidis can be an opportunistic pathogen that causes bacteremia in immunocompromised patients and its biofilm-forming capacity may contribute to bacterial resistance (Heilmann et al. 2019HEILMANN C, ZIEBUHR W & BECKER K. 2019. Are coagulase-negative Staphylococci virulent. Clin Microbiol Infect 259: 1071-1080., Malachowa et al. 2016MALACHOWA N, KOBAYASHI SD, PORTER AR, BRAUGHTON KR, SCOTT DP, GARDNER D, MISSIAKAS DM, SCHNEEWIND O & DELEO FR. 2016. Contribution of Staphylococcus aureus Coagulases and Clumping Factor A to Abscess Formation in a Rabbit Model of Skin and Soft Tissue Infection. PLoS One 11: e0158293.). S. aureus and S. epidermidis have a wide variety of virulence factors, mainly hemolysins, leukotoxins, enterotoxins and enzymes such as serine proteases, cysteine proteases and lipases (Betancourt et al. 2004BETANCOURT M, BOTERO JE & RIVERA S. 2004. Biopelículas: una comunidad microscópica en desarrollo. Colomb Med 35: 34-39., Osterson et al. 1999OSTERSON JW, STEWART PS & GREENBERG EP. 1999. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 21: 1318-1322., Patti et al. 1994PATTI JM, ALLEN BL, MCGAVIN MJ & HÖÖK M. 1994. MSCRAMM-Mediated Adherence of Microorganisms to Host Tissues. Annu Rev Microbiol 481: 585-617.). These mechanisms are of importance in public health as they have a direct effect on the morbidity and mortality of hospital-acquired infections. S aureus and S. epidermidis have other virulence factors that are involved in biofilm formation, including surface proteins that are covalently anchored to cell wall peptidoglycans, and can be classified based on structural and functional properties. The most prevalent are microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM), and this family of proteins comprises fibrinogen-binding proteins, such as clumping factor A (clfA) and clumping factor B (clfB) (Patti et al. 1994PATTI JM, ALLEN BL, MCGAVIN MJ & HÖÖK M. 1994. MSCRAMM-Mediated Adherence of Microorganisms to Host Tissues. Annu Rev Microbiol 481: 585-617.); serine-aspartate repetitive proteins (sdrC, sdrD, sdrE, sdrG and sdrF); and fibrinogen/fibronectin binding proteins (FnBPA, FnBP) (Arora et al. 2016ARORA S, UHLEMANN A-C, LOWY FD & HOOK M. 2016. A Novel MSCRAMM Subfamily in Coagulase Negative Staphylococcal Species. Front Microbiol 7: 540., Chagnot et al. 2012CHAGNOT C, LISTRAT A, ASTRUC T & DESVAUX M. 2012. Bacterial adhesion to animal tissues: protein determinants for recognition of extracellular matrix components. Cellular Microbiol 14: 1687-1696., Lianhua et al. 2014LIANHUA Y, YUNCHAO H, GUANGQIANG Z, KUN Y, XING L & FENGLI G. 2014. The effect of iatrogenic Staphylococcus epidermidis intercellar adhesion operon on the formation of bacterial biofilm on polyvinyl chloride surfaces. Surg Infect 15: 768-773., Pei et al. 1999PEI L, PALMA M, NILSSON M, GUSS B & FLOCK JI. 1999. Functional studies of a fibrinogen binding protein from Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect Immun 67: 4525-4530.).

Additionally, the accumulation of a subpopulation of microorganisms that leads to the formation of biofilm may result in the development of an approximate 1000-fold antibiotic resistance (Del Pozo 2018DEL POZO JL. 2018. Biofilm-related disease. Expert review of anti-infective therapy 16: 51-65.), making antimicrobial therapy ineffective due to the capacity of the bacteria to remain viable in the host for a prolonged period of time. In addition, the ability of slow-growing bacteria to poorly or incompletely penetrate through polysaccharides can block directly antibiotics (Hall & Mah 2017HALL CW & MAH TF. 2017. Molecular mechanisms of biofilm-based antibiotic resistance and tolerance in pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1: 276-301., Lebeaux et al 2014, Sharma et al. 2019SHARMA D, MISBA L & KHAN AU. 2019. Antibiotics versus biofilm: an emerging battleground in microbial communities. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 8:76., Venkatesan et al. 2015VENKATESAN N, PERUMAL G & DOBLE M. 2015. Bacterial resistance in biofilm-associated bacteria. Future Microbiol 5: 1743-1750.).

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are part of the host’s defense system. In general, their immunomodulatory functions include reduction of the concentration of pro-inflammatory cytokines, modulation of chemokine expression, angiogenesis stimulation, leukocyte activation, and macrophages and leukocyte differentiation (Hilchie et al. 2013HILCHIE AL, WUERTH K & HANCOCK RE. 2013. Immune modulation by multifaceted cationic host defense (antimicrobial) peptides. Nat Chem Biol 9: 761-768.). AMPs may also act through direct interactions with the cell walls and membranes of bacteria without requiring specific receptors (Travkova et al. 2017TRAVKOVA OG, MOEHWALD H & BREZESINSKI G. 2017. The interaction of antimicrobial peptides with membranes. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 247: 521-532.). It has been also found that if the peptide sequence contains a hydrophobic fragment (i.e., nonpolar amino acids, such as A, V and other), and another hydrophilic fragment (i.e., charged or polar amino acids, such as R and K), this arrangement gives an amphipathic property and intensifies their activity and selectivity towards interaction of the phospholipids of the bacterial membrane, due to its anionic character (negative charge at a neutral pH) (Lebeaux et al. 2014LEBEAUX D, GHIGO JM & BELOIN C. 2014. Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78: 510-543.).

AMPs with antibiofilm activity, such as human cathelicidin LL-37, have also been reported, as they have been shown to inhibit biofilm formation and/or dispersion processes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Overhage et al. 2008OVERHAGE J, CAMPISANO A, BAINS M, TORFS EC, REHM BH & HANCOCK RE. 2008. Human host defense peptide LL-37 prevents bacterial biofilm formation. Infect Immun 76: 4176-4182.). Cathelicidin is a positively charged molecule (+6 at pH~7.4) with a high content of basic and hydrophobic amino acids (Ulaeto et al. 2016ULAETO D, MORRIS C, FOX M, GUMBLETON M & BECK K. 2016. Destabilization of α-Helical Structure in Solution Improves Bactericidal Activity of Antimicrobial Peptides: Opposite Effects on Bacterial and Viral Targets. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60: 1984-1991.) and greater antibacterial activity when compared to defensins. Furthermore, it has a rapid bactericidal effect and antimicrobial action against clinical isolates (Lei et al. 2019LEI J, SUN L, HUANG S, ZHU C, LI P, HE J, MACKEY V, COY DH & HE Q. 2019. The antimicrobial peptides and their potential clinical applications. Am J Transl Res 11: 3919-3931.); however, the optimization of molecular parameters, such as charge and/or structure, grants them a higher selectivity towards microbial cells and reduces cytotoxicity against host cells (Barrero et al. 2016BARRERO L, RIVERA S & VILLALOBOS A. 2016. Protocolo de vigilancia en salud pública, Infecciones asociadas a dispositivos. Grupo Infecciones Asociadas a la Atención en Salud PRO-R02.046 Versión 01., Hancock & Sahl 2006HANCOCK RE & SAHL HG. 2006. Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat Biotechnol 24: 1551-1557., Mishra & Wang 2012MISHRA B & WANG G. 2012. Ab initio design of potent anti-MRSA peptides based on database filtering technology. J Am Chem Soc 134: 12426-12429., Travkova et al. 2017TRAVKOVA OG, MOEHWALD H & BREZESINSKI G. 2017. The interaction of antimicrobial peptides with membranes. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 247: 521-532.).

L-amino acid-containing AMPs are susceptible to degradation by host enzymes (De la Fuente-Núñez et al. 2016DE LA FUENTE-NÚÑEZ C, CARDOSO MH, DE SOUZA CÂNDIDO E, FRANCO OL & HANCOCK RE. 2016. Synthetic antibiofilm peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta 1858: 1061-1069.); therefore, chemical modifications are necessary that allow them to overcome their limitations (Sim et al. 2019SIM JY, KIM S, LEE J, LIM H, KIM HH, PARK ZY & KIM JI. 2019. A significantly enhanced antibacterial spectrum of D-enantiomeric lipopeptide bactenecin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 514: 497-502.). D enantiomers depict great potential for the treatment of biofilms; specifically, modifications with D-amino acids such as D-tyrosine, D-methionine, D-tryptophan or D-leucine have been shown to result in derivatives that are able to inhibit biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus (De la Fuente-Núñez et al. 2016DE LA FUENTE-NÚÑEZ C, CARDOSO MH, DE SOUZA CÂNDIDO E, FRANCO OL & HANCOCK RE. 2016. Synthetic antibiofilm peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta 1858: 1061-1069., Rabin et al. 2015RABIN N, ZHENG Y, OPOKU-TEMENG C, DU Y, BONSU E & SINTIM H. 2015. Agents that inhibit bacterial biofilm formation. Future Med Chem 7: 647-671.). They also grant antimicrobial activity, proteolytic stability, decreased cytotoxicity to human cells, and increased immunomodulatory activity (Dean et al. 2011DEAN SN, BISHOP BM & VAN HOEK ML. 2011. Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm to alpha-helical peptides: D-enantiomer of LL-37. Front Microbio 2: 128., Jiang et al. 2011JIANG Z, HIGGINS MP, WHITEHURST J, KISICH KO, VOSKUIL MI & HODGES RS. 2011. Anti-tuberculosis activity of α-helical antimicrobial peptides: de novo designed L- and D-enantiomers versus L- and D-LL-37. Protein Pept Lett 18: 241-252.).

This work considers four LL37 analogous peptides (LL37-1, ACLL37–1, ACLL37–2 and DLL37-1) as candidates to inhibit biofilm formation caused by S. aureus and S. epidermidis and their inhibition potential for the expression of MSCRAMM adhesion proteins was evaluated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Design of the peptides

The peptide LL37-1 is shorter than the peptide LL37 and was synthesized with the free amino group (NH2) and the carboxyl group as the amide derivative (changes from having the last amino acid with COOH to the amide form [CONH2]) (Table I). Seeking to enhance the biological activity, three modifications were generated from the sequence of this peptide. The first analog peptide, called ACLL37-1, was generated by the elimination of G (Glycine) and acetylation of the N-terminal group; and the second analog was named ACLL37-2 because the terminal amino group of the entire LL37-1 sequence was acetylated. Both peptides were synthesized with C-terminal amidation. Finally, for the third analog, the peptide called DLL37-1, the amino group was acetylated and the phenylalanine amino acid 21 (F) was changed from the L to D stereochemical configuration.

Table I
Sequences of peptides analogous to LL-37.

Synthesis and evaluation of the purity of the peptides

All peptides were synthesized on a solid matrix using the protocol previously described by Merrifield (1964)MERRIFIELD RB. 1964. Solid-phase peptide synthesis. 3. an improved synthesis of bradykinin. Biochemistry 3: 1385-1390., using one of the two peptide synthesis strategies, 9-fluoromethoxycarbonyl/tert-butyl (Fmoc/Tbu), in which protection of the amino group of the amino acid is used during synthesis with the Fmoc group and protection of the side chains of amino acids that can react with the Tbu group. The deprotection and coupling steps were monitored by the ninhydrin test. At the end of synthesis, the protecting groups of the side chains were removed and the peptide was released from the resin (Guzman et al. 2007GUZMÁN F, ILLANES A & BARBERIS S. 2007. Peptide synthesis : chemical or enzymatic. Electron J Biotechnol 10: 279-314.). Using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectrometry, the purity of the peptides and their molecular mass were determined. For the chromatography analysis, a Column AlltimaTM C-18, 4.6 x 250 mm, was used, with the following conditions: pump A: 0.065% trifluoroacetic in 100% water (v/v), and pump B: 0.05% trifluoroacetic in 100% acetonitrile (v/v); total flow: 1 ml/min; wavelength: 220 nm. The peptides were purified to a purity ≥ 95%. The molecular weight of the purified peptides was determined by mass spectrometry at the main peak fraction of the chromatogram using an Waters Alliance 2695 chromatography system equipped with Waters 995 photodiode array detector and ESI-MS Waters Micromass Detector ZQ (Waters, USA). The spectrum collection conditions were: nebulization gas flow, 1.5 L/min; temperature CDL, 250 °C; block temperature, 200 °C; interface bias (Bias interface), + 4.5 kV; drying gas flow, 5 L/min; T flow, 0.2 mL/min; and concentration of B, 50% water/50% MeOH.

The secondary structure assessment

The preferential secondary structure of the peptides was established by circular dichroism (CD) in a JASCO-J-810 (Jacso Incorporated, USA) spectropolarimeter at a final concentration of 200 µM in 30% trifluoroethanol (TFE) (Greenfield 2006GREENFIELD N. 2006. Using circular dichroism spectra to estimate protein secondary structure. Nat Protoc 1: 2876-2890.).

Clinical isolates

Sixty-two clinical isolates of different samples and hospitals of the city of Bogota, Colombia were analysed. The purity of the isolates was verified in agar chromogenic BBL™ CHROMagar™ (Becton, Dickinson). They were genotypically characterized by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), amplifying the 16s rADN for S. epidermidis and the gene nuc for S. aureus (Brakstad et al. 1992BRAKSTAD OG, AASBAKK K & MAELAND JA. 1992. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene. J Clin Microbiol 30: 1654-1660., Zakrzewska-Czerwińska et al. 1992ZAKRZEWSKA-CZERWIŃSKA J, GASZEWSKA-MASTALARZ A, PULVERER G, & MORDARSKI M. 1992. Identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis using a 16S rRNA-directed oligonucleotide probe. FEMS Microbiol Lett 100: 51-58.). Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by the method of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), following the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI 2020CLSI. 2020. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 30th ed., CLSI supplement M100. Wayne, PA. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.). The antibiotics tested were oxacillin, gentamicin, vancomycin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, rifampicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, clindamycin and linezolid.

Analysis of biofilm formation by Congo red and crystal violet methods

Phenotypic determination of biofilm production was performed using the Congo red agar (CRA) method described by Freeman et al. (1989)FREEMAN DJ, FALKINER FR & KEANE CT. 1989. New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. J Clin Pathol 42: 872-874.. The strains of S. epidermidis ATCC 35984 and S. aureus USA300 were used as positive controls and S. epidermidis ATCC 12228, a non-biofilm former, as a negative control. Biofilm formation was assessed in polystyrene microtiter plates using the crystal violet technique described by Christensen et al. (1985)CHRISTENSEN GD, SIMPSON WA, YOUNGER JJ, BADDOUR LM, BARRETT FF, MELTON DM & BEACHEY EH. 1985. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 22: 996-1006.. Briefly, 198 µL of brain heart infusion broth (BHI) with 1% glucose or BHI broth with 2% NaCl was inoculated with 2 µL of the inoculum at 0.5 McFarland scale, and subsequently incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C. The absorbance of the plates was read in a MicroElisa reader (Infinite 200 Pro, Tecan, Switzerland) at a wavelength of 492 nm and 570 nm. All tests were carried out in triplicate. To perform the classification, the cut-off point was calculated, and for this purpose, the standard deviation was multiplied by 3 and the value of the mean optical density of the BHI + glucose or BHI + NaCl was added at the same wavelength. The isolates were classified into three categories: non-adherent (NA), in which the optical density was equal to or less than the cut-off point; weakly adherent (WA), in which the optical density was greater than the cut-off point or equal to or less than twice that amount; and strongly adherent (SA), in which the optical density was greater than twice the cut-off point.

Determination of adhesion factors associated with the formation of biofilm by conventional PCR

Specific primers directed against the genes of interest were designed (Table II). The bacterial DNA extraction was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions (Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit Technical Manual, Promega, USA). The genes fnbA, clfA and clfB of S. aureus were amplified by a single multiplex PCR reaction and sdrG and sdrF in another reaction. A conventional PCR was executed to detect the gene sdrC of S. aureus. DNA from ATCC bacteria strains was used as positive controls and negative controls in the reactions, USA300 was the positive control of amplification of fnbA, clfA, sdrC and clfB and negative control of sdrG and sdrF, the strains ATCC 35984 and ATCC 12228 were the positive control for genes sdrG and sdrF and were also used as a negative control for the specific genes of S. aureus.

Table II
Sequences of primers targeting the adhesion proteins ClfA, ClfB, FnbA, SdrG, SdrC, SdrF.

Analysis of the hemolytic activity of the peptides

Human red blood cells (group O Rh +) at 3% were suspended in a solution containing 0.9% saline (Baxter Healthcare, USA) and five dilutions of peptides LL37-1, ACLL37-1, ACLL37-2 and DLL37-1 were analyzed at a final concentration of 10, 7.5, 5, 2.5 and 1.25 μM in triplicate, and incubated in microtiter plates (Greiner Bio-one background U, USA) for 72 hours at 37 °C. Red blood cells without peptide were used as a negative control and erythrocytes were lysed with 20% Triton as a positive control. After incubation, microtiter plates were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes, and the absorbance of the microtiter plate reader was 540 nm in an ELISA plate reader (Multiskan EX, Thermo Scientific, USA). Subsequently, the percentage of hemolysis was calculated:

% hemolysis: ([absorbance exposed cells - absorbance negative control/absorbance positive control - absorbance negative control] x 100).

Cytotoxic effect of the peptides

L929 fibroblasts were cultured in DMEM medium (Life Technologies Corporation, USA) at 37 °C, after which the culture was exposed to an atmosphere of 5% CO2 until reaching a confluence of 80–90%. In 96-well plates, 21,000 cells/per well were seeded in DMEM medium and incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C. The culture medium was extracted and each of the peptides (LL37-1, ACLL37-1, ACLL37-2 and DLL37-1) were added at a concentration of 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 µM, in a final volume of 100 µL per well.

The plates were incubated for 72 hours at 37 °C, and subsequently, the reduction of tetrazolium (XTT) (EZcountTM XTT Cell Assay Kit, HiMedia Laboratories, India) reagent was added. The plates were incubated again for two to four hours, shaken for 15 seconds and read in an ELISA Reader using 450 nm as primary filter and 620 nm as differential filter. The experimental values were normalized with the results of the negative control red blood cells without peptide (0% hemolysis) and 20% Triton X-100 (100% hemolysis). The percentage of cytotoxicity was calculated:

% cytotoxicity = ([absorbance untreated cells - absorbance treated cells/absorbance treated cells] x 100).

Assessment of the effect of analogous peptides on bacterial growth and biofilm formation

The impact of the peptides on the bacterial growth curves was tested on 37 of the isolates. For this purpose, the strains were grown in triplicate in LB broth, at 0.5 McFarland scale, in the presence of the peptides LL37-1, ACLL37-1, ACLL37-2 and DLL37-1 at a final concentration of 5 µM. Optical density readings were made at 620 nm every hour for 24 hours with continuous stirring at 37 °C in the Bioscreen C® equipment (Oy Growth Curves Ab Ltd, Finland).

Seventeen S. epidermidis isolates (14 biofilm formers, two non-biofilm formers, and one strain sensitive to all antibiotics) and 19 biofilm-forming S. aureus isolates with resistance to at least one antibiotic were analyzed. The strains were cultured in 96-well plates in BHI broth with 1% glucose, following the protocol described for biofilm evaluation. Incubation times of 6, 12 and 24 hours were evaluated at 37 °C in the presence of the peptides LL37-1, ACLL37-1, ACLL37-2 and DLL37-1 at a final concentration of 5 µM. The absorbance of the plates was read at a wavelength of 492 nm and 570 nm in the MicroELISA reader and the percentage of biofilm inhibition exerted by the peptide was calculated (Costa et al. 2018COSTA GA, ROSSATTO FCP, MEDEIROS AW, CORREA APF, BRANDELLI A, FRAZZON APG & MOTTA ASD. 2018. Evaluation antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of the antimicrobial peptide P34 against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. An Acad Bras Cienc 90: 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201820160131.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-37652018201...
):

Percentage inhibition = (100 - [Abs nm experimental well with the peptide/Abs nm control well without the peptide] x 100).

Assay of the effect of analogous peptides on the expression of MSCRAMM adhesion proteins

Two analogous peptides, LL37-1 and DLL37-1, were selected since they showed the best results in the hemolysis and cytotoxicity assays. These peptides were challenged at a concentration of 5 µM in a 96-well plate assay of the bacterial culture of two strains of S. aureus and S. epidermidis in LB broth after an incubation period of 8, 10 and 12 hours at 37 °C. For this task, 1.5 mL of the bacterial culture was centrifuged at 10000 rpm for five minutes at a temperature of 4 ºC, the supernatant was removed and the pellet was suspended with lysozyme (2.5 mg/mL), lysostaphin (0.2 mg/mL), buffer lysis and proteinase K (25 U/mL), followed by incubation at 37 ºC for four hours. Subsequently, the RNA extraction protocol was followed by the Trizol® Max™ (Ambion Life Technologies, USA) and Chomczynski method (Chomczynski & Sacchi 2006CHOMCZYNSKI P & SACCHI N. 2006. The single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction: twenty-something years on. Nat Protoc 1: 581-585.). The extracted RNA was quantified in a Nanodrop 2000 (Technoscientific, USA) and 102–1010 copies were taken as an RNA template, and the recommendations of the ImProm-II ™ Reverse Transcription System kit (Promega, USA) were followed for cDNA synthesis. Finally, cDNA was amplified using the GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix Kit (Promega, USA) and different specific primers (Table II) targeting the genes of the adhesion proteins clfA, fnbA, sdrC, sdrG and sdrF. qPCR was performed using the BioRad CFX96 thermal cycler Touch™ Real Time PCR System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA) and the USA300, ATCC12228, and ATCC 35984 were used as controls. Ct (cycle threshold) data were normalized to the expression of the reference genes rrn and gyrB and analyzed by the method 2-ΔΔCt (Pfaffl 2001PFAFFL MW. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29: e45.).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 19.0 (Ibm, USA) and GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software Inc, USA). The p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The Kendall’s Tau-b correlation coefficient, chi-square test, Fisher’s exact test and comparison test (Bonferroni, one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA) were used.

RESULTS

Designed peptides are of high purity

The four peptides under study, LL37-1, ACLL37–1, ACLL37–2 and DLL37-1, each had a single chromatographic peak on HPLC, indicating they are high purity products. Electrospray spectrometry analysis confirmed that the molecular mass corresponded to the expected species and revalidated the purity of the product (data not shown).

Secondary structure of analogous peptides that may have antibiofilm activity

The CD applied to the peptides LL37-1, ACLL37–1, ACLL37–2 and DLL37-1 was used to evaluate the preferential secondary structure that each one of them adopts in solution. The CD spectra of the four peptides showed maximum absorption in the spectrum at 193 nm, minimum absorption at 208 nm and 222 nm, which are the characteristic peaks when the peptide presents as an alpha helix structure (Fig. 1) (Lau et al. 1984LAU SY, TANEJA AK & HODGES RS. 1984. Synthesis of a model protein of defined secondary and quaternary structure. Effect of chain length on the stabilization and formation of two-stranded alpha-helical coiled-coils. J Biol Chem 259: 13253-13261.). To corroborate the structure found experimentally, secondary structure prediction was also made with the sequence of the peptides using bioinformatics programs, such as the PSSpred software, confirming that the sequences predicted had alpha helix structures. This secondary structure has been related to the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of peptides.

Figure 1
Preferential structure of the analogous peptides. Circular dichroism in 30% TFE at room temperature of the peptides LL37-1, ACLL37-1, ACLL37-2 and DLL37-1.

The peptides LL37-1, ACLL37-1, ACLL37-2 and DLL37-1 did not demonstrate hemolytic or cytotoxic activity

The analogous peptides, in 1.5, 2.5 and 5 µM concentrations, presented a hemolysis of less than 5% at 72 hours of incubation, while at a 10 µM concentration, they could induce 15–17% hemolysis. All peptides at the 10 µM concentration showed a statistical difference with respect to their counterpart in different concentrations and the other peptides. No differences were observed in hemolysis between peptides at concentrations of 7.5, 5 and 1.5 µM (Fig. 2). Additionally, the LL37-1 and DLL37-1 peptides at 1.5 µM to 5 µM concentrations displayed a tendency to low cytotoxicity (less than 25%) even after 72 hours of incubation; peptides ACLL37-1 and ACLL37-2 exhibited a tendency to higher cytotoxicity, however no statistical differences were found in any of the comparisons (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
Hemolytic and cytotoxic effects of the analogous peptides. (a) Percentage of hemolysis at 72 hours of incubation of the peptides at concentrations of 1.5–10 µM. (b) Percentage of cell viability of L929 cells after 72 hours of incubation with the peptides LL37-1, ACLL37-1, ACLL37-2 and DLL37-1, at four different concentrations. The data shown corresponds to the mean and standard error of the mean of tests carried out in triplicate. Data analyzed by Two-way ANOVA test, Tukey’s post test, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.001.

Clinical isolates belong to the genus Staphylococcus spp. and show antimicrobial resistance

In this study, 62 clinical isolates from blood cultures (45.1%), 27 from secretions (43.5%) and seven samples of unknown origin (11.4%) were evaluated. A total of 31 were characterized as S. epidermidis, 31 were S. aureus, and the purity of all the isolates was verified. Eleven antimicrobials were tested and this susceptibility analysis evidenced that four (6.5%) isolates were not resistant to any antibiotic and 58 (93.5%) were resistant to at least one antibiotic. For S. aureus, the resistance to oxacillin was 100%, and for S. epidermidis, resistance was 64.5%.

S. aureus and S. epidermidis strains from clinical isolates have the capacity to form biofilm

The CRA test showed that 67.8% of S. aureus isolates and 35.5% of S. epidermidis are biofilm formers, with a significant difference observed in these proportions (p = 0.011) (Fig. 3a). Therefore, S. aureus strains have a greater capacity to produce biofilm compared to S. epidermidis. The isolates were classified according to the Christensen method (Christensen et al. 1985CHRISTENSEN GD, SIMPSON WA, YOUNGER JJ, BADDOUR LM, BARRETT FF, MELTON DM & BEACHEY EH. 1985. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 22: 996-1006.), evidencing that 1% glucose stimulates biofilm formation (Fig. 3b), according to the correlation coefficient of Kendall’s Tau-b of 0.52 (p ≤ 0.001). In this study, 96.8% of S. aureus isolates were strong biofilm formers and 48.4% of S. epidermidis would form film as well, if BHI + 1% glucose were found (Fig. 3c–d).

Figure 3
Biofilm formation ability assessment of the clinical isolates. (a) Distribution of the results of the Congo red agar (CRA) test, data analyzed by the Chi-square test (X2), *p = 0.011 (b) Determination of biofilm formation per microplate in the presence of brain heart infusion (BHI) + 1% glucose. NA: non-adherent. WA: weakly adherent. SA: strongly adherent. (c) Representative figure formation of biofilm crystal violet method. (d) Classification of biofilm production according to the Christensen method for isolated Staphylococcus spp.

Genes coding for MSCRAMM adhesion proteins are present in microbiological isolates

A total of 100% of the S. epidermidis isolates had sdrG and sdrF genes and all the S. aureus isolates displayed specific MSCRAMM, such as: clfA (89%), clFB, sdrC and fnBA (94%) in several S. epidermidis isolates. These genes were also amplified (29–35%) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4
Detection of the genes encoding the MSCRAMM adhesion proteins. (a) sdrC gene amplification from S. aureus (b) Multiplex PCR, fnbA 180 bp, clfA 155 bp and clfB 96 bp amplified in S. aureus strains (c) Amplicons of the 188 bp sdrG and 137 bp sdrF genes in clinical isolates of S. epidermidis, USA300 positive control of S. aureus, ATCC 35984 positive control of S. epidermidis. ATCC 12228 non-producing negative control biofilm. Molecular Weight (MW): 100bp. (d) Percentage of isolates positive for the sdrG, sdrF, sdrC, fnbA, slfA and clfB genes by species.

The peptides LL37-1, ACLL37-1, ACLL37-2 and DLL37-1 affect bacterial growth

In a previous analysis through the cell continuous flow cabinet methodology, it was observed that the peptide LL37-1 has the ability to eradicate 100% of the aggregation of live bacterial cells from preformed biofilm in the ATCC 35984 strain at 24 hours of treatment in a concentration of 5 µM. The peptide at a lower concentration did not trigger the dispersal of biofilm cells (data in process of publication). Considering this result, a decision was made to carry out the next experiments with this concentration of the peptides.

The growth curves displayed statistical differences (p < 0.0001) when compared with their equivalent subjected to treatment with peptide at a 5 µM concentration (two-way ANOVA with Sidak posthoc test). It was proven these analog peptides inhibited bacterial growth at 24 hours of incubation, with the exception of a clinical isolate corresponding to S. epidermidis, with the ACLL37-1 peptide at 5 µM (Fig. 5). The results present a prolongation of the latency phase (lac) for the peptide LL37-1, with S. aureus that lasts approximately 10 hours. With ACLL37-1 and ACLL37-2, there were no differences observed with respect to the control. DLL37-1 lengthened the adaptation phase to almost 10 hours in the clinical isolation of S. epidermidis (Fig. 5).

Figure 5
Effect of synthetic peptides at a concentration of 5 µM into growth kinetics of clinical isolates of S. aureus and S. epidermidis and of the controls, without treatment. The data shown correspond to the mean OD of tests performed in triplicate of measurements performed every hour for 24 hours. Data analyzed by Two-way ANOVA test, Tukey’s post test, ** p < 0.01, ** p = 0.002, **** p < 0.001.

Analogous peptides showed antibiofilm activity

The percentage differences in biofilm inhibition with significant differences (p < 0.001; Bonferroni test) in the optical density (OD) of strains with and without treatment with a 5 µM peptide concentration were analyzed. The bacterial species evaluation depicted a high percentage of biofilm inhibition, especially at 24 hours (Fig. 6), indicating this activity could be incubation time-dependent. DLL37-1 displayed a consistent effect in both bacterial species (inhibition percentage of 52–58%) and LL37-1 presented a significant inhibition rate in S. aureus (52.9%).

Figure 6
Biofilm inhibition of analogous peptides at concentration of 5 µM in clinical isolates of S. aureus and S. epidermidis The data shown correspond to the mean of the % inhibition of the clinical isolates by species carried out in triplicate. The inhibition percentage was calculated with respect to the absorbance obtained from the isolation without peptide. Data analyzed by Two-way ANOVA test, Tukey’s post test, * p < 0.05.

Peptides affect the expression of the MSCRAMM adhesion proteins in S. aureus and S. epidermidis

Fig. 7 shows the mRNA expression level coding genes for the adhesion proteins clfA, fnbA, and sdrC of S. aureus in a clinical isolate and in the control strain USA300, which was previously subjected to treatment with the peptides LL37-1 and DLL37-1 (at 5 µM). LL37-1 decreases the expression of the clfA gene at 10 and 12 hours of incubation in the USA300 strain. In clinical isolation, it is notorious that after 12 hours of treatment, gene expression is stimulated. DLL37-1 did not cause alterations in the protein expression of the strain from the hospital environment, but it negatively regulated its expression at 12 hours in the USA300 strain. In relation to the fnbA gene, the peptides stimulated expression at 10 and 12 hours of incubation in clinical isolation. For the sdrC gene, its expression is increased after treatment with LL37-1 at eight hours for the control strain, and at 10 and 12 hours for the S. aureus isolate; however, with DLL37-1, the opposite effect was observed at eight hours for the USA300 strain.

Figure 7
Relative expression of mRNA from genes (a) clfA, (b) fnbA and (c) sdrC of a clinical isolate of S. aureus and of the control strain USA300. The results are presented as mRNA expression of the bacterial strains treated with the LL37-1 and DLL37-1 peptides at concentration of 5 µM, in relation to the untreated bacterial strains. Relative levels of gene expression were calculated in relation to the bacterial reference gene gyrB of S. aureus, using the threshold cycle method (Ct). Two-way ANOVA test, with Tukey’s multiple comparison post test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Data are presented as the mean of each group ± SEM and are representative of at least three independent experiments.

The expression levels of the sdrG and sdrF genes of S. epidermidis (Fig. 8) indicated that LL37-1 positively regulates the expression of sdrG in the two ATCC strains at eight hours of exposure, while in clinical isolation, there is negative regulation. The DLL37-1 peptide was found to increase the expression of the sdrG gene at 12 hours of treatment only in the non-biofilm-forming strain ATCC 12228, but the clinical isolation of S. epidermidis had gene expression inhibition at 8, 10 and 12 hours of treatment. The LL37-1 peptide was shown to affect the expression of the sdrF gene at 10 hours (ATCC 12228) and 12 hours of incubation (in all strains). With DLL37-1, there was a decrease in the expression of this gene in clinical isolation, mainly at eight and 10 hours.

Figure 8
Level of expression of mRNA of the genes target (a) sdrG and (b) sdrF of a clinical isolate of S. epidermidis and the controls ATCC 12228 and ATCC 35984. The results are presented as mRNA expression of the bacterial strains treated with the LL37-1 and DLL37-1 peptides at concentration of 5 µM, in relation to the untreated bacterial strains. Relative levels of gene expression were calculated by reference to the bacterial rrn gene of S. epidermidis by the threshold cycle method (Ct). Two-way ANOVA test, Tukey’s multiple comparison post test. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. Data are presented as the mean of each group ± SEM and are representative of at least three independent experiments.

DISCUSSION

The increasing number of nosocomial infections associated with the appearance of conventional antibiotic-resistant microorganisms is one of the main concerns of clinical institutions (Galdiero et al. 2019GALDIERO E, LOMBARDI L, FALANGA A, LIBRALATO G, GUIDA M & CAROTENUTO R. 2019. Biofilms: Novel Strategies Based on Antimicrobial Peptides. Pharmaceutics 11: 322.). In this study, it was found that 93.5% of clinical isolates presented resistance to at least one antibiotic. A total of 96.8% of S. aureus and 48.4% of S. epidermidis were biofilm formers. This finding is highly relevant, as these microorganisms are among the most associated with medical device-related infections (Arciola et al. 2006ARCIOLA CR, CAMPOCCIA D, BALDASSARRI L, DONATI ME, PIRINI V, GAMBERINI S & MONTANARO L. 2006. Detection of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis from implant infections. Comparison of a PCR-method that recognizes the presence of ica genes with two classic phenotypic methods. J Biomed Mater Res A 76: 425-30., Evans & Bold 2019EVANS JJ & BOLZ DD. 2019. Regulation of virulence and antibiotic resistance in Gram-positive microbes in response to cell wall-active antibiotics. Curr Opin Infect Dis 32: 217-222., Haddad et al. 2018HADDAD O, MERGHNI A, ELARGOUBI A, RHIM H, KADRI Y & MASTOURI M. 2018. Comparative study of virulence factors among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. BMC Infect Dis 18: 560.).

Additionally, S. aureus and S. epidermidis have adhesins associated to the building and maturation of biofilm, known as MSCRAMM (Speziale et al. 2014SPEZIALE P, PIETROCOLA G, FOSTER T & GEOGHEGAN J. 2014. Protein-based biofilm matrices in Staphylococci. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 1: 171.); thus, clfA was found in 89.47% of isolates and clfB, fnbA and sdrC were found in 94.73% of isolates in S. aureus samples. These results match those reported by Wang et al. (2019)WANG FD, WU PF & CHEN SJ. 2019. Distribution of virulence genes in bacteremic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from various sources. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 52: 426-432.. In the case of S. epidermidis, it was determined that the genes clfA, clfB, and fnbA were in 35.29% and sdrC were found in 29.41% of isolates; this finding could indicate horizontal transfer of said genes between the species studied, and S. epidermidis, being an important genetic reservoir (Büttner et al. 2015BÜTTNER H, MACK D & ROHDE H. 2015. Structural basis of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation: mechanisms and molecular interactions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 5: 14., Méric et al. 2015MÉRIC G ET AL. 2015. Ecological Overlap and Horizontal Gene Transfer in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Genome Biol Evol 7: 1313-1328.), or due to the high homology amongst the identified genes. The sdrG and sdrF genes were detected in 100% of the isolates studied.

Cardile et al. (2014)CARDILE AP, SANCHEZ CJ JR, SAMBERG ME, ROMANO DR, HARDY SK, WENKE JC, MURRAY CK & AKERS KS. 2014. Human plasma enhances the expression of Staphylococcal microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules promoting biofilm formation and increases antimicrobial tolerance In Vitro. BMC Res Notes 17: 457. found that exposing S. aureus to human plasma in vitro improves MSCRAMM expression and biofilm formation, confirming the relevant role of these proteins in vivo biofilm infections, as they favor anchorage to the cell wall and are involved in host colonization and invasion (De la Fuente-Núñez et al. 2016DE LA FUENTE-NÚÑEZ C, CARDOSO MH, DE SOUZA CÂNDIDO E, FRANCO OL & HANCOCK RE. 2016. Synthetic antibiofilm peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta 1858: 1061-1069.).

On the other hand, antimicrobial peptides have emerged as an alternative therapy in response to bacterial resistance, given their ability to inhibit growth and biofilm formation, even in drug-resistant microorganisms (Paharik & Horswill 2016PAHARIK AE & HORSWILL AR. 2016. The Staphylococcal Biofilm: Adhesins, Regulation, and Host Response. Microbiol Spectr 4: 10.). In this study, four peptides with helical structures were designed, which has been reported to favor biofilm inhibition (Klubthawee et al. 2020KLUBTHAWEE N, ADISAKWATTANA P, HANPITHAKPONG W, SOMSRI S & AUNPAD R. 2020. A novel, rationally designed, hybrid antimicrobial peptide, inspired by cathelicidin and aurein, exhibits membrane-active mechanisms against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci Rep 10: 9117.). Regarding the potential cytotoxic effect, peptides LL37-1 and DLL37-1 displayed the lowest toxicity against red blood cells and L929 cells at concentrations up to 5 µM.

It has been suggested that differences in the sequence and position of amino acids are important for the antimicrobial activity of the peptides (Klubthawee et al. 2020KLUBTHAWEE N, ADISAKWATTANA P, HANPITHAKPONG W, SOMSRI S & AUNPAD R. 2020. A novel, rationally designed, hybrid antimicrobial peptide, inspired by cathelicidin and aurein, exhibits membrane-active mechanisms against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci Rep 10: 9117.). In fact, in this research, it was found that peptides LL37-1, ACLL37-2 y DLL37-1 induced changes in the kinetic growth of strains by extending the latency or adaptation phase, which is where the microorganism adapts to a new environment (Yates & Smotzer 2007YATES GT & SMOTZER T. 2007. On the lag phase and initial decline of microbial growth curves. J Theor Biol 244: 511-517.), and then initiates an increase in gene expression of relevant genes. A change in adaptation may be directly related to a decrease in the adherence ability of the bacterial population, reducing its virulence capacity (Lee et al. 2014LEE H, KIM K, LEE S, HAN M & YOON Y. 2014. Growth kinetics of Staphylococcus aureus on Brie and Camembert cheeses. J Dairy Res 81: 252-256.). In some of the analyzed strains (mainly ATCC 12228), a recovery in growth rate was observed after 24 hours of incubation. This phenomenon can be explained as a collective tolerance mechanism previously described in bacteria subjected to treatment with LL37, a mechanism by which the peptide eliminates a subpopulation of bacteria and absorbs it, decreasing its availability in the environment. As a result, they protect the remaining viable strains from death by peptide (Wu & Tan 2019WU F & TAN C. 2019. Dead bacterial absorption of antimicrobial peptides underlies collective tolerance. J Royal Soc Interface 16: 20180701.).

The peptides with the highest biofilm inhibitory activity were LL37-1 and DLL37-1, with inhibition percentages of 58% and 57% in S. epidermidis and S. aureus, respectively. These results are consistent with those found by Hell et al. (2010)HELL E, GISKE CG, NELSON A, RÖMLING U & MARCHINI G. 2010. Human cathelicidin peptide LL37 inhibits both attachment capability and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Lett Appl Microbiol 50: 211-215., in which they described that a low concentration of the LL37 peptide significantly reduced the binding of bacteria on the surface. The mechanism by which the LL37 peptide acts is not yet well described, but it could penetrate biofilms and exhibit antimicrobial activity. Other mechanisms may include decreased adhesion of planktonic bacteria and regulation of quorum sensing, related to the development and maintenance of biofilm (Overhage et al. 2008OVERHAGE J, CAMPISANO A, BAINS M, TORFS EC, REHM BH & HANCOCK RE. 2008. Human host defense peptide LL-37 prevents bacterial biofilm formation. Infect Immun 76: 4176-4182., Segev-Zarko & Shai 2017SEGEV-ZARKO LA & SHAI Y. 2017. Methods for Investigating Biofilm Inhibition and Degradation by Antimicrobial Peptides. Methods Mol Biol 1548: 309-322.). The D enantiomer cationic peptide, DJK-5, exerted antibiofilm activity against E. faecalis and oral biofilms of multiple species. It has great advantages, such as resistance to protease degradation, effective activity and that it is more powerful than other antimicrobial peptides (Wang et al. 2017WANG D, SHEN Y, MA J, HANCOCK R & HAAPASALO M. 2017. Antibiofilm Effect of D-enantiomeric Peptide Alone and Combined with EDTA In Vitro. J Endodont 43: 1862-1867.), as well what was observed in this study.

The expression of the MSCRAMM proteins was evaluated in the clinical isolates after treatment with the analog peptides DLL37-1 and LL37-1. In relation to the clfA gene, the two peptides depicted a negative regulation in the strongly biofilm-building strain USA300; and with LL37-1, positive regulation was observed in clinical isolation. This last result could be related to the inhibition of biofilm formation and the proportion of sessile and planktonic cells available. It has been described that the transcription levels of this protein can vary when it binds to a solid substrate; therefore, clinical isolation may present a greater quantity of bacteria in the planktonic state (greater inhibition), and therefore, greater expression of the gene (Wolz et al. 2002WOLZ C, GOERKE C, LANDMANN R, ZIMMERLI W & FLUCKIGER U. 2002. Transcription of clumping factor A in attached and unattached Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and during device-related infection. Infect Immun 70: 2758-2762.). Additionally, the bacteria can change their expression profile as the infection progresses, or according to their survival needs (Jan-Roblero et al. 2017JAN-ROBLERO J, GARCÍA-GÓMEZ E, RODRÍGUEZ-MARTÍNEZ S & MARIO E. 2017. Surface Proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. In: Enany S & Alexander LEC (Eds), The Rise of Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus<. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/65976.
https://doi.org/10.5772/65976...
).

In the fnbA expression, a compensation mechanism was found; that is, in response to treatment with analogous peptides in S. aureus, the expression of this protein, which promotes the formation of biofilm on polystyrene surfaces, was stimulated (Beenken et al. 2004BEENKEN KE, DUNMAN PM, MCALEESE F, MACAPAGAL D, MURPHY E, PROJAN SJ, BLEVINS JS & SMELTZER MS. 2004. Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol 186: 4665-4684., Yeswanth et al. 2017YESWANTH S, CHAUDHURY A & SARMA P. 2017. Quantitative Expression Analysis of SpA, FnbA and Rsp Genes in Staphylococcus aureus: Actively Associated in the Formation of Biofilms. Curr Microbiol 74: 1394-1403.). This change in expression is significant for the perpetuation and survival of bacteria in biofilm, which contributes to its permanence over time (Atshan et al. 2013ATSHAN SS ET AL. 2013. Quantitative PCR analysis of genes expressed during biofilm development of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Infect Genet Evol 8:106-112.). Regarding adhesion protein sdrC, Sitkiewicz et al. (2011)SITKIEWICZ I, BABIAK I & HRYNIEWICZ W. 2011. Characterization of transcription within sdr region of Staphylococcus aureus. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 99: 409-416. found that treatment with calcium and magnesium causes significant changes in gene expression, which is associated to the differential reactions of the strains to the environment (Sitkiewicz et al. 2011SITKIEWICZ I, BABIAK I & HRYNIEWICZ W. 2011. Characterization of transcription within sdr region of Staphylococcus aureus. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 99: 409-416., Trivedi et al. 2017TRIVEDI S, UHLEMANN AC, HERMAN-BAUSIER P, SULLIVAN SB, SOWASH MG, FLORES EY, KHAN SD, DUFRÊNE YF & LOWY FD. 2017. The Surface Protein SdrF Mediates Staphylococcus epidermidis Adherence to Keratin. J Infect Dis 15: 1846-1854.). Similarly, in a previous study, it was found that the role of sdrC in biofilm formation in clinical isolates is dependent on genetic and molecular factors of the strain and this could justify the variation in gene expression in the two strains evaluated (Barbu et al. 2014BARBU EM, MACKENZIE C, FOSTER TJ & HÖÖK M. 2014. SdrC induces staphylococcal biofilm formation through a homophilic interaction. Mol Microbiol 94: 172–185.).

In the S. epidermidis strain ATCC (non-biofilm forming), an increase in the expression of sdrG and its inhibition was found during clinical isolation and in the positive control; this may be caused by negative counter-regulation and virulence factors in the presence of other biofilm inhibitor treatments (Swetha et al. 2019SWETHA TK, POORANACHITHRA M, SUBRAMENIUM GA, DIVYA V, BALAMURUGAN K & PANDIAN SK. 2019. Umbelliferone Impedes Biofilm Formation and Virulence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis via Impairment of Initial Attachment and Intercellular Adhesion. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 18: 357.). In this sense, the DLL37-1 peptide could be postulated as a counter-regulator of this protein that plays a key role in the colonization of implanted biomaterials (Bowden et al. 2008BOWDEN MG, HEUCK AP, PONNURAJ K, KOLOSOVA E, CHOE D, GURUSIDDAPPA S, NARAYANA SVL, JOHNSON AE & HÖÖK M. 2008. Evidence for the “dock, lock, and latch” ligand binding mechanism of the staphylococcal microbial surface component recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM) SdrG. J Biol Chem 4: 638-647.).

Regarding the expression of sdrF, there was a correlation in the three bacterial strains, again showing an increase in the expression of these strains treated with the LL37-1 peptide. Treatment with the LL37-1 peptide showed a general tendency to positively regulate the expression of the genes of the MSCRAMM proteins in S. aureus and S. epidermidis, which could be correlated with bacterial survival mechanisms. In the DLL37-1 peptide, a more counter-regulatory mechanism of these proteins was observed, mainly in clfA and sdrC; however, research is required to understand the genetic and metabolic factors involved in the regulation of these genes in vivo and in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, it was found that 93.5% of clinical isolates presented resistance to at least one antibiotic. A total of 96.8% of S. aureus and 48.4% of S. epidermidis were biofilm formers. LL37-1 and DLL37-1 peptides exhibited biofilm inhibitory activity with inhibition percentages of 58% and 57% in S. epidermidis and S. aureus,

respectively are promising results. The D enantiomer cationic peptide DLL37-1 has great advantages, such as the lowest toxicity against red blood cells and L929 cells at concentrations up to 5 µM and they have no hemolytic effect. Therefore, the DLL-37 enantiomer peptide possibly has higher biological activity, making it a better candidate for the inhibition of biofilm formation and the containment of bacterial resistance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was financed by the Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (Colciencias) and the Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca. Thanks to Teresa Martinez for her support in data analysis.

REFERENCES

  • ARCIOLA CR, CAMPOCCIA D, BALDASSARRI L, DONATI ME, PIRINI V, GAMBERINI S & MONTANARO L. 2006. Detection of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis from implant infections. Comparison of a PCR-method that recognizes the presence of ica genes with two classic phenotypic methods. J Biomed Mater Res A 76: 425-30.
  • ARORA S, UHLEMANN A-C, LOWY FD & HOOK M. 2016. A Novel MSCRAMM Subfamily in Coagulase Negative Staphylococcal Species. Front Microbiol 7: 540.
  • ATSHAN SS ET AL. 2013. Quantitative PCR analysis of genes expressed during biofilm development of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Infect Genet Evol 8:106-112.
  • BARBU EM, MACKENZIE C, FOSTER TJ & HÖÖK M. 2014. SdrC induces staphylococcal biofilm formation through a homophilic interaction. Mol Microbiol 94: 172–185.
  • BARRERO L, RIVERA S & VILLALOBOS A. 2016. Protocolo de vigilancia en salud pública, Infecciones asociadas a dispositivos. Grupo Infecciones Asociadas a la Atención en Salud PRO-R02.046 Versión 01.
  • BEENKEN KE, DUNMAN PM, MCALEESE F, MACAPAGAL D, MURPHY E, PROJAN SJ, BLEVINS JS & SMELTZER MS. 2004. Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol 186: 4665-4684.
  • BETANCOURT M, BOTERO JE & RIVERA S. 2004. Biopelículas: una comunidad microscópica en desarrollo. Colomb Med 35: 34-39.
  • BOWDEN MG, HEUCK AP, PONNURAJ K, KOLOSOVA E, CHOE D, GURUSIDDAPPA S, NARAYANA SVL, JOHNSON AE & HÖÖK M. 2008. Evidence for the “dock, lock, and latch” ligand binding mechanism of the staphylococcal microbial surface component recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM) SdrG. J Biol Chem 4: 638-647.
  • BRAKSTAD OG, AASBAKK K & MAELAND JA. 1992. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction amplification of the nuc gene. J Clin Microbiol 30: 1654-1660.
  • BÜTTNER H, MACK D & ROHDE H. 2015. Structural basis of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation: mechanisms and molecular interactions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 5: 14.
  • CARDILE AP, SANCHEZ CJ JR, SAMBERG ME, ROMANO DR, HARDY SK, WENKE JC, MURRAY CK & AKERS KS. 2014. Human plasma enhances the expression of Staphylococcal microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules promoting biofilm formation and increases antimicrobial tolerance In Vitro. BMC Res Notes 17: 457.
  • CERVANTES-GARCÍA E, GARCÍA-GONZÁLEZ R & SALAZAR-SCHETTINO P. 2014. Características generales del Staphylococcus aureus. Rev Latinoam Patol Clin Med Lab 61: 28-40.
  • CHAGNOT C, LISTRAT A, ASTRUC T & DESVAUX M. 2012. Bacterial adhesion to animal tissues: protein determinants for recognition of extracellular matrix components. Cellular Microbiol 14: 1687-1696.
  • CHOMCZYNSKI P & SACCHI N. 2006. The single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction: twenty-something years on. Nat Protoc 1: 581-585.
  • CHRISTENSEN GD, SIMPSON WA, YOUNGER JJ, BADDOUR LM, BARRETT FF, MELTON DM & BEACHEY EH. 1985. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol 22: 996-1006.
  • CLSI. 2020. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 30th ed., CLSI supplement M100. Wayne, PA. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
  • COSTA GA, ROSSATTO FCP, MEDEIROS AW, CORREA APF, BRANDELLI A, FRAZZON APG & MOTTA ASD. 2018. Evaluation antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of the antimicrobial peptide P34 against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. An Acad Bras Cienc 90: 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201820160131.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201820160131
  • DE LA FUENTE-NÚÑEZ C, CARDOSO MH, DE SOUZA CÂNDIDO E, FRANCO OL & HANCOCK RE. 2016. Synthetic antibiofilm peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta 1858: 1061-1069.
  • DEAN SN, BISHOP BM & VAN HOEK ML. 2011. Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm to alpha-helical peptides: D-enantiomer of LL-37. Front Microbio 2: 128.
  • DEL POZO JL. 2018. Biofilm-related disease. Expert review of anti-infective therapy 16: 51-65.
  • EVANS JJ & BOLZ DD. 2019. Regulation of virulence and antibiotic resistance in Gram-positive microbes in response to cell wall-active antibiotics. Curr Opin Infect Dis 32: 217-222.
  • FREEMAN DJ, FALKINER FR & KEANE CT. 1989. New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. J Clin Pathol 42: 872-874.
  • GALDIERO E, LOMBARDI L, FALANGA A, LIBRALATO G, GUIDA M & CAROTENUTO R. 2019. Biofilms: Novel Strategies Based on Antimicrobial Peptides. Pharmaceutics 11: 322.
  • GREENFIELD N. 2006. Using circular dichroism spectra to estimate protein secondary structure. Nat Protoc 1: 2876-2890.
  • GUZMÁN F, ILLANES A & BARBERIS S. 2007. Peptide synthesis : chemical or enzymatic. Electron J Biotechnol 10: 279-314.
  • HADDAD O, MERGHNI A, ELARGOUBI A, RHIM H, KADRI Y & MASTOURI M. 2018. Comparative study of virulence factors among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. BMC Infect Dis 18: 560.
  • HALL CW & MAH TF. 2017. Molecular mechanisms of biofilm-based antibiotic resistance and tolerance in pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 1: 276-301.
  • HANCOCK RE & SAHL HG. 2006. Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat Biotechnol 24: 1551-1557.
  • HEILMANN C, ZIEBUHR W & BECKER K. 2019. Are coagulase-negative Staphylococci virulent. Clin Microbiol Infect 259: 1071-1080.
  • HELL E, GISKE CG, NELSON A, RÖMLING U & MARCHINI G. 2010. Human cathelicidin peptide LL37 inhibits both attachment capability and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Lett Appl Microbiol 50: 211-215.
  • HILCHIE AL, WUERTH K & HANCOCK RE. 2013. Immune modulation by multifaceted cationic host defense (antimicrobial) peptides. Nat Chem Biol 9: 761-768.
  • JAN-ROBLERO J, GARCÍA-GÓMEZ E, RODRÍGUEZ-MARTÍNEZ S & MARIO E. 2017. Surface Proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. In: Enany S & Alexander LEC (Eds), The Rise of Virulence and Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus<. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/65976.
    » https://doi.org/10.5772/65976
  • JIANG Z, HIGGINS MP, WHITEHURST J, KISICH KO, VOSKUIL MI & HODGES RS. 2011. Anti-tuberculosis activity of α-helical antimicrobial peptides: de novo designed L- and D-enantiomers versus L- and D-LL-37. Protein Pept Lett 18: 241-252.
  • KLUBTHAWEE N, ADISAKWATTANA P, HANPITHAKPONG W, SOMSRI S & AUNPAD R. 2020. A novel, rationally designed, hybrid antimicrobial peptide, inspired by cathelicidin and aurein, exhibits membrane-active mechanisms against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci Rep 10: 9117.
  • LAU SY, TANEJA AK & HODGES RS. 1984. Synthesis of a model protein of defined secondary and quaternary structure. Effect of chain length on the stabilization and formation of two-stranded alpha-helical coiled-coils. J Biol Chem 259: 13253-13261.
  • LEBEAUX D, GHIGO JM & BELOIN C. 2014. Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 78: 510-543.
  • LEE H, KIM K, LEE S, HAN M & YOON Y. 2014. Growth kinetics of Staphylococcus aureus on Brie and Camembert cheeses. J Dairy Res 81: 252-256.
  • LEI J, SUN L, HUANG S, ZHU C, LI P, HE J, MACKEY V, COY DH & HE Q. 2019. The antimicrobial peptides and their potential clinical applications. Am J Transl Res 11: 3919-3931.
  • LIANHUA Y, YUNCHAO H, GUANGQIANG Z, KUN Y, XING L & FENGLI G. 2014. The effect of iatrogenic Staphylococcus epidermidis intercellar adhesion operon on the formation of bacterial biofilm on polyvinyl chloride surfaces. Surg Infect 15: 768-773.
  • MALACHOWA N, KOBAYASHI SD, PORTER AR, BRAUGHTON KR, SCOTT DP, GARDNER D, MISSIAKAS DM, SCHNEEWIND O & DELEO FR. 2016. Contribution of Staphylococcus aureus Coagulases and Clumping Factor A to Abscess Formation in a Rabbit Model of Skin and Soft Tissue Infection. PLoS One 11: e0158293.
  • MÉRIC G ET AL. 2015. Ecological Overlap and Horizontal Gene Transfer in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Genome Biol Evol 7: 1313-1328.
  • MERRIFIELD RB. 1964. Solid-phase peptide synthesis. 3. an improved synthesis of bradykinin. Biochemistry 3: 1385-1390.
  • MISHRA B & WANG G. 2012. Ab initio design of potent anti-MRSA peptides based on database filtering technology. J Am Chem Soc 134: 12426-12429.
  • OSTERSON JW, STEWART PS & GREENBERG EP. 1999. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 21: 1318-1322.
  • OVERHAGE J, CAMPISANO A, BAINS M, TORFS EC, REHM BH & HANCOCK RE. 2008. Human host defense peptide LL-37 prevents bacterial biofilm formation. Infect Immun 76: 4176-4182.
  • PAHARIK AE & HORSWILL AR. 2016. The Staphylococcal Biofilm: Adhesins, Regulation, and Host Response. Microbiol Spectr 4: 10.
  • PATTI JM, ALLEN BL, MCGAVIN MJ & HÖÖK M. 1994. MSCRAMM-Mediated Adherence of Microorganisms to Host Tissues. Annu Rev Microbiol 481: 585-617.
  • PEI L, PALMA M, NILSSON M, GUSS B & FLOCK JI. 1999. Functional studies of a fibrinogen binding protein from Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect Immun 67: 4525-4530.
  • PFAFFL MW. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29: e45.
  • RABIN N, ZHENG Y, OPOKU-TEMENG C, DU Y, BONSU E & SINTIM H. 2015. Agents that inhibit bacterial biofilm formation. Future Med Chem 7: 647-671.
  • SEGEV-ZARKO LA & SHAI Y. 2017. Methods for Investigating Biofilm Inhibition and Degradation by Antimicrobial Peptides. Methods Mol Biol 1548: 309-322.
  • SHARMA D, MISBA L & KHAN AU. 2019. Antibiotics versus biofilm: an emerging battleground in microbial communities. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 8:76.
  • SIM JY, KIM S, LEE J, LIM H, KIM HH, PARK ZY & KIM JI. 2019. A significantly enhanced antibacterial spectrum of D-enantiomeric lipopeptide bactenecin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 514: 497-502.
  • SITKIEWICZ I, BABIAK I & HRYNIEWICZ W. 2011. Characterization of transcription within sdr region of Staphylococcus aureus. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 99: 409-416.
  • SPEZIALE P, PIETROCOLA G, FOSTER T & GEOGHEGAN J. 2014. Protein-based biofilm matrices in Staphylococci. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 1: 171.
  • SWETHA TK, POORANACHITHRA M, SUBRAMENIUM GA, DIVYA V, BALAMURUGAN K & PANDIAN SK. 2019. Umbelliferone Impedes Biofilm Formation and Virulence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis via Impairment of Initial Attachment and Intercellular Adhesion. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 18: 357.
  • TRAVKOVA OG, MOEHWALD H & BREZESINSKI G. 2017. The interaction of antimicrobial peptides with membranes. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 247: 521-532.
  • TRIVEDI S, UHLEMANN AC, HERMAN-BAUSIER P, SULLIVAN SB, SOWASH MG, FLORES EY, KHAN SD, DUFRÊNE YF & LOWY FD. 2017. The Surface Protein SdrF Mediates Staphylococcus epidermidis Adherence to Keratin. J Infect Dis 15: 1846-1854.
  • ULAETO D, MORRIS C, FOX M, GUMBLETON M & BECK K. 2016. Destabilization of α-Helical Structure in Solution Improves Bactericidal Activity of Antimicrobial Peptides: Opposite Effects on Bacterial and Viral Targets. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60: 1984-1991.
  • VENKATESAN N, PERUMAL G & DOBLE M. 2015. Bacterial resistance in biofilm-associated bacteria. Future Microbiol 5: 1743-1750.
  • VESTERGAARD M, FREES D & INGMER H. 2019. Antibiotic Resistance and the MRSA Problem. Microbiology Spectrum 7: 1-23.
  • WANG D, SHEN Y, MA J, HANCOCK R & HAAPASALO M. 2017. Antibiofilm Effect of D-enantiomeric Peptide Alone and Combined with EDTA In Vitro. J Endodont 43: 1862-1867.
  • WANG FD, WU PF & CHEN SJ. 2019. Distribution of virulence genes in bacteremic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from various sources. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 52: 426-432.
  • WERTHEIM HF, MELLES DC, VOS MC, VAN LEEUWEN W, VAN BELKUM A, VERBRUGH HA & NOUWEN JL. 2005. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis 5: 751-762.
  • WOLZ C, GOERKE C, LANDMANN R, ZIMMERLI W & FLUCKIGER U. 2002. Transcription of clumping factor A in attached and unattached Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and during device-related infection. Infect Immun 70: 2758-2762.
  • WU F & TAN C. 2019. Dead bacterial absorption of antimicrobial peptides underlies collective tolerance. J Royal Soc Interface 16: 20180701.
  • YATES GT & SMOTZER T. 2007. On the lag phase and initial decline of microbial growth curves. J Theor Biol 244: 511-517.
  • YESWANTH S, CHAUDHURY A & SARMA P. 2017. Quantitative Expression Analysis of SpA, FnbA and Rsp Genes in Staphylococcus aureus: Actively Associated in the Formation of Biofilms. Curr Microbiol 74: 1394-1403.
  • ZAKRZEWSKA-CZERWIŃSKA J, GASZEWSKA-MASTALARZ A, PULVERER G, & MORDARSKI M. 1992. Identification of Staphylococcus epidermidis using a 16S rRNA-directed oligonucleotide probe. FEMS Microbiol Lett 100: 51-58.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    21 Nov 2022
  • Date of issue
    2022

History

  • Received
    15 June 2021
  • Accepted
    8 Nov 2021
Academia Brasileira de Ciências Rua Anfilófio de Carvalho, 29, 3º andar, 20030-060 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil, Tel: +55 21 3907-8100 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: aabc@abc.org.br