본 연구는 한국의 비정규직 고용과 건강의 연관성을 다룬 기존 논문을 체계적으로 정리하고 향후 연구방향을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 국내외 웹 기반 학술데이터베이스를 활용해 비정규직 고용과 건강의 연관성을 검토한 문헌을 검색하여 2014년 12월 31일까지 출판된 학술논문 37편을 검토하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 관련하여 총 37편의 논문이 출판되었으며 모두 양적 연구였고, 가장 많이 이용된 데이터는 한국노동패널(N=9)이었다. 둘째, 건강변수는 정신건강(N=17)과 자가평가건강수준(N=13)에 집중되어 있었다. 셋째, 전체 37편 중 31편의 연구에서 인구학적 혹은 사회경제적 정보를 잠재적 교란인자로 통제하여 다변량분석을 진행했다. 넷째, 전체 37편 중 35편의 연구결과에서 정규직보다 비정규직의 건강이 유의미하게 나빴음을 보여주었다. 이에 기반하여, 향후 연구는 다음과 같은 고려가 필요하다. 비정규직을 정의하고 범주화하는 구체적, 현실적 기준이 제시되어야 한다. 행정데이터나 의료기록 등의 자료를 활용하여 보다 다양한 건강관련 변수를 고려하고, 고용형태와 건강과의 연관성 분석에서 교란인자와 매개인자를 구분해서 분석해야 한다. 나아가, 고용형태와 건강에 대한 질적 연구나 정책적 개입 연구, 성별, 종사산업별, 연령별 차이에 주목한 연구가 필요하다.
The goal of this study is to systematically review the academic literature on the association between non-standard employment and health in South Korea. We searched online academic databases to find relevant papers in domestic and international journal by 31 December 2014 and this study reviewed a total of 37 articles. The followings are the findings of this study. First, all 37 studies have adopted quantitative methods and the most frequently used dataset was the Korean Labor & Income Panel Study (N=9). Second, the studies focused mainly on mental health (N=17) or self-rated health (N=13). Third, 31 studies controlled demographic or socio-economic indicators as potential confounders. Fourth, 35 studies reported that non-standard workers had poorer health compared to standard workers. This study suggests recommendations for future research. First, it is necessary to define non-standard employment with concrete criteria, reflecting labor market conditions in Korean society. Second, various health outcome should be examined using administrative data and medical records. Third, it is important to take account of relevant confounders in the data analysis. Finally, future research needs to consider how the health effect of non-standard employment could differ by worker’s gender, age, and industry division.
The goal of this study is to systematically review the academic literature on the association between non-standard employment and health in South Korea. We searched online academic databases to find relevant papers in domestic and international journal by 31 December 2014 and this study reviewed a total of 37 articles. The followings are the findings of this study. First, all 37 studies have adopted quantitative methods and the most frequently used dataset was the Korean Labor & Income Panel Study (N=9). Second, the studies focused mainly on mental health (N=17) or self-rated health (N=13). Third, 31 studies controlled demographic or socio-economic indicators as potential confounders. Fourth, 35 studies reported that non-standard workers had poorer health compared to standard workers. This study suggests recommendations for future research. First, it is necessary to define non-standard employment with concrete criteria, reflecting labor market conditions in Korean society. Second, various health outcome should be examined using administrative data and medical records. Third, it is important to take account of relevant confounders in the data analysis. Finally, future research needs to consider how the health effect of non-standard employment could differ by worker’s gender, age, and industry division.
