Legal bases status quo children who were unafficiently carried out of Ukraine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.207873

Keywords:

rights of a child, illegal export of a child, principle of ensuring the best interests of a child, mechanism for the return of children

Abstract

The article is devoted to analysis of international law and norms of the operating civil legislation of Ukraine, which regulates the order of removal of a child from the country of permanent residence. The content of the principle of the best interests of a child identified a number of issues, which in practice can lead to the adoption of unreasonable decisions to return a child from abroad.

Separately stated that the child should grow up in conditions of care and responsible parenting in an atmosphere of love, moral and material security; juvenile children, except when there are exceptional circumstances, should not part with their parents.

The article analyzes the issues that arise, when the court is considering the cases of "the return of the children", when some courts mistakenly determine the jurisdiction of the following categories of cases, not paying attention to the fact that the court may consider the case both at the location of the defendant and the child, and at the location of the Ministry or its territorial bodies (alternative jurisdiction).

The attention is paid to the fact that an important issue in the consideration of this category of cases about the return of a child is too long, in accordance with international law. These things are subject to quick consideration, in practice, there is a violation of the reasonable time of proceedings.

Ukraine became party to the Convention on the civil aspects of international child abduction, has made a commitment to take all necessary measures to join the international cooperation mechanism that allows to solve questions of the organization in an orderly and rapid return of illegally removed or retained children, who have suffered from the consequences of wrongful conduct of one of parents or other family members, actions, which violated the rights of parents regarding child care, because the immediate return of the child allows to protect his\her rights and to prevent the infliction of moral harm and suffering

Author Biographies

Olena Dashkovska, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University Pushkinska str., 77, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61024

Doctor of Law, Professor

Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law

Olha Yavor, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University Pushkinska str., 77, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61024

Doctor of Law, Professor

Department of Civil Law No. 2

References

  1. Konvencіia pro civіlno-pravovі aspekti mіzhnarodnogo vikradennia dіtei. 25.10.1980 (1980). Available at: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_188
  2. Stefanchuk, M. O. (2017). Zakhyst subiektyvnykh tsyvilnykh prav ditei v umovakh zbroinykh konfliktiv cherez pryzmu adaptatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy do standartiv YeS (problemy priorytetiv ta terminolohii). Naukovyi visnyk UzhNU. Seriia «Pravo», 1 (45), 101–105.
  3. Maksymovych, L. B. (2005). O prave rebenka virazhat svoe mnenye. Problemi hrazhdanskoho, semeinoho y zhylyshchnoho zakonodatelstva. Moscow: Horodets, 58–70.
  4. Tripulskyi, H. Ya. (2007). Protsesualni osoblyvosti rozghliadu sporiv, yaki zviazani z vynyknenniam, zdiisnenniam ta zminoiu osobystykh nemainovykh pravovidnosyn mizh batkamy ta ditmy. Odessa, 227.
  5. Valuieva, N. O., Kravchuk, M. O., Poliakova, K. A. (2015). Pytannia vrakhuvannia dumky dytyny pid chas vyrishennia pytan, shcho stosuiutsia yii zhyttia. Visnyk AMSU. Seriia:“Pravo”, 1 (14), 91–94.
  6. Krasytska, L. V. (2011). Pravo dytyny vilno vyslovliuvaty vlasni pohliady ta dumky z usikh pytan, shcho yii stosuiutsia. Universytetski naukovi zapysky, 4, 80–86.
  7. Krestovska, N. M. (2014). Prava dytyny pid chas zbroinoho konfliktu: suchasni ukrainski realii. Derzhavnyi suverenitet, natsionalna bezpeka i svitovyi pravoporiadok v istoryko-pravovomu vymiri. Berehove, 150–157.
  8. Fakultatyvnyi protokol do Konventsii pro prava dytyny shchodo uchasti ditei u zbroinykh konfliktakh: Ratyfikovano iz zaiavoiu Zakonom No. 1845-IV vid 23.06.2004 (2004). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, 38, 476.
  9. Yavor, O. A. (2004). Do problemy osobystykh nemainovykh prav dytyny. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho instytutu rehionalnoho upravlinnia ta prava, 4, 68–74.
  10. Pohribnyi, S. O. (2009). Mekhanizm ta pryntsypy rehuliuvannia dohovirnykh vidnosyn u tsyvilnomu pravi Ukrainy. Kyiv, 412.
  11. Zavhorodnii, V. A., Pshenychna, H. Ye. (2013). Konstytutsiinyi oboviazok batkiv utrymuvaty ditei do yikh povnolittia: stan naukovykh doslidzhen. Pravo i suspilstvo, 6, 20–23.
  12. Kohm, L. M. (2008). Tracing the Foundations of the Best Interest of the Child Standard in American Jurisprudence. Journal of Law and Family Studies, 10 (2), 40. doi: http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1957143
  13. Volynka, K. H. (2000). Zabezpechennia prav i svobod osoby v Ukraini: teoretychni i praktychni aspekty. Pravo Ukrainy, 11, 30–33.
  14. Deklaratsiia prav dytyny Pryiniata rezoliutsiieiu 1386 (XIV) Heneralnoi Asamblei OON. 20.11.1959 (1959). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_384#Text
  15. Konventsiia OON pro prava dytyny. 20.11.1989 (1998). Available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_021/print
  16. Yevtushenko, O. (2015). Spirni pytannia vyvezennia abo povernennia ditei maiut vyrishuvatysia lyshe u pravovomu poli. Yurydychna hazeta, 10-11 (456-457). Available at: https://yur-gazeta.com/interview/spirni-pitannya-vivezennya-abo-povernennya-ditey-mayut-virishuvatisya-lishe-u-pravovomu-poli.html
  17. Mizhnarodna konventsiia pro zakhyst usikh osib vid nasylnytskykh znyknen. Shchodo pryiednannia do Konventsii iz zaiavamy dyv: Zakon No. 525-VIII. 17.06.2015. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_l54#Text
  18. Pro okhoronu dytynstva (2001). Zakon Ukrainy No. 2402-III. 26.04.2001. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR), 30, 142. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2402-14#Text
  19. Pavlenko, Yu. (2013). Z bezpravnoho ne vyroste vilnyi. Narodnii Deputat, 93. Available at: http://nardep-journal.com/article/2013/93/Uriy-Pavlenko-Z-BEZPRAVNOGO-NE-VIROSTE-VILNIY
  20. Zaichuk, O. V. et. al.; Zaichuk, O. V., Onishchenko, N. M. (Eds.) (2008). Teoriia derzhavy i prava. Akademichnyi kurs. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter, 688.
  21. Konventsiia pro likvidatsiiu vsikh form dyskryminatsii shchodo zhinok 1979 r. (2014). Osnovni mizhnarodni dohovory z prav liudyny. New York, Zheneva: Orhanizatsiia Obiednanykh Natsii, 107–114. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_207#Text
  22. Kabanov, V. L. (2019). Realizaciia principa nailuchshego obespecheniia interesov rebenka v mezhdunarodnom prave. Moscow, 407.
  23. Zastosuvannia konventsii pro tsyvilno-pravovi aspekty mizhnarodnoho vykradennia ditei. Available at: https://minjust.gov.ua/m/str_28838
  24. Informatsiinyi lyst. Vyshchyi spetsializovanyi sud Ukrainy z rozghliadu tsyvilnykh i kryminalnykh sprav. Pro praktyku rozghliadu sudamy tsyvilnykh sprav iz zastosuvanniam Konventsii pro tsyvilno-pravovi aspekty mizhnarodnoho vykradennia ditei 25.10.1980 (Haazka konventsiia). Available at: https://zib.com.ua/ua/113728-vssu_uzagalniv_praktiku_schodo_konvencii_pro_vikradennya_dit.html
  25. Kabanov, V. L. (2016). Realizaciia obschepriznannogo mezhdunarodnopravovogo principa, obespechivaiuschego nailuchshie interesy rebenka: universalnye i regionalnye aspekty. Moscow: RUDN, 227.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-30

How to Cite

Dashkovska, O., & Yavor, O. (2020). Legal bases status quo children who were unafficiently carried out of Ukraine. ScienceRise: Juridical Science, (1 (11), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.15587/2523-4153.2020.207873

Issue

No. 1 (11) (2020)

Section

Juridical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Olena Dashkovska, Olha Yavor

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.