An algorithm for building a project team considering interpersonal relations of employees

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.85222

Keywords:

project team, sociometric matrix, sociometric indices, group interaction, interpersonal relations in team

Abstract

The setting of the problem of building a project team considering interpersonal relations between the employees was formulated.

While selecting an employee to a project team, it is proposed to consider his contribution to inter-group interaction, which is determined on the basis of the number of choices and rejections, given and obtained by each candidate in the process of sociometric survey.

We proposed improvement of the procedure of sociometric survey, which allows taking into consideration the degree of preference (rejection) of each other by the individuals while filling in sociometric cards and when calculating individual sociometric indices, which makes it possible to decrease the uncertainty during selection of candidates to a project team.

The algorithm of solution of the problem of building a project team by the criterion of the maximum total contribution of employees to group interaction was developed, in which ranking procedure of sociometric survey was used.

It is expedient to build a project team by the criterion of maximum total contribution of employees to group interaction in the case, when each candidate can perform only one role in the project. If employees of a company can perform different roles in the project, the proposed criterion of individual contribution of employees to group interaction can be used as a particular criterion in the overall model of multifactor evaluation of candidates to a project team. 

Author Biographies

Zulfiya Imangulova, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics Nauky ave., 14, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of System Engineering

Liudmyla Kolesnyk, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics Nauky ave., 14, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of System Engineering

References

  1. Aldefer, C. P.; Lorsch, J. W. (Ed.) (1987). An intergroup perspective on group dynamics. Handbook of organizational behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 190–222.
  2. Guzzo, R. A., Shea, G. P.; Dunnette, M. D., Hough, L. M. (Eds.) (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3rd ed. Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto, 269–313.
  3. Baiden, B. K., Price, A. D. F. (2011). The effect of integration on project delivery team effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management, 29 (2), 129–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.016
  4. Chansler, P. A., Swamidass, P. M., Cammann, C. (2003). Self-Managing Work Teams: An Empirical Study of Group Cohesiveness in “Natural Work Groups” at a Harley-Davidson Motor Company Plant. Small Group Research, 34 (1), 101–120. doi: 10.1177/1046496402239579
  5. Maurer, I. (2010). How to build trust in inter-organizational projects: The impact of project staffing and project rewards on the formation of trust, knowledge acquisition and product innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 28 (7), 629–637. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.006
  6. Hoegl, M., Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence. Organization Science, 12 (4), 435–449. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635
  7. Andrews, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Blakely, G. L., Bucklew, N. S. (2008). Group Cohesion as an Enhancement to the Justice--Affective Commitment Relationship. Group & Organization Management, 33 (6), 736–755. doi: 10.1177/1059601108326797
  8. Weiss, J. W. (2001). Project management process in early stage E-businesses: strategies for leading and managing teams. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. doi: 10.1109/hicss.2001.927158
  9. Levin, S. V., Petrik, А. А. (2011). Teoretiko-igrovoy podhod k resheniyu mnogokriterialnoy zadachi o naznacheniyah. Otkrytye informatsionnye i kompyuternye integrirovannye tehnologii, 50, 103–110.
  10. Sabadosh, L. Yu., Dotsenko, N. V., Chumachenko, I. V. (2013). Metod formirovaniya multiproektnyh komand. Systemy obrobky informatsiyi, 2 (109), 290–293.
  11. Fitzpatrick, E. L., Askin, R. G. (2005). Forming effective worker teams with multi-functional skill requirements. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 48 (3), 593–608. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2004.12.014
  12. Hlaoittinun, O., Bonjour, E., Dulmet, M. (2007). A team building approach for competency development. 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. doi: 10.1109/ieem.2007.4419343
  13. Tseng, T.-L., Huang, C.-C., Chu, H.-W., Gung, R. R. (2004). Novel approach to multi-functional project team formation. International Journal of Project Management, 22 (2), 147–159. doi: 10.1016/s0263-7863(03)00058-9
  14. Moreno, J. L. (2001). Sotsiometriya: Ehxperimentalnyj metod i nauka ob obschestve. Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt, 383.
  15. Yadov, V. A. (2003). Strategiya sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniya. Moscow: Akademkniga, Dobrosvet, 596.
  16. Asquin, A., Garel, G., Picq, T. (2010). When project-based management causes distress at work. International Journal of Project Management, 28 (2), 166–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.08.006
  17. Kolominskij, Ja. L. (2000). Psihologija vzaimootnoshenij v malyikh gruppakh (obshhie i vozrastnye osobennosti). Minsk: TetraSistems, 432.
  18. Volkov, I. P. (2002). Sociometricheskie metody v vsotsyalno-psihologichescih issledovanijakh. SPb.: SPbHU, 350.
  19. Marcovscaja, I. M. (1999). Sociometrichescie metody v psikhologii. Cheliabynsk: YuUrHU, 46.
  20. Saati, T. L. (1989). Prinjatie reshenij. Metod analiza ierarkhij. Moscow: Radio i svjaz, 316.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-19

How to Cite

Imangulova, Z., & Kolesnyk, L. (2016). An algorithm for building a project team considering interpersonal relations of employees. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(3 (84), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.85222

Issue

Section

Control processes