Abstract
Fabrication of high performance III–V devices and integrated circuits depends on careful control of layer thicknesses and compositions in the as-grown epitaxial layers and in the etching of these layers. The relatively high value of compound semiconductor devices (compared with high-volume Si devices) makes the use of advanced process control (with expensive in situ sensors) potentially advantageous. Considerable attention has been given to the problems of realtime feedback control of MBE growth systems. In this paper, I will discuss experiences with use of both in situ and ex situ monitors for controlling reactive ion etching (RIE) of III–V materials. Specific examples from an electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) RIE base contact etch from an AlInAs/GalnAs HBT process will be given. The relative merits of reflection-based wafer sensors vs. process state sensors (optical emission spectroscopy and mass spectroscopy) will be discussed. The unique opportunities and problems associated with the III–V materials and required etch processes will be contrasted to implementation of advanced wafer state endpoint detection schemes in Si and flat panel display processes. Specific problems and solutions from our research which I will discuss include chamber seasoning effects on the drift of optical emission based endpoint detection schemes and signal processing techniques for accounting for this drift, modeling of the optical dielectric function of the compounds of interest vs. composition, and the effects of surface roughness on optical thickness measurements.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. E. Aspnes, W. E. Quinn, M. C. Tamargo, M. A. A. Pudensi, S. A. Schwarz, M. J. S. P. Brasil, R. E. Nahory, S. Gregory, Appl. Phys. Lett., 60, pp. 1244–6 (1992)
G. N. Maracas, C. H. Kuo, S. Anand-S, R. Droopad, G. R. L. Sohie, T. Levola J Vac. Sci. Techn, A13 pp 727–32 (1995)
F. G. Celli, Y. C. Kao, T. S. Moise, M. Woolsey, T. B. Harton, K. Haberman, Diagnostic Techniques for Semiconductor Materials Processing, Mater. Res. Soc, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; xv+585 pp 365–70 (1996).
J. D. Benson, A. B. Cornfeld, M. Martinka, K. M. Singley, Z. Derzko, P. J. Shorten, J. H. Dinan, P. R. Boyd, F. C. Wolfgram, B. Johs, P. He, J.A. Woollam, J. Electron. Mat. 25, pp. 1406–10 (1996)
C. Pickering, R. T. Carline, D. A. O. Hope, D. J. Robbins, Physica Status Solidi, A152; pp.95–102 1995)
M. Hafizi, W. E. Stanchina, R. A. Metzger, J. F. Jensen, F. Williams, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 40, pp.2178–85 (1993).
S. Thomas III., Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, 1997, and references therein.
S. Thomas III, H. H. Chen, C. K. Hanish, J. W. Grizzle, S. W. Pang, J. Vac. Sci. Techn.. B14, pp.2531–6 (1996).
D. L. Delville, J Budinavicius, D. A. Thompson, J. G. Simmons, Nuclear Instruments Methodsin Physics Research, -B106; pp. 179–82 (1995)
C. K. Hanish, J. W. Grizzle, H. H. Chen, L. I. Karnlet, S. Thomas III, F. L. Terry Jr, and S. W. Pang, J. Electron. Mat., 26, pp. 1401–8 (1997).
T. L. Vincent, P. P. Khargonekar, and F. L. Terry Jr., SID/IEEE International Display Research Conference Digest, Toronto, Canada, September 15–19, 1997, pp. 274–7 (1997).
L. I. Kamlet and F. L. Terry, Jr., Thin SolidFilms, 313–4, pp. 435–441 (1998).
T. E. Benson, A. Ramamoorthy, L. I. Kamlet, and F. L. Terry, Jr., Thin Solid Films, 313–4, pp. 177–182 (1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Terry, F.L. In Situ Monitoring of III–V Processing. MRS Online Proceedings Library 535, 189–200 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-535-189
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-535-189