Skip to main content
Log in

Filament Fragmentation Phenomena

  • Articles
  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

The effect of fiber surface treatments on the relationship between the tensile strength of a filament and the shear strength of its interphase is one of the central issues facing composite materials technologists today. We demonstrate here that analysis of fragmentation phenomena in monofilament composites can simultaneously yield information about these two parameters. Characterization of shear stress transfer zones in non-critical fragments has led us to the determination of interphase strength.

A phenomenological treatment that highlights the role of the matrix in the fragmentation process is presented here. This analysis considers issues such as the strain energy exchange between a failing fiber and the matrix, as well as interphase relaxation due to the viscoelastic nature of the matrix. Our observations of the fragmentation phenomena in AU4/polycarbonate monofilament composites indicate that the fiber/matrix interaction in this system is governed by micromechanical locking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Narkis, E. J. H. Chcn, R. B. Pipcs, Polymer Composites, 9, 245 (1988), and references cited herein.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Wu, Polymer Interface and Adhesion, Marcel Decker (1982)

  3. L. S. Schadler, J. C. Figueroa, C. Laird, B. T. Ma, paper presented at the 1989 Advanced Materials Conference, Golden, Colorado, March 1989 (in press).

  4. N. Ikuta, Z. Maekawa, H. Hamada, S. Yoshioka, E. Nishio, T. Hirashima in Interfaces in Polymer, Ceramic, and Metal Matrix Composites, edited by H. Ishida (Proc. 3rd International Conference on Composite Interfaces, 1988) pp. 611.

  5. L. T. Drzal, Adv. Polym, Sci., 75, 1 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W. D. Bascom, R. M. Jensen, J. Adhesion, 19, 219 (1986)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Dilandro, A. T. Dibenedetto, J. Groeger, Polymer Composites, 9(3), 209 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. N. Netravali, R. B. Hensterburg, S. L. Phoenix, P. Schwartz, Polymer Composites, 10(4). 226 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Donnet, S. Dong, G. Guilpain, M. Brandle in Interfaces in Polvmer. Ceramic, and Metal Matrix Composites, edited by H. Ishida (Proc. 3rd International Conference on Composite Interfaces, 1988) pp. 35.

  10. L. T. Drzal, M. J. Rich, P. F. Lloyd, J. Adhesion, 16, 1 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Ohsawa, A. Nakayama, M. Miwa, A. Hasegawa, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 22, 3203 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. EI. M. Asloun, M. Nardin, J. Schultz, J. Materials Sci., 24, 1835 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Figueroa, J.C., Schadler, L.S. & Laird, C. Filament Fragmentation Phenomena. MRS Online Proceedings Library 170, 65–70 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-170-65

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-170-65

Navigation