Skip to main content
Log in

Why does Hydrogen Loss Rate Correlate with How Strongly Hydrogen Inhibits Ion Beam Mixing?

  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the presence of hydrogen in multilayer samples containing Ti reduces ion beam mixing rates. The present study sought to determine why the magnitude of this effect depends on which metal is mixed into Ti and why it is correlated to the rate at which hydrogen leaves the sample during mixing. Hydrogen loss rates of multilayers were compared with those of bilayer samples designed to minimize the effect of mixing. For bilayers, hydrogen loss rates were smaller and did not depend on which metal was mixed into Ti in the same way that multilayer loss rates do. This suggests that hydrogen leaves the multilayer samples because it is bound less strongly in the mixed regions than in the Ti. The primary cause of hydrogen loss is mixing rather than ion beam induced desorption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Børgesen, R. E. Wistrom, H. H. Johnson, and D. A. Lillenfeld: J. Mater. Res. 4, 821 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. E. Wistrom, P. Børgesen, H. H. Johnson, and D. A. Lillenfeld: in Processing and Characterization of Materials Using Ion Beams, edited by L. E. Rehn, J. E. Greene, and F. A. Smid ( Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 128, Pittsburgh, Pa 1989) pp. 219–224.

  3. P. Børgesen, R. E. Wistrom, T. L. Alford, H. H. Johnson, and D. A. Lillenfeld:, Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B43, 165 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Børgesen, D. A. Lillenfeld, R. E. Wistrom: to be published.

  5. J. -P. Hirvonen, M. A. Elve, J. W. Mayer, and H. H. Johnson, Mater. Sci. and Eng. 90, 13 0987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. W. L. Johnson, Y. T. Cheng, M. Van Rossum, and M.-A. Nicolet, Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B7/B8, 657 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. J. Reilly, Z. Phys. Chem. NF 117, 155 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. B. L. Doyle and P. S. Peercy: Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 811 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Behrisch (ed.), Sputtering by Particle Bombardment I. Topics in Applied Physics, vol. 47, (Springer Verlag,1981).

  10. O. Becker, W. Knippelberg, and K. Wien, Physica Scripta T6, 117 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Schluckebier, Th. Pfeiffer, K. Muskalla, W. Schmulling, and D. Kamke, Appl. Phys. A 42, 19 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Schluckebier, Th. Pfeiffer, K. Muskalla, W. Schmulling, and D. Kamke, Appl. Phys. A 42, 179 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wistrom, R.E., Borgesen, P. Why does Hydrogen Loss Rate Correlate with How Strongly Hydrogen Inhibits Ion Beam Mixing?. MRS Online Proceedings Library 157, 209–214 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-157-209

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-157-209

Navigation