Abstract
Bone is an anisotropic material, and its mechanical properties are determined by its microstructure as well as its composition. Mechanical properties of bone are a consequence of the proportions of, and the interactions between, mineral, collagen and water. Water plays an important role in maintaining the mechanical integrity of the composite, but the manner in which water interacts within the ultrastructure is unclear. Dentine being an isotropic two-dimensional structure presents a homogenous composite to examine the dehydration effects. Nanoindentation methods for determining the viscoelastic properties have recently been developed and are a subject of great interest. Here, one method based on elastic-viscoelastic correspondence for ‘ramp and hold’ creep testing (Oyen, J. Mater. Res., 2005) has been used to analyze viscoelastic behavior of polymeric and biological materials. The method of ‘ramp and hold’ allows the shear modulus at time zero to be determined from fitting of the displacement during the maximum load hold. Changes in the viscoelastic properties of bone and dentine were examined as the material was systematically dehydrated in a series of water:solvent mixes. Samples of equine dentine were sectioned and cryo-polished. Shear modulus was obtained by nanoindentation using spherical indenters with a maximum load hold of 120s. Samples were tested in different solvent concentrations sequentially, 70% ethanol to 50% ethanol, 70 % ethanol to 100% ethanol, 70% ethanol to 70% methanol to 100% methanol, and 70% ethanol to 100% acetone, after storage in each condition for 24h. By selectively removing and then replacing water from the composite, insights in to the ultrastructure of the tissue can be gained from the corresponding changes in the experimentally determined moduli, as well as an understanding of the complete reversibility of the dehydration process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K.L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (1985).
W.C. Oliver and G.M. Pharr, J Mater Res 7:1564 (1992).
M.L. Oyen and R.F. Cook. J Mater Res, 18:139 (2003).
M.L. Oyen, J Mater Res, 20(8):2094 (2005).
B.J. Briscoe, L. Fiori, and E. Pelillo, J Phys D: Appl. Phys. 31:2395 (1998).
Cheng L, Xia X, Yu W, Scriven LE, Gerberich WW. Mech of Mater 37:213 (2005).
E.H. Lee and J.R.M. Radok, Journal of Applied Mechanics 27:438 (1960).
Bushby AJ, VL Ferguson and A Boyde. J Mater Res, 19(1):249 (2004).
Pashley DH, KA Agee, RM Carvalho, K-W Lee, FR Tay and TE Callison. Dent Mat, 19:347 (2003).
Nalla RK, M Balooch, JW Ager, JJ Kruzic, JH Kinney and RO Ritchie. Acta Biomateriala. 1:31 (2005).
Bembey AK, V Koonjul, AJ Bushby, VL Ferguson and A Boyde. MRS Proc. 841, R2.7.1–6 (2005).
Linde F and HCF Sovensen. J Biomech. 26(10):1249 (1993).
Boyde A and E Maconnachie. Scanning. 2:149 (1979).
Tooze J. J Cell Biol. 22:551 (1964).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bembey, A., Oyen, M., Bushby, A. et al. Nanoindentation Measurements of Bone Viscoelasticity as a Function of Hydration State. MRS Online Proceedings Library 898, 704 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0898-L07-04
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0898-L07-04