Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between nanohardness and microstructures in high-purity Fe–C as-quenched and quench-tempered martensite

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between the nanohardness and the microstructures in the Fe–C martensite was studied to understand the contributions of the matrix and the grain boundary to the macroscopic strength. As-quenched martensite was examined for five kinds of Fe–C alloys with various carbon contents in the range of 0.1–0.8 mass%, while quench-tempered martensite was investigated for an Fe–0.4% C alloy. The ratio of the nanohardness to the macrohardness H n/H v was much smaller for the Fe–C martensite than those for the single crystals, indicating that there is a significant grain-boundary effect for the martensite. The ratio H n/H v of the as-quenched martensite decreased with an increase in the carbon content since the size of the block structure decreased with increasing carbon content. For the quench-tempered specimens, a significant reduction of the grain-boundary effect occured at the tempering temperature of 723 K. It is mainly due to the depression of the locking parameter caused by the disappearance of the film-like carbides on the boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W.C. Leslie and R.J. Sober, Trans. ASM 60, 459 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. L-A. Norstrom, Scand. J. Metall. 5, 159 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. F.B. Pickering, Hardenability Concepts with Applications to Steel (AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1978), p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Krauss, Hardenability Concepts with Applications to Steel (AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1978), p. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Krauss, Mater. Sci. Eng. A273-275, 40 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A.R. Marder and G. Krauss, Trans. ASM 60, 651 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J.M. Marder and A.R. Marder, Trans. ASM 62, 1 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A.R. Marder and G. Krauss, Trans. ASM 62, 957 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Maki, K. Tsuzaki, and I. Tamura, Trans ISIJ 20, 207 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Ohmura, K. Tsuzaki, and S. Matsuoka, Scripta Mater. 45, 889 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Ohmura, K. Tsuzaki, and S. Matsuoka, Philos. Mag. A 82, 1903 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. W.C. Oliver and G.M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Dörnen and W. Hofman, Arch. Eisenhütt 30, 627 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Itokazu and Y. Murakami, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. A 59, 2560 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Miyahara, S. Matsuoka, and T. Hayashi, Metall. Mater. Trans. 32A, 761 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. R.N. Caron and G. Krauss, Metall. Trans. 3, 2381 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohmura, T., Hara, T. & Tsuzaki, K. Relationship between nanohardness and microstructures in high-purity Fe–C as-quenched and quench-tempered martensite. Journal of Materials Research 18, 1465–1470 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2003.0201

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2003.0201

Navigation