메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터

주제분류

정기구독(개인)

소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.

회원혜택

로그인 회원이 가져갈 수 있는 혜택들을 확인하고 이용하세요.

아카루트

학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.

영문교정

영문 논문 작성에 도움을 드리기 위해, 영문 교정 서비스를
지원하고 있어요.

고객센터 제휴문의

...

저널정보

저자정보

표지
이용수
내서재
4
내서재에 추가
되었습니다.
내서재에서
삭제되었습니다.

내서재에 추가
되었습니다.
내서재에서
삭제되었습니다.

초록·키워드

오류제보하기
Under the United Nations Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), ‘climate finance’ and ‘climate technology’ are two important issues in terms of the support provided to developing countries. The Financial Mechanism was established in 1992 to provide financial resources, including for the transfer of technology, to developing countries for climate change response, and there are two operating entities, the Global Environment Facility (GEF) from 1992 and the Green Climate Fund (GCF) from 2010. To facilitate technology development and transfer support, the Technology Mechanism was established in 2010, and it consists of the Technology Executive Committee (TEC) as a policy arm and the Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) as an implementing arm. Based on these organizational developments, there has been greater recognition of the overlap between the Technology Mechanism and the Financial Mechanism in terms of technology support to developing countries. This has led to agenda-setting on the ‘linkage’ between the two Mechanisms in 2015. Since then, various cooperative activities have been discussed and undertaken amongst the TEC, the CTCN, GCF, and GEF. Particularly, the CTCN, which provides technical assistance to developing countries, has collaborated with the GCF and the GEF in technology support. However, there has been a considerable contestation between developed and developing countries over the degree of linkage between the CTCN and the GEF and GCF. From this context, this paper attempts to analyze the current status of linkage of the CTCN with the GCF and the GEF on the grounds of policy integration theory. Focusing on substantive and procedural policy instruments that constitute one of the dimensions of the policy integration approach, this paper utilizes the consistency of policy instruments as an indicator of the extent of policy integration. For analytical targets, i) the CTCN’s Technical Assistance program, ii) the GCF’s Readiness and Preparatory Support Program, and iii) the GEF’s Global Project of the Poznan Strategic Program for Technology Transfer are selected. For each program, this paper examines how these programs are procedurally and substantively integrated under the three aspects of i) technology support procedures, ii) project proposal submission requirements, and iii) project selection criteria. The results suggest that a considerable level of procedural integration has been attained. However, from the substantive aspect, there are still inconsistencies among the CTCN and the GEF and GCF due to different approaches to financing. This paper concludes with policy suggestions on substantive adjustments of the CTCN’s technical assistance program to be better harmonized with the programs of the GCF and the GEF.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 배경
3. 이론 및 분석틀
4. 분석
5. 결론
References

참고문헌 (64)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0