Medvedeva Anzhelica

Analysis of Evaluation of Scientific Institutions in Ukraine

Abstract: Intensive development of the information society and increase of public demand for qualitative information have caused the growth of general public interest in the problems of defining the criteria of scientific research. The question of improving the efficiency of domestic science, developing clear criteria for evaluating its activities, until a comprehensive reform of the entire system, including funding mechanisms, methods and management structure of industrial relations all acutely raises. It concerns both fundamental and applied science. In this regard, there is interest in the issue of benchmarks and indicators used to measure the effectiveness of the scientists. A special part of the research describes a result, consistency is checked novelty, which is the main criterion of effectiveness research. Library institutions in Ukraine have experienced bibliometric monitoring of documentary communications, surveillance training, and analytical materials on the situation of scientific environment, but it is the lack of theoretical and methodological researches aimed at creating a system of scientific and analytical support of research evaluation and prediction of science development. The introduction of new information technologies was made possible by full-text electronic library facilities resources, significant computing power, developing specialized software for mathematical and statistical methods for information analysis. Complementary set of information, library, bibliographic and scientometric studies plays an important role for quantitative detection of patterns in bibliographic and processes of scientific communication aimed to optimize scientific and information sphere of modern society.

Keywords: bibliometric; bibliometric indicators; library institutions; scientometrics; scientometric evaluation; knowledge society; function libraries.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/np.43.270     Citation

• Medvedeva Anzhelica (V. I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, Ukraine, Kyiv)

Cite:
Medvedeva Anzhelica (2016). Analysis of Evaluation of Scientific Institutions in Ukraine. Academic Papers of The Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, (43) 270-284. (In Ukrainan). doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/np.43.270

References:

1. Bessarabov, A. M. and Sofiiev, A. E. (2010). Rozrobka modeli dlia upravlinnia innovatsiinym biudzhetnym finansuvanniam haluzevoi nauky [Development of innovative models for budget financing industry science]. Problemy upravlinnia – Management Problems, no. 1, pp. 33–38 [in Ukrainian].
2. Bessarabov, A. M. and Yahudin, S. Y. (2006). Systemnyi analiz biudzhetnoho innovatsiinoho finansuvannia haluzevykh naukovykh orhanizatsii khimichnoi ta naftokhimichnoi promyslovosti [System analysis of budget funding innovative scientific organizations specialized chemical and petrochemical industry]. Naftopererobka i naftokhimiia – Naftopererobka i Naftohimiya, no. 4, pp. 17–22 [in Ukrainian].
3. Vasylieva, V. M. Metodychne kerivnytstvo po vykorystanniu poshukovoi systemy Google Akademiia (Google Scholar). [Guidance on the use of search engine Google Scholar]. [in Ukrainian].
4. Vyznachennia indeksu tsytovanosti vchenoho z vykorystanniam GOOGLE SCHOLAR. [Definition of scientific citation index using GOOGLE SCHOLAR]. [in Ukrainian].
5. Zusman, O. M. (2000). Bibliometricheskie issledovaniia nauki [Bibliometry Science]. S.-peterburhskii hosudarstvennyi universytet kultury i iskusstv – Saint Petersburg State University of Culture and Arts [in Russian].
6. Kostenko, L. Y. and Solovianenko, D. V. (2009). Biblioteka ta naukometriia: svitovyi dosvid, ukrainska perspektyva [Library and scientometrics: international experience, Ukrainian perspective]. Bibliotechnyi visnyk – Library Journal, no. 6, pp. 29–32. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
7. Kostenko, L. Y. (2014). Bibliometryka ukrainskoi nauky: informatsiino-analitychna systema [Bibliometryka Ukrainian science: information-analytical system]. Bibliotechnyi visnyk – Library Journal, no. 4, pp. 8–12. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
8. Kostenko, L. Y., Zhabin, O. I. and Kopanieva Y. O. (2015). Naukometriia: metodolohiia ta instrumentarii [Scientometrics: methodology and tools]. Visnyk Knyzhkovoi palaty – Bulletin of the Book Chamber, no. 9, pp. 25–29. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
9. Kostenko, L. Y. (2013). Naukoemkie tekhnolohii v byblioteke [Higt technologies in library]. Biblioteki natsyonalnykh akademii nauk: problemy funktsionyrovanyia, tendentsii razvitiia – Library of the National Academies of Sciences: Problems of Functioning, Trends, no. 11, pp. 70–81. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
10. Kukharchuk, Y. O. (2013). Svitovi naukometrychni systemy [Global scientometric system]. Bibliotechnyi visnyk – Library Journal, no. 5, pp. 7–11. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
11. Kruhlyi stil «Mekhanizmy ta kryterii otsinky diialnosti naukovoi ustanovy», 17 lyp. 2006 r. [Round table «Mechanisms and criteria for evaluation of the scientific establishment,» July 17, 2006]. [in Ukrainian].
12. Malitskii, B., Rybachuk, V., Popovich, A. and Koretskii, A. (2013). Naukometriia: novye funktsii i problemy adekvatnosti [Scientometrics: New functions and problems of adequacy]. Nauka i innovatsii – Science and Innovation, no. 1, pp. 11–17 [in Russian].
13. Marshakova I. V. (1988). Sistema tsitirovaniyia nauchnoi literatury kak sredstvo slezheniia za razvitiem nauki [The system nauchnoy literature citation slezhenyya As funds for the development of science]. Moscow [in Russian].
14. Mindeli, L. E. Rozvytok nauky: novi tendentsii i zavdannia: Mizhnarodna konferentsiia «Upravlinnia naukoiu v XXI stolitti: mekhanizmy ta perspektyvy» Moskva, 2009 [The development of science, new trends and objectives of the International Conference «Management science in XXI century: mechanisms and perspectives» Moscow, 2009]. [in Russian].
15. Nalimov, V. V. (1969). Naukometriia. Izuchenie razvitiia nauki kak informatsionnoho protsessa [Scientometrics. Study How is information science development process]. Moscow [in Russian].
16. Feihelman, M. (2015). Kak otsenivat rezultativnost raboty institutov FANO [As otsenyvat performance work ynstytutov FANO]. Troitskii variant – Troitsky Variant, no. 13 (182), pp. 1–2. Moscow [in Russian].
17. Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman L., Rijcke de S., Rafols, I. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.