Back to the journal

Theoretical Constructs of Nation Formation in the Realm of the Creation of Ukrainian Identity at the Turn of the 19th – 20th Centuries

Read the articleRead the articleDownload the article
The authors of the publication:
Vermenych Yaroslava
p.:
47–59
UDC:
303.094.4:17.023.32](477)“18/19”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15407/mue2021.20.047
Bibliographic description:
Vermenych, Ya. (2021). Theoretical Constructs of Nation Formation in the Realm of the Creation of Ukrainian Identity at the Turn of the 19th – 20th Centuries. Materials to Ukrainian Ethnology, 20 (23), 47–59.

Author

Vermenych Yaroslava

a Corresponding Member of the NAS of Ukraine, a Doctor of History, a professor, a head of the Department of Historical Regional Science at the Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine). ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4445-9492

 

Theoretical Constructs of Nation Formation in the Realm
of the Creation of Ukrainian Identity at the Turn of the 19th – 20th Centuries

 

Abstract

Geopolitical vectors of transformational dynamics in the 19th – at the early 20th centuries have been intersected on Ukrainian lands quite often. It has conditioned the necessity of comprehension of both favorable and inhibitory factors of development in the field of self-identification. The nationally conscious elite of Ukrainianhood has used every opportunity to represent the people’s desire for self-determination. The fact that the Ukrainian issue has appeared repeatedly before the politicians of Europe and the world, has created certain obstacles for the implementation of assimilation plans of anti-Ukrainian forces and encouraged Ukrainians not so much to revive the nation as to rebuild it in qualitatively new terms and practices.

The article is dedicated to the analysis of theoretical constructs of nation-creation in the context of the formation of the foundations of Ukrainian identity at the turn of the 19th – 20th centuries. Emphasis is placed on the definition of fundamental concepts – «nation», «conciliarism», «Ukrainian socio-political thought», «national revival», «Ukrainian project», «national ideal», etc. The comprehension of the reflections arisen at various stages of the search for unifying ideas and social consensus is submitted in the light of the relationship between potential expectations and historical realities. Obviously, it has been impossible to achieve it in the current conditions, but the consolidation context with the representation of the nation idea, popular in the 19th century and inherent in theoretical models, is the evidence of the intellectual maturity of local elites and their awareness of the potential for solidarity.

The national idea in its rudimentary form has been quite abstract and against the background of exacerbation of social contradictions is not perceived as a priority at the mass level. However, its search at the turn of the 19th – early 20th centuries has become not only a phenomenon of political life, but also an integral part of socio-political and intellectual thought. Today, given the deepening polarization of Ukrainian society and the transformation of the inherent conflict into an armed stage, this search acquires the significance of ideological heritage, which should be understood comprehensively on the new principles proposed by modern historiography.

 

Keywords

nation, Ukrainian identity, conciliarism, national idea, consolidation potential.

 

References

  1. ANTONOVYCH, Volodymyr. My Confession. Selected Historical and Journalistic Works. Olha TODIYCHUK, Vasyl ULIANOVSKYI, compilers. S. HOLOVKO, ed.-in-chief. Kyiv: Lybid, 1995, 813, [1] pp. (Monuments of the Historical Thought of Ukraine) [in Ukrainian].
  2. GALUSHKO, Kirill. Ukrainian Borders. Ukraine and Ukrainians in European Cartography from Antiquity to the 20th Century: Popular Science Edition. Kiev, 2014, 143 pp. [in Russian].
  3. HYRYCH, Ihor. Ukrainian History: Through Identity to the State. Yuriy BURIAK, ed. Kyiv: Ukrainian Propylaea, 2021, 270 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  4. HYRYCH, Ihor. Ukrainian Intellectuals and Political Separation (Mid 19th – Early 20th Century). Oleksandr RUBLIOV, ed.-in-chief. Kyiv: Ukrainian Writer, 2014, 496 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  5. HRINCHENKO, Borys. Letters from the Dnieper Ukraine. In: The Sources on the History of the Socio-Political Movement in Ukraine of the 19th – Early 20th Century.Iss.1. Hrinchenko B. – Drahomanov M. Dialogues on the Ukrainian National Cause. Kyiv: Institute of Ukrainian Archaeography of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 1994, pp. 34–105 [in Ukrainian].
  6. YEVTUKH, Volodymyr. Ethnicity. Glossary. Kyiv: Mykhailo Drahomanov NPU, 2009, 170 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  7. KARTUNOV, Oleksii. Introduction to Ethnopolitology: A Scientific Teaching Aid. Kyiv: Institute of Economics, Management and Economic Law, 1999, 300 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  8. KASIANOV, Heorhii. Theories of Nation and Nationalism. Kyiv: Lybid, 1999, 352 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  9. KOSTOMAROV, Mykola. Ukrainophilia. In: KOSTOMAROV, Mykola. Slavic Mythology. Selected Works in Folklore and Literary Criticism. Kyiv: Lybid, 1994, 384 pp. (Literary Monuments of Ukraine) [in Ukrainian].
  10. KOTENKO, Anatoly, Olga MARTYNIUK, Aleksei MILLER. «Little Russian»: The Concept Evolution before the First World War. In: Irina PROKHOROVA, ed.-in-chief. A New Literary Review, 2011, no. 108, pp. 9–27 [in Russian].
  11. KRAVCHENKO, Volodymyr. Ukraine, Empire, Russia. Selected Articles on Modern History and Historiography. Kyiv: Critique, 2011, 544 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  12. LYPYNSKYI, Viacheslav. Nobility in Ukraine. In: Editorial board: Yaroslav PELENSKYI, ed.-in-chief, Ihor HYRYCH, Oksana PROTSENKO, Heorhii PAPAKIN, Halyna SVARNYK, Tetiana OSTASHKO. Viacheslav Lypynskyi: Complete Collection of Works, Archives, Studies. Vol. 1. Social and Political Works (1908–1917). Viacheslav Lypynskyi East European Research Institute; Mykhailo Hrushevskyi Institute of Ukrainian Archaeography and Source Criticism of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv; Philadelphia: Ukrainian Writer, 2015, 784 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  13. MALGIN, Andrey. Ukraine: Conciliarism and Regionalism. Simferopol: SONAT, 2005, 280 pp. [in Russian].
  14. MASLIICHUK, Volodymyr. «From Ukraine to Little Russia»: Regional Names and National History. In: Andreas KAPPELER, compiler. Ukraine. Nation Formation Processes: Collected Volume. Juliane BESTERS-DILGER et al; Volodymyr MASLIICHUK, scientific ed. Translated from German by Sofiia MATIASH and Yurii DURKOT. Kyiv: K.I.S., 2011. pp. 229–245 [in Ukrainian].
  15. MIKHUTINA, Irina. The Ukrainian Issue in Russia (Late 19th – Early 20th Century): A Monograph. Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Slavic Studies. Moscow, 2003, 287 pp. [in Russian].
  16. NAHORNA, Larysa. Historical Culture: A Concept, Information Resource, Reflective Potential. Kyiv: Ivan Kuras IPENS of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2014, 382 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  17. LEVENETS, Yurii, editorial board’s chairperson. Problems of Ukrainian Politics:Analytical Reports of the Ivan Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnonational Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv: Ivan Kuras IPENS of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2010, 410 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  18. SVITLENKO, Serhii. The World of Modern Ukraine of the Late 18th – Early 20th Century: Collected Scientific Works. Dnipropetrovsk: Herda, 2007, 460 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  19. SMOLII, Valerii, Oleksandr UDOD, Oleksii YAS. Institute History, Ukrainian History. In: Valerii SMOLII, ed.-in-chief. Historiographical Research in Ukraine: Collected Scientific Works. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of History of Ukraine. 2012, iss. 22, pp. 5–42 [in Ukrainian].
  20. BORIAK, Hennadii, ed.-in-chief. Ukrainian Identity and the Language Issue in the Russian Empire: an Attempt of State Correction (1847–1914). Collection of Documents and Materials. Hennadii BORIAK, Volodymyr BARAN, Liubov HISTSOVA, Liudmyla DEMCHENKO, Olha MUZYCHUK, P. NAIDENKO, Valentyna SHANDRA, compilers. NAS of Ukraine. Institute of History of Ukraine; Ukrainian State Archives, USHAK of Ukraine. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine, 2013, 810 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  21. ANON. Forum “Above the Border”: the Concept of Borderlands as an Object of Research. Translated from English by Marharyta YEHORCHENKO, from German by Roksoliana SVIATO. In: Ukraine is Modern, 2011, no. 18, pp. 47–78 [in Ukrainian].
  22. SHPORLIUK, Roman. Empire and Nations (From the Historical Experience of Ukraine, Russia, Poland and Belarus). Translated from English. Kyiv: Spirit and Letter, 2000, 354 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  23. YAKOVENKO, Natalia. Introduction to History. Kyiv: Critique, 2007, 375 pp. [in Ukrainian].
  24. YAREMCHUK, Viacheslav. The Ukrainian Issue and the Attitude to It of Russian Political Parties at the Early 20th Century. In: Yurii LEVENETS, editorial board’s chairperson. Modern Ukrainian State: Historical Imperatives of Formation, Tendencies and Problems of Development: Collected Volume. NAS of Ukraine, Ivan Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnonational Studies. Kyiv: IPENS, 2007, pp. 539–552 [in Ukrainian].
  25. ALEXANDER, Jeffrey Charles. Neofunctionalism and Modern Society: Introduction. In: Henry ETZKOWITZ, Ronald M. GLASSMAN, general editors. The Renascence of Sociological Theory: Classical and Contemporary. F. E. Peacock Publishers, 1991, pp. 267–275 [in English].
  26. KREJČÍ, Jaroslav, Vitezslav VELIMSKY.Ethnic and Political Nations in Europe. London, 1981, 280 pp. [in English].
  27. ROTHSCHILD, Joseph. Ethnopolitics: A Conceptual Framework. New York: Columbia University Press, 1981, 290 pp. [in English]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/roth91044.
  28. SHILS, Edward. Tradition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1983, 334 pp. [in English].
© ІМФЕ