Indicação de biomateriais em alvéolos pós extração previamente à instalação de implantes

  • Karin Gisel Apaza Bedoya Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis
  • Camilo Andrés Villabona López Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis; Universidad Santo Tomás
  • Gabriela Peñarrieta Juanito Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis
  • Renato Yassutaka Faria Yaedu Universidade de São Paulo
  • Cesar Augusto Magalhaes Benfatti Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis
Palabras clave: Extração dentária, enxerto ósseo, biomaterial

Resumen

O presente trabalho descreve os processos fisiológicos envolvidos no processo de cicatrização alveolar, assim como as mudanças dimensionais que suscitam-se depois da perda do elemento dentário. Desta maneira, mostra-se a importância da utilização de biomateriais. Os quais favoreçam a posterior reabilitação com implantes osseointegrados. A presente revisão de literatura, a partir de critérios de inclusão e exclusão, propõe o estudo dos biomateriais encontrados na literatura e busca a avaliação criteriosa das suas propriedades, vantagens e limitações na indicação de alvéolos pós-extração.

Biografía del autor

Karin Gisel Apaza Bedoya, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis
Master program in Implantology Federal University of Santa Cataria, Florianópolis, Brazil. Centro de ensino e pesquisa em implantes dentarios (CEPID), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil
Camilo Andrés Villabona López, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis; Universidad Santo Tomás
Master program in Implantology Federal University of Santa Cataria, Florianópolis, Brazil. Centro de ensino e pesquisa em implantes dentarios (CEPID), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bucaramanga, Santander, Colômbia
Gabriela Peñarrieta Juanito, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis
Master program in Implantology Federal University of Santa Cataria, Florianópolis, Brazil. Centro de ensino e pesquisa em implantes dentarios (CEPID), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil
Renato Yassutaka Faria Yaedu, Universidade de São Paulo
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil
Cesar Augusto Magalhaes Benfatti, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis
Master program in Implantology Federal University of Santa Cataria, Florianópolis, Brazil. Centro de ensino e pesquisa em implantes dentarios (CEPID), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brasil

Referencias

1. Fardin AC, Jardim Ellen CG, Pereira FC, Guskuma MH, Aranega AM, Garcia Júnior IR. Enxerto ósseo em odontologia: revisão de literatura. Innov. Implant. J., Biomater. Esthet. 2010;5(3):48-52.

2. Granjeiro, J. M., Soares, G. D. A. de, Biomateriais em odontologia: princípios, métodos investigativos e aplicações, 1ª ed. São Paulo: VM Cultural Editora; 2011, p. 207.

3. Buser, D. 20 Years of guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry, 2da ed.Singapore: Quistessence; 2009, p. 261.

4. Caplanis N, Lozada JL, Kan JY. Extraction defect assessment, classification, and management. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2005;33(11):853-63.

5. Melnick, P. R.; Camargo, P. M. Alveolar bone preservation following tooth extraction in the esthetic zone. In: Implant and Regenerative Therapy in Dentistry: A Guide to Decision Making. 1ª ed. Iowa: Wiley- Blackwell. 2009. Cap. 10, p. 272-294.

6. Fugazzotto, P. A., Implant and Regenerative Therapy in Dentistry: A Guide to Decision Making, 1ª ed., Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.

7. Pagni G, Pellegrini G, Giannobile WV, Rasperini G. Posextraction aveolar ridge preservation: biological basis and treatments. Int J Dent. 2012:1-13. doi: 10.1155/2012/151030.

8. Pietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent. 1967;17(1):21-7.

9. Araújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(2):212-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x.

10. Johnson K. A study of the dimensional changes occurring in the maxilla following tooth extraction. Aust Dent J. 1969;14(4):241-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1969.tb06001.x.

11. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23(4):313-23.

12. Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr, Hämmerle CH. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:12-25.

13. Nemcovsky CE, Serfaty V. Alveolar ridge preservation following extraction of maxillary anterior teeth. Report on 23 consecutive cases. J Periodontol. 1996;67(4):390-5. doi: 0.1902/jop.1996.67.4.390.

14. 14. Rasperini G, Canullo L, Dellavia C, Pellegrini G, Simion M. Socket grafting in the posterior maxilla reduces the need for sinus augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010;30(3):265-73.

15. Nevins M, et al. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26(1):19-29.

16. Block MS, Jackson WC. Techniques for grafting the extraction site in preparation for dental implant placement. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2006;14(1):1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cxom.2005.11.006.

17. Santos FA, Pochapski MT, Martins MC, Zenóbio EG, Spolidoro LC, Marcantonio E Jr. Comparison of biomaterial implants in the dental socket: histological analysis in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12(1):18-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00126.x.

18. Darby I, Chen S, De Poi R. Ridge preservation: what is it and when should it be considered. Aust Dent J. 2008;53(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.00008.x.

19. Hupp, J. R.; Ellis, III E.; Tucker, M. R.; Cirurgia Oral e Maxilofacial Contemporânea. Elsevier, 5ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2009. P. 53.

20. Farina, R.; Trombelli L. Wound healing of extraction sockets. Endod topics. 2011;25 (1):16-43. doi: 10.1111/etp.12016.

21. Cardaropoli G, Araújo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(9):809-18. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00366.x.

22. Carvalho, P. S. P. de. et al. Biomaterias aplicados a implantodontia. In: Fundamentos em implantodontia: uma visão contemporânea, 1 ed., São Paulo: Quintessence; 2011, cap. 8, p. 111 -123.

23. De Carvalho, P. S. P. Subtitutos Osseos- Quando Utilizá-los? In: Osseointegração 20 anos: Visão contemporânea da Implantodontia. 1ra ed. São Paulo: Quintessence; 2009. cap 7. P. 197-122.

24. Becker W, Becker BE, Caffesse R. A comparison of demineralized freeze-dried bone and autologous bone to induce bone formation in human extraction sockets. J Periodontol. 1994 Dec;65(12):1128-33. doi: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.12.1128.

25. Brownfield LA, Weltman RL. Ridge preservation with or without an osteoinductive allograft: a clinical, radiographic, micro-computed tomography, and histologic study evaluating dimensional changes and new bone formation of the alveolar ridge. J Periodontol. 2012;83(5):581-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110365.

26. Scheyer ET, Schupbach P, McGuire MK. A histologic and clinical evaluation of ridge preservation following grafting with demineralized bone matrix, cancellous bone chips, and resorbable extracellular matrix membrane. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012;32(5):543-52.

27. Beck TM, Mealey BL. Histologic analysis of healing after tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized human bone allograft. J Periodontol. 2010;81(12):1765-72. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100286.

28. Lasella JM et al. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membranecompared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol. 2003;74(7):990-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990.

29. Wood RA, Mealey BL. Histologic comparison of healing after tooth extractionwith ridge preservation using mineralized versus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft. J Periodontol. 2012;83(3):329-36. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110270.

30. Lee DW, Pi SH, Lee SK, Kim EC. Comparative histomorphometric analysis of extraction sockets healing implanted with bovine xenografts, irradiated cancellous allografts, and solvent-dehydrated allografts in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24(4):609-15.

31. Barone A, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Calvo Guirado JL, Covani U. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. J Periodontol. 2008;79(8):1370-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070628.

32. Ten Heggeler JM, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. Effect of socket preservationtherapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(8):779-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02064.x.

33. Kim YK, Yun PY, Lee HJ, Ahn JY, Kim SG. Ridge preservation of the molar extraction socket using collagen sponge and xenogeneic bone grafts. Implant Dent. 2011;20(4):267-72. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182166afc.

34. Heberer S, Al-Chawaf B, Jablonski C, Nelson JJ, Lage H, Nelson K. Healing of ungrafted and grafted extraction sockets after 12 weeks: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(2):385-92.

35. Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L, Cardaropoli G. Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012;32(4):421-30.

36. Lindhe J, Cecchinato D, Donati M, Tomasi C, Liljenberg B. Ridge preservation with the use of deproteinized bovine bone mineral. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(7):786-90. doi: 10.1111/clr.12170.

37. Araújo MG, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J. Dynamics of Bio-Oss Collagen incorporation in fresh extraction wounds: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(1):55-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01854.x.

38. Perelman-Karmon M, Kozlovsky A, Liloy R, Artzi Z. Socket site preservation using bovine bone mineral with and without a bioresorbable collagen membrane. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012;32(4):459-65.

39. Crespi R, Capparè P, Gherlone E. Comparison of magnesium-enrichedhydroxyapatite and porcine bone in human extraction socket healing: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(5):1057-62.

40. Mardas N, Chadha V, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided boné regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(7):688- 98. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01918.x.

41. Gholami GA, Najafi B, Mashhadiabbas F, Goetz W, Najafi S. Clinical, histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of socket preservation using a synthetic nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in comparison with a bovine xenograft: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(10):1198-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02288.x.

42. Berube P, Yang Y, Carnes DL, Stover RE, Boland EJ, Ong JL. The effect of sputtered calcium phosphate coatings of different crystallinity on osteoblast differentiation. J Periodontol. 2005;76(10):1697-709. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1697.

43. Rohanizadeh R, Padrines M, Bouler JM, Couchourel D, Fortun Y, Daculsi G. Apatite precipitation after incubation of biphasic calcium-phosphate ceramic invarious solutions: influence of seed species and proteins. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;42(4):530-9. Doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19981215)42:4<530::AID-JBM8>3.0.CO;2-6.

44. Ruga E, Gallesio C, Chiusa L, Boffano P. Clinical and histologic outcomes of calcium sulfate in the treatment of postextraction sockets. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(2):494-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318208bb21.

45. Jensen SS, Yeo A, Dard M, Hunziker E, Schenk R, Buser D. Evaluation of a novel biphasic calcium phosphate in standardized bone defects: a histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(6):752-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01417.x.

46. Horowitz RA, Mazor Z, Miller RJ, Krauser J, Prasad HS, Rohrer MD. Clinical evaluation alveolar ridge preservation with a beta-tricalcium phosphate socket graft. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2009;30(9):588-90.

47. Inomata K, Marukawa E, Takahashi Y, Omura K. The effect of covering materials with an open wound in alveolar ridge augmentation using beta-tricalcium phosphate: an experimental study in the dog. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(6):1413-21.

48. Brkovic BM, Prasad HS, Rohrer MD, Konandreas G, Agrogiannis G, Antunovic D, Sándor GK. Beta-tricalcium phosphate/type I collagen cones with or without a barrier membrane in human extraction socket healing: clinical, histologic, histomorphometric, and immunohistochemical evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(2):581-90. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0531-1.

49. Wakimoto M, Ueno T, Hirata A, Iida S, Aghaloo T, Moy PK. Histologic evaluation of human alveolar sockets treated with an artificial bone substitute material. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(2):490-3. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318208bacf.

50. Crespi R, Capparè P, Gherlone E. Magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite compared to calcium sulfate in the healing of human extraction sockets: radiographic and histomorphometric evaluation at 3 months. J Periodontol. 2009;80(2):210-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080400.

51. Lindhe J, Araújo MG, Bufler M, Liljenberg B. Biphasic alloplastic graft used to preserve the dimension of the edentulous ridge: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(10):1158-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02527.x.

52. Toloue SM, Chesnoiu-Matei I, Blanchard SB. A clinical and histomorphometric study of calcium sulfate compared with freeze-dried bone allograft for alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontol. 2012;83(7):847-55. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110470.

53. Santos FA, Pochapski MT, Martins MC, Zenóbio EG, Spolidoro LC, Marcantonio E. Jr. Comparison of biomaterial implants in the dental socket: histological analysis in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12(1):18-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00126.x.

54. Tunes, R. U. da; Dourado, M.; Bitterncourt, S. Terapêutica periodontal regenerativa: técnicas cirúrgicas, biomateriais e fatores de crescimento transformando o periodontista em engenheiro tecidual. In: Avanços em periodontia e implantodontia: paradigmas e desafios, 1 ed., Nova Odessa: Napoleão; 2011. cap, p. 564-576.

55. Kutkut A, Andreana S, Kim HL, Monaco E Jr. Extraction socket preservationgraft before implant placement with calcium sulfate hemihydrate and platelet-rich plasma: a clinical and histomorphometric study in humans. J Periodontol. 2012;83(4):401-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110237.

56. Suba Z, Takács D, Gyulai-Gaál S, Kovács K. Facilitation of beta-tricalcium phosphate-induced alveolar bone regeneration by platelet-rich plasma in beagle dogs: a histologic and histomorphometric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(6):832-8.

57. Nevins ML, Camelo M, Schupbach P, Kim DM, Camelo JM, Nevins M. Human histologic evaluation of mineralized collagen bone substitute and recombinante platelet- derived growth factor-BB to create bone for implant placement in extraction socket defects at 4 and 6 months: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009;29(2):129-39.

58. McAllister BS, Haghighat K, Prasad HS, Rohrer MD. Histologic evaluation ofrecombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB after use in extractionsocket defects: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010;30(4):365-73.

59. Hammerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction socket. Int J Oral Maxillofa Implants. 2004;19 (Supl):26-8.

60. Sclar AG. Strategies for management of single-tooth extraction sites inaesthetic implant therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Sep;62(9 Suppl 2):90-105. Erratum in: J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;62(9 Supl 2):90-105.

61. Covani U, Bortolaia C, Barone A, Sbordone L. Bucco-lingual crestal bone changes after immediate and delayed implant placement. J Periodontol. 2004;75(12):1605-12. doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.12.1605.

62. Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014;93(10):950-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034514541127.

63. Chappuis V, Araujo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):73-83. doi: 10.1111/prd.12167.

64. Januario AL, Duarte WR, Barriviera M, Mesti JC, Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimension of the facial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(10):1168-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02086.x.
Cómo citar
Apaza Bedoya, K., Villabona López, C., Peñarrieta Juanito, G., Faria Yaedu, R., & Magalhaes Benfatti, C. (1). Indicação de biomateriais em alvéolos pós extração previamente à instalação de implantes. Ustasalud, 16, 52-68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15332/us.v16i0.2020
Sección
Artículos de Revisión