Aubergine and piRNAs repress the proto-oncogene Cbl for germline stem cell self-renewal

PIWI proteins have essential roles in germ cells and stem cell lineages. In Drosophila, Piwi is required in somatic niche cells and germline stem cells (GSCs) for GSC self-renewal and differentiation. Whether and how other PIWI proteins are involved in GSC biology remains unknown. Here, we show that Aubergine (Aub), another PIWI protein, is intrinsically required in GSCs for their self-renewal and differentiation. Aub loading with piRNAs is essential for these functions. The major role of Aub is in self-renewal and depends on mRNA regulation. We identify the Cbl proto-oncogene, a regulator of mammalian hematopoietic stem cells, as a novel GSC differentiation factor. Aub represses Cbl mRNA translation for GSC self-renewal, and does so through recruitment of the CCR4-NOT complex. This study reveals the role of piRNAs and PIWI proteins in translational repression for stem cell homeostasis and highlights piRNAs as major post-transcriptional regulators in key developmental decisions.


Introduction
The regulation of gene expression at the mRNA level is fundamental for many biological and developmental processes. In recent years, Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) have emerged as novel key players in the regulation of gene expression at the mRNA level in several models. These 23-to 30-nucleotide-long non-coding RNAs are loaded into specific Argonaute proteins, the PIWI proteins (Guzzardo et al, 2013;Ishizu et al, 2012). Classically, piRNAs repress transposable element expression and transposition in the germline. They are largely produced from transposable element sequences and target transposable element mRNAs by complementarity, which induces their cleavage through the endonuclease activity of PIWI proteins and represses their expression.
Recent studies have shown that piRNAs also target protein-coding mRNAs, leading to their repression by PIWI-dependent mRNA cleavage or via the recruitment of the CCR4-NOT deadenylation complex. This regulation is required for embryonic patterning in Drosophila (Barckmann et al, 2015;Rouget et al, 2010), sex determination in Bombyx mori (Kiuchi et al, 2014), and degradation of spermiogenic mRNAs in mouse sperm (Goh et al, 2015;Gou et al, 2014;Watanabe et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015). piRNAs involved in the regulation of protein-coding mRNAs in Drosophila embryos are produced in the female germline and provided maternally. An open question is whether this function of the piRNA pathway in post-transcriptional control of gene expression plays a role in the biology of germ cells and germline stem cells (GSCs). In the Drosophila ovary, two to three GSCs are localized in the anterior-most region of each ovariole and self-renew throughout the adult life, giving rise to all germ cells. GSCs in contact with somatic niche cells divide asymmetrically to produce a new stem cell that remains in contact with niche cells (self-renewal) and another cell that differentiates into a cystoblast, upon losing the contact with the niche. Subsequently, the cystoblast undergoes four rounds of synchronous division with incomplete cytokinesis to produce a cyst of sixteen interconnected germ cells, of which one cell is specified as the oocyte and the other fifteen cells become nurse cells ( Figure 1A).
Two features make Piwi unique with respect to the other two Drosophila PIWI proteins, Aubergine (Aub) and Argonaute 3 (Ago3). First, it represses transposable elements at the transcription level through a nuclear function, whereas Aub and Ago3 act by endonucleolytic cleavage of transposable element mRNAs in the cytoplasm; and second, it plays a role in the somatic and germ cells of the ovary, whereas aub and ago3 function is restricted to germ cells. piwi function in GSC biology has long been addressed. piwi is required in somatic escort cells (which surround GSCs) for GSC differentiation, as well as intrinsically in GSCs for their maintenance and differentiation (Cox et al, 1998;Cox et al, 2000;Jin et al, 2013;Ma et al, 2014). One molecular mechanism underlying Piwi function in GSC biology has recently been proposed to involve its direct interaction with Polycomb group proteins of the PRC2 complex, leading to indirect massive gene deregulation through reduced PRC2 binding to chromatin . Regulation of c-Fos by Piwi at the mRNA level in somatic niche cells has also been reported to contribute to the role of Piwi in GSC maintenance and differentiation (Klein et al, 2016).
Translational control acting intrinsically in GSCs plays a major role in the switch between self-renewal and differentiation. Two molecular pathways ensure GSC self-renewal through translational repression of differentiation factor mRNAs: the microRNA pathway, and the translational repressors Nanos (Nos) and Pumilio (Pum) (Slaidina & Lehmann, 2014). Nos and Pum bind to and repress the translation of mRNAs that encode the differentiation factors Brain tumor (Brat) and Mei-P26, through the recruitment of the CCR4-NOT deadenylation complex (Harris et al, 2011;Joly et al, 2013). In turn, cystoblast differentiation depends on Bag of marbles (Bam), the major differentiation factor forming a complex with Mei-P26, Sex lethal (Sxl) and Benign gonial cell neoplasm (Bgcn) to repress nos mRNA translation; Pum interacts with Brat in these cells to repress the translation of mRNAs encoding self-renewal factors (Harris et al, 2011;Li et al, 2012;Li et al, 2009b;Li et al, 2013).
Aub has a distinctive role in protein-coding mRNA regulation. In the early embryo, Aub binds several hundred maternal mRNAs in a piRNA-dependent manner and induces the decay of a large number of them during the maternal-to-zygotic transition (Barckmann et al, 2015). Aubdependent unstable mRNAs are degraded in the somatic part of the embryo and stabilized in the germ plasm. These mRNAs encode germ cell determinants, indicating an important function of Aub in embryonic patterning and germ cell development. Indeed, Aub recruits the CCR4 deadenylase to nos mRNA and contributes to its deadenylation and translational repression in the somatic part of the embryo. This Aub-dependent repression of nos mRNA is involved in embryonic patterning (Rouget et al, 2010).
Here, we address the role of aub in GSC biology. We show that aub is autonomously required in GSCs for their self-renewal. This aub function is independent of bam transcriptional repression in the GSCs and activation of the Chk2-dependent DNA damage checkpoint. Using an Aub pointmutant form that cannot load piRNAs, we show that piRNAs are required for GSC self-renewal.
Genetic and physical interactions indicate that Aub function in GSCs involves interaction with the CCR4-NOT deadenylation complex. Importantly, we identify Casitas B-cell lymphoma (Cbl) mRNA as a target of Aub in GSCs. Cbl acts either as a tumor suppressor or a proto-oncogene depending on its mutations, which lead to myeloid malignancies in humans (Sanada et al, 2009). Cbl encodes an E3 ubiquitin ligase that negatively regulates signal transduction of tyrosine kinases; it plays a role in hematopoietic stem cell homeostasis, maintaining quiescence, and preventing exhaustion of the stem cell pool . We show that Aub acts to maintain a low level of Cbl protein in GSCs, and that this repression of Cbl mRNA by Aub is essential for GSC self-renewal. Furthermore, we find that Cbl is required for GSC differentiation, thereby identifying a role for Cbl in the regulation of yet another stem cell lineage.
This study reveals the function of Aub and piRNAs in GSC self-renewal through the translational repression of Cbl mRNA, thus highlighting the role of the piRNA pathway as a major post-transcriptional regulator of gene expression in key developmental decisions.

aub is intrinsically required in GSCs for their self-renewal and differentiation
Although Aub and Ago3 are expressed in GSCs, their function in GSC biology has not yet been addressed (Brennecke et al, 2007;Gunawardane et al, 2007). GSCs can be recognized by their anterior localization in the germarium as well as the presence of the spectrosome, an anteriorly localized spherical organelle in contact with the niche, which is enriched in cytoskeletal proteins ( Figure 1A). Cystoblasts also contain a spectrosome that is randomly located in the cell, whereas cells in differentiating cysts are connected by the fusome, a branched structure derived from the spectrosome ( Figure 1A). GSCs and differentiating cells were analyzed by immunostaining with an anti-Hts antibody that labels the spectrosome and fusome, and anti-Vasa, a marker of germ cells.
We used aub HN2 and aub QC42 strong or null alleles (Schupbach & Wieschaus, 1991) to address the role of Aub in GSC biology. Immunostaining of ovaries with anti-Hts and anti-Vasa revealed strong defects in both GSC self-renewal and differentiation, in aub HN2/QC42 mutant ovaries at 7, 14 and 21 days. A large proportion of aub HN2/QC42 germaria had 0 to 1 GSC indicating GSC loss, and this defect increased over time ( Figure 1B, C, F). A lower proportion of germaria showed differentiation defects, observed as tumors containing undifferentiated cells with spectrosomes ( Figure 1D). This phenotype did not markedly increase with time ( Figure 1F). Both aub HN2/QC42 phenotypes were almost completely rescued following expression of GFP-Aub with the germline driver nos-Gal4, indicating that both defects were due to aub loss of function in germ cells ( Figure 1E, F).
Because GSC loss was the most prominent defect in aub mutant ovaries, and this defect was not rescued by a Chk2 kinase mutant (see below), we focused on this phenotype. We used clonal analysis as an independent evidence to confirm the intrinsic role of aub in GSCs for their selfrenewal. Wild-type and aub mutant clonal GSCs were generated using the FLP-mediated FRT recombination system (Golic & Lindquist, 1989) and quantified at three time points after clone induction. We first verified that aub clonal GSCs did not express Aub (Supplementary Figure 1A, A'). The percentage of germaria with wild-type clonal GSCs was stable over time ( Figure 1G, I). In contrast, the percentage of germaria with aub mutant clonal GSCs strongly decreased with increasing time after clone induction, showing that aub mutant GSCs cannot self-renew ( Figure 1H-I). The presence of aub mutant clonal differentiated cysts marked with fusomes indicated that aub mutant GSCs were lost by differentiation ( Figure 1H). To confirm this conclusion, we used anti-cleaved Finally, we determined the division rate of aub HN2 GSCs by counting the number of cysts produced by a clonal marked mutant GSC and dividing it by the number of cysts produced by a control unmarked GSC in the same germarium (Jin & Xie, 2007). As expected, the division rate of wild-type GSCs (FRT40A chromosome) was close to 1 (0.95), whereas that of aub HN2 mutant GSCs was 0.67, indicating a slower division rate in aub mutant GSCs ( Figure 1J).
To address the role of Ago3 in GSC biology, we used the ago3 mutant alleles ago3 t2 and ago3 t3 , which contain premature stop codons (Li et al, 2009a). No GSC loss was recorded in the mutant combination ago3 t2 / t3 in 7-, 14-or 21-day-old females, showing that GSC self-renewal was not affected in the ago3 mutant. In contrast, ago3 t2 / t3 females showed a prominent defect in GSC differentiation, with a large proportion of germaria having a higher number of undifferentiated germ cells with a spectrosome (2 to 4 in control germaria, versus 6 to 9 in ago3 t2 / t3 germaria) (Supplementary Figure 2).
Together, these results demonstrate that Aub is required intrinsically in GSCs for their selfrenewal and differentiation. Aub maintains GSCs by preventing their differentiation independently of Bam expression. In contrast, Ago3 is specifically involved in GSC differentiation.

Aub function in GSC self-renewal is independent of Chk2
The Chk2-dependent DNA damage checkpoint is activated in several piRNA pathway mutants, leading to developmental defects during mid-oogenesis and, in turn, defective dorsoventral and anteroposterior embryonic patterning (Klattenhoff et al, 2007;Pane et al, 2007). These developmental defects are partially rescued in double mutants of Chk2 kinase (mnk mutant) and different piRNA pathway components. DNA damage in piRNA pathway mutants is thought to result from transposable element transposition. Mobilization of P-elements in crosses that induce hybrid dysgenesis (i.e. the crossing of females devoid of P-elements with males that contain P-elements) leads to a block in GSC differentiation, which is partly rescued by mutation in Chk2 (Rangan et al, 2011). To address whether the defects in GSC self-renewal and differentiation in aub mutant ovaries might be due to activation of the Chk2-dependent checkpoint, we analyzed mnk p6 aub HN2/QC42 double mutant ovaries using anti-Hts and anti-Vasa immunostaining. The aub mutant tumor phenotype of undifferentiated cell accumulation was almost completely rescued by mnk p6 , demonstrating that this phenotype depends on Chk2 ( These results show that the mild defect in GSC differentiation in the aub mutant is due to activation of the DNA damage checkpoint. In contrast, the prominent GSC self-renewal defect does not arise from activation of the DNA damage checkpoint, strongly supporting a more direct role of Aub in GSC self-renewal.

Aub loading with piRNAs is required for GSC self-renewal
To determine whether the role of Aub in GSC self-renewal depends on its loading with piRNAs, we used an Aub double point mutant in the PAZ domain that is unable to bind piRNAs (Aub AA ) (Barckmann et al, 2015). In contrast to UASp-GFP-Aub, which was able to rescue the GSC loss phenotype in aub mutant flies when expressed with nos-Gal4 ( Figure  We conclude that Aub function in GSC self-renewal depends on its loading with piRNAs.

Aub interacts with the CCR4-NOT complex for GSC self-renewal
Previous reports have shown that PIWI proteins can recruit the CCR4-NOT deadenylation complex to repress mRNAs at the post-transcriptional level (Gou et al, 2014;Rouget et al, 2010). To address whether Aub might act through a similar mode of action in GSCs, we analyzed Aub and CCR4 colocalization. CCR4 is present diffusely in the cytoplasm and accumulates in cytoplasmic foci, in GSCs (Joly et al, 2013). Aub also has a diffuse distribution in the cytoplasm and is present in foci that surround the nucleus collectively referred to as "nuage" (Harris & Macdonald, 2001).
Colocalization occurred in diffusely distributed pools of proteins and occasionally in foci ( Figure 3A-A''), consistent with deadenylation not taking place in foci (Joly et al, 2013). We then overexpressed CCR4-HA in GSCs using nos-Gal4 and found that CCR4-HA was able to recruit Aub in discrete cytoplasmic regions where CCR4-HA had accumulated, consistent with the presence of CCR4 and Aub in the same complex in GSCs ( Figure 3B-B''). Coimmunoprecipitation experiments in early ovaries from 1-day-old females revealed that GFP-Aub was able to coprecipitate the NOT1 and CCR4 subunits of the CCR4-NOT deadenylation complex, either in the presence or absence of RNA ( Figure 3C).
We previously reported that the twin gene encoding the CCR4 deadenylase is essential for GSC self-renewal (Joly et al, 2013). To genetically determine if aub acts together with twin in GSC selfrenewal, we tested whether GSC loss in the hypomorphic allele twin DG24102 might be enhanced by reducing the gene dosage of aub. GSC loss in twin DG24102 was accelerated in the presence of heterozygous aub HN2 or aub QC42 mutations, consistent with a role for Aub and CCR4 in the same molecular pathway for GSC self-renewal ( Figure 3D-G).
Together, these results show that Aub and CCR4 are in complex in GSCs, and cooperate for GSC self-renewal.

Cbl is an mRNA target of Aub in GSCs
To identify mRNA targets of Aub in GSCs, we looked for candidate genes with a reported role in Nos protein levels in aub mutant GSCs suggests that the direct regulation of nos mRNA by Aub occurring in the early embryo is maintained in other biological contexts (Rouget et al, 2010).
Cbl protein displayed the highest increased levels in aub mutant GSCs compared to control. We thus focused on the possible regulation of the Cbl proto-oncogene by Aub. Cbl encodes two isoforms through alternative splicing: a long isoform (CblL) and a short isoform (CblS), both of which contain the N-terminal phosphotyrosine binding domain that binds phosphotyrosine kinases, in addition to a ring finger domain that acts as an E3 ubiquitin ligase ( Figure 4A) (Robertson et al, 2000). We used two available monoclonal antibodies directed against either the long Cbl isoform (8C4) or both isoforms (10F1) (Pai et al, 2006), to analyze the deregulation of Cbl in aub mutant GSCs. Cbl protein levels were significantly increased in aub mutant GSCs as observed with either antibody, although a stronger effect was revealed with the 8C4 antibody (specific to CblL) ( Figure   4B We then analyzed the potential deregulation of Cbl mRNA in the absence of CCR4 deadenylase. We performed Cbl immunostaining in ovaries containing clonal twin mutant GSCs using the 8C4 antibody. Similar to the results observed in aub mutant GSCs, the levels of CblL isoform were increased in twin mutant GSCs (Supplementary Figure 5). To address whether the regulation of Cbl mRNA by Aub and CCR4 occurred at the level of poly(A) tail length, we measured the poly(A) tail of CblL mRNA in ovaries using ePAT assays. ePAT assays from bam Δ86 ovaries that only contained undifferentiated GSC-like cells confirmed the presence of the long CblL mRNA in these cells ( Figure 4G). CblL poly(A) tails were not notably affected in twin and aub mutant early ovaries as compared to the wild-type, suggesting that CblL mRNA regulation by Aub/CCR4-NOT does not involve deadenylation. Indeed, the CCR4-NOT complex has the capacity to repress mRNA translation independently of its role in deadenylation, through the recruitment of translational repressors (Chekulaeva et al, 2011;Chen et al, 2014;Mathys et al, 2014).
Taken together, these results reveal Cbl mRNA as a direct target of Aub/CCR4-NOTdependent translational repression, and the implication of piRNAs in this regulation.

Regulation of Cbl mRNA by Aub is required for GSC self-renewal
To determine whether translational repression of Cbl mRNA by Aub is relevant to GSC self-renewal, we analyzed the function of Cbl in GSCs. We first determined the expression pattern of Cbl in the germarium using immunostaining. The bamP-GFP reporter was used to mark the cystoblast to 8-cell cysts (Chen & McKearin, 2003). Co-staining of both Cbl antibodies with GFP revealed the presence of Cbl at low levels in GSCs, cystoblasts and early (2-cell) cysts. This was followed by reduced levels in the remaining dividing and differentiating cysts up to region 2a of the germarium, and stronger expression starting in region 2b in both somatic and germ cells ( Figure 5A-B''). Strikingly, co-staining with anti-Cbl and anti-GFP antibodies of germaria expressing GFP-Par1 to visualize the spectrosomes, revealed a significant increase, albeit slight and transient, of Cbl levels in cystoblasts as compared to GSCs ( Figure 5C, D, Supplementary Figure 6).
Null alleles of Cbl are larval/pupal lethal (Pai et al, 2000;Pai et al, 2006). To address a potential role for Cbl in GSC biology in adults, we used two Cbl insertion alleles: Cbl EY11427 , which contains a P-UAS insertion in the Cbl 5'UTR (Bellen et al, 2004), and Cbl MB05683 , which contains a Minos-based insertion in the third exon (Metaxakis et al, 2005) (Figure 4A). Cbl EY11427/MB05683 transheterozygotes mostly died at the pupal stage, with a small number of adult escapers surviving for 3-4 days at 25°C. The number of escapers and their survival time increased at 22°C. Western blots of ovaries from these escapers revealed that the CblL isoform was absent in this mutant combination, and that CblS levels were strongly reduced ( Figure 5E). Anti-Hts immunostaining of ovaries from 3-, 7-, 14-and 21-day-old Cbl EY11427/MB05683 mutant females revealed a defect in GSC differentiation. The number of undifferentiated germ cells containing a spectrosome in Cbl mutant germaria was higher than in the wild-type and increased with time (2 to 4 spectrosomes in the wildtype versus 6 to 9 in Cbl mutant) ( Figure 5F-I).
In a reverse experiment, we overexpressed the long or short isoforms of Cbl in germ cells using the Hsp83-CblL and Hsp83-CblS transgenes (Pai et al, 2006) and analyzed germaria using immunostaining with anti-Hts and anti-Vasa. Consistent with a role for Cbl in GSC differentiation, overexpressing Cbl in the germline led to a GSC loss that increased with time ( Figure 5J-L). These results identify a new Cbl function in GSC homeostasis.
Finally, we addressed whether the translational repression of Cbl mRNA by Aub in the GSCs has a functional role in their self-renewal. If increased Cbl protein levels in aub mutant ovaries contribute to the aub GSC loss phenotype, we would expect to reduce this phenotype by reducing Cbl gene dosage. We used both Cbl EY11427 and Cbl MB05683 heterozygous mutants in combination with aub HN2/QC42 and examined the germaria of these females at three time points by immunostaining with anti-Hts and anti-Vasa. Strikingly, the GSC loss phenotype in aub mutants was significantly rescued in the presence of both Cbl heterozygous mutants ( Figure 6A-C). These results show that the regulation of Cbl by Aub is essential for GSC self-renewal.
Together, these data identify a new role for Cbl in GSC differentiation and reveal an essential role of Cbl mRNA translational repression by Aub for GSC self-renewal.

Discussion
Here we have demonstrated that aub is required intrinsically in GSCs for their self-renewal. Our results show that this aub function does not depend on activation of the DNA damage response mediated by Chk2 kinase, but rather on regulation of protein-coding genes at the mRNA level. The main phenotype of aub mutant GSCs is a reduced capacity to self-renew, leading to their progressive loss by differentiation and this phenotype is not rescued by a mutant of the Chk2 kinase.
We provide evidence that the Aub mechanism of action involves the recruitment of the CCR4-NOT deadenylation complex ( Figure 6D). Aub and the subunits of CCR4-NOT, NOT1 and CCR4 form a complex in the ovaries. Moreover, aub heterozygous mutants significantly increase the GSC loss phenotype of a twin hypomorphic mutant. Translational repression plays an essential role in GSC biology, for both GSC self-renewal and differentiation. Through their interaction with CCR4-

NOT, the translational repressors Nos and Pum repress the translation of differentiation factors in
GSCs for their self-renewal (Joly et al, 2013); in turn, Pum and Brat recruit CCR4-NOT in the cystoblasts for their differentiation by repressing the translation of self-renewal factors (Harris et al, 2011;Newton et al, 2015). Therefore, the CCR4-NOT complex is central to mRNA regulation for GSC homeostasis. We have identified Aub as a novel interactor of the CCR4-NOT deadenylation complex involved in translational repression of Cbl mRNA for GSC self-renewal. Interestingly, repression of Cbl mRNA by Aub/CCR4-NOT does not involve poly(A) tail shortening. This is consistent with the reported role of the CCR4-NOT complex in translational repression, independent of deadenylation. In this mode of regulation, the CCR4-NOT complex serves as a platform to recruit translational repressors such as DDX6/Me31B and Cup (Chen et al, 2014;Igreja & Izaurralde, 2011;Mathys et al, 2014). In addition, a role in translational regulation has been proposed for two mouse PIWI proteins, MILI and MIWI. MILI associates with the translation factor eIF3A, while both MILI and MIWI associate with the cap-binding complex (Grivna et al, 2006;Unhavaithaya et al, 2009).
Similarly, Aub might also regulate mRNA translation through direct interaction with translation factors.
A major point addressed here is the characterization of the role of the piRNA pathway in GSC biology; until now, only the function of Piwi has been thoroughly analyzed in GSCs. Piwi is involved in somatic niche cells for GSC differentiation, as well as in GSCs for their maintenance and differentiation (Cox et al, 1998;Cox et al, 2000;Jin et al, 2013;Ma et al, 2014). Strikingly, the molecular mechanisms underlying the somatic role of Piwi for GSC differentiation are not related to transposable element repression, but gene regulation. Piwi interacts with components of the PRC2 complex, thus limiting PRC2 binding to chromatin and transcriptional repression .
Piwi also represses c-Fos mRNA via its processing into piRNAs (Klein et al, 2016). Cutoff, a component of the piRNA pathway required for piRNA production, is reported to play a role in GSC self-renewal and differentiation, with a partial rescue of the differentiation defects by mutation in the Chk2 kinase (Chen et al, 2007;Pane et al, 2011). Here, we describe the GSC phenotypes in three additional piRNA pathway mutants: aub, ago3, and armi ( Figure 6D). Notably, the three mutants display different defects in GSC biology. Specifically, ago3 mutants only have differentiation defects, whereas the most prominent phenotype of aub and armi mutants is GSC loss. This suggests that different molecular pathways affect GSC biology in these mutants. Importantly, the effect of transposition per se on GSC homeostasis has been analyzed using P-element mobilization in PM hybrid dysgenesis crosses, and has been shown to induce defects in GSC differentiation (Rangan et al, 2011). These defects are partly rescued by Chk2 mutation, indicating that they arise following DNA damage. Accordingly, differentiation defects in aub mutant GSCs are also largely rescued by Chk2 mutation, and might result from transposition. Remarkably, GSC loss in the aub mutant was not rescued by the Chk2 mutant. These results support the conclusion that defects in GSC selfrenewal, the main phenotype in aub mutants, do not predominantly depend on transposable element mobilization or DNA damage, and are consistent with our identification of the aub-dependent regulation of a cellular mRNA for GSC self-renewal. These findings broaden the developmental functions of Aub and piRNAs as regulators of gene expression in various biological processes, and highlight their key role in developmental transitions. Importantly, our study reveals a new function for Cbl in GSC biology. Overexpression and mutant analysis show the implication of Cbl in GSC differentiation. Cbl is a tumor suppressor gene encoding an E3 ubiquitin ligase that binds and represses receptor tyrosine kinases. In particular, Cbl regulates epidermal growth factor receptor (Egfr) signaling through ubiquitination and degradation of activated Egfr (Mohapatra et al, 2013). In Drosophila, the regulation of Gurken/Egfr signaling by Cbl is involved in dorsoventral patterning during oogenesis (Chang et al, 2008;Pai et al, 2000;Pai et al, 2006). Mutations in Cbl that disrupt E3 ubiquitin ligase activity lead to myeloid neoplasms in humans (Sanada et al, 2009). Indeed, Cbl plays a key role in hematopoietic stem cell homeostasis, in the maintenance of their quiescence and their long-term self-renewal capacity . Our data thus add a biological function for Cbl to yet another stem cell lineage.
Other E3 ubiquitin ligases are known to play important roles in GSC biology. Mei-P26 and Brat, two members of the conserved Trim-NHL family of proteins, contain E3 ubiquitin ligase domains and have roles in stem cell lineages. Mei-P26 in particular is involved in GSC self-renewal and differentiation, and this dual function partly depends on a very tight regulation of its levels in these cells (Joly et al, 2013;Li et al, 2012;Neumuller et al, 2008). Smurf is another E3 ubiquitin ligase that plays a major role in GSC differentiation. Specifically, Smurf associates with the Fused serine/threonine kinase in cystoblasts to degrade the Thickveins receptor and thus repress BMP signaling, the main signaling pathway in the GSC lineage. This mechanism generates a steep gradient of BMP activity between GSCs and cystoblasts (Xia et al, 2010). Cbl might participate in the regulation of Egfr signaling or other signaling pathways in the GSC lineage. Although the role of Egfr in adult GSC biology in the ovary has not yet been addressed, this signaling pathway is involved in regulating the primordial germ cell number in the larval gonad (Gilboa & Lehmann, 2006) and in the GSC mitotic activity in adult males (Parrott et al, 2012).
Our data highlight an important role of Aub in fine-tuning Cbl levels for GSC self-renewal.
Translational regulation is known to be central for cell fate choices in adult stem cell lineages.
RNA binding proteins and microRNAs have a recognized regulatory function in female GSCs to trigger cell fate changes through cell-specific regulation of mRNA targets. Here, we reveal piRNAs as an additional layer of translational regulators for GSC biology. PIWI proteins and piRNAs are stem cell markers in somatic stem cells of higher organisms, as well as in pluripotent stem cells involved in regeneration in lower organisms (Juliano et al, 2011). This function of piRNAs in translational control is likely to be conserved in these stem cell lineages and might play a key role in stem cell homeostasis.

PIWI proteins and piRNAs are upregulated in a number of cancers, and functional studies in
Drosophila have shown that this upregulation participates in cancer progression (Fagegaltier et al, 2016;Janic et al, 2010). This suggests that the role of piRNAs in the translational control of cellular mRNA targets might also be crucial to cancer.

Drosophila stocks and genetics
Drosophila stocks are described in Expanded View Materials and Methods.

Immunostaining and image analysis
Ovaries were dissected at room temperature in PBS supplemented with 0.1% Tween-20 (PBT), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, blocked with PBS containing 10% BSA for 1 h and incubated in primary antibodies with PBT 1% BSA overnight at 4°C. Primary antibodies were then washed three times with PBT 1% BSA for 10 min at room temperature. Secondary antibodies were diluted in PBT 0.1% BSA and were incubated for 4 h at room temperature. Secondary antibodies were then washed three times in PBT for 10 min. Primary antibodies were used at the following concentrations: 1/1000; rabbit anti-Bruno (Sugimura & Lilly, 2006) 1/3000; rabbit anti-Lola (a gift from E. Giniger (Giniger et al, 1994)) 1/100. Secondary antibodies (Alexa 488-and Cy3-conjugated; Jackson ImmunoResearch) were used at 1/300. DNA staining was performed using DAPI at 0.5 μg/mL. Images were captured with a Leica SP8 Confocal microscope and analyzed using the ImageJ software.
Fluorescence intensity was measured with ImageJ software in wild-type, heterozygous or mutant GSCs. For each GSC, the mean fluorescence intensity was determined using three independent quantifications in three different cytoplasmic regions in the same confocal section; the number of cells analyzed (n) is indicated in the bar graphs for each genotype.

Coimmunoprecipitations and western blots
Protein coimmunoprecipitations were performed using 60 ovaries per experiment from w 1118 and nos-Gal4/UASp-GFP-Aub 3-day-old females. Ovaries were homogenized in 600 μL of DXB-150 (25 mM Hepes-KOH pH 6.8, 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM MgCl 2 , 1 mM DTT, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100) containing cOmplete TM EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche) and either RNase Inhibitor (0.25 U/μL; Promega) or RNase A (0.1 U/μL; Sigma). 50 μL of Dynabeads Protein G (Invitrogen) were incubated with 15 μL of mouse anti-GFP antibody (3E6; Invitrogen) for 1 h on a wheel at room temperature. Protein extracts were cleared on 30 μL of Dynabeads Protein G previously equilibrated with DXB-150 for 30 min at 4°C. The pre-cleared protein extracts were incubated with Dynabeads Protein G bound to mouse anti-GFP antibody for 3 h at 4°C. The beads were then washed 7 times with DXB-150 for 10 min at room temperature. Proteins were eluted in NUPAGE buffer supplemented with 100 mM DTT at 70°C. Western blots were performed as previously reported (Benoit et al, 1999) with antibodies used at the following concentrations: rabbit anti-GFP (Invitrogen) 1/1000; rabbit anti-CCR4

RNA-immunoprecipitations and RT-qPCR
For RNA-immunoprecipitations, protein extracts were performed using 300 ovaries from w 1118 and nos-Gal4/UASp-GFP-Aub females. Ovaries were homogenized in 600 μL of DXB-150 containing cOmplete TM EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche) and RNase Inhibitor (0.25 U/μL; Promega). 50 μL of Protein G Mag Sepharose (GE Healthcare) were incubated with 2 μg mouse anti-GFP antibody (3E6; Invitrogen) for 3 h on a wheel at 4°C. Protein extracts were cleared on 50 μL of Protein G Mag Sepharose previously equilibrated with DXB-150 for 30 min at 4°C. The pre-cleared protein extracts were incubated with Protein G Mag Sepharose bound to mouse anti-GFP antibody for 3 h at 4°C. The beads were then washed 7 times with DXB-150 for 10 min at room temperature. RNA was prepared using TRIzol (Invitrogen), followed by DNA removal with TURBO DNA-free (Ambion). The total RNA amount was used for reverse transcription; RT-qPCR was performed with the LightCycler System (Roche Molecular Biochemical) using three independent RNA extractions and the primers listed in Expanded View Materials and Methods.

Poly(A) tail assays
ePAT assays were performed as previously described (Chartier et al, 2015) using the primer indicated in Expanded View Materials and Methods.

Author contributions
PRR performed the experiments and analyzed the data; AC performed PAT assays and coimmunoprecipitations; MS analyzed the data; PRR and MS designed the study and wrote the manuscript; all authors discussed the manuscript.     (D-E) Quantification of Cbl protein levels in aub HN2/+ and aub HN2 mutant GSCs using fluorescence intensity of immunostaining with 8C4 or 10F1. Fluorescence intensity was measured in arbitrary units using the ImageJ software. Horizontal bars correspond to the mean and standard deviation. ***p-value <0.001 using the Student's t test.
(L) Quantification of mutant germaria with 0 to 1 GSC in the indicated genotypes. The number of scored germaria (n) is indicated. *** p-value <0.001 using the χ2 test.