Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter August 29, 2019

β-Eu(BO2)3 – a new member of the β-RE(BO2)3 (RE=Y, Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu) structure family

  • Birgit Fuchs and Hubert Huppertz EMAIL logo

Abstract

The title compound β-Eu(BO2)3 was synthesized in a high-pressure/high-temperature experiment at 4 GPa and 1473 K. The europium borate crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pnma (no. 62) with the lattice parameters a = 16.071(2), b = 7.440(4), and c = 12.362(5) Å. The structure is isotypic to the already known meta-borates β-RE(BO2)3 (RE = Y, Nd, Sm, Gd, Dy–Lu) and is built up of approximately triangular ribbons of BO4 tetrahedra. The compound was further characterized by X-ray powder diffraction, vibrational spectroscopy and shows a typical Eu3+ line emission upon excitation at 448 nm.

1 Introduction

In the past years, high-pressure investigations on rare earth borates led to a variety of new compositions that were not accessible under ambient pressure conditions. In the year 2002, the Huppertz group was able to synthesize the new compounds RE4B6O15 (RE=Dy, Ho) with a molar ratio of metal to boron of 2:3 [1], [2]. Next to an unknown composition, Dy4B6O15 was the first borate showing the structural feature of edge-sharing BO4 tetrahedra. Further investigations into this system led to a variety of other compounds with previously unknown metal to boron ratios, like for example 1:2 in α-RE2B4O9 (RE=Y, Sm–Ho) [3], [4], [5] and β-RE2B4O9 (RE=Gd, Dy) [6], [7], or 3:5 in RE3B5O12 (RE=Sc, Er–Lu) [8], [9]. Very recently, we were able to describe the hitherto unknown compound YB7O12, a highly condensed structure with an exceptionally low metal to boron ratio of 1:7 [10]. These examples impressively demonstrate the potential of the high-pressure technique for the discovery of new compounds in the field of borates.

In addition, it was also possible to synthesize new modifications of already existing compositions. For example, in the field of rare earth meta-borates, four modifications of the composition RE(BO2)3 (RE=rare earth) are known to date, designated with the Greek letters α, β, γ, and δ. The monoclinic α-phase represents the longest known modification and is built up of chains of planar BO3 and tetrahedral BO4 units. For the β-modification, the first detailed description of the crystal structure was published by Nikelski and Schleid in 2003 [11], who synthesized the orthorhombic meta-borate β-Tb(BO2)3 in sealed platinum ampoules. Subsequently, the syntheses of the phases β-RE(BO2)3 (RE=Y, Nd, Sm, Gd, Dy–Lu) [12], [13], [14] were reported under high-pressure conditions. In 2008, Nikelski et al. [15] showed that the synthesis of β-Dy(BO2)3 was also possible under ambient pressure. For the larger lanthanides, two additional modifications were discovered under high-pressure conditions, e.g. at 7.5 GPa represented by γ-RE(BO2)3 (RE=La–Nd) [16] and at 5.5 and 3.5 GPa by δ-La(BO2)3 [17] and δ-Ce(BO2)3 [18], respectively.

To date, the ICSD (International Crystal Structure Database) lists six ternary europium borates that were obtained at ambient conditions, EuB2O4, EuB4O7, Eu2B2O5 [19], [20], Eu3(BO2)3 [21], EuBO3 [22], and EuB3O6 [=α-Eu(BO2)3] [23], but only one high-pressure europium borate phase, α-Eu2B4O9 [4], is known. Interestingly, no high-pressure meta-borate of europium has been described. In this work, we report the hitherto missing compound β-Eu(BO2)3 that completes the series of phases with the β-RE(BO2)3 structure type from neodymium to lutetium (without promethium). The new compound exhibits typical fluorescence bands of Eu3+ obtained upon excitation at 448 nm, which are presented below along with the results of the crystal structure determination and of vibrational spectroscopic investigations.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Crystal structure

β-Eu(BO2)3 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pnma (no. 62) like its isotypic compounds β-RE(BO2)3 (RE=Y, Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu) [12], [13], [14]. The unit cell (Z=16) exhibits the lattice parameters a=16.071(2), b=7.440(4), and c=12.362(5) Å and a volume of V=1478.1(1) Å3. All relevant details of the structure refinement based on single-crystal data are listed in Table 1.

Table 1:

Crystal data and structure refinement of β-Eu(BO2)3.

Empirical formulaβ-Eu(BO2)3
Molar mass, g mol−1280.39
Crystal systemOrthorhombic
Space groupPnma (no. 62)
Single-crystal data
T, K285(2)
 Radiation/λ, pmMo/71.07
a, Å16.071(2)
b, Å7.440(4)
c, Å12.362(5)
V, Å31478.1(1)
Z16
 Calculated density, g cm−35.04
 Absorption coeff., mm−116.9
F(000), e2016
 Crystal size, mm30.120×0.030×0.020
θ range, deg2.1–38.6
 Index ranges−27≤h≤28

−13≤k≤13

−21≤l≤21
 Reflections collected52777
 Independent reflections/Rint4393/0.0352
 Completeness to θ=25.2°, %100
 Refinement methodFull-matrix least-squares on F2
 Data/parameters4393/197
 Goodness-of-fit on F21.457
 Final R1/wR2 indices [I>2 σ(I)]0.0197/0.0483
 Final R1/wR2 indices (all data)0.0197/0.0483
 Largest diff. peak/hole, e Å−31.52/–4.04

The anionic backbone of β-Eu(BO2)3 is built up exclusively of BO4 tetrahedra. Three of them, namely those with the boron atoms B1, B2, and B3, are connected via the common oxygen atom O7 and form a “windmill-like” structural unit (Fig. 1, top). These “windmills” are linked by three [B2O7] groups developing the fundamental building block (FBB) that comprises 12 BO4 tetrahedra (Fig. 1, bottom). Through the interconnection of the FBBs, infinite ribbons with an approximately triangular cross section are formed along [010] (Fig. 2). These ribbons are connected by the common oxygen atoms O15 to form corrugated layers parallel to the bc plane. The oxygen atom O14 constitutes the only oxygen atom that is coordinated to just one boron atom and represents the terminal corner of the triangular strand.

Fig. 1: Top: “windmill-like” structural unit comprising three BO4 tetrahedra that are connected via the common oxygen atom O7. Bottom: Connection of the “windmill-like” units through [B2O7] groups (light blue) to form infinite ribbons along [010]. Red spheres: boron; blue spheres: oxygen.
Fig. 1:

Top: “windmill-like” structural unit comprising three BO4 tetrahedra that are connected via the common oxygen atom O7. Bottom: Connection of the “windmill-like” units through [B2O7] groups (light blue) to form infinite ribbons along [010]. Red spheres: boron; blue spheres: oxygen.

Fig. 2: Triangular cross section of the fundamental building block (FBB) along [01̅0]. Common oxygen atoms O15 form the link between two of these units at a time. Red spheres: boron; blue spheres: oxygen.
Fig. 2:

Triangular cross section of the fundamental building block (FBB) along [01̅0]. Common oxygen atoms O15 form the link between two of these units at a time. Red spheres: boron; blue spheres: oxygen.

The B–O distances and O–B–O angles lie in the ranges 1.435(3)–1.531(2) Å and 103.5(2)–115.1(2)°, respectively (Tables 2 and 3). The corresponding average values of 1.474 Å and 109.48° are similar to the those reported by Zobetz [1.476(35) Å/109.44(2.78)°] [24]. Interestingly, the two tetrahedra that exhibit both the lowest and the broadest spreading of their O–B–O angles are those which connect the triangular ribbons, B4O4 and B6O4, respectively.

Table 2:

Interatomic B–O distances (Å) for β-Eu(BO2)3 (standard deviations in parentheses).

B1–O81.455(3)B2–O21.451(2)B3–O131.435(3)
–O11.459(2)–O101.454(3)–O121.445(2)
–O91.472(3)–O111.483(3)–O31.486(2)
–O71.507(2)–O71.530(3)–O71.531(2)
Ø1.473Ø1.480Ø1.474
B4–O131.458(3)B5–O141.443(3)B6–O121.442(3)
–O51.465(2)–O101.444(3)–O41.445(2)
–O81.469(3)–O61.511(2)–O151.473(3)
–O151.471(3)–O91.517(3)–O111.518(3)
Ø1.466Ø1.479Ø1.470
Table 3:

Bond angles (deg) for β-Eu(BO2)3 (standard deviations in parentheses).

O8–B1–O9106.4(2)O10–B2–O7107.1(2)O12–B3–O3106.6(2)
O8–B1–O1107.0(2)O10–B2–O11107.4(2)O13–B3–O7107.6(2)
O1–B1–O9109.6(2)O2–B2–O11107.9(2)O13–B3–O12108.9(2)
O9–B1–O7110.5(2)O2–B2–O10110.3(2)O12–B3–O7109.3(2)
O1–B1–O7111.1(2)O11–B2–O7111.3(2)O13–B3–O3111.4(2)
O8–B1–O7112.1(2)O2–B2–O7112.7(2)O3–B3–O7113.1(2)
Ø109.5Ø109.5Ø109.5
O5–B4–O15106.2(2)O6–B5–O9105.4(2)O4–B6–O11103.5(2)
O8–B4–O15109.1(2)O14–B5–O6107.5(2)O12–B6–O15105.3(2)
O13–B4–O5109.9(2)O14–B5–O9107.5(2)O12–B6–O11107.0(2)
O13–B4–O8110.1(2)O10–B5–O9109.7(2)O4–B6–O15112.0(2)
O5–B4–O8110.7(2)O10–B5–O6111.4(2)O15–B6–O11114.1(2)
O13–B4–O15110.7(2)O14–B5–O10114.8(2)O12–B6–O4115.1(2)
Ø109.5Ø109.4Ø109.5

The europium cations are located between the anionic BO layers (Fig. 3). The four crystallographically independent Eu3+ cations are each coordinated by eight oxygen atoms, forming irregularly shaped polyhedra (Fig. 4). The Eu–O distances range from 2.298 to 2.877 Å (see Table 4), which is in good agreement with the Sm–O and Gd–O distances in the isotypic compounds β-Sm(BO2)3 and β-Gd(BO2)3 (2.306–2.899 Å and 2.289–2.867 Å, respectively) [14]. Also in comparison to another high-pressure europium-borate, α-Eu2B4O9, which was synthesized at 10 GPa/1423 K and possesses Eu–O distances between 2.26 and 3.04 Å [4], the aforementioned Eu–O distances of β-Eu(BO2)3 lie within the same range.

Fig. 3: Layered structure of β-Eu(BO2)3 where the ribbons with approximately triangular cross section are interconnected via common vertices along [001]. The europium cations are located between the layers.
Fig. 3:

Layered structure of β-Eu(BO2)3 where the ribbons with approximately triangular cross section are interconnected via common vertices along [001]. The europium cations are located between the layers.

Fig. 4: Coordination spheres of the four crystallographically independent Eu3+ atoms in β-Eu(BO2)3.
Fig. 4:

Coordination spheres of the four crystallographically independent Eu3+ atoms in β-Eu(BO2)3.

Table 4:

Interatomic Eu–O distances (Å) for β-Eu(BO2)3 (standard deviations in parentheses).

Eu1–O152.368(2)Eu2–O122.338(2)
–O12.381(2)–O52.416(2)
–O82.423(2)–O92.445(2)
–O92.548(2)–O142.475(2)
–O62.671(2)–O32.584(2)
Ø2.466Ø2.440
Eu3–O132.304(2)Eu4–O142.298(2)
–O62.378(2)–O102.318(2)
–O112.468(2)–O42.341(2)
–O142.568(2)–O112.529(2)
–O22.649(2)–O32.877(2)
Ø2.463Ø2.439

The bond valence sums were calculated for all atoms in β-Eu(BO2)3 according to both, the bond-length/bond-strength (ΣV) [25], [26] as well as the CHARDI (ΣQ) [27] concept (Table 5). The formal ionic charges are in good agreement with the expected values within the limits of the concepts.

Table 5:

Charge distributions according to both the bond-length/bond-strength (ΣV) and the CHARDI (∑Q) concept.

Eu1Eu2Eu3Eu4B1B2B3B4B5B6
ΣV+2.89+3.05+3.02+3.33+3.04+2.99+3.04+3.10+3.00+3.08
ΣQ+2.93+2.75+2.78+2.74+3.21+3.44+3.35+3.10+2.68+3.02
O1O2O3O4O5O6O7O8O9O10
ΣV–2.02–1.82–1.72–2.13–1.95–2.01–1.99–1.96–2.08–2.14
ΣQ–1.93–1.82–1.90–2.06–2.02–2.18–1.80–1.95–2.08–2.07
O11O12O13O14O15
ΣV–2.08–2.14–2.17–1.98–1.98
ΣQ–2.01–1.99–1.98–2.20–1.99

Table 6 and Fig. 5 allow a comparison of the lattice parameters and cell volumes of β-Eu(BO2)3 with those of the already known meta-borates β-RE(BO2)3 (RE=Y, Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu). The new europium compound fits well into this scheme. The positional parameters as well as the isotropic and anisotropic displacement parameters of the new phase are listed in Tables 7 and 8.

Table 6:

Comparison of the lattice parameters (Å) and volumes (Å3) of β-RE(BO2)3 (RE=Y, Nd, Sm–Lu).

CompoundabcVReference
β-Y(BO2)315.886(2)7.3860(6)12.2119(9)1432.8(2)[12]
β-Nd(BO2)316.162(3)7.474(2)12.442(3)1502.8(5)[14]
β-Sm(BO2)316.125(2)7.4602(4)12.4087(7)1492.7(2)[14]
β-Eu(BO2)316.071(2)7.440(4)12.362(5)1478.1(1)This work
β-Gd(BO2)316.028(2)7.4270(4)12.3217(7)1466.8(2)[14]
β-Tb(BO2)315.9897(9)7.4139(4)12.2958(7)1457.6(2)[11]
β-Dy(BO2)315.930(2)7.402(2)12.264(1)1446(1)[13], [15]
β-Ho(BO2)315.919(2)7.395(2)12.233(2)1440(1)[13]
β-Er(BO2)315.876(2)7.380(2)12.189(2)1428(1)[13]
β-Tm(BO2)315.816(2)7.362(2)12.162(2)1416(1)[13]
β-Yb(BO2)315.791(3)7.352(2)12.140(3)1410(1)[13]
β-Lu(BO2)315.767(2)7.347(2)12.115(2)1403(1)[13]
Fig. 5: Comparison of the cell parameters in the β-RE(BO2)3 (RE=Y, Nd, Sm-Lu) series.
Fig. 5:

Comparison of the cell parameters in the β-RE(BO2)3 (RE=Y, Nd, Sm-Lu) series.

Table 7:

Wyckoff positions, atomic coordinates, and equivalent isotropic displacement parameters Ueq2).

AtomWyckoff positionxyzUeq
Eu14c0.54789(2)1/40.58679(2)0.00379(3)
Eu24c0.87323(2)1/40.22628(2)0.00365(3)
Eu34c0.82875(2)3/40.43164(2)0.00347(3)
Eu44c0.37974(2)1/4–0.00582(2)0.00334(3)
B18d0.5584(2)0.0732(3)0.3450(2)0.0034(3)
B28d0.6102(2)0.4229(3)0.1445(2)0.0034(3)
B38d0.7174(2)0.4292(3)0.3135(2)0.0037(3)
B48d0.6542(2)0.5757(3)0.4817(2)0.0035(3)
B58d0.4701(2)0.5615(3)0.1794(2)0.0035(3)
B68d0.7568(2)0.9310(3)0.1292(2)0.0035(3)
O14c0.5479(2)1/40.3942(2)0.0050(3)
O24c0.5786(2)1/40.1089(2)0.0044(3)
O34c0.7451(2)1/40.3525(2)0.0043(3)
O44c0.7248(2)3/40.1376(2)0.0046(3)
O54c0.6611(2)3/40.5360(2)0.0040(3)
O64c0.4381(2)3/40.1980(2)0.0051(3)
O78d0.6296(8)0.4270(2)0.2656(2)0.0029(2)
O88d0.5715(9)0.5539(2)0.4329(2)0.0044(2)
O98d0.4807(9)0.4809(2)0.2912(2)0.0044(2)
O108d0.5492(9)0.5630(2)0.1239(2)0.0037(2)
O118d0.6851(9)0.4653(2)0.0792(2)0.0038(2)
O128d0.7759(9)0.4835(2)0.2309(2)0.0049(2)
O138d0.7185(9)0.5597(2)0.3989(2)0.0038(2)
O148d0.4052(1)0.4621(2)0.1252(2)0.0048(2)
O158d0.6655(9)0.4385(2)0.5661(2)0.0038(2)
  1. Ueq is defined as one third of the trace of the orthogonalized Uij tensor (standard deviations in parentheses).

Table 8:

Anisotropic displacement parameters Uij2) (standard deviations in parentheses).

AtomU11U22U33U12U13U23
Eu10.00233(5)0.00454(6)0.00449(5)0–0.00014(3)0
Eu20.00319(5)0.00453(5)0.00322(5)0–0.00012(3)0
Eu30.00251(5)0.00383(5)0.00409(5)00.00017(3)0
Eu40.00445(6)0.00320(5)0.00239(5)0–0.00026(3)0
B10.0028(6)0.0046(7)0.0028(6)–0.0003(5)–0.0008(5)0.0004(6)
B20.0027(6)0.0042(7)0.0032(6)0.0001(5)0.0003(5)–0.0003(6)
B30.0030(7)0.0050(7)0.0031(6)0.0003(6)0.0000(5)–0.0010(6)
B40.0037(7)0.0038(7)0.0029(6)–0.0012(6)–0.0002(5)–0.0002(6)
B50.0024(6)0.0046(7)0.0033(6)–0.0003(5)–0.0010(5)0.0002(6)
B60.0024(7)0.0043(7)0.0037(6)0.0002(5)–0.0004(5)0.0000(6)
O10.0074(8)0.0036(7)0.0040(7)00.0027(6)0
O20.0043(7)0.0030(7)0.0058(7)0–0.0019(6)0
O30.0053(7)0.0025(7)0.0052(7)0–0.0010(6)0
O40.0033(7)0.0034(7)0.0071(8)00.0000(6)0
O50.0058(7)0.0035(7)0.0027(7)0–0.0002(6)0
O60.0041(7)0.0034(7)0.0078(8)00.0010(6)0
O70.0011(5)0.0059(5)0.0017(4)0.0001(4)–0.0003(3)–0.0001(4)
O80.0024(5)0.0062(5)0.0044(5)–0.0024(4)–0.0009(4)0.0003(4)
O90.0021(5)0.0082(5)0.0029(5)0.0012(4)–0.0005(4)0.0003(4)
O100.0026(5)0.0043(5)0.0043(5)0.0011(4)0.0016(4)0.0014(4)
O110.0026(5)0.0050(5)0.0037(5)–0.009(4)0.0008(4)–0.0008(4)
O120.0018(5)0.0088(6)0.0041(5)0.0026(4)0.0008(4)0.0009(4)
O130.0020(5)0.0050(5)0.0044(5)–0.0016(4)0.0008(4)–0.0007(4)
O140.0041(5)0.0063(5)0.0041(5)–0.0012(4)–0.0013(4)–0.0010(4)
O150.0022(5)0.0043(5)0.0048(5)0.0020(4)–0.0019(4)–0.0011(4)

Interestingly, the title compound was synthesized at 4 GPa, while its neighbors β-Sm(BO2)3 and β-Gd(BO2)3 were obtained at 7.5 GPa. We tried to receive the latter two borates at the same conditions as the Eu compound, and this turned out to be possible. In contrast, when we tried to synthesize β-Eu(BO2)3 at 7.5 GPa, we only received the already known compounds EuB4O7 [19], [20] and α-Eu2B4O9 [4].

Further details of the crystal structure investigation may be obtained from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre CCDC/FIZ Karlsruhe deposition service via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures on quoting the deposition number CCDC 1941204 for β-Eu(BO2)3.

2.2 X-ray powder diffraction

Figure 6 shows a comparison between the experimental X-ray powder diffraction pattern and the theoretical powder pattern derived from the single-crystal data of β-Eu(BO2)3. Obviously the product was obtained phase-pure, as no side phase is visible in the experimental pattern.

Fig. 6: Comparison of the experimental X-ray powder diffraction data (top) and the theoretical X-ray powder pattern simulated from the single-crystal data (bottom).
Fig. 6:

Comparison of the experimental X-ray powder diffraction data (top) and the theoretical X-ray powder pattern simulated from the single-crystal data (bottom).

2.3 Vibrational spectroscopy

The infrared (IR) spectrum of the β-Eu(BO2)3 powder sample in the range between 400 and 2500 cm−1 in displayed in Fig. 7. Typical stretching vibrations of the BO4 tetrahedra occur in the region between 900 and 1200 cm−1 [28]. The absorptions that appear between approximately 1300 and 1400 cm−1, around 1200 cm−1 and below 790 cm−1 would be assigned to vibrations of BO3 groups in standard cases. Since there are no BO3 groups present in this compound, these vibrational bands may be due to O–B–Eu, B–O–B, O–B–O, and B–O bending and stretching vibrations, as was confirmed by quantum-chemical calculations for β-ZnB4O7 and β-CaB4O7, two high-pressure compounds that also only feature exclusively BO4 tetrahedra connected via threefold coordinated oxygen atoms [29]. BO4 bending vibrations are observed below ~900 cm−1. In the upper range of the spectrum (2000–4000 cm−1), no absorption bands due to hydroxyl groups or H2O were visible.

Fig. 7: IR spetrum of a β-Eu(BO2)3 powder sample.
Fig. 7:

IR spetrum of a β-Eu(BO2)3 powder sample.

2.4 Luminescence properties

The photoluminescence measurements were carried out on a polycrystalline sample. An emission spectrum was collected on excitation at 448 nm (Fig. 8). For orthorhombic structures, five groups of Eu3+ transitions are assigned to the 5D0→→7FJ (J=0–4) transitions as follows: a weak, single band at 579 nm is due to the 5D07F0 transition. The magnetic dipole transitions (5D0→→7F1) in the region between 583 and 596 nm are less intense than the electric dipole transitions (5D0→→7F2) between 614 and 624 nm [30]. This also confirms the presented crystal structure, in which no inversion center was found in the four crystallographic independent Eu3+ sites [31]. The 5D0→→7F3 transitions may be attributed to the weak bands around 649 nm while the 5D07F4 transitions are visible in the region from 681 to 705 nm. Interestingly, no concentration quenching is observed in this compound, even though Eu3+ is the sole cationic species present. For the europium borates EuBO3, EuB2O4, and EuB4O7 also no quenching effects were observed [20], [22].

Fig. 8: Luminescence spectrum of β-Eu(BO2)3, obtained upon excitation at 448 nm.
Fig. 8:

Luminescence spectrum of β-Eu(BO2)3, obtained upon excitation at 448 nm.

3 Conclusion

In this work, we have presented a new member of the β-RE(BO2)3 (RE=Y, Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu) structure family. The hitherto missing β-Eu(BO2)3, synthesized at 4 GPa and 1473 K, completes the series of β-meta-borates from samarium to lutetium. The compound is built up of ribbons with triangular cross section along [010], which form corrugated layers parallel to the bc plane. Between those borate layers, the four crystallographically independent europium cations are located.

In contrast to the isotypic compounds β-Sm(BO2)3 and β-Gd(BO2)3 that were synthesized at 7.5 GPa, the europium meta-borate could not be obtained at higher pressures than the reported 4 GPa.

The compound has been characterized by single-crystal X-ray analyses and vibrational spectroscopy. In contrast to the aforementioned isotypic Sm3+ and Gd3+ analogues, β-Eu(BO2)3 exhibits a bright red emission.

4 Experimental section

4.1 Synthesis

For the synthesis of the title compound β-Eu(BO2)3, the starting materials Eu2O3 (Smart Elements, Wien, Austria, 99.99%) and B2O3 (Strem Chemicals, Newburyport, MA, USA, 99.9+%) were grinded together in the stoichiometric ratio of 1:3 under ambient conditions. The homogenized mixture was filled into a Pt capsule, placed into a crucible and closed with a lid (both made of α-BN; Henze Boron Nitride Products AG, Germany). The high-pressure/high-temperature experiment was carried out in an 18/11 assembly. It was compressed by eight tungsten carbide cubes (Hawedia, Marklkofen, Germany) using a Walker-type module and a hydraulic 1000 t press (both Max Voggenreiter GmbH, Germany). A detailed description of this setup can be found in the literature [32], [33], [34].

A pressure of 4 GPa was built up within 110 min followed by heating the sample to 1473 K in the following 10 min. This temperature was kept for 10 min, before the sample was cooled to 773 K over the following 30 min. After quenching to room temperature, the 300 min decompression process started. The product was separated from its surroundings to reveal colorless crystals which were found to be β-Eu(BO2)3.

4.2 Single-crystal structure analysis

The intensity data of a single-crystal was collected at room temperature with a Bruker D8 Quest Kappa diffractometer equipped with a Photon 100 CMOS detector. Monochromatized Mo radiation (λ=0.7107 Å) was generated with an Incoatec microfocus X-ray tube and a multilayer optic. Reflections were measured in the range 2.1≤θ≤38.6° and a multiscan absorption correction of the intensity data was performed with Sadabs-2014/5 [35]. For the structure solution and parameter refinement, the software Shelxs/l-2013 [36], [37] implemented in the program WinGX-2013.3 [38] was used.

4.3 X-ray powder diffraction

The powder diffraction pattern of the product was obtained in transmission geometry on a STOE Stadi P powder diffractometer (STOE & Cie GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). The measurement was performed on a flat sample with Ge(111)-monochromatized Mo1 radiation (λ=70.93 pm) in the 2θ range of 2–52° with a step size of 0.015°. The reflections were detected with a Mythen 1 K detector (Dectris).

4.4 Vibrational spectroscopy

An FTIR-ATR (Attenuated Total Reflection) characterization of the β-Eu(BO2)3 powder sample was performed in the spectral range of 400–4000 cm−1 with a Bruker ALPHA Platinum-ATR spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) provided with a 2×2 mm diamond ATR-crystal and a DTGS detector. Three hundred and twenty scans of the powder sample were acquired and afterwards corrected for atmospheric influences employing the Opus 7.2 software [39].

4.5 Luminescence spectroscopy

The emission spectrum of the powder sample was collected using a setup equipped with an AvaSpec2048 spectrometer (AVANTES, Apeldoorn, Netherlands). As excitation source, a blue laser diode (THORLABS, Newton, NJ, USA) with 448 nm wavelength was used. Prior to the experiments, a tungsten-halogen calibration lamp was used for a spectral radiance calibration of the setup. The software AVA AvaSoft full version 7 was used for data handling. The excitation spectrum was measured in the range of 200–1100 nm and was background-corrected.

Acknowledgments

We thank Assoc. Prof. Dr. G. Heymann for collecting the single-crystal diffraction data and C. Stoll for helping with the collection of the FTIR and the luminescence data of the β-Eu(BO2)3 powder sample. We also thank OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH for the provision of the single-grain spectrometer setup.

References

[1] H. Huppertz, B. von der Eltz, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2002, 124, 9376–9377.10.1021/ja017691zSearch in Google Scholar

[2] H. Huppertz, Z. Naturforsch.2003, 58b, 278–290.10.1515/znb-2003-0406Search in Google Scholar

[3] M. K. Schmitt, H. Huppertz, Z. Naturforsch.2017, 72b, 977–982.10.1515/znb-2017-0150Search in Google Scholar

[4] H. Emme, H. Huppertz, Chem. Eur. J.2003, 9, 3623–3633.10.1002/chem.200204696Search in Google Scholar

[5] H. Emme, H. Huppertz, Acta Crystallogr.2005, C61, i29–i31.10.1107/S0108270104030446Search in Google Scholar

[6] H. Huppertz, S. Altmannshofer, G. Heymann, J. Solid State Chem.2003, 170, 320–329.10.1016/S0022-4596(02)00099-3Search in Google Scholar

[7] H. Emme, H. Huppertz, Acta Crystallogr.2005, C61, i23–i24.10.1107/S0108270104033396Search in Google Scholar

[8] S. C. Neumair, H. Huppertz, Z. Naturforsch.2009, 64b, 1339–1344.10.1515/znb-2009-11-1213Search in Google Scholar

[9] H. Emme, M. Valldor, R. Pöttgen, H. Huppertz, Chem. Mater.2005, 17, 2707–2715.10.1021/cm047741+Search in Google Scholar

[10] B. Fuchs, M. K. Schmitt, K. Wurst, H. Huppertz, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.2019, 271–276.10.1002/ejic.201801303Search in Google Scholar

[11] T. Nikelski, T. Schleid, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2003, 629, 1017–1022.10.1002/zaac.200200446Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. K. Schmitt, H. Huppertz, Z. Naturforsch.2017, 72b, 983–988.10.1515/znb-2017-0151Search in Google Scholar

[13] H. Emme, T. Nikelski, T. Schleid, R. Pöttgen, M. H. Möller, H. Huppertz, Z. Naturforsch.2004, 59b, 202–215.10.1515/znb-2004-0213Search in Google Scholar

[14] H. Emme, G. Heymann, A. Haberer, H. Huppertz, Z. Naturforsch.2007, 62b, 765–770.10.1515/znb-2007-0603Search in Google Scholar

[15] T. Nikelski, M. C. Schäfer, H. Huppertz, T. Schleid, Z. Kristallogr.2008, 223, 177–178.10.1524/ncrs.2008.0073Search in Google Scholar

[16] H. Emme, C. Despotopoulou, H. Huppertz, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.2004, 630, 2450–2457.10.1002/zaac.200400202Search in Google Scholar

[17] G. Heymann, T. Soltner, H. Huppertz, Solid State Sci.2006, 8, 821–829.10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2006.03.002Search in Google Scholar

[18] A. Haberer, G. Heymann, H. Huppertz, Z. Naturforsch.2007, 62b, 759–764.10.1515/znb-2007-0602Search in Google Scholar

[19] K.-I. Machida, H. Hata, K. Okuno, G.-Y. Adachi, J. Shiokawa, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem.1979, 41, 1425–1430.10.1016/0022-1902(79)80205-5Search in Google Scholar

[20] K.-I. Machida, G.-Y. Adachi, J. Shiokawa, Acta Crystallogr.1980, B36, 2008–2011.10.1107/S0567740880007820Search in Google Scholar

[21] K.-i. Machida, G.-y. Adachi, H. Hata, J. Shiokawa, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.1981, 54, 1052–1055.10.1246/bcsj.54.1052Search in Google Scholar

[22] G. Corbel, M. Leblanc, E. Antic-Fidancev, M. Lemaı̂tre-Blaise, J. C. Krupa, J. Alloys Compd.1999, 287, 71–78.10.1016/S0925-8388(99)00023-7Search in Google Scholar

[23] A. Goriounova, P. Held, P. Becker, L. Bohaty, Acta Crystallogr.2004, E60, i131–i133.10.1107/S1600536804024353Search in Google Scholar

[24] E. Zobetz, Z. Kristallogr.1990, 191, 45–57.10.1524/zkri.1990.191.1-2.45Search in Google Scholar

[25] I. D. Brown, D. Altermatt, Acta Crystallogr.1985, B41, 244–247.10.1107/S0108768185002063Search in Google Scholar

[26] N. E. Brese, M. O’Keeffe, Acta Crystallogr.1991, B47, 192–197.10.1107/S0108768190011041Search in Google Scholar

[27] R. Hoppe, S. Voigt, H. Glaum, J. Kissel, H. P. Müller, K. Bernet, J. Less-Common Met.1989, 156, 105–122.10.1016/0022-5088(89)90411-6Search in Google Scholar

[28] S. C. Neumair, S. Vanicek, R. Kaindl, D. M. Többens, C. Martineau, F. Taulelle, J. Senker, H. Huppertz, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.2011, 4147–4152.10.1002/ejic.201100618Search in Google Scholar

[29] R. Kaindl, G. Sohr, H. Huppertz, Spectrochim. Acta A2013, 116, 408–417.10.1016/j.saa.2013.07.072Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[30] K. Binnemanns, Coord. Chem. Rev.2015, 295, 1–45.10.1016/j.ccr.2015.02.015Search in Google Scholar

[31] G. Chadeyron, R. Mahiou, M. El-Ghozzi, A. Arbus, D. Zambon, J. C. Cousseins, J. Lumin.1997, 72–74, 564–566.10.1016/S0022-2313(96)00191-3Search in Google Scholar

[32] D. Walker, M. A. Carpenter, C. M. Hitch, Am. Mineral.1990, 75, 1020–1028.Search in Google Scholar

[33] D. Walker, Am. Mineral.1991, 76, 1092–1100.10.1007/978-1-4615-3968-1_10Search in Google Scholar

[34] H. Huppertz, Z. Kristallogr.2004, 219, 330–338.10.1524/zkri.219.6.330.34633Search in Google Scholar

[35] G. M. Sheldrick, Sadabs (version 2014/5), Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI (USA) 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[36] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2008, A64, 112–122.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2015, C71, 3–8.Search in Google Scholar

[38] L. J. Farrugia, J. Appl. Crystallogr.2012, 45, 849–854.10.1107/S0021889812029111Search in Google Scholar

[39] Bruker Opus (version 7.2), Bruker, Billerica, MA (USA) 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-07-17
Accepted: 2019-08-06
Published Online: 2019-08-29
Published in Print: 2019-09-25

©2019 Hubert Huppertz et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 19.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2019-0117/html
Scroll to top button