Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter January 7, 2017

Two isostructural fluorinated metal-organic frameworks with rare rod-packing architecture: syntheses, structures and luminescent properties

  • Sheng-Chun Chen , Feng Tian , Ming-Yang He and Qun Chen EMAIL logo

Abstract

Two isostructural fluorinated metal-organic frameworks, formulated as [M2(Fbix)(1,4-NDC)2]n (M=Cd for 1 and Mn for 2), were synthesized by employing 1,4-naphthalenedicarboxylic acid (1,4-H2NDC) and the flexible fluorinated ligand 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-1,4-bis(imidazole-1-yl-methyl)benzene (Fbix) under hydrothermal conditions. Their structures were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and further characterized by infrared spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, and thermogravimetric analyses. Structure analyses have revealed that compounds 1 and 2 show an unusual hex net based on infinite rod-shaped secondary building units. The solid-state fluorescence spectra of 1 and 2 were measured and indicate a ligand-based emission for both complexes.

1 Introduction

Crystal engineering of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) has attracted much attention in recent years, not only for their fascinating architectures and topologies [1], [2], but also for their applications as multifunctional materials in catalysis, gas storage, luminescence, and magnetism [3], [4], [5], [6]. The overall topology of MOFs mainly depends on the assembly of metal salts and organic ligands. In this field, the most effective and facile method to construct novel MOFs is the selection of well-designed organic ligands containing modifiable backbones. Among multitudinous organic ligands, di- or multicarboxylic acids are the most efficient families in the formation of coordination networks, due in large part to their well-known bonding interactions with metal ions [7], [8], [9], [10]. In particular, metal ions can be locked into place by the carboxylate groups to produce rigid entities of simple geometry, referred to as secondary building units (SBUs). A series of representative SBUs, including discrete shapes (trigonal [11], square [12], octahedral [13], and others) and infinite rod-shaped building blocks [8], [14], have been identified and adopted to construct MOFs. The pioneering research of Yaghi et al. has well illustrated the principal structural possibilities for packing infinite rod-shaped SBUs and presented a number of MOF structures belonging to rod packing motifs [8], with most of them showing a 4-connected pcu-type net, while limited cases are defined as 3-connected bnn-type, 6-connected hex-type, or 4,6-connected rod-packing structures.

Apart from the multicarboxylate ligands, aromatic N-donor linkers are frequently employed as ancillary ligands in view of charge balance and versatile conformation [15], [16], [17]. Moreover, the ancillary N-donor ligands also play an important role in adjusting the coordination mode of the multicarboxylate blocks, giving control over the topology of the resulting frameworks. In this context, the mixed-ligand synthetic strategy based on carboxylate and N-donor ligands has been well utilized to generate various MOFs with novel topologies [18]. For example, bis(imidazole) ligands such as 1,4-bis(imidazol-1-yl)benzene, 1,4-bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene, 1,4-bis (imidazole-1-yl)-butane, and 1,4-bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)-2,3,5,6-tetramethylbenzene have been extensively used as auxiliary organic linkers combining with various carboxylate ligands for constructing fascinating structures [19], [20], [21], [22]. Meanwhile, the effect of the perfluorinated N-heterocyclic bis-pyridyl/imidazolyl/triazolyl ligands on structures and properties has also been investigated [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. However, to the best of our knowledge, MOFs constructed from aromatic carboxylates and fluorinated bis-imidazolyl mixed ligands have been scarcely explored [28], [29], which prompted us to initiate this research. As a continuous effort, in this work, we selected the flexible 1,4-bis(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)-2,3,5,6-tetrafluorobenzene (Fbix) and the rigid 1,4-naphthalene dicarboxylate (1,4-H2NDC) as the mixed ligands (see Scheme 1) to assemble with Cd(II) and Mn(II) ions under hydrothermal conditions, and synthesized two isostructural perfluorinated MOFs [M2(Fbix)(1,4-NDC)2]n (M=Cd for 1 and Mn for 2). Both complexes display a rare 6-connected hex-type net based on infinite rod-shaped SBUs. The IR spectral, thermal, and luminescence properties of 1 and 2 are also presented and discussed.

Scheme 1: The used ligands Fbix and 1,4-H2NDC.
Scheme 1:

The used ligands Fbix and 1,4-H2NDC.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 Synthesis and general characterization

Previous work by Bu [30], and Du [31] demonstrated that mixing 1,4-bis(imdazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene (bix) with 1,4-H2NDC in the presence of Zn(II) and Co(II) ions produced unusual 3D 10-connected MOFs based on pentanuclear SBUs. Encouraged by these results, we were interested in extending these studies employing the use of the perfluorinated analogue Fbix. Compounds 1 and 2 were synthesized by the hydrothermal reactions of Fbix and the corresponding metal sources in the presence of 1,4-H2NDC. It should be noted that, when we also tried to use NaOH to adjust the pH value of the mixture system, only white precipitates of unknown composition were obtained. Moreover, the synthesis of the compounds was sensitive to the reaction temperature. If the reaction temperature was set, for example, 10°C higher or lower, no suitable crystals were formed. Both complexes are stable at room temperature and insoluble in water and common organic solvents, which is consistent with their polymeric nature. The phase purity of the bulk samples of each complex was confirmed by the powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns, which matches approximately with the corresponding simulated ones obtained from the single-crystal data (see Fig. 1). For the IR spectra of 1 and 2, bands around 3112 cm−1 are associated with aromatic C–H stretching vibrations. The weak absorption peaks around 2925 cm−1 are the characteristic peaks of the methylene group of the Fbix ligand. The strong absorption bands in the range of 1650–1600 and 1420–1400 cm−1 can be assigned to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibrations of carboxylate groups of 1,4-NDC.

Fig. 1: Experimental and simulated PXRD patterns for complexes 1 (a) and 2 (b).
Fig. 1:

Experimental and simulated PXRD patterns for complexes 1 (a) and 2 (b).

2.2 Description of the crystal structure

Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis has revealed that complexes 1 and 2 are isostructural (see Table 1), and thus herein only the crystal structure of 1 is described in detail as a typical example. Complex 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c and shows a 3D network structure. The asymmetric unit of 1 contains two crystallographically independent Cd(II) ions, one Fbix ligand, and two 1,4-NDC dianions. As shown in Fig. 2a, both Cd1 and Cd2 ions are six-coordinated and display a similar CdO5N octahedral geometry, which is provided by five oxygen atoms from four 1,4-NDC ligands [Cd–O=2.159(3)–2.159(3) Å] and one nitrogen atom from a Fbix ligand [Cd–N=2.230(3) and 2.303(3) Å]. Each 1,4-NDC ligand is μ4-bridging with one carboxylate group in a μ2-η2:η1-chelating/bridging mode and the other adopting a μ2-η1:η1-syn-syn-bridging mode. As shown in Fig. 2b, two Cd(II) ions are linked in sequence by carboxylate groups of 1,4-NDC, forming an infinite 1D rod-like chain along the c axis. Corner-sharing CdO5N polyhedra are alternately arranged in the rod with separations of adjacent Cd···Cd atoms of 4.087(1) and 4.130(1) Å. Each rod-shaped chain is linked to four neighboring chains through the naphthalene rings of 1,4-NDC ligands to generate a 3D subframework, as shown in Fig. 2c. The Fbix ligand adopts an anti-configuration, which links two rod-like chains along the b axis to construct an ultimate 3D framework (Fig. 2d). Further analysis of the structure reveals a hex-type net topology considering each rod-shaped SBU as a six-connected node (Fig. 2e). It should be noted that, to our knowledge, only limited examples belonging to 6-connected hex net based on infinite rod-shaped SBUs have been reported [8], [32]. Further, examination of the structure with PLATON [33] also shows that there is no solvent-accessible void in the structure of both complexes 1 and 2.

Table 1:

Crystal structure data for 1 and 2.

12
Empirical formulaC38H22Cd2F4N4O8C38H22F4Mn2N4O8
Mr963.42848.48
Crystal size, mm30.22×0.20×0.150.20×0.19×0.16
Crystal systemMonoclinicMonoclinic
Space groupP21/cP21/c
a, Å17.665(5)17.431(4)
b, Å13.496(4)13.307(3)
c, Å16.016(4)15.987(4)
β, deg116.276(4)116.410(4)
V, Å33423.7(15)3321.2(14)
Z44
Dcalcd, g cm−31.871.69
μ(MoKα ), cm−11.30.8
F(000), e18961712
hkl range−18≤h≤+23−22≤h≤+24
−17≤k≤+18−18≤k≤+16
−22≤l≤+21−22≤l≤+22
Refl. measured2315122913
Refl. unique89998540
Rint0.02070.0397
R1a/wR2b0.0285/0.13420.0331/0.0889
GoF (F2)c0.9580.990
Δρfin (max/min), e Å−30.52, −0.740.48, −0.61

aR1=Σ||Fo|−|Fc||/Σ|Fo|.

bwR2=[Σw(Fo2Fc2)2w(Fo2)2]1/2, w=[σ2(Fo2)+(AP)2+BP]−1, where P=(Max(Fo2, 0)+2Fc2)/3.

cGoF=S=[Σw(Fo2Fc2)2/(nobsnparam)]1/2.

Fig. 2: Views of (a) the coordination environment of Cd(II) ions in 1 (symmetry codes: #1, −x+1, −y, −z+2; #2, −x+2, y−1/2, −z+5/2; #3, x, −y−1/2, z+1/2; #4, −x+1, y−1/2, −z+3/2; #5, −x+2, −y+1, −z+2), (b) the chain structure of infinite rod-shaped SBUs, (c) the 3D framework by linking rod-shaped SBUs with 1,4-NDC, (d) the 3D structure of 1 (bright green: Fbix; hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity), and (e) the six-connected hex net of 1.
Fig. 2:

Views of (a) the coordination environment of Cd(II) ions in 1 (symmetry codes: #1, −x+1, −y, −z+2; #2, −x+2, y−1/2, −z+5/2; #3, x, −y−1/2, z+1/2; #4, −x+1, y−1/2, −z+3/2; #5, −x+2, −y+1, −z+2), (b) the chain structure of infinite rod-shaped SBUs, (c) the 3D framework by linking rod-shaped SBUs with 1,4-NDC, (d) the 3D structure of 1 (bright green: Fbix; hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity), and (e) the six-connected hex net of 1.

2.3 Thermal stability

In order to estimate the thermal stability of complexes 1 and 2, thermogravimetric (TG) analyses were performed under N2 atmosphere in the temperature range of 30–800°C. The corresponding curves are depicted in Fig. 3. Compounds 1 and 2 exhibit high thermal stability, being stable up to 293 and 296°C, respectively, followed by two consecutive steps of weight loss up to 600°C. This result reveals close thermal decomposition behavior on account of their isomorphic features. The final solids hold weights of ca. 27.0% for 1 and 15.2% for 2 relative to the total sample, which are close to those of CdO (calculated: 26.7%) and MnO (calculated: 14.7%), respectively.

Fig. 3: TGA curves of complexes 1 and 2.
Fig. 3:

TGA curves of complexes 1 and 2.

2.4 Luminescent properties

The emission spectra of complexes 1 and 2 as well as of the free ligand Fbix were examined in the solid state at room temperature (Fig. 4). Excitation of the solid samples at 336 nm leads to the generation of broad fluorescence emission in the range of 465–540 nm. The main emission peak of Fbix is at 493 nm (λex=338 nm), which may be ascribed to the π*→π transition. As for 1, a red-shift (11 nm) on the emission band is observed, which could most probably be attributed to an intraligand and/or ligand-to-ligand charge transfer [34], [35], because the Cd(II) ion is hardly oxidized or reduced, and thus the emission is neither ligand-to-metal charge transfer nor metal-to-ligand charge transfer in nature. The fluorescent emission of 2 with maximum at 495 nm may be attributed to the intraligand transition of coordinated Fbix ligands because similar emission at 493 nm was observed for the free Fbix ligand. Although the free dicarboxylate ligand 1,4-H2NDC can also exhibit fluorescence (λem=508 nm) at room temperature [19], its emission band originating from the π*→n transition is weak, suggesting that the carboxylate ligand has no significant contribution to the fluorescence emission of complexes 1 and 2 in the presence of the N-donor ligand.

Fig. 4: Solid-state fluorescent emission spectra of complexes 1 and 2 as well as the free ligand Fbix.
Fig. 4:

Solid-state fluorescent emission spectra of complexes 1 and 2 as well as the free ligand Fbix.

In summary, two new perfluorinated MOFs based on mixed Fbix and 1,4-NDC ligands have been synthesized under hydrothermal conditions and structurally characterized. Both complexes are isostructural and feature a rare 3D hex-type framework based on infinite rod-packing SBUs. The Cd(II) MOF displays a strong fluorescence emission in the solid state at room temperature. This work may provide useful information for employing fluorinated N-containing heterocyclic ligands and substituted aromatic carboxylates to assemble new functional MOFs with fascinating topologies and properties.

3 Experimental section

All reagents and solvents for synthesis and analysis were commercially available and used without further purification, except that the ligand Fbix was synthesized according to our previously reported method [24]. The Fourier transform (FT) IR spectra (KBr pellet) were taken on a Nicolet ESP 460 FT-IR spectrometer in the range of 4000–400 cm−1. Elemental analyses were performed on a PE-2400II (Perkin-Elmer) analyzer. PXRD patterns were recorded on a Rigaku D/max-2500 diffractometer at 40 kV and 100 mA for a Cu-target tube (λ=1.5406 Å). The calculated PXRD patterns were obtained from the single-crystal diffraction data using the PLATON software [33]. TG analysis experiments were carried out in the temperature range of 30–800°C on a Dupont thermal analyzer under N2 atmosphere at a heating rate of 10°C min−1. The luminescence emission spectra for the powdered solid samples were measured on a Varian Cary Eclipse spectrometer at room temperature.

3.1 Synthesis of [Cd2(Fbix)(1,4-NDC)2]n (1)

A mixture of Cd(NO3)2·4H2O (61.7 mg, 0.2 mmol), Fbix (31.0 mg, 0.1 mmol), 1,4-H2NDC (43.2 mg, 0.2 mmol), NaNO3 (18 mg, 0.1 mmol), and water (7 mL) was stirred for 30 min at room temperature and then sealed in a 15 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel container, which was heated to 120°C and held at that temperature for 3 days. After cooling down to room temperature, yellow block-shaped crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained in ca. 77% yield (37.1 mg, based on 1,4-H2NDC). – Anal. for C38H22Cd2F4N4O8 (%): calcd. C 47.37, H 2.30, N 5.82; found C 47.52, H 2.28, N 5.76. – IR (cm−1, KBr pellet): v=3113 (m), 3035 (m), 2974 (w), 2927 (w), 1621 (s), 1549 (m), 1493 (s), 1464 (m), 1418 (s), 1364 (m), 1298 (s), 1258 (m), 1200 (m), 1158 (w), 1089 (w), 931 (w), 774 (m), 753 (w), 616 (w).

3.2 Synthesis of [Mn2(Fbix)(1,4-NDC)2]n (2)

Complex 2 was hydrothermally synthesized by a procedure similar to that of 1 except that Cd(NO3)2·4H2O was replaced by MnCl2·4H2O (39.6 mg, 0.2 mmol). Yellow block-shaped crystals of 2 were isolated in ca. 54% yield (22.9 mg, based on 1,4-H2NDC). – Anal. for C38H22F4Mn2N4O8 (%): calcd. C 53.79, H 2.61, N 6.60; found C 53.43, H 2.64, N 6.68. – IR (cm−1, KBr pellet): v=3112 (m), 3033 (m), 2972 (w), 2925 (w), 1613 (s), 1550 (m), 1493 (s), 1465 (m), 1412 (s), 1365 (m), 1298 (s), 1261 (m), 1203 (m), 1085 (w), 863 (w), 797 (w), 775 (w), 660 (w).

3.3 X-ray structure determinations

The single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements were performed on a Bruker Apex II CCD diffractometer at ambient temperature with MoKα radiation (λ=0.71073 Å). A semiempirical absorption correction was applied using SADABS [36], and the program SAINT was used for integration of the diffraction profiles [37]. The structure was solved by Direct Methods using the SHELXS program of SHELXTL packages and refined anisotropically for all non-H atoms by full-matrix least squares on F2 with SHELXL [38], [39], [40], [41]. In general, hydrogen atoms were located geometrically and allowed to ride during the subsequent refinement. Further crystallographic data and structural refinement parameters are summarized in Table 1, and selected bond lengths and angles are listed in Table 2.

Table 2:

Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg) for 1 and 2 with estimated standard deviations in parentheses.a

12
DistancesDistances
Cd1–O22.282(2)Mn1–O12.089(1)
Cd1–O4#12.159(3)Mn1–O3#12.107(1)
Cd1–O62.286(2)Mn1–O52.153(1)
Cd1–O7#22.317(2)Mn1–O8#22.119(1)
Cd1–O8#22.576(2)Mn1–N12.187(1)
Cd1–N4#32.303(3)Mn2–O2#32.170(1)
Cd2–O12.242(2)Mn2–O4#42.152(1)
Cd2–O22.628(3)Mn2–O6#32.037(1)
Cd2–O3#42.321(2)Mn2–O7#52.107(1)
Cd2–O52.247(2)Mn2–N42.236(1)
Cd2–O8#52.275(2)
Cd2–N12.230(3)
AnglesAngles
O2–Cd1–O4#1100.9(1)O1–Mn1–O3#1107.6(1)
O2–Cd1–O687.8(1)O1–Mn1–O5101.5(5)
O2–Cd1–O7#2108.1(1)O1–Mn1–O8#294.7(5)
O2–Cd1–O8#2161.1(1)O1–Mn1–N196.2(5)
O2–Cd1–N4#388.2(1)O3#1–Mn1–O5150.8(5)
O4#1–Cd1–O691.8(1)O3#1–Mn1–O8#292.0(1)
O4#1–Cd1–O7#2150.7(1)O3#1–Mn1–N190.3(5)
O4#1–Cd1–O8#298.0(1)O5–Mn1–O8#287.2(1)
O4#1–Cd1–N4#3103.4(1)O5–Mn1–N184.7(1)
O6–Cd1–O7#285.0(1)O8#1–Mn1–N1167.5(1)
O6–Cd1–O8#291.5(1)O2#3–Mn2–O4#485.8(1)
O6–Cd1–N4#3164.8(1)O2#3–Mn2–O6#3140.2(1)
O7#2–Cd1–O8#253.1(1)O2#3–Mn2–O7#5117.8(1)
O7#2–Cd1–N4#382.2(1)O2#3–Mn2–N482.7(1)
O8#2–Cd1–N4#387.6(1)O4#4–Mn2–O6#393.1(1)
O1–Cd2–O3#487.5(1)O4#4–Mn2–O7#591.1(1)
O1–Cd2–O593.6(1)O4#4–Mn2–N4167.0(1)
O1–Cd2–O8#589.5(1)O6#3–Mn2–O7#5101.9(1)
O1–Cd2–N1171.1(1)O6#3–Mn2–N499.7(1)
O3#4–Cd2–O5160.0(1)O7#5–Mn2–N488.7(1)
O3#4–Cd2–O8#594.0(1)
O3#4–Cd2–N184.5(1)
O5–Cd2–O8#5105.9(1)
O5–Cd2–N192.6(1)
O8#5–Cd2–N194.9(1)

aSymmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms. For 1, #1: −x+1, −y, −z+2; #2: −x+2, y−1/2, −z+5/2; #3: x, −y−1/2, z+1/2; #4: −x+1, y−1/2, −z+3/2; #5: −x+2, −y+1, −z+2. For 2, #1: −x, −y+1, −z; #2: −x+1, y+1/2, −z+1/2; #3: −x, y−1/2, −z+1/2; #4: −x+1, −y, −z+1; #5: x, y+1, −z.

CCDC 1496989 and 1496990 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for complexes 1 and 2. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21201026), and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) and the Nature Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20131142).

References

[1] H. Furukawa, K. E. Cordova, M. O’Keeffe, O. M. Yaghi, Science2013, 341, 974.10.1126/science.1230444Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] D. Zhao, D. J. Timmons, D. Yuan, H.-C. Zhou, Acc. Chem. Res.2011, 44, 123.10.1021/ar100112ySearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] J. Y. Lee, O. K. Farha, J. Roberts, K. A. Scheidt, S. B. T. Nguyen, J. T. Joseph, Chem. Soc. Rev.2009, 38, 1450.10.1039/b807080fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] J.-R. Li, R. J. Kuppler, H.-C. Zhou, Chem. Soc. Rev.2009, 38, 1477.10.1039/b802426jSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] M. D. Allendorf, C. A. Bauer, R. K. Bhakta, R. J. T. Houk, Chem. Soc. Rev.2009, 38, 1330.10.1039/b802352mSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] E. Coronado, G. M. Espallargas, Chem. Soc. Rev.2013, 42, 1525.10.1039/C2CS35278HSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] H. Li, M. Eddaoudi, M. O’Keeffe, O. M. Yaghi, Nature1999, 402, 276.10.1038/46248Search in Google Scholar

[8] N. L. Rosi, J. Kim, M. Eddaoudi, B. Chen, M. O’Keeffe, O. M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2005, 127, 1504.10.1021/ja045123oSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] O. K. Farha, A. Ö. Oezguer, I. Eryazici, C. D. Malliakas, B. G. Hauser, M. G. Kanatzidis, S. T. Nguyen, R. Q. Snurr, J. T. Hupp, Nat. Chem.2010, 2, 944.10.1038/nchem.834Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] K. C. Stylianou, R. Heck, S. Y. Chong, J. Bacsa, J. T. A. Jones, Y. Z. Khimyak, D. Bradshaw, M. J. Rosseinsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2010, 132, 4119.10.1021/ja906041fSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Y. Liu, J. F. Eubank, A. J. Cairns, J. Eckert, V. C. Kravtsov, R. Luebke, M. Eddaoudi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2007, 46, 3278.10.1002/anie.200604306Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] J. S. Seo, D. Whang, H. Lee, S. I. Jun, J. Oh, Y. J. Jeon, K. Kim, Nature1999, 404, 982.10.1038/35010088Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] M. Eddaoudi, J. Kim, N. Rosi, D. Vodak, J. Wachter, M. O’Keeffe, O. M. Yaghi, Science2002, 295, 469.10.1126/science.1067208Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] H. Furukawa, J. Kim, N. W. Ockwig, M. O’Keeffe, O. M. Yaghi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.2008, 130, 11650.10.1021/ja803783cSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] C. Pettinari, N. Masciocchi, L. Pandolfo, D. Pucci, Chem. Eur. J.2010, 16, 1106.10.1002/chem.200901923Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] M.-L. Han, J.-G. Wang, L.-F. Ma, H. Guo, L.-Y. Wang, CrystEngComm2012, 14, 2691.10.1039/c2ce06511hSearch in Google Scholar

[17] L. Fan, X. Zhang, Z. Sun, W. Zhang, Y. Ding, W. Fan, L. Sun, X. Zhao, H. Lei, Cryst. Growth Des.2013, 13, 2462.10.1021/cg400172wSearch in Google Scholar

[18] M. Du, C.-P. Li, C.-S. Liu, S.-M. Fang, Coord. Chem. Rev.2013, 257, 1282.10.1016/j.ccr.2012.10.002Search in Google Scholar

[19] Y.-W. Li, H. Ma, Y.-Q. Chen, K.-H. He, Z.-X. Li, X.-H. Bu, Cryst. Growth Des.2012, 12, 189.10.1021/cg200926zSearch in Google Scholar

[20] J. Xu, X.-Q. Yao, L.-F. Huang, Y.-Z. Li, H.-G. Zheng, CrystEngComm2011, 13, 857.10.1039/C0CE00219DSearch in Google Scholar

[21] C. Li, D.-S. Li, J. Zhao, Y.-Q. Mou, K. Zou, S.-Z. Xiao, M. Du, CrystEngComm2011, 13, 6601.10.1039/c1ce05896gSearch in Google Scholar

[22] T. Inoue, K. Yamanishi, M. Kondo, Inorg. Chem.2013, 52, 4765.10.1021/ic400315gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Z.-H. Zhang, S.-C. Chen, M.-Y. He, C. Li, Q. Chen, M. Du, Cryst. Growth Des.2011, 11, 5171.10.1021/cg200902gSearch in Google Scholar

[24] S.-C. Chen, Z.-H. Zhang, H. Xu, H.-B. Gao, R.-R. Qin, Q. Chen, M.-Y. He, M. Du, Inorg. Chem. Commun.2012, 15, 180.10.1016/j.inoche.2011.10.019Search in Google Scholar

[25] Z.-H. Zhang, S.-C. Chen, Q. Chen, M.-Y. He, H. Xu, Inorg. Chem. Commun.2011, 14, 1819.10.1016/j.inoche.2011.08.017Search in Google Scholar

[26] H. Xu, J.-L. Mi, Z.-J. Hu, X.-K. Guo, Q. Chen, Acta Crystallogr.2010, C66, o151.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Z.-H. Zhang, Q.-Q. Zhang, S. Feng, Z.-J. Hu, S.-C. Chen, Q. Chen, M.-Y. He, Dalton Trans.2014, 43, 646.10.1039/C3DT52211CSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] H. Zhou, M. Yu, G.-X. Liu, Inorg. Chim. Acta.2016, 439, 130.10.1016/j.ica.2015.10.016Search in Google Scholar

[29] H.-Y. Xia, X.-C. Zha, G.-X. Liu, Y. Wang, X.-M. Ren, Chin. J. Inorg. Chem.2011, 27, 1441.Search in Google Scholar

[30] K.-H. He, W.-C. Song, Y.-W. Li, Y.-Q. Chen, X.-H. Bu, Cryst. Growth Des.2012, 12, 1064.10.1021/cg2014495Search in Google Scholar

[31] D.-S. Li, J. Zhao, Y.-P. Wu, B. Liu, L. Bai, K. Zou, M. Du, Inorg. Chem.2013, 52, 8091.10.1021/ic4007718Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] B. Li, Y. Zhang, G. Li, D. Liu, Y. Chen, W. Hu, Z. Shi, S. Feng, CrystEngComm2011, 13, 2457.10.1039/c0ce00682cSearch in Google Scholar

[33] A. L. Spek, PLATON, A Multipurpose Crystallographic Tool, Utrecht University, Utrecht (The Netherlands) 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[34] L.-F. Ma, L.-Y. Wang, J.-L. Hu, Y.-Y. Wang, G.-P. Wang, Cryst. Growth Des.2009, 9, 5334.10.1021/cg900825ySearch in Google Scholar

[35] D. Sun, Z.-H. Yan, V. A. Blatov, L. Wang, D.-F. Sun, Cryst. Growth Des.2013, 13, 1277.10.1021/cg3017358Search in Google Scholar

[36] G. M. Sheldrick, SADABS, Program for Empirical Absorption Correction of Area Detector Data, University of Göttingen (Germany) 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[37] SAINT, Software Reference Manual, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI (USA) 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[38] G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXTL NT (Version 5.1), Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, WI (USA) 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[39] G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXS/L-97, Program for Crystal Structure Determination, University of Göttingen, Göttingen (Germany) 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[40] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.1990, A46, 467.10.1107/S0108767390000277Search in Google Scholar

[41] G. M. Sheldrick, Acta Crystallogr.2008, A64, 112.10.1107/S0108767307043930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-8-24
Accepted: 2016-9-19
Published Online: 2017-1-7
Published in Print: 2017-2-1

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/znb-2016-0191/html
Scroll to top button