Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton November 5, 2018

Sign language iconicity and gradient effects

  • Sandro Zucchi EMAIL logo
From the journal Theoretical Linguistics

References

Benedicto, E. & D. Brentari. 2004. Where did all the arguments go? Argument changing properties of classifiers in American sign language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(4). 743–810.10.1007/s11049-003-4698-2Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1988. Language and problems of knowledge. The Managua lectures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cogill-Koez, D. 2000a. A model of signed language ‘classifier predicates’ as templated visual representation. Sign Language & Linguistics 3(2). 209–236.10.1075/sll.3.2.04cogSearch in Google Scholar

Cogill-Koez, D. 2000b. Signed language classifier predicates: Linguistic structures or schematic visual representation? Sign Language & Linguistics 3(2). 153–207.10.1075/sll.3.2.03cogSearch in Google Scholar

Davidson, K. 2015. Quotation, demonstration & iconicity. Linguistics and Philosophy 38. 477–520.10.1007/s10988-015-9180-1Search in Google Scholar

Emmorey, K. & M. Herzig. 2003. Categorical versus gradient properties of classifier constructions in ASL. In K. Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, 221–46. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.10.4324/9781410607447Search in Google Scholar

Emmorey, K., S. McCullough, S. Mehta, L. M. B. Ponto & T. J. Grabowski. 2013. The biology of linguistic expression impacts neural correlates for spatial language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 25(4). 517–533.10.1162/jocn_a_00339Search in Google Scholar

Emmorey, K. & A. Ozyurek. 2014. Language in our hands: Neural underpinnings of sign language and co-speech gesture. The Cognitive Neurosciences 56. 657–665.10.7551/mitpress/9504.003.0072Search in Google Scholar

Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Search in Google Scholar

Recanati, F. 2003. Literal meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615382Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, P. 2011. Iconic agreement. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3–4). 223–234.10.1515/thli.2011.017Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, P., J. Lamberton & M. Santoro. 2013. Iconic variables. Linguistics and Philosophy 36(2). 91–149.10.1007/s10988-013-9129-1Search in Google Scholar

Supalla, T. 1982. Structure and acquisition of verbs of motion and location in American sign language. Ph. D. thesis, University of California at San Diego.Search in Google Scholar

Supalla, T. 1986. The classifier system in American sign language. In C. Craig (ed.), Noun classes and categorization, 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.7.13supSearch in Google Scholar

Valli, C. & C. Lucas. 2000. Linguistics of American sign language: An introduction, 3rd edn. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, J., P. J. Gannon, K. Emmorey, J. F. Smith & A. R. Braun. 2009. Symbolic gestures and spoken language are processed by a common neural system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(49). 20664–20669.10.1073/pnas.0909197106Search in Google Scholar

Zucchi, S. 2012. Formal semantics of sign languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(11). 719–734.10.1002/lnc3.348Search in Google Scholar

Zucchi, S. 2017. Event categorization in sign languages. In H. Cohen and C. Lefebvre (eds.), The Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science, 2nd edn, 377–396. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-101107-2.00016-6Search in Google Scholar

Zucchi, S., C. Cecchetto & C. Geraci. 2011. Event descriptions and classifier predicates in sign languages. Presented at the Venice FEAST Colloquium.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-11-05
Published in Print: 2018-11-27

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/tl-2018-0021/html
Scroll to top button