Grain amino acid composition of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars subjected to selenium doses Selenyum arpa Hordeum vulgare çeşitlerinde tane amino asit içeriği

Background: Selenium (Se 34 ) is an essential micronutrient for humans and animals and has growth promoting and antioxidative effects at low concentrations. Methods: Effects of various sodium selenite (Na 2 SeO 3 ) doses on grain amino acid content of barley cultivars (Bülbül 89 and Çetin 2000) was investigated using ion exchange liquid chromatography. Results: Majority of the amino acids could be altered with Selenium (Se) fertilization. Grain Se content of Bülbül 89 (0.175 mg kg −1 ) and Çetin 2000 (0.171 mg kg −1 ) were similar and both displayed an increase in proteinogenic, essential, and sulfur amino acids. The response of cultivars was more pronounced for Se accumulation and amino acid content at mid dose (12.5 mg ha −1 ). The quantities of proteinogenic, essential and sulfur amino acids increased considerably at that dose. Se induced increase in nitrogen content might cause an increase in some of the proteins of grain and con­ sequently can alter amino acid composition. An obvious increase in the limiting amino acids (lysine and threonine) were prominent in response to Se fertilization. Conclusion: Se treatment influence amino acid composi­ tion of barley grains; especially improve the quantity of limiting amino acids and consequently nutritional value of the grain. comparisons. A two­sided independent samples t test was applied to compare barley cultivars and one­way analysis of vari­ ance was applied to compare dose groups. Post­hoc analy­ sis was performed with Tukey test. Multiple tests were adjusted using Benjamini­Hochberg procedure. All values are expressed as mean and standard deviation statistics. Analyses were conducted using R 3.2.3 software (www.r­ project.org ) [18]. A p < 0.05 probability level was consid­ ered as statistically significant.


Introduction
Selenium (Se 34 ) is an essential micronutrient for humans, animals and many other life forms [1,2]. It is also neces sary for animal growth, fertility and needed for the pre vention of several diseases through mainly taking part in selenocysteine (SeCys)containing proteins [3]. Sec is involved in active site of selenoproteins as glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx) and iodothyronine deiodinases [3][4][5]. Selenium exists in multiple oxidation states, with each state having different fates within the environment. Plants take up Se as selenate (SeO 4 2− ) or selenite (SeO 3 2− ) ions [6]. Selenite and selenate are more soluble than the reduced Se forms [7]. Although there is strong evidence that Se is required for the growth of green algae, the essentiality of Se as a micronutrient in higher plants is still controver sial [8]. Plants can functionally concentrate selenium in the body, primarily in the seeds [9], which can be toxic at higher concentrations and cause membrane lipid peroxi dation in barley [10].
The physical and chemical similarities of Se and sulfur (S) help elucidate the intimate association between the metabolisms of the two elements in plants [11]. The predominant forms of S and Se available to plants are sulfate, selenate and selenite. These elements have chemical differences from which one can infer that some biochemical processes involving Se may be excluded from those associated with S. Most plant species contain less than 25 μg Se g −1 dry weight and cannot tolerate high levels of Se in the environment. The nonspecific integra tion of the selenoamino acids, selenocysteine (SeCys) and selenomethionine (SeMet) into proteins is believed to be the major contributor of Se toxicity in plants [12,13]. The existence of Se analogs of Scontaining metabolites in plants indicates that the biosynthesis of most Se com pounds may depend on the enzymes involved in the S assimilation pathway [13].
Content and amino acid composition are important quality criteria for nutritional value of cereal grains used as fodder. The amino acid composition of cereal grains is somewhat unbalanced and the content of essential amino acids in cereal grains is insufficient to meet the needs of livestock [14]. Barley is one of the most important cereal species used as fodder. Barley cultivars satisfy the requirements of livestock for both energy and protein. It is possible to fortify fodder with Seenriched barley to prevent diseases caused by Se deficiency. Besides, Seenriched barley may provide additional compounds that may benefit livestock health. Consid ering difficulties of several approaches for improving nutritional quality of barley grains, we tested the effect of Se fertilization on grain amino acid composition of two barley cultivars. To the best of our knowledge, no detailed research has been conducted on how Se fertili zation influences the amino acid composition of barley grains. This study aims to determine amino acid compo sition and to take an initial look at the effect of different levels of Se fertilization on the amino acid composition in two barley cultivars.

Experimental design
The field experiment was arranged in a completely ran domized block with three replications. In each repeti tion, there were 15 different equal plots (2 m 2 each) and the application of four doses (6.25, 12.50, 18.75, and 25 g ha −1 ) of Na 2 SeO 3 to the two barley cultivars (Çetin 2000, Bülbül 89). The soil texture of the experimental field was analyzed according to the method described by Bouyou cus [15]. Seeds were sowed approximately 2 cm deep in the soil. Na 2 SeO 3 was dissolved in water and applied in highly diluted state to the soil for homogenous application soon after the sowing. Controlled irrigation was practiced to prevent leaching of the Se from the soil. After a matura tion period of 4 months, 25 whole plants from each plot were harvested manually for analysis.

Selenium analysis
Sample preparation was made by following the proce dure of EPA, Perkin Elmer Inc. [16]. Grains were ground in the laboratory mill and digested in a flask and 0.10 g of sample was added to 20 mL of nitric acid (HNO 3 ) and let stand overnight. Then 3 mL of perchloric acid (HClO 4 ) was added, refluxes inserted, and heated to 175°C for 60 min. After that, refluxes were removed and continued to heat until dense white fumes were present and evaporated. Deionized water was then added to bring the total volume to 25 mL. A 5 mL aliquot of digested solution was pipet ted into a 50 mL volumetric flask to which concentrated HCI (25 mL) and deionized water (15 mL) were added. The flask was placed in a water bath for 20 minutes at 900°C to reduce selenate to selenite. After cooling, the solution was brought to volume with deionized water. Selenium con tents in all samples were analyzed by Hydride Generation (FIAS400, PerkinElmer, USA) Atomic Absorption Spec trophotometer (Perkin Elmer AAnalyst800, PerkinElmer, USA). The method's detection limit was 0.003 mg kg −1 . All samples were analyzed in triplicate.

Amino acid analysis
Amino acids were analyzed according to ion exchange liquid chromatographic method by Amino Acid Analyzer AAA 339 M. Grains of barley cultivars treated with Se was used to determine the amino acid compositions. Column chromatography method was used to determine qualitative and quantitative amino acid compositions [17]. Ground dry tissue was extracted and hydrolyzed by using hydrochloric acid (6 N) in a drying chamber at 103-105°C during 24 h. The moisture content of the samples varied between 10 and 12% and calculations were made considering the dry matter. Amino acids were separated on an AAA 339 M amino acid analyzer (OSTION LG ANB column, 8 mm diameter, 35 mm length). The chromatography conditions included the use of mobile phase, ninhydrin with added sodium citrate buffer (pH 2.2), eluent flow rate of 15 mL h −1 and a chroma tography cycle of 120 min [17]. Standard amino acids were chromatographed in parallel, while qualitative amino acid composition was determined from retention times. Mixture of 18 amino acids was used as internal standard. The col orimetric measurement of the complex resulting from the ninhydrin reaction was carried out at 570 nm (440 nm for proline). Quantitative analysis was by automated determi nation of peak areas for identified acids [17].

Statistical analysis
The ShapiroWilk's test was used and histogram and q-q plots were examined to assess the data normality. Levene test was applied to test variance homogeneity. A twoway analysis of variance (twoway ANOVA) was performed to investigate the effects of barley cultivars and dose groups on amino acid levels. Both main effects and interaction of these two factors are examined with interaction models. Since, interaction terms were found to be statistically sig nificant for nearly half of the aminoacid levels, oneway analysis was also applied to conduct group comparisons. A twosided independent samples t test was applied to compare barley cultivars and oneway analysis of vari ance was applied to compare dose groups. Posthoc analy sis was performed with Tukey test. Multiple tests were adjusted using BenjaminiHochberg procedure. All values are expressed as mean and standard deviation statistics. Analyses were conducted using R 3.2.3 software (www.r project.org ) [18]. A p < 0.05 probability level was consid ered as statistically significant.
Se content of experimental soil in the previous study was estimated as 0.83 mg kg −1 , being twice as high as the world's mean Se content [19]. The Se content in some soils were calculated to be in the range of 0.01-2 mg kg −1 , but mean Se content was reported as 0.4 mg kg −1 [24] in the world.

Grain selenium content
Both Bülbül 89 and Çetin 2000 contained significantly higher selenium concentrations at 6.25, 12.5, 18.75 g ha −1 doses compared to the control set up (For cultivar effect: F = 79.945, p < 0.001; For dose effect: F = 0.843, p = 0.369; For interaction effect: F = 26.062, p < 0.001) as reported in the previous study [19]. In general, grain selenium content increased with treatment doses, but it was more pronounced at 12.5 g ha −1 (mid dose) in both cultivars ( Figure 1) (p < 0.001). This study supports the work of Broadley et al. [25] who also reported increases in grain Se concentration of Triticum aestivum L. on application of Na 2 SeO 4 . Similarly, Lyons [26] reported that a modest application of 10 g Se ha −1 can increase Se concentration of wheat grain by around 10fold. Differential Se accu mulation in different plant genotypes is an expected phenomenon, and the uptake, translocation and accu mulation of Se may be distinctive for different plant species, even in cultivars of the same species [27]. Both genetic and environmental factors affect Se concentra tion in cereal grains. Genetic variation in grain Se has been reported for wheat, although Se acquisition and accumulation is strongly dependent upon environmen tal conditions, cultural practices and selenium fertiliza tion [28][29][30].

Effect of Se on amino acid composition
Amino acids are fundamental ingredients in protein syn thesis. Previous studies confirmed that Se affects the physiology of plants and as a result, amino acid meta bolism may be directly or indirectly influenced. There are several constraints in improving the amino acid com position of grain storage proteins. Classical breeding or genetic engineering strategies which are typical exam ples to achieve that purpose, may either not be useful or are very difficult steps for the modification of amino acid composition, considering the limited genetic variations in barley. Some other approaches used for the modifi cation of amino acid composition include the work of Juncong et al. [31], who reported significant differences in grain protein and Bhordein content when different sowing dates were considered, and the use of high lysine mutant barley genotypes as reported by Shewry [32]. The increments were between the ranges of a few percentage points to a maximum of 30%. A corresponding decrease in Bhordein content was also reported. Reduced starch and crop yield was also observed in those lysinerich mutant phenotypes. Thus, in spite of a considerable investment in mutation breeding for high lysine barley cultivars, yields were not correlated with lysine content due to segregation of high lysine character with low grain yield.
In present study, it was observed that the main effect of doses on amino acids except for His, Pro, and Glu in cultivars were significant ( Table 1). The increase in most limiting amino acids (lysine and threonine) is espe cially noteworthy after Se fertilization. The lysine level increased to 27% in Çetin 2000 and 8% in Bülbül 89. On the other hand, threonine level increased 19% in Bülbül 89 and 18% in Çetin 2000 (Table 2). Similar results have also been reported by Duma and Karklina [33] indicating that Se treatment caused an increase of 16.2% in lysine and 22.7% in threonine. Genetic engineering was used to balance amino acid composition in barley in a study by Hansen et al. [34] in which antisense technology was used to sup press Chordein biosynthesis and leading to 12 and 18% increases in cysteine and methionine, respectively. Our approach was also seemed to be efficient for the fact that the strategy resulted in 15 and 40% increases in cysteine and methionine levels, respectively. While Hansen et al. [34] obtained 15 and 19% increases in lysine and threo nine, we obtained 19 and 27% increases, respectively.
The response of cultivars was especially highlighted at the mid dose ranges (except a few amino acids altered at other doses) ( Table 2). Grain Se content was also sig nificantly higher in mid Se dose (Figure 1). At 18.75 g ha −1 Se application, grain Se contents were close between cultivars, but amino acid contents were not as homog enous as grain Se content (p = 0.086). Such a fluctuating result in amino acid content depending on the treated Se doses was also reported by Duma and Karklina [33]. For example, while they have obtained a prominent increase in aspartic acid content in 5 mg mL −1 Se dose, arginine was the highest in 10 mg mL −1 treatment. In the current study, the level of methionine, one of the important sulfur amino acids, increased 40% in Bülbül 89 and 22% in Çetin 2000 (Table 2). Grain methionine content was highest at 6.25 g ha −1 Se dose for Bülbül 89. In Çetin 2000, the highest level was observed at the mid dose and the highest dose (Table 3). Se application at that dose might be utilizable to increase the methio nine content in those cultivars. Although cysteine level was also significantly increased, the response to Se application was not as remarkable as methionine as a consequence of interaction effect between cultivars in response to doses ( Table 1). The cysteine level increased 9% in Çetin 2000 and 15% in Bülbül 89 at the 12.50 g ha −1 dose ( Table 2).
More than 10% increase was observed in the level of all amino acids other than serine, cysteine and glu tamate in Çetin 2000 cultivar. The level of alanine, argi nine, proline and methionine increased 40, 34, 31 and 28%, respectively. In Bülbül 89, methionine, arginine and proline exhibited the highest response to Se treatment with 40, 36, and 24% increases, respectively. The gluta mate was the least responsive amino acid with only 4% increase for that cultivar. A parallel increase in serine and cysteine content of Çetin 2000 and Bülbül 89 was observed with 4 and 8% rise for cysteine, and 9 and 15% rise for serine, respectively ( Table 2). The reason for this obser vation might be the synthesis of serine from 3phospho glyserate and its usage as a precursor for cysteine biosyn thesis in plants [35].
The rate of increase in aromatic amino acids phe nylalanine and tyrosine was almost parallel in the cul tivars studied. This can be explained by the fact that chorismate is the precursor in the biosynthesis of those aromatic amino acids. On the other hand, tryptophan biosynthesis did not increase in both cultivars. It was clear that Se fertilization can be used to manipulate the level of phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan, since these amino acids could be converted into other amino acids and compounds. Aspartate is used as a precursor in methionine biosynthesis in plants. A similar impact of Se on aspartate and methionine levels in Çetin 2000 and Bülbül 89 was observed at 11 and 16% in aspartate, and 28 and 40% in methionine, respectively. Glutamate is a very important amino acid and plays a crucial role in nitrogen metabolism and as expected, the amount of glutamate was the highest in both cultivars (Table 3). Glutamate level was also found to be highest in the study of Asween [14]. It is the precursor for the biosynthesis of proline, which is the cyclic form of glutamic acid. Proline synthesis is affected by many abiotic stress factors and although not significant, it was the second in quantity compared to other proteinogenic amino acids in our cultivars (Tables 1 and 3). Se applications resulted in 31  and 24% increase in grain proline level in Çetin 2000 and Bülbül 89, respectively. Cultivars exhibited a slight decrease in both Se and proline content at 25 g ha −1 dose compared with that of mid dose ( Table 3). The amount of Se (0.252 mg kg −1 ) and proline (1.247 mg 100 mg −1 dry weight) reached the highest level in Çetin 2000 at the mid Se dose. Although the level of glutamate was lower in our cultivars, the levels of proline and arginine were higher. This indicates that glutamate was used as a precursor for proline and arginine biosynthesis. Histidine biosynthe sis is not directly connected to the biosynthesis of other amino acids [35] and its response was comparable in both cultivars.

Essential amino acid content
In this study, the modification of the essential amino acid level in barley grains was realized by Se fertilization. Modification of essential amino acid level, especially lim iting ones, might be important for feeding animals since the barley grains are valuable as a fodder. Although sta tistical significance was not realized in essential amino acid contents of cultivars, they exhibited an increase up to the mid dose application rate and gradually decreased after that rate (For Çetin 2000, p = 0.771; For Bülbül 89, p = 0.600). Considering the essential amino acid and grain selenium contents, the cultivars showed similar  response to increasing Se doses. Apart from the highest dose, considerable increase in essential amino acid content was observed and reached a maximum level at the mid dose rate ( Figure 2). Se might be interfering with amino acid metabolism at the highest dose, while it was promoting the biosynthesis of some amino acids at the mid dose.

Proteinogenic amino acid content
Although the amount of total proteinogenic amino acid content was different in the cultivars, their response was similar at 6.25, 18.75 and 25 g ha −1 doses (Figure 3). Bülbül 89 did not show a significant change at 6.25, 12.5, 25 g ha −1 doses, but Çetin 2000 showed a sharp increase at the mid dose rate (For Çetin 2000, p = 0.829; For Bülbül 89, p = 0.944). At 25 g ha −1 both cultivars exhib ited a decrease in proteinogenic amino acid content ( Figure 3).

Sulfur amino acid content
Sufficient supplies of sulfur amino acids in seeds help the accumulation of sulfurrich proteins up to a level adequate to meet the nutritional requirement of livestock and poultry [36]. An increase in sulfur amino acid content was observed at 12. Similar results were observed in the study carried out by Lee et al. [37]. They reported that free amino acid content of Brassica oleracea cv. Majestic increased in response to increas ing Se doses.
In conclusion, our study indicates that Se fertiliza tion alters the amino acid content in grains of barley. Total sulfur amino acid content of grains can be increased by applying the appropriate dose of Se. However, this depends on cultivars; for instance, methionine level was the highest in Bülbül 89 cultivar at the lowest dose. Moreover, limiting amino acid (lysine and threonine) content of grain can also be increased by Se fertilization. Considering the disadvan tages of mutation breeding and the difficulties in genetic manipulation of barley for increasing the limiting amino acid content, Se fertilization might be an effective way to improve the limiting amino acids of grains.