Abstract
This article engages with the widely used academic concept of discourse. The aim is threefold: first, to provide a comprehensive overview of how the notion of discourse is conceived based on (a) definitions in the academic literature, (b) dictionary definitions, and (c) corpus data; second, to define discourse as a set of related representations; and, third, to suggest a basis for a typology of discourses. Following Peirce, a representation is regarded as a relationship between a signifier, signified element, and interpretant. A basis for a typology is developed by considering various types of representations and ways they are related.
Funding statement: Funding: This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (grant number 2009–1696).
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank Carola Betzold, Åsa Boholm, Anja Karlsson Franck, and Neva Leposa for their constructive criticism and suggestions.
References
Allwood, Jens & Lars-Gunnar Andersson. 1976. Semantik (Göteborg University LINGuisitcs [GULING] 1). Göteborg: Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.Search in Google Scholar
Atkin, Albert. 2010. Peirce’s theory of signs. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce-semiotics/(accessed 3 September 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Baker, Paul & Ellece Sibonile. 2011. Key terms in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511610295Search in Google Scholar
Boholm, Max. 2014. Political representations of nano in Swedish government documents. Science and Public Policy 41(5). 575–596.10.1093/scipol/sct092Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian & George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805226Search in Google Scholar
Burr, Vivien. 1995. An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203299968Search in Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel. 2007. Semiotics: The basics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203014936Search in Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203561218Search in Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas & Adam Jaworski. 2009. Discourse. In Paul Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, 134–148. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2009. The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English: Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(2), 159–190.10.1075/ijcl.14.2.02davSearch in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1979. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2001 [1989]. Language and power, 2nd edn. Harlow: Longman.10.4324/9781315838250Search in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203697078Search in Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2013. Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies 7(2). 177–197.10.1080/19460171.2013.798239Search in Google Scholar
Fiske, John. 2011 [1982]. Introduction to communication studies. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203837382Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge & the discourse on language, A. M. Sheridan Smith (trans.). New York: Pantheon.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990. The history of sexuality, Robert Hurley (trans.), vol. 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul. 1999. An introduction to discourse analysis. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Gee, James Paul. 2011. How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203850992Search in Google Scholar
Hajer, Maarten A. 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Hansson, Sven Ove. 2006. How to define – A tutorial. Princípios, Revista de Filosofia 13(19–20). 5–30.Search in Google Scholar
Hodge, Bob. 1984. Historical semantics and the meanings of “discourse”. Australian Journal of Cultural Studies 2(2). 124–130.Search in Google Scholar
Holmberg, Per, Anna-Malin Karlsson & Andreas Nord (eds.). 2011. Funktionell textanalys [Functional text analysis]. Stockholm: Nordstedts.Search in Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Brian Paltridge (eds.). 2011. The Bloomsbury companion to discourse analysis. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Marianne & Louise Phillips. 2002. Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849208871Search in Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto & Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lindenfeld, Jacqueline. 1971. Verbal and non-verbal elements in discourse. Semiotica 3(3). 223–233.10.1515/semi.1971.3.3.223Search in Google Scholar
Mandoki, Katya. 2004. Power and semiosis. Semiotica 151(1/4). 97–114.10.1515/semi.2004.075Search in Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony. & Andrew Wilson. 2001. Corpus linguistics: An introduction, 2nd edn. Edingburgh: Edingburgh University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster. 2014. discourse. Merriam-Webster Online. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discourse (accessed 10 October 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Mills, Sara. 1997. Discourse. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Morris, Charles W. 1938. Foundations of the theory of signs (International encyclopedia of unified science 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
OED. 2014. discourse, n. Oxford English Dictionary Online. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/53985?rskey=w3SYgf&result=1 (accessed 10 October 2015).Search in Google Scholar
Parker, Ian. 1990. Discourse: definitions and contradictions. Philosophical Psychology 3(2). 189–204.10.1057/9781137505279_13Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1931–1966. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce, 8 vols., C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks (eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce’s papers will be designated CP followed by volume and paragraph number.]Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1992 [1867]. On a new list of categories. In Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel (eds.), The essential Peirce, vol. 1, 1–10. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998 [1894]. What is a sign? In Nathan Houser et al. (eds.), The essential Peirce, vol. 2, 4–10. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Phillips, Nelson & Cynthia Hardy. 2002. Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand Oaks: Sage10.4135/9781412983921Search in Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, Margaret Wetherell, Ros Gill & Derek Edwards. 1990. Discourse: Noun, verb or social practice? Philosophical Psychology 3(2). 205–217.10.1057/9781137505279_14Search in Google Scholar
Renkema, Jan. 2004. Introduction to discourse studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.124Search in Google Scholar
Robinson, Mairi. 1999. discourse. In Chambers twenty-first century dictionary, 381. Edinburgh: Chambers Harrap.Search in Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.). 2001a. The handbook of discourse analysis. Malden: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton. 2001b. Introduction. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 1–10. Malden: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631205968.2003.00001.xSearch in Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 2010. Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Siefkes, Martin. 2010. Power in society, economy, and mentality: Towards a semiotic theory of power. Semiotica 181(1/4). 225–261.10.1515/semi.2010.042Search in Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. 1983. Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin & Kristine Mroczek (eds.). 2011. Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1993. Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 4(2). 249–283.10.1177/0957926593004002006Search in Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1997. What is political discourse analysis? In J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (eds.), Political linguistics, 11–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.10.1075/bjl.11.03dijSearch in Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. (ed.) 2011 [2006]. Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, 2nd edn. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446289068Search in Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G. 2007. Discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton