Abstract
Late Stoics and, in particular, Epictetus made ample use of the notion of attention (prosochê), which they understood as the soul’s vigilant focus on sense impressions and on the Stoic principles. Attention, in their view, was meant to assist our self-examination and lead to ethical progress. It was thus regarded as a Stoic good and a constitutive part of eudaimonia. Early Stoics did not seem to have invoked such a notion, whereas the Neoplatonists appropriated it into their psychology by postulating the soul’s attentive part, which they introduced to explain both perceptual and intellectual attention as well as self-awareness.
Bibliography
Armstrong, Arthur Hilary (trans.) (1966–1988): Plotinus, 7 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bonhöffer, Adolf Friedrich (1996): The Ethics of the Stoic Epictetus (trans. W. O. Stephens). New York: Peter Lang; first pub. (1894): Die Ethik des Stoikers Epictet. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.Search in Google Scholar
Bernard, Wolfgang (1987): “Philoponus on Self-Awareness”. In: Richard Sorabji (ed.): Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science. London: Duckworth, pp. 195–206.Search in Google Scholar
Brennan, Tad and Brittain, Charles, trans. (2002): Simplicius. On Epictetus Handbook 27–53. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles (2003). “Attention Deficit in Plotinus and Augustine: Psychological Problems in Christian and Platonist Theories of the Grades of Virtue”. In: John J. Cleary and Gary M. Gurtler J. (eds.): Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, vol. 18. Leiden: Brill, pp. 223–63.10.1163/22134417-90000043Search in Google Scholar
Cagnoli Fiecconi, Elena (forthcoming): “Aristotle on attention”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie.Search in Google Scholar
Caston, Victor (2002): “Aristotle on Consciousness”, Mind NS 111, pp. 751–815.10.1093/mind/111.444.751Search in Google Scholar
Charlton, William, trans. (2000): ‘Philoponus’. On Aristotle On the Soul 3.1–8. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Cooper, John (2005): “The Emotional Life of the Wise”, The Southern Journal of Philosophy. Special Issue: Ancient Ethics and Political Philosophy, suppl. 43, pp. 176–218.10.1111/j.2041-6962.2005.tb01985.xSearch in Google Scholar
Emilsson, Eyjólfur (1988): Plotinus on Sense-Perception: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511720017Search in Google Scholar
Emilsson, Eyjólfur (2017): Plotinus. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203413159Search in Google Scholar
Fleet, Barrie (2002): Simplicius. On Aristotle’s Categories 7–8. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar
Gill, Christopher (2006): The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198152682.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Golitsis, Pantelis (2016): “John Philoponus’ Commentary on the Third Book of Aristotle’s De Anima, Wrongly Attributed to Stephanus”. In: Richard Sorabji (ed.): Aristotle Re-Interpreted. New Findings on Seven Hundred Years of the Ancient Commentators. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 393–412.Search in Google Scholar
Gosling, J. C. B. and Taylor, C. C. W. (1982): The Greeks on Pleasure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198246664.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Graver, Margaret (2007): Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226305202.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hadot, Ilsetraut (1997): “Aspects de la théorie de la perception chez les néoplatoniciens: sensation (aisthêsis), sensation commune (koinê aisthêsis), sensibles communs (koina aisthêta) et conscience de soi (sunaisthêsis)”, Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8, pp. 33–87.Search in Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre (1995): Philosophy as a Way of Life (trans. Michael Chase). Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre (1998): The Inner Citadel: The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius (trans. Michael Chase). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hahm, David (1992): “A Neglected Stoic Argument for Human Responsibility”, Illinois Classical Studies 17, pp. 23–48.Search in Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina (2015): “How Feasible is the Stoic Conception of eudaimonia?”. In: Ø. Rabbås et al. (eds.): The Quest for the Good Life: Ancient Philosophers on Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–96.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746980.003.0010Search in Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina (2021): “Aristotle and Alexander of Aphrodisias on Sight as a Relative.” In: P. Gregorić and J. L. Fink (eds.): Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind. London: Routledge, pp. 99–118.10.4324/9781003008484-7Search in Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina (forthcoming): “Perceptual Attention and Reflective Awareness in the Aristotelian tradition”. In: C. Cohoe (ed.): The Cambridge Critical Guide on Aristotle’s De Anima. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108641517.010Search in Google Scholar
Inwood, Brad (1984): “Hierocles: Theory and Argument in the Second Century A.D.”, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2, pp. 151–84.Search in Google Scholar
Lautner, Péter (1992): “Philoponus, In De anima III: Quest for an Author’, The Classical Quarterly 42, pp. 510–22.10.1017/S0009838800016116Search in Google Scholar
Lautner, Péter (1994): “Rival Theories of Self-Awareness in Late Neoplatonism”, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 39, pp. 107–16.10.1111/j.2041-5370.1994.tb00455.xSearch in Google Scholar
Lautner, Péter (2004): “The Koinê Aisthêsis in Proclus and Ps.-Simplicius”. In: P. Adamson, H. Baltussen, and M.F.W. Stone (eds.): Philosophy, Science, and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries. London: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, suppl. 83 (1), pp. 163–173.Search in Google Scholar
Lautner, Péter (2014): “Perceptual awareness in the ancient commentators”. In: Pauliina Remes and Svetla Slaveva-Griffin (eds.): The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism. London: Routledge, pp. 323–38.Search in Google Scholar
Liebersohn, Yosef (2015): “Epicurus’ ‘Kinetic’ and ‘Katastematic’ Pleasures. A Reappraisal”, Elenchos 36, pp. 271–96.10.1515/elen-2015-360204Search in Google Scholar
Lloyd, Anthony Charles (1964): “Nosce teipsum and conscientia”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 46, pp. 188–200.10.1515/agph.1964.46.2.188Search in Google Scholar
Long, Anthony Arthur (1996a): “Hierocles on Oikeiôsis and Self-Perception”. In: Stoic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 250–263; first publ. (1993): In Konstantinos J. Boudouris (ed.): Hellenistic Philosophy, vol. 1. Athens, pp. 93–104.Search in Google Scholar
Long, Anthony Arthur (1996b): “Representation and the Self in Stoicism”. In: Stoic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 264–285; first publ. (1991): In Stephen Everson (ed.): Psychology: Companions to Ancient Thought, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–120.Search in Google Scholar
Long, Anthony Arthur (2002): Epictetus. A Stoic and Socratic Way to Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199245568.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Long, Anthony Arthur and Sedley, David Neil (1987): The Hellenistic Philosophers, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (= LS).10.1017/CBO9781139165907Search in Google Scholar
Nehamas, Alexander and Woodruff, Paul (trans.) (1995): Plato’s Symposium. Indianapolis: Hackett.Search in Google Scholar
Nikolsky, Boris (2001): “Epicurus on Pleasure”, Phronesis 46, pp. 440–65.10.1163/156852801753736490Search in Google Scholar
Oldfather, William Abbott, trans. (1925): Epictetus. Discourses, Books I–II; and (1928): Epictetus. Discourses, Books III–IV. The Encheiridion. Fragments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Perkams, Matthias (2008): Selbstbewusstsein in der Spätantike. Die neuplatonische Kommentare zu Aristoteles’ De anima. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Protopapas-Marneli, Maria (2020–2021): “L’hexis comme privation de changement et d’altération chez les stoïciens”, Chôra 18–19, pp. 371–86.10.5840/chora2020/202118/1916Search in Google Scholar
Purinton, Jeffrey (1993): “Epicurus on the Telos”, Phronesis 38, pp. 281–321.10.1163/156852893321052316Search in Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria (2009): Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts (trans. David Konstan). Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Search in Google Scholar
Remes, Pauliina (2007): Plotinus on Self. The Philosophy of the ‘We’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597411Search in Google Scholar
Roskam, Geert (2005): On the Path to Virtue: The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and Its Reception in (Middle-)Platonism. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sellars, John (2018): “Stoic Roman Mindfulness. An Ancient Technology of the Self”. In: Matthew Dennis and Sander Werkhoven (eds.): Ethics and Self-Cultivation. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. New York: Routledge, pp. 15–29.10.4324/9781315102269-2Search in Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard (2000): Emotion and Peace of Mind. From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199256600.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard (2004a): “Aristotle’s Perceptual Functions Permeated by Platonist Reason”. In: Caroline Macé and Gerd van Riel (eds.): Platonic Ideas and Concept Formation in Ancient and Medieval Thought. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 99–118.Search in Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard (2004b): The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: A Sourcebook, vol. 1: Psychology (with Ethics and Religion). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard (2006): Self: Ancient and Modern Insights about Individuality, Life, and Death. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226768304.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos (2006): “Proklos über Selbstreflexion und Selbstbegründung”. In: Matthias Perkams and R. M. Piccione (eds.): Proklos. Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik. Leiden: Brill, pp. 230–55.10.1163/9789047409397_013Search in Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos (2017): “Newly Discovered Scholia from Philoponus’ Lost Commentary on De anima III”, Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médievale 84, pp. 223–43.Search in Google Scholar
Striker, Gisela (1993): “Epicurean Hedonism”. In: Jacques Brunschwig and Martha Nussbaum (eds.): Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–17.10.1017/CBO9781139172783.011Search in Google Scholar
Warren, James (2016): “Epicurean Pleasure in Cicero’s De Finibus”. In: Julia Annas and Gábor Betegh (eds.): Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–76.10.1017/CBO9781139871396.003Search in Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, David (2012): Pleasure in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511667510Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
