Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton April 15, 2021

Simple Monotransitive and Complex Dative Alternation Predicates in Spanish Monolingual Child Acquisition Data

  • Silvia Sánchez Calderón ORCID logo EMAIL logo
From the journal Probus

Abstract

This work analyzes the acquisition of simple and complex constructions in Spanish monolingual children’s data. It examines the emergence and the role played by adult input in child production of simple monotransitive constructions when compared to two types of complex predicates that undergo dative alternation (DA), namely, a/para-datives and dative-clitic doubled (DCLD) structures. In order to shed light on these issues, we have analyzed data from Spanish monolingual children and from the adults that they interact with, as available in CHILDES (MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk [Dataset], 3rd edn. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. http://childes.talkbank.org (accessed 20 October 2019)). The results show that there is an order in the onset of simple and complex predicate constructions, as reflected in the earlier emergence of monotransitives when compared to DA constructions. The latter also show a subsequent order of first occurrence, namely, DCLDs before a/para-datives. Thus, the degree of syntactic complexity seems to have played a role in the acquisition of simple and complex constructions, as measured by the number of Case assignment relations between the verb and its internal argument(s). Moreover, the differences in the Spanish monolingual children’s incidence of the three structures under analysis do not appear to be explained by the relative frequency of exposure in the adult input.


Corresponding author: Silvia Sánchez Calderón, Facultad de Filología UNED, National University of Distance Education (UNED), Edificio de Humanidades, Paseo Senda del Rey 7, 28040Madrid, Spain, E-mail:

Funding source: Castile and León Regional Government (Spain)

Award Identifier / Grant number: ORDEN EDU/1083/2013

Funding source: European Social Funding and the University of Valladolid (Spain)

Funding source: Castile and León Regional Government and FEDER

Award Identifier / Grant number: VA009P17

Funding source: Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and FEDER

Award Identifier / Grant number: PGC2018-097693-B-I00

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Castile and León Regional Government (Spain), ORDEN EDU/1083/2013, 27 December, co-funded by the European Social Funding and the University of Valladolid (Spain); by the Castile and León Regional Government and FEDER (ref. VA009P17), and by the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities and FEDER (PGC2018-097693-B-I00).

References

Abbot-Smith, Kristen & Michael Tomasello. 2006. Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition. Linguistic Review 23(3). 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2006.011.Search in Google Scholar

Aguado, Gerardo. 1988. Valoración de la competencia morfosintáctica en el niño de dos años y medio. Infancia y Aprendizaje 43. 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.1988.10822211.Search in Google Scholar

Akhtar, Nameera. 1999. Acquiring basic word order. Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language 26(2). 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1017/S030500099900375X.Search in Google Scholar

Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2006. Clitic doubling. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The blackwell companion to syntax, 519–581. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch14Search in Google Scholar

Aoun, Joseph & Yen-Hui Li. 1989. Scope and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 20(2). 141–172.Search in Google Scholar

Aranovich, Raul. 2012. A lexical-functional account of Spanish dative usage. In Peter de Swart & Monique Lamers (eds.), Case, word order and prominence, 17–42. Springer Verlag.10.1007/978-94-007-1463-2_2Search in Google Scholar

Arnold, Jennifer E., Thomas Wasow, Anthony Losongco & Ryan Ginstrom. 2000. Heaviness versus newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language 76. 28–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2000.0045.Search in Google Scholar

Beavers, John & Chiyo Nishida. 2009. The Spanish dative alternation revisited. In Sonia Colina, Antxon Olarrea & Ana María Carvalho (eds.), Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 39th linguistic symposium on Romance languages (LSRL), 217–230. Tucson: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.315.13beaSearch in Google Scholar

Bel, Aurora. 2006. Aspectos de la adquisición del orden de palabras: la posición del sujeto en castellano y catalán. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada 1(4). 36–48.Search in Google Scholar

Bleam, Tonia. 2003. Properties of the double object construction in Spanish. In Rafael Nuñez Cedeño, Luis López & Richard Cameron (eds.), A Romance perspective on language knowledge and use, 233–252. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.238.19bleSearch in Google Scholar

Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello. 2003. A construction-based analysis of child directed speech. Cognitive Science 27. 843–873. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2706_2.Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, Aimee L. & Michael Tomasello. 2001. The acquisition of English dative constructions. Applied Psycholinguistics 22. 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716401002065.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. On the representation of form and function. The Linguistic Review 1. 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1981.1.1.3.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1987. Barriers. Linguistic inquiry monograph thirteen. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1996. Language and problems of knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cornett, Hannah E. 2014. Gender differences in syntactic development among English speaking adolescents. Inquiries Journal/Students Pulse 6(3).Search in Google Scholar

Cuervo, Cristina. 2003a. Datives at large. USA: MIT Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Cuervo, Cristina. 2003b. Structural asymmetries but same word order: The dative alternation in Spanish. In A. M. Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar, vol. I: Syntax and semantics, 117–144. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.57.07cueSearch in Google Scholar

Cuervo, Cristina. 2007. Double objects in Spanish as a second language: Acquisition of morpho-syntax and semantics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29(4). 583–615.10.1017/S0272263107070441Search in Google Scholar

Demonte, Violeta. 1994. Datives in Spanish. Working Papers in Linguistics 4(1). 71–96.Search in Google Scholar

Demonte, Violeta. 1995. Dative alternation in Spanish. Probus 7(1). 5–30.10.1515/prbs.1995.7.1.5Search in Google Scholar

Domínguez, Laura. 2003. Interpreting reference in the early acquisition of Spanish clitics. In Silvina Montrul & Francisco Ordóñez (eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages. Papers from the 5th Hispanic linguistics symposium and the 4th conference on the acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese, 212–228. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Larson, Richard K. 1990. Double objects revisited: Reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry 21(4). 589–632.10.4324/9780203429204-8Search in Google Scholar

López Ornat, Susana. 1994. La Adquisición de la Lengua Española. Madrid: Siglo XXI de España Editores S. A.Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk [Dataset], 3rd edn. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. http://childes.talkbank.org (accessed 20 October 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Ojea, Ana Isabel. 2001. El desarrollo sintáctico en la adquisición de la primera lengua: análisis de la etapa telegráfica de un sujeto monolingüe de español. Revista Espanola de Linguistica 3(2). 413–430.Search in Google Scholar

Ortiz López, Luis A. 2010. Adquisición de 1L1 vs. 2L1 y L2: la interfaz morfosintáctica de los objetos directos. In Claudia Borgonovo, Manuel Español Echevarría & Philippe Prévost (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 12th Hispanic linguistics symposium, 194–208. Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar

Peccei, Jean S. 1999. Child language. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. Orlando: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Radford, Andrew. 1990. Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax: The nature of early child grammars of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Reglero, Lara & Emma Ticio. 2003. The acquisition of clitics in child Spanish. In Silvina Montrul & Francisco Ordóñez (eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages: Papers from the 5th Hispanic linguistics symposium and the 4th conference on the acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese, 297–316. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rowland, Caroline. 2014. Understanding child language acquisition. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203776025Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez Calderón, Silvia. 2018. The acquisition of English and Spanish dative alternation structures in the longitudinal spontaneous production of monolingual and bilingual children. Spain: University of Valladolid Doctoral Dissertation.10.35376/10324/33474Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez Calderón, Silvia & Raquel Fernández Fuertes. 2018. Which came first: The chicken of the egg? Ditransitive and passive constructions in the English production of simultaneous bilingual English children. ATLANTIS. A Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies 40(1). 39–58. https://doi.org/10.28914/atlantis-2018-40.1.02.Search in Google Scholar

Snyder, William. 2001. On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation. Language 77. 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0108.Search in Google Scholar

Snyder, William & Karim Stromswold. 1997. The structure and acquisition of English dative constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 28(2). 281–317.Search in Google Scholar

Suñer, Margarita. 1988. The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 391–434.10.1007/BF00133904Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Torrens, Vincenç & Kenneth Wexler. 2000. The acquisition of clitic doubling in Spanish. In Susan M. Powers & Cornelia Hamann (eds.), The acquisition of scrambling and cliticization. Studies in theoretical psycholinguistics 26, 279–297. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-3232-1_11Search in Google Scholar

Villa-García, Julio & Imanol Suárez-Palma. 2016. Early null and overt subjects in the Spanish of simultaneous English-Spanish bilinguals and crosslinguistic influence. Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 29(2). 350–395. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.29.2.01vil.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Charles. 2016. The Price of Linguistic Productivity: How Children Learn to Break the Rules of Language. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262035323.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-04-15
Published in Print: 2021-05-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/prbs-2021-0005/html
Scroll to top button