Abstract
Research in conceptual metaphor and conceptual blending-referred to collectively as “conceptual mapping”-identifies human thought as a process of making connections across fields of meaning. Underlying the theory of conceptual mapping is a particular understanding of the mind as embodied. Over the past few decades, researchers in the cognitive sciences have been “putting brain, body, and world back together again.” The result is a picture of the human being as one who develops in transaction with her environment, and whose highest forms of intelligence and meaning-making are rooted in the body’s movement in the world. Conceptual mapping therefore not only gives us insight into how we think, but also into who we are. This calls for a revolution in theological anthropology. Our spirituality must be understood in light of the fact that we are embodied beings, embedded in our environment, whose identities are both material and discursive. Finally, using the example of white supremacy, I show how this revolution in understanding the human person can be useful for ethical reflection, and in thinking about sin and redemption.
References
Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press, 2011.Search in Google Scholar
Anderson, Michael L. “Embodied Cognition: A Field Guide.” Artificial Intelligence. 149 (2003), 91-130.Search in Google Scholar
Brooks, Rodney A. Cambrian Intelligence: The Early History of the New AI. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.10.7551/mitpress/1716.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. “Endangered/Endangering: Schematic Racism and White Paranoia.” In Reading Rodney King: Reading Urban Uprising, edited by Robert Gooding-Williams, 15-22. New York: Routledge, 1993.Search in Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. “Foucault and the Paradox of Bodily Inscription.” Journal of Philosophy. 86: 11 (1989), 601-7.10.5840/jphil198986117Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Andy. “An Embodied Cognitive Science.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 3:9 (September 1999), 345-351.10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01361-3Search in Google Scholar
Dewey, John. John Dewey: The Later Works: 1925-1953, vol. 1. Edited by Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University, 1981.Search in Google Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. “The Fact of Blackness,” in Black Skin; White Masks, trans. Charles Lam Markmann. New York: Grove Press, 1967.Search in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner. “Rethinking Metaphor.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, edited by Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr., 53-66. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511816802.005Search in Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Giles and Mark Turner. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002.Search in Google Scholar
Gallese, Vittorio and George Lakoff. “The Brain’s Concepts: The Role of the Sensory-motor System in Conceptual Knowledge.” Cognitive Neuropsychology 22:3-4 (2005), 455-79.10.1080/02643290442000310Search in Google Scholar
Gerhart, Mary and Allan Russell. Metaphoric Process: The Creation of Scientific and Religious Understanding. Fort Worth: TCU Press, 1984.Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. “The Embodied Mind, and How to Live with One.” In The Nature and Limits of Human Understanding: The 2001Search in Google Scholar
Gifford Lectures at the University of Glasgow, ed. Anthony J. Sanford, 47-108. New York: T&T Clark, 2003.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Search in Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books, 1999.Search in Google Scholar
Leung, Angela K.-y., Lin Qiu, Laysee Ong, and Kim-Pong Tam. “Embodied Cultural Cognition: Situating the Study of Embodied Cognition in Socio-Cultural Contexts.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 5:9 (2011), 591-608.10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00373.xSearch in Google Scholar
Mahon, Bradford Z. and Alfonso Caramazza. “A Critical Look at the Embodied Cognition Hypothesis and a New Proposal for Grounding Conceptual Content.” Journal of Physiology - Paris. 102 (2008), 59-70.10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004Search in Google Scholar
Masson, Robert. Without Metaphor, No Saving God: Theology after Cognitive Linguistics. Walpole, MA: Peeters, 2013.Search in Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl. “The Body in the Order of Salvation.” In Theological Investigations, vol. 17. New York: Crossroad, 1981. Text of the original German can be found as “Der Leib in der Heilsordnung.” In Sämtliche Werke, vol. 22/2. Freiberg: Herder, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Sanders, John. Theology in the Flesh: How Embodiment and Culture Shape the Way We Think about Truth, Morality, and God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2016.10.2307/j.ctt1b3t7k7Search in Google Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon. Living Across and Through Skins: Transactional Bodies, Pragmatism, and Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University, 2001.Search in Google Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon. Revealing Whiteness: The Unconscious Habits of Racial Privilege. Bloomington: Indiana University, 2006.Search in Google Scholar
Van der Kolk, Bessel. The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. New York: Penguin, 2014.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, Andrew D. and Sabrina Golanka. “Embodied Cognition is Not What You Think It Is,” Frontiers in Psychology. 4:58 (February 2013), 1-13.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058Search in Google Scholar
Yancy, George. Black Bodies, White Gazes: The Continuing Significance of Race. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
