Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access April 26, 2017

From Self-Attaching to Self-Emptying: An Investigation of Xuanzang’s Account of Self-Consciousness

  • Jingjing Li EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Theology

Abstract

In this paper, I investigate the account of self-consciousness provided by Chinese Yogācārins Xuanzang (602-664CE) and Kuiji (632-682CE). I will explain how they clarify the transition from selfattaching to self-emptying through the articulation of consciousness (vijñāna). Current scholarship often interprets the Yogācāra account of consciousness either as a science of mind or as a metaphysical idealism. Both interpretations are misleading, partly because they perpetuate various stereotypes about Buddhism, partly also because they overlook the religious goal of realizing in practice the wisdom of emptiness and the non-egoistic compassion. Against the status quo, I argue that through their account of self-consciousness, Xuanzang and Kuiji advocate what can be referred to as transcendental idealism that stresses the correlation between subjectivity and objectivity. Yogācārins thus neither nullify the existence of subjectivity nor formulate subjectivity as a higher entity. The transcendental idealism yields a Buddhist phenomenology that is similar to and also different from Edmund Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology. In what follows I will first characterize Husserl’s phenomenology as an approach to consciousness at two levels (the descriptive level and the explicative level). Then, I elicit the Buddhist phenomenology from Yogācāra philosophy that is not only descriptive and explicative but also prescriptive. This three-level architectonic of consciousness, while reaffirming the importance of agency, further justifies the role of religious rituals and moral practices for Yogācāra devotees.

References

Chatterjee, A.K. The Yogācāra Idealism. Varanasi: Banaras Hindu University, 1962.Search in Google Scholar

Coseru, Christian. Perceiving Reality: Consciousness, Intentionality, and Cognition in Buddhist Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199843381.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Flanagan, Owen. The Bodhisattva’s Brain: Buddhism Naturalized. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2011.10.7551/mitpress/7414.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Griffiths, Paul. On Being Mindless: Buddhist Meditation and the Mind-body Problem. La Salle: Open Court, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

Hori, Victor. “Openings: How do we study Buddhism in Canada?” In Wild Geese: Buddhism in Canada. 12-38. Ed. Harding, John; Hori, Victor; and Soucy, Alec. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vortrage, Hua1. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1973.10.1007/978-94-011-3029-5_1Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. Ideen zu einen Reinen Phaenomenologie und Phaenomenologischen Philosophie, erstes Buch, Hua3. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1950.Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. Die Krisis der Europaeische Wissenschaften und die Transzendentale Phaenomenologie, Hua6. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1976.10.1007/978-94-010-1335-2Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. Zur Phaenomenologie der Inneren Zeitbewusstseins (1983-1917), Hua10. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1969.10.1007/978-94-015-3945-6Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. Logische Untersuchungen, Zweiter Bund, Hua19. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund. Aufsatze und Vortrage (1922-1937). Hua27. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

Kuiji. 成唯識論述記 [Commentaries on Vijnāptimātratāsiddhi]. T43N1830Search in Google Scholar

Lü, Cheng. 呂澄佛學論著選集(一)[The Collected Writings of Lu Cheng on Buddhism, Vol 1]. Jinan: Qilu Press, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

Rhys-Davids, T.W. Buddhism, Ist History and Literature. New York: Putnam, 1896.Search in Google Scholar

Sūtrālamkārakārikā. trans. Prabhākaramita. 莊嚴經論[The Adornment of Mahāyāna Sūtras]. T31N1604.Search in Google Scholar

Schmithausen, Lambert. Ālayavijnāna: On the Origin and the Early Development of a Central Concept of Yogācāra Philosophy. Tokyo: International Institute for Buddhist Studies, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, D.T. Essays in Zen Buddhism, Vol 1. London: Luzac Press, 1927.10.2307/2382444Search in Google Scholar

Vijnāptimātratāsiddhi. trans. Xuanzang. 成唯識論 [Discourse on the Perfection of Consciousness-only]. T1585.Search in Google Scholar

Wayman, Alex. “The Yogācāra Idealism”, Philosophy East and West. 15:1 (1965): 65-73.10.2307/1397409Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-1-7
Accepted: 2017-3-16
Published Online: 2017-4-26
Published in Print: 2017-1-26

© 2017

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opth-2017-0015/html
Scroll to top button