Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Saur February 6, 2015

Scholarly Communication in a Digital Environment: Populating the Institutional Repository of the University of Botswana

  • Olugbade Oladokun EMAIL logo
From the journal Libri

Abstract

This paper examines the numerous benefits of digital scholarly communication made visible through institutional repositories (IRs) that have become trendy in institutions of higher learning in developed countries of the world. In line with its vision to be a leading centre of academic excellence in Africa and the world, the University of Botswana (UB) established its own IR known as the UB Research, Innovation and Scholarship Archive (UBRISA). This paper discusses the challenges of profiling digital scholarly communication on UBRISA, a technology brimming with potential but which UB staff has largely ignored. The consequences of this neglect are seen in the paltry submissions to it during its four years of existence. The paper explains the implementation policy, and the involvement and functions of a tripartite team that drives UBRISA. The paper notes that the problem of tardiness experienced in populating the digital repositories of other institutions is also deeply rooted in UB. It shares some failed efforts made to populate UBRISA through the instrument of the performance management system – an annual contract which the academic staff members sign at the beginning of the year. The paper then analyses the efforts of the Scholarly Communication in Africa Programme (SCAP) that worked with UB in training its staff regarding the operation of the IR, and also established a workflow process for vetting, describing and uploading content to the IR so that UB scholarship could become more visible to the world. Some recommendations are also offered.

References

Correia, A. M. R., and J. C.Teixeira. 2005. “Reforming Scholarly Publishing and Knowledge Communication: From the Advent of the Scholarly Journal to the Challenges of Open Access.” Online Information Review29 (4): 34964.10.1108/14684520510617802Search in Google Scholar

Davis, P. M., and M. J. L.Connolly. 2007. “Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University’s Installation of DSpace.” D-Lib Magazine 13(3–4). Accessed May 6, 2013. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html.Search in Google Scholar

Emmett, A., J.Stratton, A. T.Peterson, J.Church-Duran, and L. J.Haricombe. 2011. “Toward Open Access: It Takes a ‘Village’.” Journal of Library Administration51 (5–6): 55779.10.1080/01930826.2011.589345Search in Google Scholar

Feijen, M., and A.van der Kuil. 2005. “A Recipe for Cream of Science: Special Content Recruitment for Dutch Institutional Repositories.” Ariadne 45 (October 30). Accessed October 30, 2013. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/vanderkuil.Search in Google Scholar

Foster, N. F., and S.Gibbons. 2005. “Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories.”D-Lib Magazine11(1). Accessed October 4, 2013. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html.10.1045/january2005-fosterSearch in Google Scholar

Giesecke, J. 2011. “Institutional Repositories: Keys to Success.” Journal of Library Administration51 (5–6): 52942.10.1080/01930826.2011.589340Search in Google Scholar

Harnad, S. 2006. “Maximizing Research Impact through Institutional and National Open-Access Self-Archiving Mandates.” Keynote address delivered at Current Research Information Systems (CRIS2006) held at Bergen, Norway, 11–13 May. Accessed November 28, 2013. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/262093/2/harnad-crisrev.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Harnad, S., and M.Hemus. 1997. “All or None: No Stable Hybrid or Half-Way Solutions for Launching the Learned Periodical Literature into the PostGutenberg Galaxy.” In The Impact of Electronic Publishing on the Academic Community, edited by I. Butterworth, 18–27. London: Portland Press. Accessed January 6, 2014. http://tiepac.portlandpress.com/pp/books/online/tiepac/session1/ch5.htm.Search in Google Scholar

Jantz, R. C., and M. C.Wilson. 2008. “Institutional Repositories: Faculty Deposits, Marketing, and the Reform of Scholarly Communication.” Journal of Academic Librarianship34 (3): 18695.10.1016/j.acalib.2008.03.014Search in Google Scholar

Lynch, C. 2003. “Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age.” ARL Bimonthly Report226: 17.10.1353/pla.2003.0039Search in Google Scholar

Mackie, M. 2004. “Filling Institutional Repositories: Practical Strategies from the DAEDALUS Project.” Ariadne 39. Accessed May 2, 2013. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/print/issue39/mackie.Search in Google Scholar

Navin, J. C., and J. M.Vandever. 2011. “The Market for Scholarly Communication.” Journal of Library Administration51 (5–6): 45563.10.1080/01930826.2011.589350Search in Google Scholar

Oliveira, S. M. 2011. “Benefits and Challenges of OA and Institutional Repository Implementation in Seventh-day Adventist University Libraries: An International Perspective.” Paper presented at the International Association of Scientific and Technological University Libraries (IATUL) Conference held in Warsaw, Poland, May 29–June 2. Accessed August 1, 2014. http://www.bg.pw.edu.pl/iatul2011/proceedings/presentation/Oliveira_S.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Salo, D. 2008. “‘Innkeeper at the Roach Motel.” Library Trends57 (2): 98123.10.1353/lib.0.0031Search in Google Scholar

Salo, D. 2013. “How to Scuttle a Scholarly Communication Initiative.” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication1 (4): 114.10.7710/2162-3309.1075Search in Google Scholar

Sekhwela, M. B. M. 2011. “University of Botswana Research Innovation and Scholarship Archive (UBRISA): Implementation of Digital Repository Policy.” Unpublished manuscript.Search in Google Scholar

Shearer, K. 2006. “The CARL Institutional Repositories Project: A Collaborative Approach to Addressing the Challenges of IRs in Canada.” Library Hi Tech24 (2): 16572.10.1108/07378830610669547Search in Google Scholar

University of Botswana. 2009. Digital Repository Policy: University of Botswana Research, Innovation and Scholarship Archive (UBRISA). Gaborone: University of Botswana, Office of Research and Development.Search in Google Scholar

University of Calgary. 2014. “Scholarly Communication: Benefits of the Institutional Repository.” Accessed August 1, 2014. http://www.ucalgary.ca/scholarlycommunication/node/26.Search in Google Scholar

Willmers, M. 2012. “Concept Document: Establishing a Process for Quality Assurance and Profiling of Alternative Research Outputs via Institutional Repositories.” Unpublished paper.Search in Google Scholar

Xia, J. 2007. “Assessment of Self-Archiving in Institutional Repositories: Across Disciplines.” Journal of Academic Librarianship33 (6): 64754.10.1016/j.acalib.2007.09.020Search in Google Scholar

Xia, J. 2008. “A Comparison of Subject and Institutional Repositories in Self-Archiving Practices.” Journal of Academic Librarianship34 (6): 48995.10.1016/j.acalib.2008.09.016Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-1-6
Revised: 2014-7-23
Accepted: 2014-10-2
Published Online: 2015-2-6
Published in Print: 2015-3-31

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/libri-2014-0117/html
Scroll to top button