Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) July 18, 2018

The Authenticity of the Document at Demosth. or. 24.20–3, the Procedures of nomothesia and the so-called ἐπιχɛιροτονία τῶν νόμων

  • Mirko Canevaro EMAIL logo
From the journal Klio

Summary

This article is a response to Hansen's recent defence of the authenticity of the document at Demosth. or. 24.20–3. It discusses the methodology for assessing the authenticity of the documents in the orators, in particular the role(s) of the stichometry and the importance of the epigraphic evidence. It provides an in-depth analysis of the evidence about the nomothesia procedure provided in Demosthenes' „Against Timocrates“, showing, first, that this procedure was one centred on the enactment of new laws, and not, as the document describes, a general review of the laws of Athens; second, that the procedure described in the speech is one that can be initiated at all points of the year (consistently with what the epigraphic evidence shows), whereas the document describes an annual procedure taking place only on the 11th day of the first prytany; third, that the procedure described in the speech was initiated by a simple διαχειροτονία that allowed new proposals to be made, whereas the document describes multiple initial votes „kapitelweise“ to be held in the Assembly on different groups of existing laws. The last part of the article surveys eight specific problems with the text of the document, which confirm that it cannot be an authentic Athenian law.

Bibliography

Alessandrì, 1980: S. Alessandrì, IG II2, 40 (Una proposta di lettura), ASNP 20, 1980, 1132–1161.Search in Google Scholar

Bearzot 2015: C. Bearzot, Review of Canevaro 2013b, RFIC 143, 2015, 497–500.Search in Google Scholar

Canevaro 2013a: M. Canevaro, Nomothesia in Classical Athens: What Sources Should We Believe?, CQ 63, 2013, 139–160.10.1017/S0009838812000560Search in Google Scholar

Canevaro 2013b: M. Canevaro, The Documents in the Attic Orators. Laws and Decrees in the Public Speeches of the Demosthenic Corpus, Oxford 2013.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668908.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Canevaro 2014: M. Canevaro, Commento a Arist. Pol. IV 14, 15, 16, in: L. Bertelli – M. Moggi (eds.), Aristotele, Politica IV, Introduzione, traduzione e commento, Rome 2014, 279–377.Search in Google Scholar

Canevaro 2015: M. Canevaro, Making and Changing Laws in Ancient Athens, in: E. M. Harris – M. Canevaro (eds.). Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Law, Oxford 2015, http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfor-dhb/9780199599257.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199599257-e-4.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199599257.013.4Search in Google Scholar

Canevaro 2016a: M. Canevaro, The Procedure of Demosthenes' Against Leptines. How to Repeal (and Replace) an Existing Law, JHS 136, 2016, 39–58.10.1017/S0075426916000045Search in Google Scholar

Canevaro (2016b): M. Canevaro, Demostene, „Contro Leptine“. Introduzione, traduzione e comment storico, Berlin 2016.10.1515/9783110497267Search in Google Scholar

Canevaro 2018: M. Canevaro, Memory, the Rhetors and the Public in Attic Oratory, in: L. Castagnoli – P. Ceccarelli (eds.), Greek Memories. Theories and Practices, Cambridge 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Canevaro – Harris 2012: M. Canevaro – E. M. Harris, The Documents in Andocides On the Mysteries, CQ 62, 2012, 98–129.10.1017/S0009838811000413Search in Google Scholar

Carawan 2014: E. Carawan, Documents in the Case. Demosthenes 23–24, TAPhA 146, 2014, 37–60.Search in Google Scholar

Carawan forthcoming: E. Carawan, Decrees in Andocides. On the Mysteries and ‚Latent Fragments from Craterus‘, CQ.Search in Google Scholar

Cobetto Ghiggia 2013: P. Cobetto Ghiggia, Review of Canevaro 2013b, RDE 3, 2013, 323–328.Search in Google Scholar

De Martinis 2013: L. De Martinis, Review of Canevaro 2013b, Erga-Logoi 10.2, 2013, 161–166.Search in Google Scholar

Errington 1994: R. M. Errington, Ἐκκλησία κύρια in Athens, Chiron 24, 1994, 135–160.Search in Google Scholar

Faraguna 2003: M. Faraguna, I documenti nelle „Vite dei X oratori“ dei Moralia plutarchei, in: A. M. Biraschi – P. Desideri – S. Roda – G. Zecchini (eds), L'uso dei documenti nella storiografia antica, Napoli 2003, 479–503.Search in Google Scholar

Faraguna 2016: M. Farraguna, Antifonte, il processo per tradimento e gli archivi ateniesi, in: S. Struffolino (ed.), Ἡμέτερα γράμματα. Scritti di epigrafia greca offerti a Teresa Alfieri Tonini, Milano 2016, 67–92.Search in Google Scholar

Gagarin 2016: Review of Canevaro 2013b, Klio 98, 2016, 329–332.10.1515/klio-2016-0018Search in Google Scholar

Gauthier 1987: P. Gauthier, Bulletin épigraphique: Institutions, REG 100, 1987, 308–337.10.3406/reg.1987.1515Search in Google Scholar

Hansen 1974: M. H. Hansen, The Sovereignty of the People's Court in the Fourth Century BC and the Public Action against Unconstitutional Proposals, Odense 1974.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen 1975: M. H. Hansen, Eisangelia. The Sovereignty of the People's Court in Athens in the Fourth Century B.C. and the Impeachment of Generals and Politicians, Odense 1975.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen 1985: M. H. Hansen, Athenian Nomothesia, GRBS 26, 1985, 345–371.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen 1987: M. H. Hansen, How often did the Athenian Assembly meet? A reply, GRBS 28, 1987, 35–50.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen 1991: M. H. Hansen, The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes, Oxford 1991.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen 1993: M. H. Hansen, Was the Athenian Ekklesia convened according to the Festival Calendar or the Bouleutic Calendar?, AJPh 114, 1993, 99–113.10.2307/295385Search in Google Scholar

Hansen 2016: M. H. Hansen, The Authenticity of the Law about Nomothesia inserted in Demosthenes' Against Timokrates 20–23, GRBS 56, 2016, 438–474.10.1515/fsp-2016-0025Search in Google Scholar

Hansen – Mitchel 1984: M. H. Hansen – F. W. Mitchel, The Number of Ecclesiai in Forth-Century Athens, SO 59, 1984, 13–19.10.1080/00397678408590778Search in Google Scholar

Harris 1995: E. M. Harris, Aeschines and Athenian Politics, Oxford 1995.Search in Google Scholar

Harris 2006: E. M. Harris, Democracy and the Rule of Law in Classical Athens. Essays on Law, Society, and Politics, Cambridge 2006.10.1017/CBO9780511497858Search in Google Scholar

Harris 2009/10: E. M. Harris, What are the Laws of Athens about? Substance and Procedure in Athenian Statutes, Dike 12–13, 2009/10, 5–67.Search in Google Scholar

Harris 2013: E. M. Harris, The Rule of Law in Action in Democratic Athens, Oxford 2013.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899166.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Harris 2015: E. M. Harris, The Authenticity of the Document at Andocides' On the Mysteries 96–98, Tekmeria 12, 2013/14, 121–153.10.12681/tekmeria.319Search in Google Scholar

Hesk 2000: J. Hesk, Deception and Democracy in Classical Athens, Cambridge 2000.10.1017/CBO9780511483028Search in Google Scholar

Lambert 2005: S. D. Lambert, Athenian State Laws and Decrees 362/1–322/1: II Religious Regulations, ZPE 154, 2005, 120–159.Search in Google Scholar

Lambert 2012: S. D. Lambert, Inscribed Athenian Laws and Decrees 352/1–322/1 BC. Epigraphic Essays, Leiden 2012.10.1163/9789004228528Search in Google Scholar

Lambert forthcoming: S. D. Lambert, Attic Epigraphy, in: N. Papazarkadas (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Greek Epigraphy, Oxford forthcoming.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis 1997: D. M. Lewis, Selected Papers in Greek and Near Eastern History, Cambridge 1997.10.1017/CBO9780511518560Search in Google Scholar

Liddel 2015: P. Liddel, Review of Canevaro 2013b, JHS 135, 2015, 223–224.10.1017/S0075426915000518Search in Google Scholar

MacDowell 1975: D. M. MacDowell, Law-Making at Athens in the Fourth Century B. C., JHS 95, 1975, 62–67.10.2307/630870Search in Google Scholar

MacDowell 2000: D. M. MacDowell, Demosthenes: On the False Embassy (Oration 19), Oxford 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Maffi 2012: A. Maffi, Review of Canevaro 2013b, Dike 15, 2012, 212–15.Search in Google Scholar

Mikalson 2016: J. Mikalson, Approbation and Authority in Athenian Religion, Leiden 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Mirhady 2014: D. Mirhady, Review of Canevaro 2013b, Phoenix 68, 2014, 177–179.10.1353/phx.2014.0006Search in Google Scholar

Novotny 2014: M. Novotny, Review of Canevaro 2013b, Eirene 50, 2014, 341–345.Search in Google Scholar

Ober 1989: J. Ober, Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens. Rhetoric, Ideology and the Power of the People, Princeton 1989.10.1515/9781400820511Search in Google Scholar

Pearson 1964: L. Pearson, The Development of Demosthenes as a Political Orator, Phoenix 18, 1964, 95–109.10.2307/1085912Search in Google Scholar

Pelling 2000: C. Pelling, Literary Texts and the Greek Historian, London 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Piérart 2000: M. Piérart, Qui étaient les nomothètes à l'époque de Démosthène?, in: E. Levy (ed.), La codification des lois dans l'antiquité. Paris 2000, 229–256.Search in Google Scholar

Pinto 2015: P. M. Pinto, Review of Canevaro 2013b, QS 82, 2015, 263–272.10.31819/9783964564238-049Search in Google Scholar

Pritchett 2001: W. K. Pritchett, Athenian Calendars and Ekklesias, Amsterdam 2001.10.1163/9789004494343Search in Google Scholar

Rhodes 1972: P. J. Rhodes, The Athenian Boule, Oxford 1972.Search in Google Scholar

Rhodes 1981: P. J. Rhodes, A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia, Oxford 1981.Search in Google Scholar

Rhodes 1984: P. J. Rhodes, Nomothesia in Fourth-Century Athens, CQ 35, 1984, 55–60.10.1017/S0009838800014567Search in Google Scholar

Rhodes 2003: P. J. Rhodes. Sessions of Nomothetai in Fourth-Century Athens, CQ 53, 2003, 124–129.10.1093/cq/53.1.124Search in Google Scholar

Rhodes – Osborne 2003: P. J. Rhodes – R. Osborne, Greek Historical Inscriptions 404–323 BC, Oxford 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Rubinstein 2000: L. Rubinstein, Litigation and Cooperation: Supporting Speakers in the Courts of Classical Athens, Stuttgart 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Scafuro 2016: A. Scafuro, Review of Canevaro 2013b, ΓΡΑΜΜΑΤΕΙΟΝ 5, 2016, https://grammateion.gr/sites/grammateion.gr/files/articles/grammateion_5_2016_73–82.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Schöll 1886: R. Schöll, Ueber attische Gesetzgebung, SBAW 1886, 83–139.Search in Google Scholar

Shear 2017: J. Shear, Writing Past and Present in Hellenistic Athens: The Honours for Demosthenes, in: I. Berti – K. Bolle – F. Opdenhoff – F. Stroth (eds), Presenting and Perceiving Monumental Texts in Antiquity and the Middle Ages, Berlin 2017, 161–189.10.1515/9783110534597-008Search in Google Scholar

Sickinger 2016: J. Sickinger, Review of Canevaro 2013b, Mnemosyne 69, 2016, 873–876.10.1163/1568525X-12342210Search in Google Scholar

Sommerstein 2014: A. H. Sommerstein, The Authenticity of the Demophantus Decree, CQ 64, 2014, 49–57.10.1017/S0009838813000542Search in Google Scholar

Sommerstein – Bayliss 2012: A. H. Sommerstein – A. J. Bayliss, Oath and State in Ancient Greece, Berlin 2012.10.1515/9783110285383Search in Google Scholar

Steinbock 2012: B. Steinbock, Social Memory in Athenian Public Discourse, Ann Arbor [MI] 2012.10.3998/mpub.1897162Search in Google Scholar

Stockton 1990: D. Stockton, The Classical Athenian Democracy. Oxford 1990.Search in Google Scholar

Threatte 1980–96: L. Threatte, The Grammar of Attic Inscriptions. II Vols (I: Phonology; II: Morphology), Berlin 1980–96.Search in Google Scholar

Vlassopoulos 2014: K. Vlassopoulos, Review of Canevaro 2013b, G&R 61.2, 274.10.1017/S0017383514000114Search in Google Scholar

Online erschienen: 2018-07-18

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/klio-2018-0003/html
Scroll to top button