Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 30, 2015

Is intrauterine surgery justified? Report from the working group on ultrasound in obstetrics of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine (WAPM)

  • Renato Augusto Moreira de Sá EMAIL logo , Paulo Roberto Nassar de Carvalho , Asim Kurjak , Abdallah Adra , Aliyu Labaran Dayyabu , Alaa Ebrashy , Ritsuko Pooh , Cihat Sen , Tuangsit Wataganara and Milan Stanojevic

Abstract

Fetal surgery involves a large number of heterogeneous interventions that vary from simple and settled procedures to very sophisticated or still-in-development approaches. The overarching goal of fetal interventions is clear: to improve the health of children by intervening before birth to correct or treat prenatally diagnosed abnormalities. This article provides an overview of fetal interventions, ethical approaches in fetal surgery, and benefits obtained from antenatal surgeries.


Article note

All authors are members of the WAPM Working Group on Ultrasound in Obstetrics. This paper was produced under the auspices of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.



Corresponding author: Renato Augusto Moreira de Sá, Unidade de Pesquisa Clínica, Av Rui Barbosa 716, Flamengo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22250-020, Brazil, Tel.: +55-21-993003775, E-mail: ; and Instituto Fernandes Figueira, Pesquisa Clínica, rua Mario Alves 69 1204, Niteroi, RJ 24220-270, Brazil; Universidade Federal Fluminense, RJ, Brazil; Working Group on Ultrasound in Obstetrics of World Association of Perinatal Medicine, Niteroi, Brazil

References

[1] Liggins GC, Howie RN. A controlled trial of antepartum glucocorticoid treatment for prevention of the respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants. Pediatrics. 1972;50:515–25.10.1542/peds.50.4.515Search in Google Scholar

[2] Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Ethics of fetal surgery. Clin Perinatol. 2009;36:237–46.10.1016/j.clp.2009.03.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.Search in Google Scholar

[4] American college of obstetricians and gynecologists, committee on Ethics and american academy of pediatrics, committee on bioethics. Maternal-Fetal Intervention and Fetal Care Centers Pediatrics. 2011;128;e473–8.10.1542/peds.2011-1570Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Harrison MR, Filly RA, Golbus MS, Berkowitz RL, Callen PW, Canty TG, et al. Fetal treatment. N Engl J Med. 1982;307: 1651–2.10.1056/NEJM198212233072623Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Deprest JA, Flake AW, Gratacos E, Ville Y, Hecher K, Nicolaides K, et al. The making of fetal surgery. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30:653–67.10.1002/pd.2571Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Harrison MR, Filly RA, Parer JT, Faer MJ, Jacobson JB, de Lorimier AA. Management of the fetus with a urinary tract malformation. J Am Med Assoc. 1981;246:635–9.10.1001/jama.1981.03320060037018Search in Google Scholar

[8] Jancelewicz T, Harrison MR. A history of fetal surgery. Clin Perinatol. 2009;36:227–36.10.1016/j.clp.2009.03.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Deprest J, Nicolaides K, Done’ E, Lewi P, Barki G, Largen E, et al. Technical aspects of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:22–32.10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.10.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Senat MV, Deprest J, Boulvain M, Paupe A, Winer N, Ville Y. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:136–44.10.1056/NEJMoa032597Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Wu D, Ball RH. The maternal side of maternal -fetal surgery. Clin Perinatol. 2009;36:247–53.10.1016/j.clp.2009.03.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Farrell JA, Albanese CT, Jennings RW, Kilpatrick SJ, Bratton BJ, Harrison MR. Maternal fertility is not affected by fetal surgery. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1999;14:190–2.10.1159/000020918Search in Google Scholar

[13] Longaker MT, Golbus MS, Filly RA, Rosen MA, Chang SW, Harrison MR. Maternal outcome after open fetal surgery. A review of the first 17 human cases. J Am Med Assoc. 1991;265:737–41.10.1001/jama.265.6.737Search in Google Scholar

[14] Wilson RD, Johnson MP, Flake AW, Crombleholme TM, Hedrick HL, Wilson J, et al. Reproductive outcomes after pregnancy complicated by maternal-fetal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1430–6.10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.054Search in Google Scholar

[15] Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, Odibo A, Stevens EJ, Stamilio DM, et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1656–62.10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.002Search in Google Scholar

[16] Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY, Brock JW 3rd, Burrows PK, Johnson MP, et al. MOMS investigators. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:993–1004.10.1056/NEJMoa1014379Search in Google Scholar

[17] Yamamoto M, El Murr L, Robyr R, Leleu F, Takahashi Y, Ville Y. Incidence and impact of perioperative complications in 175 fetoscopy-guided laser coagulations of chorionic plate anastomoses in fetofetal transfusion syndrome before 26 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1110–6.10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.003Search in Google Scholar

[18] Harrison MR, Filly RA, Golbus MS, Berkowitz RL, Callen PW, Canty TG, et al. Fetal treatment. N Engl J Med. 1982;307: 1651–2.10.1056/NEJM198212233072623Search in Google Scholar

[19] Nicolini U, Rodeck CH, Fisk NM. Shunt treatment for fetal obstructive uropathy. Lancet. 1987;2:1338–9.10.1016/S0140-6736(87)91237-2Search in Google Scholar

[20] Tsao K, Sandberg PL, Lee H, Harrison MR, Farmer DL. Selective reduction of acardiac twin by radiofrequency ablation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:635–40.10.1067/mob.2002.125242Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Schulman SR, Jones BR, Slotnick N, Schwartz MZ. Fetal tracheal intubation with intact uteroplacental circulation. Anesth Analg. 1993;76:197–9.10.1213/00000539-199301000-00034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Moldenhauer JS. Ex utero intrapartum therapy. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2013;22:44–9.10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2012.10.008Search in Google Scholar

[23] Hedrick HL, Flake AW, Crombleholme TM, Howell LJ, Johnson MP, Wilson RD, et al. The ex-utero intrapartum therapy procedure for high-risk fetal lung lesions. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:1038–44.10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.03.024Search in Google Scholar

[24] Mychaliska GB, Bealer JF, Graf JL, Rosen MA, Adzick NS, Harrison MR. Operating on placental support: the ex utero intrapartum treatment procedure. J Pediatr Surg. 1997;32: 227–31.10.1016/S0022-3468(97)90184-6Search in Google Scholar

[25] Liechty KW, Crombleholme TM, Flake AW, Morgan MA, Kurth CD, Hubbard AM, et al. Intrapartum airway management for giant fetal neck masses: the EXIT (ex utero intrapartum treatment) procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:870–4.10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70285-0Search in Google Scholar

[26] Bouchard S, Johnson MP, Flake AW, Howell LJ, Myers LB, Adzick NS, et al. The EXIT procedure: experiences and outcomes in 31 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:418–26.10.1053/jpsu.2002.30839Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Ville Y. Fetal therapy: practical ethical considerations. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31:621–7.10.1002/pd.2808Search in Google Scholar PubMed

  1. The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Published Online: 2015-6-30
Published in Print: 2016-10-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2015-0132/html
Scroll to top button