Abstract
This article provides an analysis of the syntactical and metrical alignment of the subject pronoun of the first person singular in Latin epic. Based on the observation that, due to its prosody, ego may only feature in a certain number of sedes within the dactylic hexameter line, a quantitative and qualitative argument is made for a careful distinction between emphatic and unstressed uses in relation to consistent patterns of metrical and syntactical collocation.
References
Adams, J. N. 1994. Wackernagel’s law and the position of unstressed personal pronouns in Classical Latin. Transactions of the Philological Society 92(2). 103–178.10.1111/j.1467-968X.1994.tb00430.xSearch in Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. 1999. Nominative personal pronouns and some patterns of speech in Republican and Augustan poetry. In J. N. Adams & R. G. Mayer (eds.), Aspects of the language of Latin poetry (Proceedings of the British Academy 93), 97–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, L. 2004. Osservazioni sull’esametro di Claudiano. In Ehlers et al., Aetas Claudianea. Eine Tagung an der Freien Universität Berlin vom 28. bis 30. Juni 2002, 104–141. Munich & Leipzig: Teubner.10.1515/9783110928846.104Search in Google Scholar
Christiansen, P. G. & D. Christiansen. 2009. Claudian: The last great pagan poet. L’Antiquité Classique 78. 133–144.10.3406/antiq.2009.3741Search in Google Scholar
Dik, H. 2003. On unemphatic “emphatic” pronouns in Greek: Nominative pronouns in Plato and Sophocles. Mnemosyne Ser. IV 56. 535–550.10.1163/156852503770735943Search in Google Scholar
Ehlers, W. W., F. Felgentreu & S. M. Wheeler (eds.). 2004. Aetas Claudianea. Eine Tagung an der Freien Universität Berlin vom 28. bis 30. Juni 2002. Munich & Leipzig: Teubner.10.1515/9783110928846Search in Google Scholar
Felgentreu, F. 1999. Claudians Praefationes. Bedingungen, Beschreibungen und Wirkungen einer poetischen Kleinform (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 130). Stuttgart & Leipzig: Teubner.10.1515/9783110961249Search in Google Scholar
Guipponi-Gineste, M.-F. 2010. Claudien: poète du monde à la cour d’Occident. Paris: De Boccard.10.2307/j.ctv327fwbgSearch in Google Scholar
Hofmann, J. B. & A. Szantyr. 1965. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik (Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft II 2.2). Munich: C. H. Beck.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, M. 1988. Sardinian. In M. Harris & N. Vincent (eds.), The Romance languages, 314–350. London & Sydney: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar
Kruschwitz, P. 2004. Römische Inschriften und Wackernagels Gesetz (Schriften der Philosophisch-historischen Klasse der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften 31/04), Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar
Kruschwitz, P. Forthcoming. Easy on the ‘I’. A functional analysis of the unstressed Latin subject pronoun (Ego, Tu, Nos, Vos).Search in Google Scholar
Kühner, R. & C. Stegmann. 1992 [19142]. Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Hanover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung. Reprint, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar
Lücht, W. 2011. Das Lateinische als pro-drop-Sprache: Der Gebrauch von Subjektpronomina in der römischen Komödie aus sprachtypologischer und empirischer Sicht. Glotta 87. 126–154.10.13109/glot.2011.87.14.126Search in Google Scholar
Vincent, N. 1988. Latin. In M. Harris & N. Vincent (eds.), The Romance languages, 26–78. London & Sydney: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar
Wanner, D. 1987. The development of Romances clitic pronouns, from Latin to Old Romance. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110893069Search in Google Scholar
Ware, C. 2012. Claudian and the Roman epic tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139004152Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton
