Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton September 12, 2017

Bunčić Daniel:Biscriptality. A sociolinguistic typology

  • Agnes Kim EMAIL logo

Reviewed Publication:

Bunčić, Daniel. 2016. Biscriptality. A sociolinguistic typology. Edited by Daniel Bunčić, Sandra L. Lippert, and Achim Rabus (Akademiekonferenzen 24). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter. ISBN: 9783825366254 (paperback), 425 pp. €52.00


References

Ammon, Ulrich. 1995. Die deutsche Sprache in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz: Das Problem der nationalen Varietäten. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110872170Search in Google Scholar

Bakthin, Mikhail. 1981. Discourse in the novel. In Michael Holquist (ed.), The dialogic imagination by M. M. Bakhtin. Four essays, 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press. [Original publication: Mikhail Bakthin. 1975. Slovo v romane. In Voprosy literatury i ėstetiky: Issledovanija raznyx let. Moskva: Xudožestvennaja literatura. 71‒232].Search in Google Scholar

Blommaert, Jan. 2013. Writing as a sociolinguistic object. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(4). 440–459.10.1111/josl.12042Search in Google Scholar

Bunčić, Daniel. 2008. Die (Re-)nationalisierung der serbokroatischen Standards. In Sebastian Kempgen, Karl Gutschmidt, Ulrike Jekutsch & Ludger Udolph (eds.), Deutsche Beiträge zum 14. Internationalen Slavistenkongress, Ohrid 2008, 89‒102. München: Sagner.Search in Google Scholar

Bunčić, Daniel. 2011. Biscriptality in Slavic and non-Slavic languages: A sociolinguistic typology. Tübingen: University of Tübingen habilitation thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Clyne, Michael (ed.). 1992. Pluricentric languages: Differing norms in different nations. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110888140Search in Google Scholar

Ferguson, Charles A. 1959. Diglossia. Word 15. 325–340.10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702Search in Google Scholar

Kabatek, Johannes. 2000. L’oral e l’écrit ‒ quelques apsects théoretiques d’un « nouveau » paradigm dans le canon de la linguistique romane. In Wolfgang Dahmen, Günter Holtus, Johannes Kramer, Michael Metzeltin, Wolfgang Schweickard & Otto Winkelmann (eds.), Kanonbildung in der Romanistik und in den Nachbardisziplinen: Romanistisches Kolloquium XIV, 305‒320. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Kloss, Heinz. 1978 [1952]. Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800, 2nd edn. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Search in Google Scholar

Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. Sprache der Nähe ‒ Sprache der Distanz: Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36. 15‒43.10.1515/9783112418307-002Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, Melinda et al. 2001. Glossary. http://scripts.sil.org/Glossary (accessed 16 May 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Unseth, Peter. 2005. Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language & Literacy 8(1). 19‒42.10.1075/wll.8.1.02unsSearch in Google Scholar

Villa, Laura & Rik Vosters (eds.). 2015. The Historical Sociolinguistics of spelling. [Special Issue.] Written Language & Literacy 18(2). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/wll.18.2Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-09-12
Published in Print: 2017-10-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jhsl-2016-0022/html
Scroll to top button