Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter (A) June 23, 2022

Kashubian – its Middle Low German heritage as partial superstrate

  • Werner Abraham EMAIL logo , Andrzej Kątny and Piotr Bartelik
From the journal Glottotheory

Abstract

This article is about a Slavic language that has undergone massive lexical and grammatical influence from medieval Low German (MLG). As it has retained its fundamentally Slavic character, we focus on the heritage status of Low German intruding into what essentially remains Slavic typologically. Kashubian is West Slavic with a considerable (Middle) Low German heritage. As expected for a substrate language, such as Kashubian, there is considerable lexical, but minor syntactic German influence in Kashubian. Yet, one main typological characteristic of Slavic Kashubian and Polish, the cross-Slavic aspect and tense paradigm has been expanded by the miec ʻhave’ and the bëc ʻbe’ periphrases expressing tense in the sense of the German perfect tense using the verbal bracket. We trace the change from the pretemporal periphrastic predicative construction (subject-PP-Aux) and the attributive pattern (subject-Aux-PP) in Kashubian (and Polish), as opposed to the superstate German tense periphrasis and the verbal bracket “subject [-Aux-object-PP]” or “subject-object-PP-Aux”; its link to the Polish aspect and simple tense pattern. And we ask the question: are there evolutionary genetic components in the heritage situation that might lead to genetic patterns of natural L-change and grammaticalization? This paper is based on the view that grammar change in a heritage language like Kashubian is not necessarily a case of Darwinian (genetic) evolution in that the targets are seldom cognitively encapsulated procedural parts of grammar (such as the German verbal bracket in dependent clauses of German). The reason is that the latter is structural in Low German, the superstrate language, while it may be used both structurally and relationally in Kashubian and non-structurally (i.e., only relationally) in Polish. Much rather, the cognitively accessible, declarative content of grammars is open for social changes (lexical inventories and their paradigms). Theoretically, the paper is framed under modern heritage considerations (Kelleher, Ann. 2010. What is a heritage language? Davis: University of California. http://www.cal.org/heritage/pdfs/briefs/What-is-a-Heritage-Language.pdf (accessed 26 February 2021); Polinsky, Maria. 2018. Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Polinsky, Maria & Gregory Scontras. 2019. Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 1–17; Scontras, Gregory & Michael T. Putnam. 2020. Lesser studied Heritage Languages: An Appeal to the Dyad. Heritage Language Journal. 152–155).


Corresponding author: Werner Abraham, Groningen, The Netherlands, E-mail:

Primary Sources

Boryś, Wiesław & Hanna Popowska-Taborska (eds.). 1994–2006. Słownik etymologiczny kaszubszczyzny [Etymological dictionary of the Kashubian language]. Warszawa: Slawistyczny Ośrodek Wydawniczy.Search in Google Scholar

Frischbier, Hermann. 1882. Preussisches Wörterbuch. Ost- und Westpreussische Provinzialismen in alphabetischer Folge. Berlin: Verlag von Th. Chr. Fr. Enslin.Search in Google Scholar

Gołąbek, Eugeniusz. 2005. Kaszëbsczi słowôrz normatiwny [Kashubian Normdictionary]. Gdańsk: Oficyna Czec.Search in Google Scholar

Hinze, Friedhelm. 1965. Wörterbuch und Lautlehre der deutschen Lehnwörter im Pomoranischen (Kashubischen). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Ramułt, Stefan. 2003. Słownik języka pomorskiego czyli kaszubskiego. Scalił i znormalizował Jerzy Treder według wydań Akademii Umiejętności z roku 1893 i Polskiej Akademii Umiejętności z roku 1993 [Dictionary of Pomoranian language that is Kashubian. Intergrated and normalizated by Jerzy Treder according to the editions of the Polish Academy of Learning from 1893 and 1993]. Gdańsk: Oficyna Czec.Search in Google Scholar

Stegna, Kaszbscz’e leteraccz’e pismiono [Kashubian literature magazine]. http://www.miesiecznikpomerania.pl/archiwum (accessed 26 February 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Sychta, Bernard. 1967–1976. Słownik gwar kaszubskich na tle kultury ludowej [Dictionary of the Kashubian dialects in context of folk culture]. Ossolineum: Wrocław.Search in Google Scholar

Pomerania, Miesięcznik społeczno–kulturalny [Socio-cultural monthly magazine]. http://www.miesiecznikpomerania.pl/archiwum (accessed 26 February 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Magazines

References

Aalberse, Suzanne, Ad Backus & Pieter Muysken. 2019. Heritage Languages. A language contact approach (Studies in Bilingualism 58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner. 1995. Deutsche Syntax im Sprachenvergleich. Grundlegung einer typologischen Syntax des Deutschen (Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 41). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Search in Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner. 1997. The interdependence of case, aspect and referentiality in the history of German: The case of the genitive. In Ans van Kemenade & Vincent Nigel (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 29–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner. 2008. Wie ist die historisch spezifische Ausgliederung der Modalitäten bei den deutschen Modalverben denkbar? Linguistische Berichte 214. 183–210.Search in Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner. 2020. Modality. Pragmatics, semanrtics, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner & Jadwiga Piskorz. 2014. A rare case of covert modality: Spoken Polish and the novel periphrastic past with mieć ‘have. In Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds.), Modes of modality. Modality, typology, and universal grammar (Studies in language companion series, 149), 409–455. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Kątny, Andrzej. 2019. Quantifizierung der Nominalphrase durch Aspekt und Aktionsarten im Polnischen und Deutschen. Studia Germanica Gedanensia 41. 176–189.Search in Google Scholar

Bartelik, Piotr. 2011. Die kaschubischen sein (bëc-) und haben (miec)-Konstruktionen aus der Sicht des Sprachwandels und im Sprachkontrast. In Michail Kotin & Elizaveta Kotorova (eds.), Geschichte und Typologie der Sprachsysteme. History and typology of language systems, 189–197. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Bartelik, Piotr. 2015. Wpływ języka niemieckiego na system gramatyczny kaszubszczyzny w świetle nowszych badań [The German influence in Kashubian grammar system in new research]. Gwary dziś 7. 215–231.Search in Google Scholar

Bartelik, Piotr. 2018. Sprachkontaktinduzierte Grammatikalisierung am Beispiel des polnischen und Kashubianen Tempussystems. Studia Germanica Posnaniensia 39. 7–34.Search in Google Scholar

Bartelik, Piotr. 2019. Geschichte und Gegenwart der kaschubisch-polnisch-deutschen Sprachkontakte. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego LXXV. 29–43.Search in Google Scholar

Birkenmaier, Willy. 1977. Aspekt, Aktionsart und nominale Determination im Russischen. Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie 37. 398–417.Search in Google Scholar

Birkenmaier, Willy. 1979. Artikelfunktionen in einer artikellosen Sprache. Studien zur nominalen Determination im Russischen. München: Fink.Search in Google Scholar

Breza, Edward. 1997. Merkmale der kaschubischen Literatursprache. In Brunon Synak & Tomasz Wicherkiewicz (eds.), Language minorities and minority languages, 323–327. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan & Östen Dahl. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect system in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13. 51–103.Search in Google Scholar

Cetnarowska, Bożena. 2015. The lexical/phrasal status of Polish Noun+Adjective or Noun+Noun combinations and the relevance of coordination as a diagnostic test. SKASE Journal in Theoretical Linguistics 12(3). 142–170.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam & Howard Lasnik. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8/3. 425–504.Search in Google Scholar

Cognola, Federica, Ivano Baronchelli & Evelina Molinari. 2019. Inter- vs. intra-speaker variation in mixed heritage syntax: a statistical analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 10. 1528.Search in Google Scholar

Czardybon, Adrian. 2017. Definiteness in a language without articles – a study on Polish (Dissertations in language and cognition 3). Düsseldorf: Düsseldorf University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Czarnecki, Tomasz. 1998. Aspektualität im Polnischen und Deutschen. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.Search in Google Scholar

Filip, Hana. 1999. Aspect, eventuality typees and nominal reference. New York & London: Garland Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Fluck, Hans-Rüdiger. 1996. Fachsprachen. 5. Auflage. Tübingen & Basel: A. Francke Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Fuchs, Konrad & Herbert Raab. 2007. Kompaktwissen Geschichte von A-Z. Augsburg: Verlagsgrupe Weltbild.Search in Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, Murray & Merritt Ruhlen. 2011. The origin end evolution of word order. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108. 17290–17295.Search in Google Scholar

Grucza, Franciszek. 1968. Die Vertretung des altpomoranischen /s/ und /z/ in den deutschen Ortsnamen der Ostseegebiete. Zum phonologischen Status der mittelniederdeutschen Sibilanten. Lingua Posnaniensis XII/XIII. 125–133.Search in Google Scholar

Haider, Hubert. 2021. Grammar change. A case of Darwinian cognitive evolution. In Maria Rita Manzini (ed.), Biological evolution: More then a metaphor for grammar change, 6–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Haider, Hubert & Luka Szusich. 2020. VO/OV-base ordering. In Richard Page & Michael T. Putnam (eds.), Cambridge handbook of Germanic linguistics, 339–364. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hull, David. 1988. Interactors versus vehicles. In Henry C. Plotkin (ed.), The role of behavior in evolution, 19–50. Cambridge & Massachusetts: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jocz, Lechosław. 2011. Wpływ fonetyczny i fonologiczny języka niemieckiego na łużycczyznę i kaszubszczyznę w kontekście słowiańskim. Wybrane aspekty na tle porównawczym [The German influences in phonetics and phonology in Sorbian and Kashubian in Slavic context]. Acta Cassubiana XIII. 67–84.Search in Google Scholar

Jocz, Lechosław. 2012. Wpływ fonetyczny i fonologiczny języka niemieckiego na łużycczyznę i kaszubszczyznę w kontekście słowiańskim. Wybrane aspekty na tle porównawczym II [The German influences in phonetics and phonology in Sorbian and Kashubian in Slavic context. Some selected features in comparative context II]. Acta Cassubiana XIV. 39–52.Search in Google Scholar

Kabakciev, Krasimir. 2000. Aspect in English. A “Common-Sense” View of the Interplay between Verbal and Nominal Referents (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy). Stuttgart: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Kaestner, Walter. 1983. Niederdeutsch-Slavische Interferenzen. In Gerhard Cordes & Dieter Möhr Gerhard (eds.), Handbuch zur niederdeutschen Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, 678–729. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Search in Google Scholar

Karszniewicz-Mazur, Alicja. 1988. Zapożyczenia leksykalne ze źródła niemieckiego we współczesnej polszczyźnie [German lexical loan-words in contemporary Polish]. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.Search in Google Scholar

Kelleher, Ann. 2010. What is a heritage language? Davis: University of California. http://www.cal.org/heritage/pdfs/briefs/What-is-a-Heritage-Language.pdf (accessed 26 February 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Kocyba, Piotr. 2007. Die Entlehnungsskala als Grundlage einer vergleichenden Sprachkontaktforschung. In Andrzej Kątny (ed.), Słowiańsko-niesłowiańskie kontakty językowe [Slawisch-nichtslawische Sprachkontakte], 49–58. Olecko: Wszechnica Mazurska.Search in Google Scholar

Kątny, Andrzej. 1999. Zu Zustandskonstruktionen mit mieć [haben] im Polnischen und ihren Entsprechungen im Deutschen. In Andrzej Kątny & Christoph Schatte (eds.), Das Deutsche von innen und von außen, 97–106. Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM.Search in Google Scholar

Kątny, Andrzej. 2011. Zum possessiven Resultativ in ausgewählten Slavicen Sprachen. In Michail Kotin & Elizaveta Kotorova (eds.), Geschichte und typeologie der Sprachsysteme. History and typology of Language systems, 181–189. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Kątny, Andrzej. 2012. Zu den deutschen Entlehnungen in ausgewählten Fach- und Berufssprachen des Polnischen. In Magdalena Olpińska-Szkiełko, Jerzy Żmudzki, Zofia Berdychowska & Sambor Grucza (eds.), Der Mensch und seine Sprachen. Festschrift für Professor Franciszek Grucza, 345–355. Frankfurt/Main: Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Kątny, Andrzej. 2013. Zu den deutschen Entlehnungen in ausgewählten Bereichen des Kashubianen. In Edyta Błachut, Józef Jarosz & Małgorzewicz Anna (eds.), Sprachwissenschaft im Fokus germanistischer Forschung und Lehre, 145–155. Wrocław & Dresden: Atut & Neisse Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Volkmar. 1999. Sprachliche Entwicklung als Expansion und Reduktion. In Tanja Anstatt (ed.), Entwicklungen in slavischen Sprachen, 169–254. München: Otto Sanger.Search in Google Scholar

Leiss, Elisabeth. 1992. Die Verbalkategorien des Deutschen. Berlin: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Leiss, Elisabeth. 2000. Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit (Studia Linguistica Germanica, 55). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Litvinov, Viktor P & Vladimir P. Nedjalkov. 1988. Resultativkonstruktionen im Deutschen (Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 38). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Makurat, Hanna. 2007a. Stan i problemy dzisiejszego języka kaszubskiego [The state and problems of contemporary Kashubian language]. In Edward Breza Edward (ed.), Biuletyn Rady Języka Kaszubskiego 2007, 89–94. Gdańsk: ZKP.Search in Google Scholar

Makurat, Hanna. 2007b. Bilingwizm na kaszubskim obszarze językowym [Bilingualism on the Kashubian language area]. In Edward Breza (ed.), Biuletyn Rady Języka Kaszubskiego 2007, 97–104. Gdańsk: ZKP.Search in Google Scholar

Makurat, Hanna. 2014. Interferencje gwar kaszubskich w polszczyźnie w zakresie fleksji werbalnej obserwowane u osób bilingwalnych [The interferences of the Kashubian dialects observed on bilinguals]. Prace Językoznawcze 16/4. 67–79.Search in Google Scholar

Makurat, Hanna. 2016. Gramatika kaszëbsczégo jãzéka [Grammar of Kashubian]. Gdańsk: ZKP.Search in Google Scholar

Mendoza, Imke. 2004. Nominaldetermination im Polnischen. Die primären Ausdrucksmittel. München: LMU (unpublished).Search in Google Scholar

Mettke, Heine. 1970. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik. Laut- und Formenlehre. Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut.Search in Google Scholar

Mordawski, Jan. 2005. Statystyka ludności kaszubskiej. Kaszubi u progu XXI wieku, Gdańsk. Statystyka ludności kaszubskiej. Kaszubi u progu XXI wieku [The statistics of Kashubian population. The Kashubians at the doorstep of 21st century]. Gdańsk: Instytut Kaszubski.Search in Google Scholar

Nomachi, Motoki. 2006. Polska konstrukcja rezultatywno-posesywna mam to zrobione a kaszubskie jô móm to zrobioné [Polish resultative construction mam to zrobione and the Kashubian jô móm to zrobioné]. Język Polski. Rocznik Towarzystwa Miłośników Języka Polskiego Rocznik LXXXVI. 173–192.Search in Google Scholar

Nomachi, Motoki. 2011. The recipient-passive construction and its grammaticalization in Kashubian. In Andrii Danylenko & Serhii Vakulenko (eds.), Studien zu Sprache und Literatur bei den Slaven. Gedenkschrift für George Y. Shevelov zum 100. Geburtstag, 109–135. München: Otto Sagner.Search in Google Scholar

Piotrowski, Jan. 1981. Składnia słowińska wobec wpływów języka niemieckiego [German influences on Slovincian syntax]. Wrocław: Prace Wrocławskiego Towarzystwa Naukowego.Search in Google Scholar

Piskorz, Jadwiga. 2011a. Die Entwicklungslogik des Perfekts. Die Grammatikalisierung eines neuen analytischen Perfekts im Polnischen. In Michail Kotin & Elizaveta Kotorova (eds.), Geschichte und Typologie der Sprachsysteme. History and typeology of language systems, 169–181. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Piskorz, Kinga. 2011b. Entsteht ein bestimmter Artikel im Polnischen? In Michail Kotin & Elizaveta Kotorova (eds.), Geschichte und typologie der Sprachsysteme. History and typology of language systems, 159–168. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Piskorz, Jadwiga. 2012. Die Grammatikalisierung eines neuen Perfekts im Polnischen. Ein Beitrag zur Entwicklungslogik des Perfekts (Slavistische Beiträge 489). München: Otto Sagner.Search in Google Scholar

Piskorz, Jadwiga. 2016. Sprachwandelphänomene im Gegenwartspolnischen vor dem westslavischen Kontakt. Unpublished PhD dissertation University of Munich.Search in Google Scholar

Piskorz, Kinga. 2017. Die Herausbildung eines bestimmten Artikels im Polnischen. Der grammatische Status des Demonstrativpronomens ten und seine Rolle im Definitheitssystem des Polnischen. Unpublished PhD dissertation University of Munich.Search in Google Scholar

Polinsky, Maria. 2018. Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Polinsky, Maria & Gregory Scontras. 2019. Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23. 1–17.Search in Google Scholar

Popowska-Taborska, Hanna. 1980. Kaszubszczyzna. Zarys dziejów [Kashubian – a short overwiew of its history]. Warszawa: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Popowska-Taborska, Hanna & Wiesław Boryś. 1996. Leksyka kaszubska na tle słowiańskim [Kashubian lexis on the Slavic background]. Warszawa: Slawistyczny Ośrodek Wydawniczy.Search in Google Scholar

Rogall, Joachim. 1996. Polen vom Mittelalter bis zu den Polnischen Teilungen. In Joachim Rogall (ed.), Land der großen Ströme. Von Polen nach Litauen, 21–170. Berlin: Siedler Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Scontras, Gregory & Michael T. Putnam. 2020. Lesser studied Heritage Languages: An Appeal to the Dyad. Heritage Language Journal. 152–155.Search in Google Scholar

Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language contact. An introduction. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Treder, Jerzy. 2001. Fonetyka i fonologia [Phonetic and Phonology]. In Edward Breza (ed.), Kaszubszczyzna. Kaszëbizna. Najnowsze dzieje języków słowiańskich [Kashubian. The latest history of Slavic languages], 107–124. Opole: Uniwersytet Opolski.Search in Google Scholar

Treder, Jerzy. 2005. Historia kaszubszczyzny literackiej. Studia [The history of literary Kashubian. Studies]. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo UG.Search in Google Scholar

Treder, Jerzy (ed.). 2006a. Język kaszubski. Poradnik encyklopedyczny [The Kashubian language. An encyclopedic guidebook]. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego & Oficyna Czec.Search in Google Scholar

Treder, Jerzy. 2006b. Językowy status kaszubszczyzny [Language status of Kashubian]. In Jerzy Treder (ed.), Język kaszubski. Poradnik encyklopedyczny [The Kashubian language. An encyclopedic guidebook], 244–246. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego & Oficyna Czec.Search in Google Scholar

Treder, Jerzy. 2006c. Norma językowa [Language norm]. In Jerzy Treder (ed.), Język kaszubski. Poradnik encyklopedyczny [The Kashubian language. An encyclopedic guidebook], 186–187. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego & Oficyna Czec.Search in Google Scholar

Treder, Jerzy. 2012. Polish–Kashubian language contacts. In Andrzej Kątny (ed.), Sprachkontakte in Zentraleuropa, 129–144. Frankfurt/Main: Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Tschirsch, Fritz. 1974. Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. Bd. 1. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 2008. Letter to Noam Chomsky and Howard Lasnik on “Filters and Control”, April 17, 1977. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 3–15. Cambridge & Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in contact. The Hague: Mouton.Search in Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel. 1976. Sprachen in Kontakt: Ergebnisse und Probleme der Zweisprachigkeitsforschung. Herausgegeben und mit einem Nachwort versehen von A. de Vincenz [Languages in Contact. Findings and Problems. New York 1953]. München: C.H. Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Wiese, Heike. 2012. Kiezdeutsch: Ein neuer Dialekt entsteht. München: C. H. Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Wosiak-Śliwa, Róża. 2011. Kaszubskie nazwy potraw i napojów [Kashubian names of dishes and drinks]. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo UG.Search in Google Scholar

Zabrocki, Ludwik. 1961. Gesetze bei Übernahme von fremden Orts- und Flurnamen. Versuch einer strukturellen Betrachtungsweise. Studia Onomastica Monaciensis IV. 792–797. In Ludwik Zabrocki (ed.), 1980. U podstaw struktury i rozwoju języka [At the foundation of language structure and development], 303–307. Warszawa-Poznań: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Zieniukowa, Jadwiga. 2009. Zmiany w statusie języka kaszubskiego od połowy XX wieku do początku XXI wieku [The changes in the status of Kashubian language from the half of the 20th. century to the begining of the 21st century]. Etnolingwistyka 21. 259–269.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-10-22
Accepted: 2022-02-15
Published Online: 2022-06-23

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/glot-2022-2003/html
Scroll to top button