Abstract
This paper provides a new description of nominal compounds featuring the noun ādi- ‘beginning’ in Sanskrit. When used as second member of a compound, ādi- is commonly translated as ‘etcetera’ and the resulting compound displays a number of semantic and morphological oddities, as observed in reference grammars. Based on a thorough corpus analysis, we show that ādi-compounds are in fact associated with different functions, and that among other things they can be employed for the task of on-line categorization. Specifically, we argue that they can also encode ad hoc categories. In the second part of the paper, we describe the diachronic process whereby ādi-compounds developed into ad hoc category markers. In so doing, we adopt the perspective of constructionalization and suggest, against the traditional analysis of these forms as compounds, that when meaning ‘etcetera’, ādi- behaves as an affixoid. In this respect, the findings of this paper contribute to the general understanding of the diachronic typology of ad hoc category markers.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Caterina Mauri, Andrea Sansò, and all the participants to the workshop Ad Hoc Categories and their Linguistic Construction, as well as two anonymous reviewers, for their helpful comments and observations on previous drafts of this paper. It goes without saying that all remaining errors and inconsistencies are our own.
References
Ariel, Mira. 2016. Evoking higher-level categories using or constructions. Paper presented at the workshop Ad Hoc Categories and their Linguistic Construction, SLE – 49th Annual Meeting, Napoli, 31 August – 3 September 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition 11/3. 211–227.10.3758/BF03196968Search in Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2010. Ad hoc categories. In Patrick C Hogan (ed.) The Cambridge encyclopedia of the language sciences, 87–88. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bisetto, Antonietta & Sergio Scalise. 2009. The classification of compounds. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds.) The Oxford handbook of compounding, 49–82. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.Search in Google Scholar
Bonvino, Elisabetta, Francesca Masini & Paola Pietrandrea. 2009. List constructions: A semantic network. Paper presented at the 3rd International AFLiCO Confenrence – Grammars in Construction(s), Paris, 27–29 May 2009.Search in Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00213.xSearch in Google Scholar
Clackson, James. 2002. Composition in Indo-European languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 100(2). 163–167.10.1111/1467-968X.00094Search in Google Scholar
Croft, William & Alan D Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.10.1017/CBO9780511803864Search in Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Jaqueline Evers-Vermeul. 2015. Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers? More than a terminological issue. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(1). 59–85.10.1075/jhp.16.1.03degSearch in Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.) New reflections on grammaticalization, 83–101. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.49.08heiSearch in Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165525Search in Google Scholar
Hüning, Matthias & Geert Booij. 2014a. From compounding to derivation. Folia Linguistica 42(2). 579–604.Search in Google Scholar
Hüning, Matthias & Geert Booij. 2014b. Affixoids and constructional idioms. In Ronny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.) Extending the scope of construction grammar, 77–106. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110366273.77Search in Google Scholar
Kahane, Sylvain & Paola Pietrandrea. 2012. La typologie des entassements en français. In Franck Neveu, Valelia Muni Toke, Peter Blumenthal, Thomas Klingler, Pierluigi Ligas, Sophie Prévost & Sandra Teston-Bonnard (eds.), 3e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française. Lyon, 4-7 July 2012. Web publication. http://www.shsconferences.org/articles/shsconf/abs/2012/01/shsconf_cmlf12_000238/shsconf_cmlf12_000238.html.Search in Google Scholar
Lowe, John J. 2015. The syntax of Sanskrit compounds. Language 91(3). e71–e115. Web publication: http://muse.jhu.edu/issue/32463.10.1353/lan.2015.0034Search in Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina. 2014. What do connectives and plurals have in common? The linguistic expression of ad hoc categories. In Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stéphanie Durrlemann-Tame & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds.), Linguistic papers dedicated to Jacques Moeschler. Genève: University of Geneva Publication. Web publication: www.unige.ch/lettres/linguistique/moeschler/Festschrift/Festschrift.php.Search in Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina. 2017. Building and interpreting ad hoc categories: A linguistic analysis. In Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stéphanie Durrlemann-Tame & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds.) Formal models in the study of language, 297–326. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-48832-5_16Search in Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò. 2018. Strategie linguistiche per la costruzione on-line di categorie: Un quadro tipologico. In Joseph Brincat & Sandro Caruana (eds.) Tipologia e dintorni. Il metodo tipologico all’intersezione di piani di analisi. Atti del XLIX Convegno della Società di Linguistica Italiana (SLI), La Valletta, 24-26 settembre 2015, 209–232. Rome: Bulzoni.Search in Google Scholar
Monier-Williams, Monier. 1876. A practical grammar of the Sanskrit language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Monier-Williams, Monier. 1899. A Sanskrit-English dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar
Olivelle, Patrick. 2005. Manu’s code of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Olsen, Susan. 2015. Composition. In Peter O Müller, et al. (eds.), Word-formation. An international handbook of the languages of Europe, vol. 1, 364–386. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110246254-022Search in Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann. 2014. The role of pragmatic function in the grammaticalization of English general extenders. Pragmatics 24. 105–129.10.1075/prag.24.1.05oveSearch in Google Scholar
Renou, Louis. 1961. Grammaire sanscrite (2nd ed.). Lyon: IAC.Search in Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor H. 1973. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 4. 328–350.10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 1995. Linguistic categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Thumb, Albert & Richard Hauschild. 1959. Handbuch des Sanskrits. II. Teil: Formenlehre. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2010. Dialogic contexts as motivations for syntactic change. In Robert A Cloutier, Anne Marie Hamilton-Brehm & William A Kretzschmar (eds.) Studies in the of the history English language V. Variation and change in English grammar and Lexicon, 11–27. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110220339.1.11Search in Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Von Böhtlingk, Otto & Rudolph Roth. 1855-1875. Sanskrit-Wörterbuch, vol. 7. Saint Petersburg: Kaiserliche Akademie der Wissenschaften.Search in Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob. 1905. Altindische Grammatik. Teil 1: Einleitung zur Wortlehre, Nominalkomposition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Rupricht.Search in Google Scholar
Whitney, William D. 1889. Sanskrit grammar, 2nd edn. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel.Search in Google Scholar
Web resources
Digital Corpus of Sanskrithttp://kjc-sv013.kjc.uni-heidelberg.de/dcs/index.php.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
