Abstract
Background:
The innovative pneumatic tube system (iPTS) transports one sample at a time without the use of cartridges and allows rapid sending of samples directly into the bulk loader of a laboratory automation system (LAS). We investigated effects of the iPTS on samples and turn-around time (TAT).
Methods:
During transport, a mini data logger recorded the accelerations in three dimensions and reported them in arbitrary area under the curve (AUC) units. In addition representative quantities of clinical chemistry, hematology and coagulation were measured and compared in 20 blood sample pairs transported by iPTS and courier.
Results:
Samples transported by iPTS were brought to the laboratory (300 m) within 30 s without adverse effects on the samples. The information retrieved from the data logger showed a median AUC of 7 and 310 arbitrary units for courier and iPTS transport, respectively. This is considerably below the reported limit for noticeable hemolysis of 500 arbitrary units.
Conclusions:
iPTS reduces TAT by reducing the hands-on time and a fast transport. No differences in the measurement results were found for any of the investigated 36 analytes between courier and iPTS transport. Based on these findings the iPTS was cleared for clinical use in our hospital.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
References
1. Armbruster DA, Overcash DR, Reyes J. Clinical chemistry laboratory automation in the 21st century – Amat Victoria curam (Victory loves careful preparation). Clin Biochem Rev 2014;35:143–53.Search in Google Scholar
2. Fernandes CM, Worster A, Eva K, Hill S, McCallum C. Pneumatic tube delivery system for blood samples reduces turnaround times without affecting sample quality. J Emerg Nurs 2006;32:139–43.10.1016/j.jen.2005.11.013Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Lippi G, Plebani M, Favaloro EJ. Technological advances in the hemostasis laboratory. Semin Thromb Hemost 2014;40:178–85.10.1055/s-0033-1364206Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Al-Riyami AZ, Al-Khabori M, Al-Hadhrami RM, Al-Azwani IS, Davis HM, Al-Farsi KS, et al. The pneumatic tube system does not affect complete blood count results; a validation study at a tertiary care hospital. Int J Lab Hematol 2014;36:514–20.10.1111/ijlh.12180Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Gossez M, Poitevin-Later F, Demaret J, Jallades L, Venet F, Malcus C, et al. Effect of pneumatic tube transport on T lymphocyte subsets analysis. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2015;88:371–4.10.1002/cyto.b.21231Search in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Pragay DA, Edwards L, Toppin M, Palmer RR, Chilcote ME. Evaluation of an improved pneumatic-tube system suitable for transportation of blood specimens. Clin Chem 1974;20:57–60.10.1093/clinchem/20.1.57Search in Google Scholar
7. Ellis G. An episode of increased hemolysis due to a defective pneumatic air tube delivery system. Clin Biochem 2009;42:1265–9.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.05.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Strubi-Vuillaume I, Carlier V, Obeuf C, Vasseur F, Maury J-C, Maboudou P, et al. Gentle blood aspiration and tube cushioning reduce pneumatic tube system interference in lactate dehydrogenase assays. Ann Clin Biochem 2016;53(Pt 2):295–7.10.1177/0004563215586600Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Medical laboratories – Requirements for quality and competence (ISO 15189:2012, Corrected version 2014-08-15); German version EN ISO 15189:2012.Search in Google Scholar
10. Revision of the “Guideline of the German Medical Association on Quality Assurance in Medical Laboratory Examinations – Rili-BAEK” (unauthorized translation). J Lab Med 2015;39:26–69.10.1515/labmed-2014-0046Search in Google Scholar
11. Streichert T, Otto B, Schnabel C, Nordholt G, Haddad M, Maric M, et al. Determination of hemolysis thresholds by the use of data loggers in pneumatic tube systems. Clin Chem 2011;57:1390–7.10.1373/clinchem.2011.167932Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Mensel B, Wenzel U, Roser M, Ludemann J, Nauck M. Considerably reduced centrifugation time without increased hemolysis: evaluation of the new BD Vacutainer SSTTMII Advance. Clin Chem 2007;53:794–5.10.1373/clinchem.2006.079582Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Goswami B, Singh B, Chawla R, Gupta VK, Mallika V. Turn around time (TAT) as a benchmark of laboratory performance. Indian J Clin Biochem 2010;25:376–9.10.1007/s12291-010-0056-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
14. Wenham PR, Hanson T, Ashby JP. Interference in spectrophotometric analysis of cerebrospinal fluid by haemolysis induced by transport through a pneumatic tube system. Ann Clin Biochem 2001;38(Pt 4):371–5.10.1258/0004563011900687Search in Google Scholar PubMed
15. Kratz A, Salem RO, van Cott EM. Effects of a pneumatic tube system on routine and novel hematology and coagulation parameters in healthy volunteers. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007;131:293–6.10.5858/2007-131-293-EOAPTSSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Evliyaoglu O, Toprak G, Tekin A, Basarali MK, Kilinc C, Colpan L. Effect of pneumatic tube delivery system rate and distance on hemolysis of blood specimens. J Clin Lab Anal 2012;26:66–9.10.1002/jcla.21484Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
17. Hansen Rohrpost. Available at: URL:http://www.hansen-rohrpost.de/rohrmaterial/pvc-rohrpostfahrrohr/. Accessed: 20 Mar 2015.Search in Google Scholar
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
