Abstract
The development of diagnostic methods in medicine as well as the progress in the synthesis of biologically active compounds allows the use of selected radioisotopes for the simultaneous diagnosis and treatment of diseases, especially cancerous ones, in patients. This approach is called theranostic. This review article includes chemical and physical characterization of chosen theranostic radioisotopes and their compounds that are or could be useful in nuclear medicine.
Funding source: National Science Centre, Poland
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2020/04/X/ST4/01003
Funding source: University of Warsaw
Funding source: National Center for Research and Development
Award Identifier / Grant number: PBS3/A9/28/2015
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank prof. Aleksander Bilewicz for valuable comments on this paper.
Research funding: This work was realized in the framework of the National Science Centre, Poland, MINIATURA-4 grant no. 2020/04/X/ST4/01003. Also was funded by the Heavy Ion Laboratory at the University of Warsaw and partially by the National Center for Research and Development – Agreement No. PBS3/A9/28/2015, “The development of methods for production of new radiopharmaceuticals based on Sc radionuclides used in positron tomography (PET), PET-SKAND”.
Author contributions: All authors have substantial contribution to the conception of the work and in drafting the paper. All authors approved of the submitted version and have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript.
Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Informed consent: Not applicable.
Ethical approval: Not applicable.
References
1. Yordanova, A, Eppard, E, Kürpig, S, Bundschuh, RA, Schönberger, S, Gonzalez-Carmona, M, et al.. Theranostics in nuclear medicine practice. OncoTargets Ther 2017;10:4821–8. https://doi.org/10.2147/ott.s140671.Search in Google Scholar
2. Gottschalk, A, McCormack, KR, Adams, JE, Anger, HO. A comparison of results of brain scanning using Ga68-EDTA and the positron scintillation camera, with Hg203-neohydrin and the conventional focused collimator scanner. Radiology 1965;84:502–6. https://doi.org/10.1148/84.3.502.Search in Google Scholar
3. Chakravarty, R, Chakraborty, S, Ram, R, Vatsa, R, Bhusari, P, Shukla, J, et al.. Detailed evaluation of different 68Ge/68Ga generators: an attempt toward achieving efficient 68Ga radiopharmacy. J Label Compd Radiopharm 2015;59:87–94.10.1002/jlcr.3371Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Van der Meulen, NP, Dolley, SG, Steyn, GF, van der Walt, TN, Raubenheimer, HG. The use of selective volatilization in the separation of 68Ge from irradiated Ga targets. Appl Radiat Isot 2011;69:727–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2011.01.028.Search in Google Scholar
5. Rösch, F. Maturation of a key resource – the germanium-68/gallium-68 generator: development and new insights. Curr Rad 2012;5:202–11.10.2174/1874471011205030202Search in Google Scholar PubMed
6. Abbasi, AA, Easwaramoorthy, B. Method and system for producing gallium-68 radioisotope by solid targeting in a cyclotron. Patent WO2016197084A1, 2016.Search in Google Scholar
7. Alnahwi, A, Tremblay, S, Ait-Mohand, S, Beaudoin, J-F, Guerin, B. Large-scale routine production of 68Ga using 68Zn-pressed target. J Nucl Med 2019;60:109014.Search in Google Scholar
8. Oehlke, E, Hoehr, C, Hou, X, Hanemaayer, V, Zeisler, S, Adam, MJ, et al.. Production of Y-86 and other radiometals for research purposes using a solution target system. Nucl Med Biol 2015;42:842–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.06.005.Search in Google Scholar
9. Alves, V, do Carmo, S, Alves, F, Abrunhosa, A. Automated purification of radiometals produced by liquid targets. Instruments 2018;2:17. https://doi.org/10.3390/instruments2030017.Search in Google Scholar
10. Jensen, M, Clark, J. Direct production of Ga-68 from bombardment of concentrated aqueous solutions of [Zn-68] zinc chloride. In: Proceedings of the 13th international workshop on targetry and target chemistry. Riso National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, Roskilde, Denmark; 2011: 288–90 pp.Search in Google Scholar
11. Pandey, MK, Byrne, JF, Schlasner, KN, Schmit, NR, DeGrado, TR. Cyclotron production of 68Ga in a liquid target: effects of solution composition and irradiation parameters. Nucl Med Biol 2019;74–75:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2019.03.002.Search in Google Scholar
12. Pagani, M, Stone-Elander, S, Larsson, S. Alternative positron emission tomography with non-conventional positron emitters: effects of their physical properties on image quality and potential clinical applications. Eur J Nucl Med 1997;24:1301–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002590050156.Search in Google Scholar
13. Kilian, K. 68Ga-DOTA and analogs: current status and future perspectives. Rep Practical Oncol Radiother 2014;19:S13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2014.04.016.Search in Google Scholar
14. Notni, J, Hermann, P, Havlickova, J, Kotek, J, Kubicek, V, Plutnar, J, et al.. A triazacyclononane-based bifunctional phosphinate ligand for the preparation of multimeric 68Ga tracers for positron emission tomography. Chemistry 2010;16:7174–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200903281.Search in Google Scholar
15. Notni, J, Plutnar, J, Wester, HJ. Bone-seeking TRAP conjugates: surprising observations and their implications on the development of gallium-68-labeled bisphosphonates. EJNMMI Res 2012;2:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-219x-2-13.Search in Google Scholar
16. Notni, J, Pohle, K, Wester, HJ. Comparative gallium-68 labeling of TRAP-, NOTA-, and DOTA-peptides: practical consequences for the future of gallium-68-PET. EJNMMI Res 2012;2:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-219x-2-28.Search in Google Scholar
17. Połosak, M, Piotrowska, A, Krajewski, S, Bilewicz, A. Stability of 47Sc-complexes with acyclic polyamino-polycarboxylate ligands. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2013;295:1867–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-2188-x.Search in Google Scholar
18. Raj, N, Reidy-Lagunes, D. The Role of 68Ga-DOTATATE Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: a case-based approach illustrates potential benefits and challenges. Pancreas 2018;47:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0000000000000949.Search in Google Scholar
19. Hennrich, U, Benešová, M. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC: the first FDA-approved 68Ga-radiopharmaceutical for PET imaging. Pharmaceuticals 2020;13:38. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13030038.Search in Google Scholar
20. Poeppel, TD, Binse, I, Petersenn, S, Lahner, H, Schott, M, Antoch, G, et al.. 68Ga-DOTATOC versus 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in functional imaging of neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med 2011;52:1864–70. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.091165.Search in Google Scholar
21. Henze, M, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, A, Milker-Zabel, S, Schuhmacher, J, Strauss, LG, Doll, J, et al.. Characterization of 68Ga-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide kinetics in patients with meningiomas. J Nucl Med 2005;46:763–9.Search in Google Scholar
22. Syed, M. Qaim, Theranostic radionuclides: recent advances in production methodologies. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2019;322:1257–66.10.1007/s10967-019-06797-ySearch in Google Scholar
23. Bartold, SP, Donohoe, KJ, Fletcher, JW, Haynie, TP, Henkin, RE, Silberstein, EB, et al.. Procedure guideline for gallium scintigraphy in the evaluation of malignant disease. Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Nucl Med 1997;38:990–4.Search in Google Scholar
24. Ziessman, H, O’Malley, J, Thrall, J. Nuclear medicine, 3rd ed. The requisites in radiology chapter 1 – radiopharmaceuticals; Philadelphia: Mosby; 2006:3–19 pp.10.1016/B978-0-323-02946-9.50006-4Search in Google Scholar
25. Othman, MF, Mitry, NR, Lewington, VJ, Blower, PJ, Terry, SY. Re-assessing gallium-67 as a therapeutic radionuclide. Nucl Med Biol 2017;46:12–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.10.008.Search in Google Scholar
26. Watanabe, N, Nakanishi, Y, Kinukawa, N, Ohni, S, Obana, Y, Nakazawa, A, et al.. Expressions of somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTR-1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) in neuroblastic tumors; special reference to clinicopathological correlations with international neuroblastoma pathology classification and outcomes. Acta Histochem Cytoc 2014;47:219–29. https://doi.org/10.1267/ahc.14024.Search in Google Scholar
27. Majkowska-Pilip, A, Bilewicz, A. Macrocyclic complexes of scandium radionuclides as precursors for diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. J Inorg Biochem 2011;105:313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2010.11.003.Search in Google Scholar
28. Walczak, R, Krajewski, S, Szkliniarz, K, Sitarz, M, Abbas, K, Choiński, J, et al.. Cyclotron production of 43Sc for PET imaging. EJNMMI Phys 2015;2:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-015-0136-x.Search in Google Scholar
29. Szkliniarz, K, Jastrzębski, J, Bilewicz, A, Chajduk, E, Choiński, J, Jakubowski, A, et al.. Medical radioisotopes produced using the alpha particle beam from the Warsaw heavy Ion cyclotron. Acta Phys Pol, A 2015;127:1471–4. https://doi.org/10.12693/aphyspola.127.1471.Search in Google Scholar
30. Szkliniarz, K, Sitarz, M, Walczak, R, Jastrzębski, J, Bilewicz, A, Choiński, J, et al.. Production of medical Sc radioisotopes with an alpha particle beam. Appl Radiat Isot 2016;118:182–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.07.001.Search in Google Scholar
31. Minegishi, K, Nagatsu, K, Fukada, M, Suzuki, H, Ohya, T, Zhang, MR. Production of scandium-43 and -47 from a powdery calcium oxide target via the nat/44Ca(α,x)-channel. Appl Radiat Isot 2016;116:8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.07.017.Search in Google Scholar
32. Domnanich, KA, Eichler, R, Muller, C, Jordi, S, Yakusheva, V, Braccini, S, et al.. Production and separation of 43Sc for radiopharmaceutical purposes. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem 2017;2:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41181-017-0033-9.Search in Google Scholar
33. Müller, C, Domnanich, KA, Umbricht, CA, van der Meulen, NP. Scandium and terbium radionuclides for radiotheranostics: current state of development towards clinical application. Br J Radiol 2018;91:20180074. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180074.Search in Google Scholar
34. Roesch, F. Scandium-44: benefits of a long-lived PET radionuclide available from the 44Ti/44Sc generator system. Curr Rad 2012;5:187–201. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874471011205030187.Search in Google Scholar
35. Alliot, C, Audouin, N, Barbet, J, Bonraisin, AC, Bossé, V, Bourdeau, C, et al.. Is there an interest to use deuteron beams to produce non-conventional radionuclides? Front Med 2015;11:31. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2015.00031.Search in Google Scholar
36. Duchemin, C, Guertin, A, Haddad, F, Michel, N, Métivier, V. Corrigendum: production of scandium-44m and scandium-44g with deuterons on calcium-44: cross section measurements and production yield calculations. Phys Med Biol 2015;60:6847–64. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/60/17/6847.Search in Google Scholar
37. Moskal, P, Stępień, EŁ. Prospects and clinical perspectives of total-body PET imaging using plastic scintillators. Pet Clin 2020;15:439–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2020.06.009.Search in Google Scholar
38. Moskal, P, Kisielewska, D, Shopa, YR, Bura, Z, Chhokar, J, Curceanu, C, et al.. Performance assessment of the 2 γpositronium imaging with the total-body PET scanners. EJNMMI Phys 2020;7:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00307-w.Search in Google Scholar
39. Moskal, P, Kisielewska, D, Curceanu, C, Czerwiński, E, Dulski, K, Gajos, A, et al.. Feasibility study of the positronium imaging with the J-PET tomograph. Phys Med Biol 2019;64:055017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aafe20.Search in Google Scholar
40. Moskal, P, Jasińska, B, Stępień, EŁ, Bass, SD. Positronium in medicine and biology. Nat Rev Phys 2019;1:527–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0078-7.Search in Google Scholar
41. Severin, GW, Engle, JW, Valdovinos, HF, Barnhart, TE, Nickles, RJ. Cyclotron produced ⁴⁴gSc from natural calcium. Appl Radiat Isot 2012;70:1526–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.04.030.Search in Google Scholar
42. Sitarz, M, Szkliniarz, K, Jastrzębski, J, Choiński, J, Guertin, A, Haddad, F, et al.. Production of Sc medical radioisotopes with proton and deuteron beams. Appl Radiat Isot 2018;142:104–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.09.025.Search in Google Scholar
43. Krajewski, S, Cydzik, I, Abbas, K, Bulgheroni, A, Simonell, F, Holzwarth, U, et al.. Cyclotron production of 44Sc for clinical application. Radiochim Acta 2013;101:333. https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2013.2032.Search in Google Scholar
44. Pruszyński, M, Majkowska-Pilip, A, Loktionova, NS, Eppard, E, Roesch, F. Radiolabeling of DOTATOC with the long-lived positron emitter 44Sc. Appl Radiat Isot 2012;70:974–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.03.005.Search in Google Scholar
45. Kilian, K, Cheda, Ł, Sitarz, M, Szkliniarz, K, Choiński, J, Stolarz, A. Separation of 44Sc from natural calcium carbonate targets for synthesis of 44Sc-DOTATATE. Molecules 2018;23:1787. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23071787.Search in Google Scholar
46. Carzaniga, TS, Braccini, S. Cross-section measurement of 44mSc,47Sc, 48Sc and 47Ca for an optimized 47Sc production with an 18 MeV medical PET cyclotron. Appl Radiat Isot 2019;143:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.10.015.Search in Google Scholar
47. Müller, C, Bunka, M, Haller, S, Köster, U, Groehn, V, Bernhardt, P, et al.. Promising prospects for 44Sc-/47Sc-based theranostics: application of 47Sc for radionuclide tumor therapy in mice. J Nucl Med 2014;55:1658–64.10.2967/jnumed.114.141614Search in Google Scholar PubMed
48. Domnanich, KA, Muller, C, Benešova, M, Dressler, R, Haller, S, Köster, U, et al.. 47Sc as useful β-emitter for the radiotheragnostic paradigm: a comparative study of feasible production routes. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem 2017;2:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41181-017-0024-x.Search in Google Scholar
49. Rane, S, Harris, JT, Starovoitova, VN. 47Ca production for 47Ca/47Sc generator system using electron linacs. Appl Radiat Isot 2015;97:188–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.12.020.Search in Google Scholar
50. Kerdjoudj, R, Pniok, M, Alliot, C, Kubíček, V, Havlíčková, J, Rösch, F, et al.. Scandium(III) complexes of monophosphorus acid DOTA analogues: a thermodynamic and radiolabelling study with 44Sc from cyclotron and from a 44Ti/44Sc generator. Dalton Trans 2016;45:1398–409. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5dt04084a.Search in Google Scholar
51. Singh, A, van der Meulen, NP, Müller, C, Klette, I, Kulkarni, HR, Türler, A, et al.. First-in-human PET/CT imaging of metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with cyclotron-produced 44Sc-DOTATOC: a proof-of-concept study. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2017;32:124–32. https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2016.2173.Search in Google Scholar
52. Van der Meulen, NP, Hasler, R, Talip, Z, Grundler, PV, Favaretto, C, Umbricht, CA, et al.. Developments toward the implementation of 44Sc production at a medical cyclotron. Molecules 2020;25:4706. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25204706.Search in Google Scholar
53. Filosofov, DV, Loktionova, NS, Rösch, F. A 44Ti/44Sc radionuclide generator for potential application of 44Sc-based PET-radiopharmaceuticals. Radiochim Acta 2010;98:149–56. https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2010.1701.Search in Google Scholar
54. Pruszyński, M, Loktionova, NS, Filosofov, DV, Rösch, F. Post-elution processing of 44Ti/44Sc generator-derived 44Sc for medical application. Appl Radiat Isot 2010;68:1630–41.10.1016/j.apradiso.2010.04.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed
55. Mazza, M, Alliot, C, Sinquin, C, Colliec-Jouault, S, Reiller, PE, Huclier-Markai, S. Marine exopolysaccharide complexed with scandium aimed as theranostic agents. Molecules 2021;26:1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26041143.Search in Google Scholar
56. McCarthy, DW, Bass, LA, Cutler, PD, Shefer, RE, Klinkowstein, RE, Herrero, P, et al.. High purity production and potential applications of copper-60 and copper-61. Nucl Med Biol 1999;26:351–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8051(98)00113-9.Search in Google Scholar
57. Obata, A, Kasamatsu, S, Mc Carthy, DW. Production of therapeutic quantities of 64Cu using a 12 MeV cyclotron. Nucl Med Biol 2003;30:535–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8051(03)00024-6.Search in Google Scholar
58. Kozempel, J, Abbas, K, Simonelli, F, Zampese, M, Holzwarth, U, Gibson, N, et al.. A novel method for n.c.a. 64Cu production by the 64Zn(d,2p)64Cu reaction and dual ion-exchange column chromatography. Radiochim Acta 2007;95:75–80. https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2007.95.2.75.Search in Google Scholar
59. Nickles, RJ. Production of a broad range of radionuclides with an 11 MeV proton cyclotron. J Label Compd Radiopharm 1991;30:120.Search in Google Scholar
60. Nickles, J, Abbas, K, Simonelli, F, Bulgheroni, A, Holzwarth, U, Gibson, N. Preparation of 67Cu via deuteron irradiation of 70Zn. Radiochim Acta 2012;100:419–23.10.1524/ract.2012.1939Search in Google Scholar
61. Ohya, T, Nagatsu, K, Suzuki, H, Fukada, M, Minegishi, K, Hanyu, M, et al.. Small-scale production of 67Cu for a preclinical study via the 64Ni(α,p)67Cu channel. Nucl Med Biol 2018;59:56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2018.01.002.Search in Google Scholar
62. Denoyer, D, Masaldan, S, La Fontaine, S, Cater, M. Targeting copper in cancer therapy: ‘Copper that Cancer’. Metallomics 2015;7:1459–76. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5mt00149h.Search in Google Scholar
63. Shanbhag, VC, Gudekar, N, Jasmer, K, Papageorgiou, C, Singh, K, Petris, MJ. Copper metabolism as a unique vulnerability in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 2021;1868:118893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118893.Search in Google Scholar
64. Boschi, A, Martini, P, Janevik-Ivanovska, E, Duatti, A. The emerging role of copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals as cancer theranostics. Drug Discov Today 2018;23:1489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2018.04.002.Search in Google Scholar
65. Jørgensen, JT, Persson, M, Madsen, J, Kjær, A. High tumor uptake of 64Cu: implications for molecular imaging of tumor characteristics with copper-based PET tracers. Nucl Med Biol 2013;40:345–50.10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.01.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed
66. Cutler, CS, Hennkens, HM, Sisay, N, Huclier-Markai, S, Jurisson, SS. Radiometals for combined imaging and therapy. Chem Rev 2013;13:858–83. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr3003104.Search in Google Scholar
67. Anderson, CJ, Ferdani, R. Copper-64 radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging of cancer: advances in preclinical and clinical research. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2009;24:379–93. https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2009.0674.Search in Google Scholar
68. Liu, T, Karlsen, M, Karlberg, AM, Redalen, KR. Hypoxia imaging and theranostic potential of [64Cu][Cu(ATSM)] and ionic Cu(II) salts: a review of current evidence and discussion of the retention mechanisms. EJNMMI Res 2020;9:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00621-5.Search in Google Scholar
69. Ponnala, S, Amor-Coarasa, A, Kelly, J, Zia, N, Clarence, W, Nikolopoulou, A, et al.. A next generation theranostic PSMA ligand for 64Cu and67Cu-based prostate cancer imaging and therapy. J Nucl Med 2019;60(1 Suppl):1005.Search in Google Scholar
70. Gourni, E, Del Pozzo, L, Kheirallah, E, Smerling, C, Waser, B. Copper-64 labeled macrobicyclic sarcophagine coupled to a GRP receptor antagonist shows great promise for PET imaging of prostate cancer. Mol Pharm 2015;12:2781–90. https://doi.org/10.1021/mp500671j.Search in Google Scholar
71. Paterson, BM, Roselt, P, Denoyer, D, Cullinane, C, Binns, D, Noonan, W, et al.. PET imaging of tumours with a 64Cu labeled macrobicyclic cage amine ligand tethered to Tyr3-octreotate. Dalton Trans 2014;43:1386–96. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3dt52647j.Search in Google Scholar
72. McInnes, L, Zia, N, Cullinane, C, Van Zuylekom, J, Jackson, S, Stoner, J, et al.. A Cu-64/Cu-67 bifunctional PSMA ligand as a theranostic for prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 2020;61(1 Suppl):1215.Search in Google Scholar
73. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04023331.Search in Google Scholar
74. Hao, G, Mastren, T, Silvers, W, Hassan, G, Öz, OK, Sun, X. Copper-67 radioimmunotheranostics for simultaneous immunotherapy and immuno-SPECT. Sci Rep 2021;11:3622. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82812-1.Search in Google Scholar
75. Perk, LR, Visser, OJ, Stigter-van Walsum, M, Vosjan, MJ, Visser, GW, Zijlstra, JM, et al.. Preparation and evaluation of (89)Zr-Zevalin for monitoring of (90)Y-Zevalin biodistribution with positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag 2006;33:1337–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-006-0160-0.Search in Google Scholar
76. Wiseman, GA, Witzig, TE. Yttrium-90 (90Y) ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) induces long-term durable responses in patients with relapsed or refractory B-Cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2005;20:185–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/cbr.2005.20.185.Search in Google Scholar
77. Selwyn, RG, Nickles, RJ, Thomadsen, BR, DeWerd, LA, Micka, JA. A new internal pair production branching ratio of 90Y: the development of a non-destructive assay for 90Y and 90Sr. Appl Radiat Isot 2007;65:318–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2006.08.009.Search in Google Scholar
78. Wright, CL, Zhang, J, Tweedle, MF, Knopp, MV, Hall, NC. Theranostic imaging of yttrium-90. BioMed Res Int 2015;2015:481279. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/481279.Search in Google Scholar
79. Rösch, F, Qaim, SM, Stöcklin, G. Nuclear data relevant to the production of the positron emitting radioisotope 86Y via the 86Sr (p,n)- and natRb (3He, xn)- processes. Radiochim Acta 1993;61:1.10.1524/ract.1993.61.1.1Search in Google Scholar
80. Uddin, MS, Khandaker, MU, Kim, KS, Lee, YS, Lee, MW, Kim, GN. Excitation functions of the proton induced nuclear reactions on natural zirconium. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 2008;266:13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2007.10.010.Search in Google Scholar
81. Khandaker, MU, Kim, K, Lee, MW, Kim, KS, Kim, GN, Cho, YS, et al.. Experimental determination of proton-induced cross-sections on natural zirconium. Appl Radiat Isot 2009;67:1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.02.031.Search in Google Scholar
82. Szelecsényi, F, Steyn, GF, Kovács, Z, Vermeulen, C, Nagatsu, K, Zhang, M-R, et al.. Excitation functions of natZr + p nuclear processes up to 70 MeV: new measurements and compilation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B 2015;343:173.10.1016/j.nimb.2014.11.081Search in Google Scholar
83. Tárkányi, F, Ditrói, F, Takács, S, Hermanne, A, Al-Abyad, M, Yamazaki, H, et al.. New activation cross section data on longer lived radio-nuclei produced in proton induced nuclear reaction on zirconium. Appl Radiat Isot 2015;97:149.10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.12.029Search in Google Scholar
84. Rösch, F, Qaim, SM, Stöcklin, G. Production of the positron emitting radioisotope 86Y for nuclear medical application. Appl Radiat Isot 1993;44:677.10.1016/0969-8043(93)90131-SSearch in Google Scholar
85. Kandil, S, Scholten, B, Hassan, K, Hanafi, H, Qaim, S. A comparative study on the separation of radioyttrium from Sr-and Rb-targets via ion-exchange and solvent extraction techniques, with special reference to the production of no-carrier-added 86Y, 87Y and 88Y using a cyclotron. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2009;279:823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-008-7407-0.Search in Google Scholar
86. Aluicio-Sarduy, E, Hernandez, R, Valdovinos, HF, Kutyreff, CJ, Ellison, PA, Barnhart, TE, et al.. Simplified and automatable radiochemical separation strategy for the production of radiopharmaceutical quality 86Y using single column extraction chromatography. Appl Radiat Isot 2018;142:28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.09.016.Search in Google Scholar
87. Nayak, TK, Brechbiel, MW. 86Y based PET radiopharmaceuticals: radiochemistry and biological applications. Med Chem 2011;7:380–8. https://doi.org/10.2174/157340611796799249.Search in Google Scholar
88. Kunikowska, J, Pawlak, D, Bąk, MI, Kos-Kudła, B, Mikołajczak, R, Królicki, L. Long-term results and tolerability of tandem peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Y/177Lu-DOTATATE in neuroendocrine tumors with respect to the primary location: a 10-year study. Ann Nucl Med 2017;31:347–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-017-1163-6.Search in Google Scholar
89. Li, M, Sagastume, EA, Lee, D, McAlister, D, DeGraffenreid, AJ, Olewine, KR, et al.. 203/212Pb theranostic radiopharmaceuticals for image-guided radionuclide therapy for cancer. Curr Med Chem 2020;27:7003–31. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867327999200727190423.Search in Google Scholar
90. Horlock, P, Thakur, M, Watson, I. Cyclotron produced lead-203. Postgrad Med 1975;51:751–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.51.601.751.Search in Google Scholar
91. Laxdal, RE, Altman, A, Kuo, T. Beam measurements on a small commercial cyclotron. In: 4th European particle accelerator conference. London, UK: World Scientific; 1994:545 p.Search in Google Scholar
92. Azzam, A, Said, SA, Al-abyad, M. Evaluation of different production routes for the radio medical isotope 203Pb using TALYS 1.4 and EMPIRE 3.1 code calculations. Appl Radiat Isot 2014;91:109–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2014.05.009.Search in Google Scholar
93. McNeil, BL, Robertson, AKH, Fu, W, Yang, H, Hoehr, C, Ramogida, CF, et al.. Production, purification, and radiolabeling of the 203Pb/212Pb theranostic pair. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem 2021;6:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41181-021-00121-4.Search in Google Scholar
94. Sgouros, G, Hobbs, RF. Dosimetry for radiopharmaceutical therapy. Semin Nucl Med 2014;44:172–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2014.03.007.Search in Google Scholar
95. Mirzadeh, S, Kumar, K, Gansow, OA. The chemical fate of 212Bi-DOTA formed by β- decay of 212Pb(DOTA)2-. Radiochim Acta 1993;60:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.1993.60.1.1.Search in Google Scholar
96. Chappell, LL, Dadachova, E, Milenic, DE, Garmestani, K, Wu, C, Brechbiel, MW. Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of a novel bifunctional chelating agent for the lead isotopes 203Pb and 212Pb. Nucl Med Biol 2000;27:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8051(99)00086-4.Search in Google Scholar
97. Chang, SS. Overview of prostate-specific membrane antigen. Rev Urol 2004;6(10 Suppl):S13–8.Search in Google Scholar
98. Banerjee, SR, Minn, I, Kumar, V, Josefsson, A, Lisok, A, Brummet, M, et al.. Preclinical evaluation of 203/212Pb-labeled low-molecular-weight compounds for targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 2020;61:80–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229393.Search in Google Scholar
99. Miao, Y, Hylarides, M, Fisher, DR, Shelton, T, Moore, H, Wester, DW, et al.. Melanoma therapy via peptide-targeted α-radiation. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:5616–21. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-0619.Search in Google Scholar
100. Miao, Y, Figueroa, SD, Fisher, DR, Moore, HA, Testa, RF, Hoffman, TJ, et al.. 203Pb-labeled alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone peptide as an imaging probe for melanoma detection. J Nucl Med 2008;49:823–9. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.107.048553.Search in Google Scholar
101. Guo, H, Yang, J, Gallazzi, F, Miao, Y. Reduction of the ring size of radiolabeled lactam bridge-cyclized alpha-MSH peptide, resulting in enhanced melanoma uptake. J Nucl Med 2010;51:418–26. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.109.071787.Search in Google Scholar
102. Tárkányi, F, Hermanne, A, Takács, S, Shubin, YN, Dityuk, AI. Cross sections for production of the therapeutic radioisotopes 198Au and 199Au in proton and deuteron induced reactions on 198Pt. Radiochim Acta 2004;92:223–8.10.1524/ract.92.4.223.35588Search in Google Scholar
103. Anderson, P, Vaughan, ATM, Varley, NR. Antibodies labeled with 199Au: potential of 199Au for radioimmunotherapy. Nucl Med Biol 1988;15:293–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-2897(88)90109-2.Search in Google Scholar
104. Das, NR, Banerjee, K, Chatterjee, K, Lahiri, S. Separation of carrier-free 199Au as a β-decay product of 199Pt. Appl Radiat Isot 1999;50:643–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-8043(98)00115-8.Search in Google Scholar
105. Fazaeli, Y, Akhavan, O, Rahighi, R, Aboudzadeh, MR, Karimi, E, Afarideh, H. In vivo SPECT imaging of tumors by 198,199Au-labeled graphene oxide nanostructures. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2014;45:196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.09.019.Search in Google Scholar
106. Vimalnath, KV, Chakraborty, S, Dash, A. Reactor production of no-carrier-added 199Au for biomedical applications. RSC Adv 2016;6:82832–41. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra15407g.Search in Google Scholar
107. Khandaker, MU, Haba, H, Abu Kassim, H. Production of radio-gold 199Au for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. AIP Conf Proc 2016;1704:030008.10.1063/1.4940077Search in Google Scholar
108. Panchapakesan, B, Book-Newell, B, Sethu, P, Rao, M, Irudayaraj, J. Gold nanoprobes for theranostics. Nanomedicine 2011;6:1787–811. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.11.155.Search in Google Scholar
109. Aryal, S, Grailer, JJ, Pilla, S, Steeberb, DA, Gong, S. Doxorubicin conjugated gold nanoparticles as water-soluble and pH-responsive anticancer drug nanocarriers. J Mater Chem 2009;19:7879. https://doi.org/10.1039/b914071a.Search in Google Scholar
110. Żelechowska-Matysiak, K, Łyczko, M, Bilewicz, A, Majkowska-Pilip, A. Multimodal radiobioconjugate - trastuzumab-PEG-[Au-198]AuNPs-PEG-DOX for targeted radionuclide therapy of HER2-positive cancers. Nucl Med Biol 2021;96–97(S Suppl):S86.10.1016/S0969-8051(21)00407-8Search in Google Scholar
111. Shen, ZX, Chen, GQ, Ni, JH, Li, XS, Xiong, SM, Qiu, QY, et al.. Use of arsenic trioxide (As2O3) in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): II. Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics in relapsed patients. Blood 1997;89:3354–60. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v89.9.3354.Search in Google Scholar
112. Kinjo, K, Kizaki, M, Muto, A, Fukuchi, Y, Umezawa, A, Yamato, K, et al.. Arsenic trioxide (As2O3)-induced apoptosis and differentiation in retinoic acid resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia model in hGM-CSF-producing transgenic SCID mice. Leukemia 2000;14:431–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2401646.Search in Google Scholar
113. Dilda, PJ, Hogg, PJ. Arsenical-based cancer drugs. Cancer Treat Rev 2007;33:542–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.05.001.Search in Google Scholar
114. Jutoorua, I, Chadalapakaa, G, Sreevalsana, S, Leib, P, Barhoumic, R, Burghardtc, R, et al.. Arsenic trioxide downregulates specificity protein (Sp) transcription factors and inhibits bladder cancer cell and tumor growth. Exp Cell Res 2010;316:2174–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.04.027.Search in Google Scholar
115. (NNDC). National Nuclear Data Center; 2021. https://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat3/.Search in Google Scholar
116. Beard, HC. The radiochemistry of arsenic. Nuclear Science Series. Washington: National Academy of Sciences; 1960.Search in Google Scholar
117. Basile, D, Birattari, C, Bonardi, M, Goetz, L, Sabbioni, E, Salomone, A. Excitation functions and production of arsenic radioisotopes for environmental toxicology and biomedical purposes. Int J Appl Radiat Isot 1984;32:403–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-708x(81)81007-1.Search in Google Scholar
118. Phillips, DR. Chemistry and concept for an automated 72Se/72As generator. Patent No. 5,371,372, United States, 1994.Search in Google Scholar
119. DeGraffenreid, AJ, Medvedev, DG, Phelps, TE, Gott, MD, Smith, SV, Jurisson, SS, et al.. Cross-section measurements and production of 72Se with medium to high energy protons using arsenic containing targets. Radiochim Acta 2019;107:279–87. https://doi.org/10.1515/ract-2018-2931.Search in Google Scholar
120. Ellison, PA, Barnhart, TE, Chen, F, Hong, H, Zhang, Y, Theuer, CP, et al.. High yield production and radiochemical isolation of isotopically pure arsenic-72 and novel radioarsenic labeling strategies for the development of theranostic radiopharmaceuticals. Bioconjugate Chem 2016;27:179–88. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00592.Search in Google Scholar
121. Mausner, LF, Kurczak, SO, Jamriska, DJ. Production of 73As by irradiation of Ge target. J Nucl Med 2004;45:471.Search in Google Scholar
122. Ellison, PA, Barnhart, TE, Engle, JW, Nickles, RJ, DeJesus, OT. Production and chemical isolation procedure of positron-emitting isotopes of arsenic for environmental and medical applications. AIP Conf Proc 2012;1509:135. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4773955.Search in Google Scholar
123. Jennewein, M, Qaim, SM, Hermanne, A, Jahn, M, Tsyganov, E, Slavine, N, et al.. A new method for radiochemical separation of arsenic from irradiated germanium oxide. Appl Radiat Isot 2005;63:343–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.04.005.Search in Google Scholar
124. Feng, Y, DeGraffenreid, AJ, Phipps, MD, Rold, TL, Okoye, NC, Gallazzi, FA, et al.. A trithiol bifunctional chelate for 72,77As: a matched pair theranostic complex with high in vivo stability. Nucl Med Biol 2018;61:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2018.03.001.Search in Google Scholar
125. Sitarz, M, Cussonneau, JP, Matulewicz, T, Haddad, F. Radionuclide candidates for β+γ coincidence PET: an overview. Appl Radiat Isot 2020;155:108898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2019.108898.Search in Google Scholar
126. Jennewein, M, Qaim, SM, Kulkarni, PV, Mason, RP, Hermanne, A, Rösch, F. A no-carrier-added 72Se/72As radionuclide generator based on solid phase extraction. Radiochim Acta 2005;93:579–83. https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2005.93.9-10.579.Search in Google Scholar
127. Chajduk, E, Doner, K, Polkowska-Motrenko, H, Bilewicz, A. Novel radiochemical separation of arsenic from selenium for 72Se/72As generator. Appl Radiat Isot 2012;70:819–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2012.01.016.Search in Google Scholar
128. Jennewein, M, Schmidt, A, Novgorodov, AF, Qaim, SM, Rösch, F. A no-carrier-added 72Se/72As radionuclide generator based on distillation. Radiochim Acta 2004;92:245–9. https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.92.4.245.35611.Search in Google Scholar
129. Cea-Olivares, R, Toscano, RA, Lopez, M, Garcia, P. Coordination ability of the heterocycles 1,3-dithia-2-arsa- and -stiba-cyclopentanes towards sulfur containing ligands, Part II. Diheterocyclic dithiocarbamate complexes. X-ray structure of the 4-morpholinecarbodithioate of 1,3-dithia-2-arsa-cyclopentane. Monatsh Chem 1993;124:177–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00808677.Search in Google Scholar
130. Garje, SS, Jain, VK, Tiekink, ERT. Synthesis and characterisation of organoarsenic(III) xanthates and dithiocarbamates. X-ray crystal structures of RAs(S2CNEt2)2, R = Me and Ph. J Organomet Chem 1997;538:129–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-328x(96)06905-7.Search in Google Scholar
131. Wenclawiak, BW, Uttich, S, Deiseroth, HJ, Schmitz, D. Studies on bulky residual group substituted arsenic(III) dithiocarbamate structures. Inorg Chim Acta 2003;348:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1693(02)01482-2.Search in Google Scholar
132. Chen, D, Lai, CS, Tiekink, ERT. Tris(N,N-dimethyldithiocarbamato)arsenic(III) dichloromethane solvate. Appl Organomet Chem 2003;17:813–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.515.Search in Google Scholar
133. Chauhan, HPS, Kori, K, Shaik, NM, Mathur, S, Huch, V. Dialkyldithiocarbamate derivatives of toluene-3,4-dithiolato arsenic(III) and -bismuth(III): synthetic, spectral and single crystal X-ray structural studies. Polyhedron 2005;24:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2004.10.007.Search in Google Scholar
134. Tran, TTP, Ould, DMC, Wilkins, LC, Wright, DS, Melen, RL, Rawson, JM. Supramolecular aggregation in dithia-arsoles: chlorides, cations and N-centred paddlewheels. CrystEngComm 2017;19:4696–9. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ce01117b.Search in Google Scholar
135. Kisenyi, JM, Willey, GR, Drew, MGB, Wandiga, SO. Toluene-3,4-dithiol (H2tdt) complexes of group 5B halides. Observations of lone-pair stereochemical activity and redox behaviour. Crystal and molecular structures of [AsCl(tdt)] and [PPh4][Sb(tdt)3]. J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 1985:69–74. https://doi.org/10.1039/dt9850000069.Search in Google Scholar
136. DeGraffenreid, AJ, Feng, Y, Barnes, CL, Ketring, AR, Cutler, CS, Jurisson, SS. Trithiols and their arsenic compounds for potential use in diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Nucl Med Biol 2016;43:288–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2016.01.005.Search in Google Scholar
137. Lyczko, M, Lyczko, K, Majkowska-Pilip, A, Bilewicz, A. 1,2-benzenedithiol and toluene-3,4-dithiol arsenic(iii) complexes-synthesis, structure, spectroscopic characterization and toxicological studies. Molecules 2019;24:3865. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24213865.Search in Google Scholar
138. Jennewein, M, Lewis, MA, Zhao, D, Tsyganov, E, Slavine, N, He, J, et al.. Vascular imaging of solid tumors in rats with a radioactive arsenic-labeled antibody that binds exposed phosphatidylserine. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:1377–85. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-1516.Search in Google Scholar
139. Krajewski, S, Cydzik, I, Abbas, K, Bulgheroni, A, Simonell, F, Holzwarth, U, et al.. Simple and fast procedure of labelling DOTATATE with 86Y and 44Sc. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag 2012;39(2 Suppl):S525.Search in Google Scholar
140. Kunikowska, J, Kuliński, R, Muylle, K, Koziara, H, Królicki, L. 68Ga-Prostate-Specific membrane antigen-11 PET/CT: a new imaging option for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme? Clin Nucl Med 2020;45:11–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/rlu.0000000000002806.Search in Google Scholar
141. Hennrich, U, Eder, M. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11: The First FDA-Approved 68Ga-Radiopharmaceutical for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Pharmaceuticals 2021;14:713.10.3390/ph14080713Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
142. Guo, J, Rahme, K, He, Y, Li, LL, Holmes, JD, O’Driscoll, CM. Gold nanoparticles enlighten the future of cancer theranostics. Int J Nanomed 2017;12:6131–52. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s140772.Search in Google Scholar
143. Dziawer, L, Kozminski, P, Meczynska-Wielgosz, S, Pruszynski, M, Lyczko, M, Was, B, et al.. Gold nanoparticle bioconjugates labelled with 211At for targeted alpha therapy. RSC Adv 2017;7:41024–32. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra06376h.Search in Google Scholar
144. Cytryniak, A, Nazaruk, E, Bilewicz, R, Górzyńska, E, Żelechowska-Matysiak, K, Walczak, R, et al.. A lipidic cubic-phase nanoparticles (cubosomes) loaded with doxorubicin and labeled with 177lu as a potential tool for combined chemo and internal radiotherapy for cancers. Nanomaterials 2020;10:2272. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112272.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston