Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter Mouton October 12, 2022

The early the better? Or, the more the merrier? The relative effects of onset age and exposure hours on EFL learners’ implicit and explicit grammatical attainment

  • Yeu-Ting Liu ORCID logo and Wen-Ta Tseng ORCID logo EMAIL logo

Abstract

Drawing on methodological insights from psycholinguistic research protocols, the present study employed a structural equation modelling approach to examine whether explicit and implicit grammatical knowledge of English language learners would be influenced by their onset age of language learning and hours of exposure to language instruction; and if so, in what way? The present study further examined how the hypothesized causal effects might be mediated by explicit and implicit grammatical knowledge. The results showed that while early onset appeared to exert a facilitative effect on the participants’ implicit grammatical attainment, the role of exposure to instructed input was more relevant to their explicit grammatical attainment. Importantly, early onset facilitated the participants’ implicit grammatical attainment more than their explicit grammatical attainment, most likely because early learners’ analytical learning mechanism was still immature. Notably, while superior implicit grammatical attainment was conducive to the participants’ explicit grammatical attainment, their better explicit grammatical attainment did not necessarily facilitate their implicit attainment. The insights of this study shed light on the necessity of implementing early foreign language education when the curriculum goal concerns developing learners’ intuition regarding the FL, and provides empirical evidence of the need to adjust current instructional hours and foci in school.


Corresponding author: Wen-Ta Tseng, Applied Foreign Languages, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 43, Keelung Rd., Sec. 4, Da’an Dist., 106, Taipei, Taiwan, E-mail:

References

Barac, Raluca & Ellen Bialystok. 2012. Bilingual effects on cognitive and linguistic development: Role of language, cultural background, and education. Child Development 83(2). 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01707.x.Search in Google Scholar

Barac, Raluca, Ellen Bialystok, Dina Castro & Martz Sanchez. 2014. The cognitive development of young dual language learners: A critical review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 29(4). 699–714.10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Bialystok, Ellen, Shilpi Majumder & Michelle M. Martin. 2003. Developing phonological awareness: Is there a bilingual advantage? Applied PsychoLinguistics 24(1). 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/s014271640300002x.Search in Google Scholar

Celaya, Maria Luz, Maria Rosa Torras & Carmen Pérez Vidal. 2001. Short and mid-term effects of an earlier start: An analysis of EFL written production. In Eurosla Yearbook, vol. 1. 195–209, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/eurosla.1.15celSearch in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Robert. 2000. The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(4). 499–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100004022.Search in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, Robert & Jennifer Larson-Hall. 2005. What does the critical period really mean? In Judith F. Kroll & Annette M. B. de Groot (eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches, 88–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Domínguez, Rocío & Silvia Pessoa. 2005. Early versus late start in foreign language education: Documenting achievements. Foreign Language Annals 38(4). 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02514.x.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2004. The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning 54. 227–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00255.x.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2005. Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27. 141–172.10.1017/S0272263105050096Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod, Shawn Loewen, Catherine Elder, Reinders Erlam & Jennifer Philp (eds.). 2009. Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Erlam, Reinders. 2006. Elicited oral imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An Empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics 27. 464–491.10.1093/applin/aml001Search in Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, Xavier. 2012. Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge, and achievement in second language (L2) Spanish. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 15(1). 20–41.Search in Google Scholar

Jaekel, Nils, Michael Schurig, Merle Florian & Markus Ritter. 2017. From early starters to late finishers? A longitudinal study of early foreign language learning in school. Language Learning 67(3). 631–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12242.Search in Google Scholar

Jegerski, Jill. 2014. Self-paced reading. In Jill Jegerski & Bill VanPatten (eds.), Research methods in second language psycholinguistics, 20–49. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203123430Search in Google Scholar

Jessop, Lorena, Wataru Suzuki & Yasuyo Tomita. 2007. Elicited oral imitation in second language acquisition research. Canadian Modern Language Review 64. 215–220. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.1.215.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Yeu-Ting. 2018. Linguistic relativity in L2 acquisition: Chinese-English bilinguals’ reading of Chinese counterfactual statements. Language and Linguistics 19(1). 117–155.10.1075/lali.00005.liuSearch in Google Scholar

Muñoz, Carmen. 2006. The effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF project. In Carmen Muñoz (ed.), Age and the rate of foreign learning, 1–40. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853598937-003Search in Google Scholar

Muñoz, Carmen. 2008. Age-related differences in foreign language learning. Revisiting the empirical evidence. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 46(3). 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2008.009.Search in Google Scholar

Muñoz, Carmen. 2010. On how age affects foreign language learning. In A. Psaltou-Joycey & M. Mattheoudakis (eds.), Advances in research on language acquisition and teaching: Selected papershing, 39–49. Thessaloniki, Greece: Greek Applied Linguistics Association.Search in Google Scholar

Navés, Teresa 2006. The long-term effects of an early start on foreign language writing. University of Barcelona. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Pfenninger, Simone E. 2016. The literacy factor in the optimal age discussion: A five-year longitudinal study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 19(3). 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.972334.Search in Google Scholar

Pons, Ferran, Laura Bosch & David J. Lewkowicz. 2015. Bilingualism modulates infants’ selective attention to the mouth of a talking face. Psychological Science 26(4). 490–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614568320.Search in Google Scholar

Rebuschat, Patrick. 2013. Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning 63(3). 595–626.10.1111/lang.12010Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds, Barry Lee & Chian-Wen Kao. 2021. The effects of digital game-based instruction, teacher instruction, and direct focused written corrective feedback on the grammatical accuracy of English articles. Computer Assisted Language Learning 34(4). 462–482.10.1080/09588221.2019.1617747Search in Google Scholar

Singh, Lieher, Charlene Fu, Aishah Rahman, Waseem Hameed, Shamini Sanmugam, Pratibha Agarwal, Binyan Jiang, Yap Seng Chong, Michael J. Meaney & Anne Rifkin-Graboi. 2015. Back to basics: A bilingual advantage in infant visual habituation. Child Development 86(1). 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12271.Search in Google Scholar

Singleton, David Michael & Lisa Ryan. 2004. Language acquisition: The age factor, 2nd edn. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853597596Search in Google Scholar

Sobel, Michael. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology 13. 290–312.10.2307/270723Search in Google Scholar

Sorace, Antonella. 2003. Near-nativeness. In Catherine Doughty & Micheal Long (eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition 130–151. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756492.ch6Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Yuichi & Robert DeKeyser. 2015. Comparing elicited oral imitation and word monitoring as measures of implicit knowledge. Language Learning 65(4). 860–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12138.Search in Google Scholar

Tabachnick, Barbara & Linda Fedell. 2019. Using multivariate statistics, 7th edn. Boston, M.A.: Pearson.Search in Google Scholar

Tomita, Yasuyo, Wataru, Suzuki & Lorena Jessop. 2009. Elicited imitation: Toward valid procedures to measure implicit second language grammatical knowledge. TESOL Quarterly 43(2). 345–350.10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00177.xSearch in Google Scholar

Unsworth, Sharon, Liv Persson, Tineke Prins & Kees de Bot. 2015. Early English in The Netherlands: The effects of input quantity and quality on early foreign language learning. Applied Linguistics 36. 527–548.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-11-19
Accepted: 2022-09-14
Published Online: 2022-10-12

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/applirev-2021-0187/html
Scroll to top button