Abstract
Recent work on Kant’s conception of space has largely put to rest the view that Kant is hostile to actual infinity. Far from limiting our cognition to quantities that are finite or merely potentially infinite, Kant characterizes the ground of all spatial representation as an actually infinite magnitude. I advance this reevaluation a step further by arguing that Kant judges some actual infinities to be greater than others: he claims, for instance, that an infinity of miles is strictly smaller than an infinity of earth-diameters. This inequality follows from Kant’s mereological conception of magnitudes (quanta): the part is (analytically) less than the whole, and an infinity of miles is equal to only a part of an infinity of earth-diameters. This inequality does not, however, imply that Kant’s infinities have transfinite and unequal sizes (quantitates). Because Kant’s conception of size (quantitas) is based on the Eudoxian theory of proportions, infinite magnitudes (quanta) cannot be assigned exact sizes. Infinite magnitudes are immeasurable, but some are greater than others.
Anderson, R. L. 2015. The Poverty of Conceptual Truth. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198724575.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Antognazza, M. R. 2015. “The Hypercategorematic Infinite”. The Leibniz Review 25, 5–30.10.5840/leibniz2015252Search in Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Ed. J. Barnes. 2 vols. Princeton.Search in Google Scholar
Bayle, P. 1991/[1697]. Historical and Critical Dictionary: Selections. Ed. R. H. Popkin. Indianapolis.Search in Google Scholar
Berkeley, G. 1992/[1734]. De Motu and The Analyst. Ed. D. Jesseph. Boston.10.1007/978-94-011-2592-5Search in Google Scholar
Büchel, G. 1987. Geometrie und Philosophie. Zum Verhältnis beider Vernunftwissenschaften im Fortgang von der Kritik der reinen Vernunft zum Opus postumum. Berlin.10.1515/9783110857511Search in Google Scholar
Carson, E. 1997. “Kant on Intuition in Geometry”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27(4), 489–512.10.1080/00455091.1997.10717483Search in Google Scholar
Chaplin, R. ms. “Idealism, Infinity, and Indeterminacy: Kant’s Solution to the Second Antinomy.”Search in Google Scholar
Clewis, R. (ed.) 2015. Reading Kant’s Lectures. Berlin.10.1515/9783110345339Search in Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. 1890. “Aus den Rostocker Kanthandschriften”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 3(1), 79–90.10.1515/agph-1890-0108Search in Google Scholar
Domski, M. 2008. “Kant’s Argument for the Infinity of Space”. In Recht und Frieden in der Philosophie Kants. Volume 2. Eds. V. Rohden et al. Berlin, 149–59.10.1515/9783110210347.2.149Search in Google Scholar
Eberhard, J. A. 1781. Vorbereitung zur natürlichen Theologie. Halle.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1790. “Von den Begriffen des Raums und der Zeit in Beziehung auf die Gewissheit der menschlichen Erkenntnis”. Philosophisches Magazin 2(1), 53–92.Search in Google Scholar
Förster, E./Rosen, M. (ed./trans.). 1999. Immanuel Kant Opus postumum. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1992. Kant and the Exact Sciences. Cambridge. Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2000. “Geometry, Construction, and Intuition in Kant and His Successors”. In Between Logic and Intuition: Essays in Honor of Charles Parsons. Eds. G. Sher/R. L. Tieszen. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2012. “Kant on Geometry and Spatial Intuition”. Synthese 186(1), 231–55.10.1007/s11229-012-0066-2Search in Google Scholar
Galilei, G. 1989/[1638]. Two New Sciences. 2nd edition. Ed. Stillman Drake. Toronto.Search in Google Scholar
Guyer, P. 2018. “The Infinite Given Magnitude and Other Myths About Space and Time”. In Nachtomy/Winegar 2018, 181–204.10.1007/978-3-319-94556-9_11Search in Google Scholar
Jacquette, D. 2001. David Hume’s Critique of Infinity. Boston.10.1163/9789004247550Search in Google Scholar
Jesseph, D. 1992. “Editor’s Introduction”. In Berkeley 1992/[1734], 111–58.10.1007/978-94-011-2592-5_4Search in Google Scholar
–. 1993. Berkeley’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Kästner, A. 1759. “Vorlesung über den wahren Begriff des mathematischen Unendlichen”. Göttingische Anzeigen von gelehrten Sachen. 57(1), 497–500.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1790a. “Was heißt in Euklids Geometrie möglich?”. Philosophisches Magazin 2(4), 391–402.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1790b. “Ueber den mathematischen Begriff des Raumes”. Philosophisches Magazin 2(4), 403–19.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1790c. “Ueber die geometrischen Axiome”. Philosophisches Magazin 2(4), 420–31.Search in Google Scholar
Keill, J. 1739/[1702]. Introductiones ad veram physicam et veram astronomiam. Lugduni Batavorum.Search in Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, N. 1992/[1923]. A Commentary to Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. Atlantic Highlands, NJ.Search in Google Scholar
Koriako, D. 1999. Kants Philosophie der Mathematik. Grundlagen. Voraussetzungen. Probleme. Hamburg.10.28937/978-3-7873-2540-5Search in Google Scholar
Lear, J. 1980: “Aristotelian Infinity”. Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society 80(1), 187–210.10.1093/aristotelian/80.1.187Search in Google Scholar
Mancosu, P. 2016. “Measuring the Size of Infinite Collections of Natural Numbers: Was Cantor’s Theory of Infinite Number Inevitable?”. In his Abstraction and Infinity. Oxford, 116–53.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198746829.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Marschall, B. 2019. “Conceptualizing Kant’s Mereology”. Ergo 6(14), 374–404.10.3998/ergo.12405314.0006.014Search in Google Scholar
McLear, C. 2015: “Two Kinds of Unity in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason”. Journal for the History of Philosophy. 53(1), 79–110.10.1353/hph.2015.0011Search in Google Scholar
Mueller, I. 1970. “Homogeneity in Eudoxus’s Theory of Proportion”. Archive for the History of the Exact Sciences 7, 1–6.10.1007/BF00328782Search in Google Scholar
Nachtomy, O. 2011: “A Tale of Two Thinkers, One Meeting, and Three Degrees of Infinity: Leibniz and Spinoza (1675–8)”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19(5), 935–61.10.1080/09608788.2011.599570Search in Google Scholar
Nactomy, O./Winegar, R. (eds.) 2018. Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy. Berlin.10.1007/978-3-319-94556-9Search in Google Scholar
Naragon, S. 2006. Kant in the Classroom. http://users.manchester.edu/FacStaff/SSNaragon/Kant/Home/index.htm Accessed June 8, 2020.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2017. “Kant’s Lectures”. In The Kantian Mind. Eds. S. Baiasu/M. Timmons. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Onof, C./Schulting, D. 2014a. “Kant, Kästner, and the Distinction Between Metaphysical and Geometric Space”. Kantian Review 19(2), 285–304.10.1017/S1369415414000065Search in Google Scholar
–. 2014b. “On Kästner’s Treatises (Translation and Notes)”. Kantian Review 19(2), 305–13.10.1017/S1369415414000077Search in Google Scholar
–. 2015. “Space as ‘Form of Intuition’ and as ‘Formal Intuition’: On the Note to B160 in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason”. Philosophical Review 124(1), 1–58.10.1215/00318108-2812650Search in Google Scholar
Parsons, C. 1983/[1964]. “Infinity and Kant’s Conception of the ‘Possibility of Experience’”. In Mathematics in Philosophy: Selected Essays. Ithaca, 95–109.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1983/[1969]. “Kant’s Philosophy of Arithmetic”. In Mathematics in Philosophy: Selected Essays. Ithaca, 110–49. Search in Google Scholar
–. 2012/[1984]. “Arithmetic and the Categories”. In From Kant to Husserl: Selected Essays. Cambridge, 42–68.Search in Google Scholar
Patton. L. 2011. “The Paradox of Infinite Given Magnitude: Why Kantian Epistemology Needs Metaphysical Space”. Kant-Studien 102(3), 273–89.10.1515/kant.2011.021Search in Google Scholar
Schechtman, A. 2018. “The Ontic and the Iterative: Descartes on the Infinite and the Indefinite”. In Nachtomy/Winegar 2018, 27–45.10.1007/978-3-319-94556-9_3Search in Google Scholar
–. 2019. “Three Infinities in Early Modern Philosophy”. Mind 128(512), 1117–47.10.1093/mind/fzy034Search in Google Scholar
Schultz, J. 1784. Entdeckte Theorie der Parallelen. Königsberg.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1786. Darstellung der vollkommenen Evidenz und Schärfe seiner Theorie der Parallelen. Königsberg.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1788. Versuch einer genauen Theorie des Unendlichen und Meßkunst desselben. Königsberg.Search in Google Scholar
Shabel, L. 2003. Mathematics in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Sherry, D. 1987. “The Wake of Berkeley’s Analyst: rigor mathematicae?”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18(4), 455–80.10.1016/0039-3681(87)90003-3Search in Google Scholar
Stein, H. 1990. “Eudoxos and Dedekind: On the Ancient Greek Theory of Ratios and Its Relation to Modern Mathematics”. Synthese. 8(4), 163–211.10.1007/BF00485377Search in Google Scholar
Sutherland, D. 2004a. “Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics and the Greek Mathematical Tradition”. Philosophical Review 113(2), 157–201.10.1215/00318108-113-2-157Search in Google Scholar
–. 2004b. “The Role of Magnitude in Kant’s Critical Philosophy”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 34(3), 411–42. 10.1080/00455091.2004.10716573Search in Google Scholar
–. 2017. “Kant’s Conception of Number”. Philosophical Review 126(2), 147–90.10.1215/00318108-3771988Search in Google Scholar
Szabo, Z. 2000. “Locke on Supposing a Substratum”. Locke Studies 31, 11–42.Search in Google Scholar
Tait, W. 2016. “Kant and Finitism”. Journal of Philosophy 113(5/6), 261–73.10.5840/jphil20161135/617Search in Google Scholar
Tolley, C. 2016. “The Difference Between Original, Metaphysical, and Geometrical Represenations of Space”. In Kantian Nonconceptualism. Ed. D. Schulting. New York, 257–86.10.1057/978-1-137-53517-7_11Search in Google Scholar
Warda, A. 1922. Immanuel Kants Bücher. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Warren, D. 2020. “Kant on Mathematics and the Metaphysics of Corporeal Nature: The Role of the Infinitesimal”. In Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics Volume 1: The Critical Philosophy and Its Roots. Eds. C. Posy/O. Rechter. Oxford, 66–81.10.1017/9781107337596.004Search in Google Scholar
Williams, J. 2018. “Kant on the Original Synthesis of Understanding and Sensibility”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(1), 66–86.10.1080/09608788.2017.1334189Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, K. D. 1975. “Kant on Intuition”. Philosophical Quarterly 25(2), 247–65.10.2307/2217756Search in Google Scholar
Wong, W.-C. 1999. “On a Semantic Interpretation of Kant’s Concept of Number”. Synthese 121(3), 357–83.10.1023/A:1005106218147Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
