Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 5, 2014

Quality control in urinary stone analysis: results of 44 ring trials (1980–2001)

  • Albrecht Hesse , Rolf Kruse , Wolf-Jochen Geilenkeuser and Matthias Schmidt

Abstract

Urinary stone analysis is the most important diagnostic step after stone removal from the body. The methods employed for these analyses are based on diverse analytical principles. Chemical methods are used for detecting individual ions. Infrared spectroscopy is used for examining molecular structures, and X-ray diffraction for determination of the crystalline structure of a substance. Since 1980, a twice-yearly ring trials quality control survey has been on offer to examine the quality of urinary stone analyses. A summary of the results of 44 ring trials (1980–2001) has been compiled for individual pure substances and binary (two-component) mixtures. On average, 100 laboratories have participated in these ring trials. Initially, over 80% of the participants carried out their analyses using chemical methods. In 2001, this figure decreased to a mere 13%. In contrast, a progressive increase in the use of infrared spectroscopy was observed, up to 79% of all participants employed this method. X-Ray diffraction was only employed in a small number of specialised laboratories (5–9%). The chemical methods produced a very high proportion of errors (6.5–94%) with both the pure substances and binary mixtures, whereas high error rates for infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction were confined to individual substances only. Due to the poor results in the ring trials, the majority of laboratories stopped using chemical analysis, which is now considered to be obsolete. Regarding mixtures, error rates of over 10% also occurred with infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. Ring trials are indispensable for the quality management of urinary stone analysis.


Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. Albrecht Hesse, Urologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany Fax: +49-228-287-6344,

References

1 Denstedt J. Evolving concepts in surgical management of urinary calculi. Curr Opin Urol 2001; 11: 345–6. 10.1097/00042307-200107000-00001Search in Google Scholar

2 Carr LK, Honey RJ, Jewett MAS, Ibanez D, Ryan M, Bombardier C. New stone formation: a comparison of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 1996; 155: 1565–7. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66127-5Search in Google Scholar

3 Hesse A, Brändle E, Wilbert D, Köhrmann K-U, Alken P. Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 595–9. Search in Google Scholar

4 Hesse A, Tiselius HG, Jahnen A. Urinary stones, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of recurrence, 2nd ed. Basel: Karger, 2002. 10.1159/isbn.978-3-318-00811-1Search in Google Scholar

5 Laube N, Hergarten S, Hoppe B, Schmidt M, Hesse A. Determination of the calcium oxalate crystallization risk from urine samples: the BONN Risk Index in comparison to other risk formulas. J Urol 2004; 172: 355–9. 10.1097/01.ju.0000123822.20291.4dSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

6 Berg W, Schanz H, Eisenwinter B, Schorch P. Häufigkeitsverteilung und Trendentwicklung von Harnsteinsubstanzen, Auswertung von 210.000 Harnsteinanalysedaten. Urologe A 1992; 31: 98–102. Search in Google Scholar

7 Hesse A, Schneider HJ, Hienzsch. Urinary stone analysis with infrared spectroscopy (in German). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1972; 97: 1694–1701. 10.1055/s-0028-1107632Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8 Hesse A, Molt K. The technique of analysis of urinary calculi by infrared spectroscopy (in German). J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1982; 20: 861–73. Search in Google Scholar

9 Kasidas GP, Samuell CT, Weir TB. Renal stone analysis: why and how. Ann Clin Biochem 2004; 41: 91–7. 10.1258/000456304322879962Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10 Kourambas J, Aslan P, Teh CL, Mathias BJ, Preminger GM. Role of stone analysis in metabolic evaluation and medical treatment of nephrolithiasis. J Endourol 2001; 15: 181–6. 10.1089/089277901750134548Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11 Leusmann DB. Harnsteinanalysen, Methoden und Stellenwert im Zeitalter der minimal-invasiven Steinentfernung. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1995; 120: 841–4. 10.1055/s-2008-1055416Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12 Rebentisch G, Berg W. Evidence of improved urolith analysis from seven quality control surveys (in German). J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1983; 21: 673–8. Search in Google Scholar

13 Rebentisch G, Berg W. Comparison of methods and guaranteeing quality of analysis of urinary calculi – 5th international ring test. Urol Int 1989; 44: 298–302. 10.1159/000281526Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14 Röhle G, Voigt U, Hesse A, Breuer H. Results of quality control surveys for urinary calculi analyses (in German). J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1982; 20: 851–9. Search in Google Scholar

15 Hesse A, Sanders G. Atlas of infrared spectra for the analysis of urinary concrements. Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme, 1988. Search in Google Scholar

16 Hesse A, Vahlensieck W. Loading tests for diagnosis of metabolic anomalies in urinary stone formers. Int Urol Nephrol 1986; 18: 45–53. 10.1007/BF02082647Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17 Smith CL. Renal stone analysis: is there any clinical value? Curr Opinion Nephrol Hypertens 1998; 7: 703–9. 10.1097/00041552-199811000-00014Search in Google Scholar

18 von Unruh GE, Voss S, Sauerbruch T, Hesse A. Reference range for gastrointestinal oxalate absorption measured with a standard [ 13C 2]oxalate absorption test. J Urol 2003; 169: 687–90. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)63993-6Search in Google Scholar

19 Schneider HJ. Technik der Harnsteinanalyse. Leipzig: Georg Thieme, 1974. Search in Google Scholar

20 Schneider HJ, Berenyi M, Hesse A, Tscharnke J. Comparative urinary stone analysis, quantitative chemical, X-ray diffraction, infrared spectroscopy and thermoanalytical procedures. Int Urol Nephrol 1973; 5: 9–17. 10.1007/BF02081747Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21 Uldall A. Analysis of urinary calculi: a quality control programme. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1981; 41: 339–45. 10.3109/00365518109092055Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22 Röhle G, Hesse A, Voigt U. Results of collaborative studies on urinary calculi analysis in 1986 and 1987 (in German). Ärztl Lab 1988; 34: 315–20. Search in Google Scholar

23 Brändle E, Hautmann R, Alken P, Hesse A, Schäfer R. Leitlinien zur Diagnostik und Therapie urologischer Erkrankungen, Diagnostik des Harnsteinleidens. Urologe A 1997; 36: 578–81. Search in Google Scholar

24 Hesse A, Gergeleit M, Schüller P, Möller K. Analysis of urinary stones by computerized infrared spectroscopy. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1989; 27: 639–42. 10.1515/cclm.1989.27.9.639Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2004-11-9
Accepted: 2005-1-18
Published Online: 2014-6-5
Published in Print: 2005-3-1

©2005 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Downloaded on 25.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2005.051/html
Scroll to top button