Abstract
Cells are organic microsystems with functional compartments interconnected by complex signal chains. Intracellular signaling routes and signal reception from the extracellular environment are characterized by redundancy, i.e., parallel pathways exist. If a cell is exposed to an external “signal input”, the signal processing elements within the cell provide a response that will be a pattern of reactions manifest as a metabolic, morphologic or electric “signal output”. Cell-chip hybrid structures are miniaturized analytical systems with the capability to monitor such cell responses in real time and under continuous control of the environmental conditions. A system analysis approach gives an idea of how the biological component of these hybrid structures works. This is exemplified by the putative role of the microenvironmental pH as a parameter of the utmost importance for the malignant “mode” of tumor cells, which can be monitored and modeled on such hybrid structures.
References
[1] Kraus M, Wolf B. Structured biological modelling – a new approach to biophysical cell biology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press 1995.Search in Google Scholar
[2] Wolf B, Dinger V, Weiler C, Schwinde A, Scheipers P, Kraus M. Drug targeting and metabolic investigations of cryoprepared tumor cells with analytical electron energy loss spectroscopy. Tumor Biol1996; 17: 234–250.10.1159/000217985Search in Google Scholar
[3] Clapham DE. Calcium signalling. Cell1995; 80: 259–268.10.1016/0092-8674(95)90408-5Search in Google Scholar
[4] Kraus M, Wolf B, Wolf B. Crosstalk between cellular morphology and calcium oscillation patterns – insights from a stochastic computer model. Cell Calcium1996; 19: 461–472.10.1016/S0143-4160(96)90055-XSearch in Google Scholar
[5] Binggeli R, Weinstein RC. Membrane potentials and sodium channels: hypotheses for growth regulation and cancer formation based on changes in sodium channels and gap junctions. J Theor Biol1986; 123: 377–401.10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80209-0Search in Google Scholar
[6] Bray D. Intracellular signalling as a parallel distributed process. J Theor Biol1990; 143: 215–231.10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80268-1Search in Google Scholar
[7] Dumont ED, Pécasse F, Maenhaut C. Crosstalk and specificity in signalling. Are we crosstalking ourselves into general confusion? Cell Signal2001; 13: 4457–4463.10.1016/S0898-6568(01)00168-1Search in Google Scholar
[8] Friboulet A, Thomas D. Systems biology – an interdisciplinary approach. Biosens Bioelectron2005; 20: 2404–2407.10.1016/j.bios.2004.11.014Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Harguindey S, Orive G, Pedraz JL, Paradiso A, Reshkin SJ. The role of pH dynamics and the Na/H antiporter in the etiopathogenesis and treatment of cancer. Two faces of the same coin-one single nature. Biochim Biophys Acta2005; 1756: 1–24.10.1016/j.bbcan.2005.06.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Kraus M, Severin T, Wolf B. Relevance of microenvironmental pH for self-organized tumor growth and invasion. Anticancer Res1994; 14: 1573–1584.Search in Google Scholar
[11] Kraus M, Wolf B. Implications of acidic tumor microenvironment for neoplastic growth and cancer treatment: a computer analysis. Tumor Biol1996; 17: 133–154.10.1159/000217977Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[12] Severin T, Müller B, Giese G, Uhl B, Wolf B, Hauschildt S. pH-dependent LAK cell cytotoxicity. Tumor Biol1994; 15: 304–310.10.1159/000217905Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[13] Kraus M, Wolf B. Physicochemical microenvironment as key regulator for tumor microevolution, invasion and immune response: targets for endocytotechnological approaches in cancer treatment. Endocyt Cell Res1998; 12: 133–156.Search in Google Scholar
[14] Butcher EC. Can cell systems biology rescue drug discovery? Nat Rev Drug Discovery2005; 4: 461–467.10.1038/nrd1754Search in Google Scholar
[15] Brischwein M, Motrescu ER, Otto AM, Cabala E, Grothe H, Wolf B. Functional cellular assays with multiparametric silicon sensor chips. Lab Chip2003; 3: 234–240.10.1039/b308888jSearch in Google Scholar
[16] Gross GW, Rhoades BK, Azzazy HM, Wu M-C. The use of neuronal networks on multielectrode arrays as biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron1995; 10: 553–567.10.1016/0956-5663(95)96931-NSearch in Google Scholar
[17] Yu N, Atienza JM, Bernard J, et al. Real-time monitoring of morphological changes in living cells by electronic cell sensor arrays: an approach to study G protein-coupled receptors. Anal Chem2006; 78: 35–43.10.1021/ac051695vSearch in Google Scholar
[18] Owicki JC, Parce JW. Biosensors based on the energy metabolism of living cells: the physical chemistry and cell biology of extracellular acidification. Biosens Bioelectron1992; 7: 255–272.10.1016/0956-5663(92)87004-9Search in Google Scholar
[19] Motrescu ER, Otto AM, Brischwein M, Zahler S, Wolf B. Dynamic analysis of metabolic effects of chloroacetaldehyde and cytochalasin B on tumor cells using bioelectronic sensor chips. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol2005; 131: 683–691.10.1007/s00432-005-0015-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] Geisler T, Ressler J, Harz H, Wolf B, Uhl R. Automated multiparametric platform for high-content and high-throughput analytical screening on living cells. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng2006; 3: 169–176.10.1109/TASE.2006.871476Search in Google Scholar
©2007 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York
