Tetlock, Philip E.. "CHAPTER 4. Honoring Reputational Bets: Foxes Are Better Bayesians than Hedgehogs".
Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017, pp. 121-143.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888818-007Tetlock, P. (2017). CHAPTER 4. Honoring Reputational Bets: Foxes Are Better Bayesians than Hedgehogs. In
Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? (pp. 121-143). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888818-007Tetlock, P. 2017. CHAPTER 4. Honoring Reputational Bets: Foxes Are Better Bayesians than Hedgehogs.
Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 121-143.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888818-007Tetlock, Philip E.. "CHAPTER 4. Honoring Reputational Bets: Foxes Are Better Bayesians than Hedgehogs" In
Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?, 121-143. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888818-007Tetlock P. CHAPTER 4. Honoring Reputational Bets: Foxes Are Better Bayesians than Hedgehogs. In:
Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2017. p.121-143.
https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888818-007Copied to clipboard
