Abstract
Aim: To identify cardiotocography (CTG) patterns associated with increased risk of intrapartum fetal acidemia.
Methods: A prospective observational cohort study of 1070 women with fetal scalp blood sampling (FBS) during labor was conducted at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Women with a nonreassuring CTG pattern underwent FBS, and lactate concentration was measured at the bedside. Lactate concentrations >4.8 mmol/L were defined as fetal acidemia. A senior obstetrician, blinded to the lactate concentration at FBS, visually interpreted the CTG tracings that had prompted FBS.
Results: There were 2134 FBSs performed on 1070 laboring women, constituting 11% of all deliveries at this labor ward. The CTG patterns with the highest frequency of lactacidemia at FBS were late or severe variable decelerations combined with tachycardia (20%–25% at first FBS and 33%–49% at last FBS). With a normal baseline fetal heart rate, normal variability, and absence of serious decelerations, the fetal scalp blood lactate concentration at the first FBS was normal in 97.5% of cases. The group with isolated reduced variability had no increased prevalence of acidemia and median lactate concentration did not differ from the normal group.
Conclusion: Isolated reduced variability is in most cases not a sign of hypoxia. If development of hypoxia is ruled out with one FBS, this pattern does not require monitoring with repetitive FBSs throughout labor. Late decelerations and severe variable decelerations increase the risk for intrapartum fetal metabolic acidemia to the same extent. The combination of these decelerations and tachycardia was associated with the highest rate of fetal metabolic acidemia.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the late professor Ingemar Ingemarsson for his valuable input regarding division of CTG patterns.
References
[1] Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:CD006066.10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub2Search in Google Scholar
[2] Althaus JE, Petersen SM, Fox HE, Holcroft CJ, Graham EM. Can electronic fetal monitoring identify preterm neonates with cerebral white matter injury? Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:458–65.10.1097/01.AOG.0000152383.27220.26Search in Google Scholar
[3] Beard RW, Filshie GM, Knight CA, Roberts GM. The significance of the changes in the continuous fetal heart rate in the first stage of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonwealth. 1971;78:865–81.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1971.tb00198.xSearch in Google Scholar
[4] Bracero LA, Schulman H, Baxi LV. Fetal heart rate characteristics that provide confidence in the diagnosis of fetal well-being. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1986;29:3–11.10.1097/00003081-198603000-00004Search in Google Scholar
[5] Engidawork E, Chen Y, Dell’Anna E, Goiny M, Lubec G, Ungerstedt U, et al. Effect of perinatal asphyxia on systemic and intracerebral pH and glycolysis metabolism in the rat. Exp Neurol. 1997;145:390–6.10.1006/exnr.1997.6482Search in Google Scholar
[6] Fleischer A, Schulman H, Jagani N, Mitchell J, Randolph G. The development of fetal acidosis in the presence of an abnormal fetal heart rate tracing. I. The average for gestational age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:55–60.10.1016/0002-9378(82)90394-5Search in Google Scholar
[7] Hamilton E, Warrick P, O’Keeffe D. Variable decelerations: do size and shape matter? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:648–53.10.3109/14767058.2011.594118Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[8] Heinis AM, Spaanderman ME, Gunnewiek JM, Lotgering FK. Scalp blood lactate for intra-partum assessment of fetal metabolic acidosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:1107–14.10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01237.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Holzmann M, Nordstrom L. Follow-up national survey (Sweden) of routines for intrapartum fetal surveillance. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:712–4.10.3109/00016340903545009Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[10] Holzmann M, Cnattingius S, Nordstrom L. Outcome of severe intrapartum acidemia diagnosed with fetal scalp blood sampling. J Perinat Med. 2011;39:545–8.10.1515/jpm.2011.062Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[11] Ingemarsson I, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS. Single injection of terbutaline in term labor. I. Effect on fetal pH in cases with prolonged bradycardia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;153:859–65.10.1016/0002-9378(85)90690-8Search in Google Scholar
[12] International Federation of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, Rooth G, Huch A, Huch R. Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1987;25:159–67.Search in Google Scholar
[13] Kruger K, Hallberg B, Blennow M, Kublickas M, Westgren M. Predictive value of fetal scalp blood lactate concentration and pH as markers of neurologic disability. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:1072–8.10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70083-9Search in Google Scholar
[14] Kubli FW, Hon EH, Khazin AF, Takemura H. Observations on heart rate and pH in the human fetus during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969;104:1190–206.10.1016/S0002-9378(16)34294-6Search in Google Scholar
[15] Liston R, Sawchuck D, Young D, Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada, British Columbia Perinatal Health Program. Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007;29:S3–56.Search in Google Scholar
[16] Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:661–6.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181841395Search in Google Scholar
[17] National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. Manchester: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2007.Search in Google Scholar
[18] Nelson KB, Dambrosia JM, Ting TY, Grether JK. Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:613–8.10.1056/NEJM199603073341001Search in Google Scholar
[19] Nordström L, Waldenström U. Handläggning av normal förlossning. In: Welfare TNBoHa, editor. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen; 2001. p. 69.Search in Google Scholar
[20] Nordstrom L, Achanna S, Naka K, Arulkumaran S. Fetal and maternal lactate increase during active second stage of labour. BJOG. 2001;108:263–8.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00034.xSearch in Google Scholar
[21] Nordstrom L, Chua S, Roy A, Arulkumaran S. Quality assessment of two lactate test strip methods suitable for obstetric use. J Perinat Med. 1998;26:83–8.10.1515/jpme.1998.26.2.83Search in Google Scholar
[22] Ojala K, Makikallio K, Haapsamo M, Ijas H, Tekay A. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography in singleton pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:536–40.10.1080/00016340802023053Search in Google Scholar
[23] Palo P, Erkkola R. Intrapartal cardiotocography in prediction of well-being of small for gestational age newborns. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1991;31:86–9.10.1159/000293107Search in Google Scholar
[24] Palomaki O, Luukkaala T, Luoto R, Tuimala R. Intrapartum cardiotocography – the dilemma of interpretational variation. J Perinat Med. 2006;34:298–302.10.1515/JPM.2006.057Search in Google Scholar
[25] Parer JT, Krueger TR, Harris JL. Fetal oxygen consumption and mechanisms of heart rate response during artificially produced late decelerations of fetal heart rate in sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;136:478–82.10.1016/0002-9378(80)90674-2Search in Google Scholar
[26] Rooth G. Perinatal acid-base balance. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 1988.Search in Google Scholar
[27] Saling E. The measurement of fetal heart-rate and acid-base balance. 2nd Europ Cong Perinat Med. London: Karger; 1971.Search in Google Scholar
[28] Skupski DW, Eglinton GS. Intrapartum fetal stimulation tests: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:830.10.1097/00006250-200210000-00038Search in Google Scholar
[29] Steer PJ, Eigbe F, Lissauer TJ, Beard RW. Interrelationships among abnormal cardiotocograms in labor, meconium staining of the amniotic fluid, arterial cord blood pH, and Apgar scores. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:715–21.10.1097/00132582-199004000-00013Search in Google Scholar
[30] Swedish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Guidelines for CTG interpretation and intervention. https://www.sfog.se/media/17094/ctg_kort_slutversion.pdf. https://www.sfog.se/start/rad-riktlinjer/sfog-rad-obstetrik/forlossning/: Swedish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; 2009.Search in Google Scholar
[31] Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ, Antsaklis A, Varvarigos I, Guzman ER, Knuppel RA. Comparison of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation in detecting fetal acidemia at birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:1021–4.10.1016/0002-9378(95)91320-3Search in Google Scholar
[32] Westerhuis ME, Strasser SM, Moons KG, Mol BW, Visser GH, Kwee A. [Intrapartum foetal monitoring: from stethoscope to ST analysis of the ECG]. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde. 2009;153:B259.Search in Google Scholar
[33] Westerhuis ME, van Horen E, Kwee A, van der Tweel I, Visser GH, Moons KG. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN. BJOG. 2009;16:545–51.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02092.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[34] Wiberg-Itzel E, Lipponer C, Norman M, Herbst A, Prebensen D, Hansson A, et al. Determination of pH or lactate in fetal scalp blood in management of intrapartum fetal distress: randomised controlled multicentre trial. Br Med J. 2008;336:1284–7.10.1136/bmj.39553.406991.25Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[35] Williams KP, Galerneau F. Intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns in the prediction of neonatal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:820–3.10.1067/mob.2003.183Search in Google Scholar PubMed
The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.
©2015 by De Gruyter
