Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter August 26, 2016

Control of light-dependent keto carotenoid biosynthesis in Nostoc 7120 by the transcription factor NtcA

  • Gerhard Sandmann EMAIL logo , Jürgen Mautz and Jürgen Breitenbach

Abstract

In Nostoc PCC 7120, two different ketolases, CrtW and CrtO are involved in the formation of keto carotenoids from β-carotene. In contrast to other cyanobacteria, CrtW catalyzes the formation of monoketo echinenone whereas CrtO is the only enzyme for the synthesis of diketo canthaxanthin. This is the major photo protective carotenoid in this cyanobacterium. Under high-light conditions, basic canthaxanthin formation was transcriptionally up-regulated. Upon transfer to high light, the transcript levels of all investigated carotenogenic genes including those coding for phytoene synthase, phytoene desaturase and both ketolases were increased. These transcription changes proceeded via binding of the transcription factor NtcA to the promoter regions of the carotenogenic genes. The binding was absolutely dependent on the presence of reductants and oxo-glutarate. Light-stimulated transcript formation was inhibited by DCMU. Therefore, photosynthetic electron transport is proposed as the sensor for high-light and a changing redox state as a signal for NtcA binding.

1 Introduction

In cyanobacteria, carotenoids exclusively function as lipophilic antioxidative and UV- and light-protective pigments. Due to their polyene structure and appropriate substituents, they are able to quench triplet-state chlorophyll and singlet oxygen [1]. End products of cyanobacterial carotenoid pathways are mainly zeaxanthin (β,β-carotene-3,3′-diol) or canthaxanthin (β,β-carotene-4,4′-dione) [2, 3]. Both oxygenated β-carotene derivatives are highly photo protective which has been shown in different genetic engineering approaches. In Synechococcus with a higher zeaxanthin pool than the wild type, UV-induced damage of photosynthesis was prevented [4]. When the pathway was modified towards the synthesis of canthaxanthin at the expense of β-carotene, photosynthesis in this transformant was protected from UV-B and light inhibition as well as chlorophyll photo oxidation indicating the superior protection potential of canthaxanthin compared to zeaxanthin [5]. Apart from carotenoids acting as antioxidants in lipophilic environments, the mono keto β-carotene derivative echinenone (β,β-carotene-4-one) is the photo active component in a soluble carotenoid protein which dissipates excess energy from the light-harvesting phycobilisomes [6].

Depending on the type of strain, high-light conditions can stimulate the synthesis of zeaxanthin, canthaxanthin or myxoxanthophyll, thereby meeting the demand of these carotenoids for photo protection. Photo protection is an invasive process which may lead to lower carotenoid pools under high light through photo oxidation which up-regulated biosynthesis cannot fully compensate [7]. Increase of carotenoid biosynthesis under high-light conditions is caused by an up-regulation of the promotor of crtB in different zeaxanthin accumulating cyanobacteria [8, 9]. This gene encodes phytoene synthase, the gateway enzyme of the specific carotenoid pathway. A similar transcriptional regulation of this gene was also found in Nostoc PCC 73102 in which canthaxanthin is the photo protective carotenoid [10]. The ketolation reactions leading to diketo canthaxanthin occur in two steps with monoketo echinenone as an intermediate accumulating in substantial amounts [11]. Most keto carotenoid-synthesizing cyanobacteria utilize two different ketolases. One is encoded by the bacterial CrtW gene [12], the other one by crtO which is found only in cyanobacteria and which in Synechocystis encodes a mono ketolase specific for the synthesis of echinenone [13]. In Nostoc PCC 7120 [14] and also in Nostoc PCC 73102 [10] both types of ketolase genes are present simultaneously. Under high light, the crtO gene is transcriptionally down-regulated and a crtW gene up-regulated resulting in take-over of canthaxanthin biosynthesis by the CrtW ketolase.

Regulation of gene transcription involves specific proteins with DNA binding domains which bind to the promoter region. One of these transcription factors in cyanobacteria is NtcA that is involved in several cellular processes including regulation of nitrogen metabolism [15] and in differentiation, including heterocyst formation [16]. Target promoters for NtcA possess a specific sequence for recognition and binding. As potential NtcA binding sites are recognizable in the promoter regions of crtO, crtW and crtPB, in Nostoc PCC 7120 (Cyanobase database at http://www.kazusa.or.jp/cyanobase/), we focused our investigation of light-regulated carotenoid synthesis on the transcriptional control of these carotenogenic genes by NtcA. As a result, we could demonstrate the involvement of NtcA as a regulator for increased carotenoid synthesis and for enhanced metabolization of β-carotene to canthaxanthin.

2 Experimental

2.1 Strains and cultivation

Nostoc PCC 7120 from the Pasteur Culture Collection, re-assigned as such by [17] and formerly designated Anabaena PCC7120, was grown on BG11 medium containing 18 µM sodium nitrate as nitrogen source [18]. To cultures of the deletion mutants of Nostoc PCC 7120 ΔcrtO (with inactivated crtO gene) and ΔcrtW (with inactivated crtW gene) [14], 30 µg/mL neomycin sulfate was added. Growth was at 28 °C under continuous white fluorescent light at an intensity of 40 µmol/m2·s (normal light condition) and constant gassing with 1.5% (v/v) CO2 in air. High-light treatment was performed by transfer of cultures grown under normal light conditions to a light intensity of 400 µmol/m2·s from a halogen lamp. After harvesting the cells by centrifugation, they were used for carotenoid analysis and isolation of DNA and RNA. For inhibition of photosynthetic electron transport, 3-(3, 4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethyl urea (DCMU) was applied at a concentration of 1 µM before starting high-light treatment.

Escherichia coli DH5α was used for plasmid amplification and strain M15/pREP4 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for heterologous expression of NtcA. Growth medium and conditions were as described [19].

2.2 Carotenoid analysis

Carotenoids from Nostoc PCC 7120 were extracted from freeze-dried cells. They were heated in methanol containing 6% KOH (w/v) at 60 °C for 20 min and the extract partitioned into 50% ether in petrol, bp 35–80 °C (v/v) [7]. After addition of water for complete phase separation, the upper phase was collected and the solvent evaporated. Carotenoids were separated and quantified by HPLC on a Nucleosil C18, 3-lm column with a mobile phase of acetonitrile/2-propanol/methanol (85:5:10, by vol.). Spectra were recorded on-line with a Kontron DAD 440 diode array detector (Kontron Instruments, Neufahrn, Germany). Peaks were identified by co-chromatography with reference compounds and by comparison of their spectra. Authentic carotenoid standards for HPLC were generated by combinatorial biosynthesis in E. coli [20].

2.3 Genomic DNA isolation and plasmid construction

For the heterologous expression of the NtcA protein, the plasmid pQE30ntcA was constructed by PRC amplification of the open reading frame from plasmid pCSAM70 [21] with primers NtcAforSac and NtcArevSal (Table 1A). The resulting DNA fragment was cloned into the SacI/SalI sites of vector pQE30 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).

Table 1:

Oligonucleotides for PCR amplification of NtcA (A), promoter fragments for gel retardation assay (B) and real time PCR (C).

(A)
NtcAforSac5′-GAGCTCATGATCGTGACACAAGATAAGG-3′
NtcArevSal5′-GTCGACCTCCTGCTATTCTTCTTTAAGTG-3′
(B)
GRA1-CrtWfor5′-GCCAAAAAGTCAGTAAAAAC-3′
GRA1-CrtWrev5′-TTTTCTGAATGCAGAGATGATG-3′
GRA2-CrtWfor5′-TCTGAAGGGTGAGGGAAATC-3′
GRA2-CrtWrev5′-TTGGCTAATTGTGTTCCATC-3′
GRA-CrtOfor5′-ATGTCCAGACTGATATTT-3′
GRA-CrtOrev5′-TTTAGTTACTAAGCCTTGA-3′
GRA-CrtPBfor5′-TCTGAAGGGTGAGGGAAATC-3′
GRA-CrtPBrev5′-TTGGCTAATTGTGTTCCATC-3′
(C)
RT-CrtWfor5′-GTCTTATTGGCGATGGAC-3′
RT-CrtWrev5′-TTGTGGTAGCCGAAGTG-3′
RT-CrtOfor5′-CGAGCGATTTCTGCACAAG-3′
RT-CrtOrev5′-TGCAGCTACAACAGAGGAG-3′
RT-CrtPBfor5′-TACGAAACCGGGTTACACG-3′
RT-CrtPBrev5′-GCTCCCAGGTCAACATATC-3′
RT-NtcAfor5′-TACGAGGCAGGAGAAGAG-3′
RT-NtcArev5′-GAATCCGCGAAGACAGAC-3′

For the amplification of the promoter fragments of the different genes, genomic DNA was isolated from Nostoc 7120 after lysozyme treatment by the CTAB method followed by a phenol-chloroform purification step [19]. With this DNA, the promoter region fragments PRntcA, PRcrtO, PRcrtW1 and PRcrtW2 were amplified by PCR with the primers listed in Table 1B.

2.4 Transcript determination

Total RNA from Nostoc PCC 7120 was isolated with phenol and guanidine thiocyanate as described [22]. Residual DNA was removed by treatment with RNase free DNase. Complementary cDNAs were synthesized using RevertAid Transcriptase (Fermentas, St. Leon-Roth, Germany). qRT-PCR was carried out in the Rotor Gene PCR Cycler (Corbett Life Science, Sydney, Australia) with the Sensi-Mix SYBR No-ROX Kit (Bioline, Luckenwalde, Germany). The reference was a 277 bp fragment from the rnpB gene (RNAse subunit P) [23] which is constitutively expressed independent of illumination [24]. The oligonucleotides used in qRT-PCR are listed in Table 1C.

2.5 Isolation of the NtcA protein

Escherichia coli M15/pRep4/pQE30ntcA was harvested after growth on a shaker at 22 °C in SB medium [20] containing 3% ethanol to an OD600 of 0.6 before IPTG was added (0.1 mM) followed by a 3 h incubation. The harvested cells were re-suspended in 200 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH and 7.8 broken twice in a French Pressure Cell at 95 MPa. After centrifugation (10 min at 16,000 g), the supernatant was treated with Sigma (Taufkirchen, Germany) His-select Cobalt Affinity Gel equilibrated in 50 mM phosphate buffer containing 0.3 mM NaCl and 10 mM imidazole. After incubation with the protein extract, the gel was collected by centrifugation and washed with the same buffer. Finally, NtcA was eluted with the same buffer containing 250 mM imidazole and concentrated by precipitation with 6% TCA.

2.6 Gel retardation assay

DNA fragments of the promoter regions were amplified by PCR. About 100–200 ng DNA was incubated with NtcA (0.3 µM or as indicated in Section 3 – Results) for 15 min in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 7.5 containing 40 mM KCl, 0.1 mM MnCl2, 0.5 mg/mL BSA, 1 mM DDT and 10% glycerol. 2-Oxoglutarate (0.6 mM), MgCl2 and ATP were added as indicated in Results. The DNAs and DNA-NtcA complexes were separated by native SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 7% gel. Their bands were stained in a 0.5 mg/mL ethidium bromide solution.

3 Results

3.1 Carotenoids under high light

In Nostoc PCC 7120 wild type under low light conditions, β-carotene is the major carotenoid. The second highest concentration was found for monoketo echinenone followed by diketo canthaxanthin (Figure 1). Upon transfer to high light, the amount of canthaxanthin was five-fold increased already after 6 h, whereas the concentrations of β-carotene and echinenone, both precursor and intermediate in the pathway to canthaxanthin, decreased concurrently. After 24 h, most of the higher canthaxanthin level was retained. In the low-light control, the concentration changes for all three carotenoids over 24 h were negligible.

Figure 1: Change of carotenoid concentrations in Nostoc 7120 wild type (WT) and deletion mutant ΔcrtW and ΔcrtO after transfer from low light (open bars) to high light (filled in bars).
Figure 1:

Change of carotenoid concentrations in Nostoc 7120 wild type (WT) and deletion mutant ΔcrtW and ΔcrtO after transfer from low light (open bars) to high light (filled in bars).

The Nostoc PCC 7120 mutant with the inactivated crtW gene showed the same tendency of higher canthaxanthin synthesis under high light but lower levels were reached (Figure 1). Instead, the echinenone concentration was higher than in the wild type and a similar light-dependent decrease was observed. In the crtO deletion mutant, canthaxanthin synthesis was completely blocked and formation of echinenone, the only keto carotenoid in this strain, was only 20% of echinenone synthesis in the wild type. However, in contrast to wild type, a doubling of the echinenone content occurred under high light.

3.2 Transcript changes upon high-light treatment

Changes of transcript levels after transfer to high light, relative to the levels in low light, were determined for the ketolases CrtW and CrtO and for the phytoene synthase CrtB (Figure 2). In wild type, a strong increase of the transcripts of all carotenogenic genes was observed, in contrast to the ntcA transcript which did not change significantly (data not shown). For crtW, transcript level was seven-fold higher after 6 h treatment and 15 fold higher after 24 h. The increase of the crtO transcript was slower but reached a similar relative increase after 24 h. The crtB gene is light-regulated in other cyanobacteria [9, 10]. Therefore, we also looked for transcription changes of this gene. Its transcript exhibited transient kinetics with a maximum of an almost five-fold higher amount followed by a slight decrease from 6 to 24 h.

Figure 2: Transcript ratios of the genes of phytoene synthase crtB and the ketolases crtO and crtW in Nostoc 7120 grown in high light (open bars) versus low light (filled in bars). Transcript of crtO was also determined from a culture treated with the inhibitor of photosynthetic electron transport DCMU.
Figure 2:

Transcript ratios of the genes of phytoene synthase crtB and the ketolases crtO and crtW in Nostoc 7120 grown in high light (open bars) versus low light (filled in bars). Transcript of crtO was also determined from a culture treated with the inhibitor of photosynthetic electron transport DCMU.

In the mutant with inactivated crtO, the transcript of crtW was increased similar to the wild type, but this relative increase was only threefold after 24 h of high-light treatment (Figure 2). In the mutant with inactivated crtW, the crtO transcript was increased as observed for the wild type. However, this increase of 30-fold higher than the initial value was twice as high as in the wild type. Application of the inhibitor of photosynthetic electron transport, DCMU, prevented a relative increase of the crtO transcript in Nostoc PCC 7120 upon transfer to high light (Figure 2). In contrast to crtO, the transcripts of crtW and crtP decreased strongly after DCMU addition regardless of light treatment (data not shown).

3.3 Prediction of NtcA binding sites in carotenogenic genes

As NtcA is a universal transcription factor with known binding sites, we searched for NtcA binding sites in the promoter regions of crtW, crtO and the operon crtPB (Figure 3). Analysis of the crtW gene from Nostoc PCC 7120 (alr3189) revealed a typical −10 consensus region of a σ70 promoter at position −12 from the translation start codon (Figure 3, top). Instead of a missing −35 element, a potential NtcA binding region at position −58 which is 46 nucleotides upstream from the −10 region, was identified. This NtcA binding site consists of the consensus motif GTAN7TAC [25]. Further upstream at position −320 another potential NtcA binding site GTAN8AAC was found at position −320.

Figure 3: Promoter regions of the crtW, crtO genes and the crtPB operon of Nostoc 7120. Predicted NtcA binding regions are boxed, the −10 promoter elements are marked and the DNA fragments used in the gel retardation assay are underlined.
Figure 3:

Promoter regions of the crtW, crtO genes and the crtPB operon of Nostoc 7120. Predicted NtcA binding regions are boxed, the −10 promoter elements are marked and the DNA fragments used in the gel retardation assay are underlined.

The promoter of crtO (all3744) contains a −10 σ70 region at position −28 (Figure 3, middle). Again, the −35 region is replaced by a putative NtcA binding motif GTAN8TAC, 14 nucleotides further upstream. The crtP (alr1832) and the crtB (alr1833) genes are transcribed in all analyzed cyanobacteria as an operon with a common promoter region [8, 26]. In this region, a −10 element is found at position −47 (Figure 3, bottom). At position −263, a NtcA box with a slightly modified consensus motif of GTGN8GAC could be predicted. This is 110 nucleotides downstream of the −10 promoter element.

3.4 Analysis of NtcA binding

Binding activity of purified NtcA to DNA was tested with a fragment of the glutamine synthetase gene pglnA from Nostoc 7120 which covers the NtcA binding site [27]. Gel retardation assays were carried out with different NtcA concentrations (Figure 4). A doubling of the NtcA concentration resulted in a doubling of the DNA−Ntca complex. A 296 bp DNA fragment from vector pMON38201 without the NtcA binding motif was used as negative DNA control. In this case, no DNA protein complex was observed.

Figure 4: Gel retardation assay to assess the NtcA binding activity with pglnA DNA as positive control (167 bp fragment including the NtcA binding site) and a 296 bp fragment from vector pMON38201 as negative DNA control. The percentage of retarded DNA is indicated at the bottom.
Figure 4:

Gel retardation assay to assess the NtcA binding activity with pglnA DNA as positive control (167 bp fragment including the NtcA binding site) and a 296 bp fragment from vector pMON38201 as negative DNA control. The percentage of retarded DNA is indicated at the bottom.

Two individual crtW promoter regions with sizes of 144 bp for PRcrtW1 and 154 bp for PRcrtW1 (as specified in Figure 3) were used in this assay (Figure 4). As indicated by the intensity of the DNA-NtcA bands on top of both gels, binding was observed starting at 0.01 µM NtcA and increased continuously when higher concentrations were applied. With 0.3 µM, almost 100% binding was reached for PRcrtW2. For PRcrtW1 binding at this concentration was 73%. The 144 bp DNA fragment PRcrtO of crtO (as specified in Figure 3) covering the predicted NtcA binding site also exhibited an NtcA complexed band in the gel retardation assay. However, this binding was less intense reaching only 42% with 0.3 µM NtcA (Figure 4). The promoter region upstream of crtP is responsible not only for the transcription of this gene but also for crtB which is part of the crtPB operon. The 137 bp DNA fragment from the promoter region PRcrtPB (as specified in Figure 3) formed a complex with NtcA binding 86% of the DNA at 0.3 µM (Figure 4).

In the gel retardation assay, we further analyzed the conditions for NtcA binding to the promoter regions of the carotenogenic genes (Table 2). In addition, the binding strength of the DNA−NtcA complex is positively affected by oxo-glutarate and negatively affected by Mg ions. For NtcA binding to all carotenogenic gene promoters, reduced conditions were essential.

Table 2:

Binding of NtcA at promoters of the carotenogenic genes crtPB, crtO and crtW.

Additions (mM)Binding (%)
PRcrtW1PRcrtW2PRcrtOPRcrtPB
Oxoglu
 051482936
 0.268795271
 0.485974687
 0.685945789
MgCl2
 0100896831
 189902556
 219541133
 571740
ATP
 024281929
 0.122301538
 0.220232032
 0.521241434
DDT
 00000

The DNA regions are indicated in Figure 3. Concentrations of 2-oxoglutarate (Oxoglu) and DDT were 0.6 mM and 1 mM, respectively, unless stated otherwise.

4 Discussion

As in other Nostoc strains [11], echinenone is the major keto carotenoid in Nostoc PCC 7120 accompanied by diketo canthaxanthin (Figure 1). Their relative abundance is shifted towards the synthesis of canthaxanthin with increasing light intensity at the expense of the non-ketolated precursor β-carotene as already reported for Nostoc PCC 73102 [10]. The photo protective activity of canthaxanthin is superior to that of echinenone [5, 28]. The enhanced canthaxanthin synthesis strengthens the ability to survive high-light conditions. In addition, the transcriptional up-regulation of phytoene synthase and desaturase (Figure 2) supplies precursor carotenoids for the synthesis of canthaxanthin and compensates loss of carotenoids by photo oxidation [10]. Both phytoene synthase [4] and phytoene desaturase [26] are limiting enzymes in carotenoid biosynthesis of cyanobacteria. There they are jointly expressed through a common promoter finally resulting in higher carotenoid formation.

Two different ketolases are involved in the formation of keto carotenoids in cyanobacteria. Generally, CrtW catalyzes the double ketolation of β-carotene to canthaxanthin [29]. In contrast, CrtO acts as a mono ketolase synthesizing echinenone with only one keto group in Synechocystis [13]. However, CrtO of Nostoc PCC 73102 is a diketolase involved in the synthesis of canthaxanthin [10]. The carotenoid profiles of the crtO deletion mutant of Nostoc 7120 reveal a loss of canthaxanthin synthesis (Figure 1). This finding demonstrates that only CrtO can catalyze canthaxanthin formation in Nostoc PCC 7120. These functional diversities demonstrate the high species-dependent variability of both ketolases to accept echinenone as a substrate and convert it to canthaxanthin. In contrast, CrtW possesses a low affinity for echinenone and directs precursors only in support of β-carotene utilization half way to canthacanthin (Figure 6). In a previous publication [14], it has been shown that CrtW can ketolate myxoxanthophyll which, due to a single β-ionone ring in its molecule, can only be converted to a mono keto product. Under our growth condition of Nostoc PCC 7120, the myxoxanthophyll concentration was below detection.

Up-regulation of canthaxanthin biosynthesis from β-carotene via echinenone (Figure 6) is transcriptionally regulated in Nostoc PCC 7120 (Figure 3). For both ketolase genes, crtW and crtO, higher transcript levels were found under high light. This is in contrast to Nostoc PCC 73102 in which only one of the two crtW genes present therein exhibited increased transcription, whereas the crtO transcript is unchanged providing the basic catalytic activity regardless of light conditions [10]. As crtP is transcribed together with the phytoene synthase gene crtB from the same promoter, higher transcript levels of crtB indicate the simultaneous up-regulation of phytoene desaturase.

The promoters of all the analyzed carotenogenic genes can be assigned as type 2 σ70 promoters [30]. They possess only the −10 hexamer, and the −35 region is replaced by a binding site for a transcriptional activator protein. The most universal transcription factor in cyanobacteria is NtcA. Upon the screening of the promoter region of the ketolase genes and the crtPB operon, NtcA binding site were predicted (Figure 4). Only the one for crtO was strictly canonical. Both binding motifs downstream of crtW and the one of crtPB were modified either by a spacing region one nucleotide shorter or by the TAC region modified to AAC or GAC. These modifications were previously found for other Nostoc PCC 7120 genes [25]. In our case, using the promoter region DNA of crtW, crtO and crtPB, we could demonstrate that these varied NtcA motifs are genuine biding sites as demonstrated in the gel shift assays (Figure 5). This indicates that NtcA is a positive regulator for all the investigated carotenognic genes of Nostoc 7120, enhancing their basal transcription activity in a coordinated way. Binding of oxo-glutarate to NtcA is essential for the establishment of the right protein conformation for DNA binding [31]. As the NtcA transcript did not increase under high light (data not shown), it is unlikely that the mode of NtcA activation is concentration-driven.

Figure 5: Gel retardation assays with DNA fragment of the promoter region of carotenogenic genes of Nostoc 7120 and NtcA. NtcA concentrations (µM) are indicated on top. The region of the DNA-NtcA complexes is marked as the right side of each gel.
Figure 5:

Gel retardation assays with DNA fragment of the promoter region of carotenogenic genes of Nostoc 7120 and NtcA. NtcA concentrations (µM) are indicated on top. The region of the DNA-NtcA complexes is marked as the right side of each gel.

DCMU, the inhibitor of photosynthetic electron transport, also inhibits the increase of the transcripts of the carotenogenic genes under high-light whereas reduced conditions are favorable for NtcA-binding to their promoters. This is an indication that high-light sensing proceeds via photosynthesis rather than being a direct effect of photooxidation or triggering by reactive oxygen species. It has been shown that changes in the cellular redox state of Nostoc PCC 7120 affect binding of NtcA to DNA which depends on free thiol residues of the NtcA protein [32]. Therefore, we propose for the light-dependent transcriptional activation of the respective carotenogenic genes a sensing of high light through the photosynthetic electron transport system (Figure 6). This may lead to a change in the redox state with a reduced plastoquinone pool or accumulation of reductants e.g. by the ferredoxin-thioredoxin reaction which both could be the signal for NtcA binding. A similar activation mechanism involving the photosynthetic electron transport was suggested for several other light-regulated and NtcA-activated genes in Synechocystis [33].

Figure 6: Light perception, activation of NtcA binding and involvement in up-regulation of carotenogenic genes under high-light conditions in Nostoc 7120. Boxes on top of NtcA indicate activation factors for NtcA binding, dashed arrows NtcA-dependent transcriptional up-regulation of crt genes.
Figure 6:

Light perception, activation of NtcA binding and involvement in up-regulation of carotenogenic genes under high-light conditions in Nostoc 7120. Boxes on top of NtcA indicate activation factors for NtcA binding, dashed arrows NtcA-dependent transcriptional up-regulation of crt genes.


Dedication:This work is dedicated to the memory of Professor Peter Böger. His determined studies on the action of bleaching herbicides aroused the interest of the first author and triggered his future work on carotenoid biosynthesis.


References

1. Young AJ, Frank HA. Energy transfer reactions involving carotenoids: quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. J Photochem Photobiol B 1996;36:3–15.10.1016/S1011-1344(96)07397-6Search in Google Scholar

2. Goodwin TW. The biochemistry of the carotenoids. London, UK; New York, USA: Chapman & Hall, 1980.10.1007/978-94-009-5860-9Search in Google Scholar

3. Takaichi S, Mochimaru M. Carotenoids and carotenogenesis in cyanobacteria: unique ketocarotenoids and carotenoid glycosides. Cell Mol Life Sci 2007;64:2607–19.10.1007/s00018-007-7190-zSearch in Google Scholar

4. Götz T, Windhövel U, Böger P, Sandmann G. Protection of photosynthesis against UV-B radiation by carotenoids in transformants of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus PCC7942. Plant Physiol 1999;120:599–604.10.1104/pp.120.2.599Search in Google Scholar

5. Albrecht M, Steiger S, Sandmann G. Expression of a ketolase gene mediates the synthesis of canthaxanthin in Synechococcus leading to resistance against pigment photodegradation and UV-B sensitivity of photosynthesis. Photochem Photobiol 2001;73:551–5.10.1562/0031-8655(2001)073<0551:EOAKGM>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

6. Kirilovsky D, Kerfeld CA. The orange carotenoid protein in photoprotection of photosystem II in cyanobacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012;1817:158–66.10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.04.013Search in Google Scholar

7. Steiger S, Schäfer L, Sandmann G. High-light upregulation of carotenoids and their antioxidative properties in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC 6803. J Photochem Photobiol B 1999;521:14–8.10.1016/S1011-1344(99)00094-9Search in Google Scholar

8. Martinez-Ferez I, Fernandez-Gonzalez B, Sandmann G, Vioqu A. Cloning and expression in Escherichia coli of the gene coding for phytoene synthase from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. Biochim Biophys Acta 1994;1218:145–52.10.1016/0167-4781(94)90003-5Search in Google Scholar

9. Schäfer L, Sandmann M, Woitsch S, Sandmann G. Coordinate up-regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis as a response to light stress in Synechococcus. Plant Cell Envir 2006;26: 1349–56.10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01515.xSearch in Google Scholar

10. Schöpf L, Mautz J, Sandmann G. Multiple ketolases involved in light regulation of canthaxanthin biosynthesis in Nostoc punctiforme PCC 73102. Planta 2013;237:1279–85.10.1007/s00425-013-1846-8Search in Google Scholar

11. Takaichi S, Mochimaru M, Maoka T, Katoh H. Myxol and 4-ketomyxol 2′-fucosides, not rhamnosides, from Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 and Nostoc punctiforme PCC 73102, and proposal for the biosynthetic pathway of carotenoids. Plant Cell Physiol 2005;46:497–504.10.1093/pcp/pci049Search in Google Scholar

12. Misawa N, Satomi Y, Kondo K, Yokoyama A, Kajiwara S, Saito T, et al. Structure and functional analysis of a marine bacterial carotenoid biosynthesis gene cluster and astaxanthin biosynthetic pathway proposed at the gene level. J Bacteriol 1995;177:6575–84.10.1128/jb.177.22.6575-6584.1995Search in Google Scholar

13. Fernandez-Gonzalez B, Sandmann G, Vioque A. A new type of asymmetrically acting β-carotene ketolase is required for the synthesis of echinenone in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. J Biol Chem 1997;272:9728–33.10.1074/jbc.272.15.9728Search in Google Scholar

14. Mochimaru M, Masukawa H, Takaichi S. The cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 has two distinct β-carotene ketolases: CrtO for echinenone and CrtW for ketomyxol synthesis. FEBS Lett 2005;579:6111–14.10.1016/j.febslet.2005.09.081Search in Google Scholar

15. Muro-Pastor MI, Reyes JC, Florencio FJ. Ammonium assimilation in cyanobacteria. Photosynth Res 2005;83:135–50.10.1007/s11120-004-2082-7Search in Google Scholar

16. Herrero A, Muro-Pastor AM, Valladares A, Flores E. Cellular differentiation and the NtcA transcription factor in filamentous cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2004;28:469–87.10.1016/j.femsre.2004.04.003Search in Google Scholar

17. Mazel D, Houmard J, Castets AM, Tandeau de Marsac N. Highly repetitive DNA sequences in cyanobacterial genomes. J Bacteriol 1990;172:2755–61.10.1128/jb.172.5.2755-2761.1990Search in Google Scholar

18. Rippka R, Deruelles J, Waterbury JB, Herdman M, Stanier RY. Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1979;111:1–61.10.1099/00221287-111-1-1Search in Google Scholar

19. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. New York, USA: Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, 1989.Search in Google Scholar

20. Sandmann G. Combinatorial biosynthesis of carotenoids in a heterologous host: a powerfull approach for the biosynthesis of novel structures. ChemBioChem 200;3:629–35.10.1002/1439-7633(20020703)3:7<629::AID-CBIC629>3.0.CO;2-5Search in Google Scholar

21. Muro-Pastor AM, Valladares A, Flores E, Herrero A. The hetC gene is a direct target of the NtcA transcriptional regulator in cyanobacterial heterocyst development. J Bacteriol 1999;181:6664–9.10.1128/JB.181.21.6664-6669.1999Search in Google Scholar

22. Chomczynski P. A reagent for the single-step simultaneous isolation of RNA, DNA and proteins from cell and tissue samples. Biotechniques 1993;15:532–7.Search in Google Scholar

23. Soule T, Garcia-Pichel F, Stout V. Gene expression patterns associated with the biosynthesis of the sunscreen scytonemin in Nostoc punctiforme ATCC 29133 in response to UVA radiation. J Bacteriol 2009;191:4639–46.10.1128/JB.00134-09Search in Google Scholar

24. Pinto F, Pacheco CC, Ferreira D, Moradas-Ferreira P, Tamagnini P. Selection of suitable reference genes for RT-qPCR analyses in cyanobacteria. PLoS One 2012;7:e34983.10.1371/journal.pone.0034983Search in Google Scholar

25. Picossi S, Flores E, Herrero A. ChIP analysis unravels an exceptionally wide distribution of DNA binding sites for the NtcA transcription factor in a heterocyst-forming cyanobacterium. BMC Genomics 2014;15:22.10.1186/1471-2164-15-22Search in Google Scholar

26. Chamovitz D, Sandmann G, Hirschberg J. Molecular and biochemical characterization of herbicide-resistant mutants of cyanobacteria reveals that phytoene desaturation is a rate-limiting step in carotenoid biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 1993;268:17348–53.10.1016/S0021-9258(19)85341-3Search in Google Scholar

27. Valladares A, Muro-Pastor AM, HerreroA, Flores E. The NtcA-dependent P1 promoter is utilized for glnA expression in N2-fixing heterocysts of Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120. J Bacteriol 2004;186:7337–43.10.1128/JB.186.21.7337-7343.2004Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Schäfer L, Vioque A, Sandmann G. Functional in situ evaluation of photosynthesis-protecting carotenoids in mutants of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis PCC6803. J Photochem Photobiol B 2005;78:195–201.10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2004.11.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Makino T, Harada H, Ikenaga H, Matsuda S, Takaichi S, Shindo K, et al. Characterization of cyanobacterial carotenoid ketolase CrtW and hydroxylase CrtR by complementation analysis in Escherichia coli. Plant Cell Physiol 2008;49:1867–78.10.1093/pcp/pcn169Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Imamura S, Asayama M. Sigma factors for cyanobacterial transcription. Gene Reg System Biol 2009;3:65–87.10.4137/GRSB.S2090Search in Google Scholar

31. Zhao M-X, Jiang Y-L, He Y-X, Chen Y-F, Teng Y-B, Chen Y, et al. Structural basis for the allosteric control of the global transcription factor NtcA by the nitrogen starvation signal 2-oxoglutarate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:1248–92.10.1073/pnas.1001556107Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Jiang F, Mannervik B, Bergmann B. Evidence for redox regulation of the transcription factor NtcA, acting both as an activator and a repressor, in the cyanobacterium Anabaena PCC 7120. Biochem J 1997;327:513–7.10.1042/bj3270513Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. HiharaY, Sonoike K, Kanehisa M, Ikeuchi M. DNA microarray analysis of redox-responsive genes in the genome of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6803. J Bacteriol 2003;185:1719–2.10.1128/JB.185.5.1719-1725.2003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2016-6-2
Revised: 2016-7-18
Accepted: 2016-7-19
Published Online: 2016-8-26
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/znc-2016-0117/html
Scroll to top button