Additional questions on contrastive topics

References

Abrusán, Márta. 2019. Semantics anomaly, pragmatic infelicity, and unacceptability. Annual Review of Linguistics 5. 329–351.10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011938Search in Google Scholar

Braşoveanu, Adrian & Anna Szabolcsi. 2013. Presuppositional too, postsuppositional too. In M. Aloni et al. (eds.), The Dynamic, Inquisitive, and Visionary Life of ϕ, ?ϕ, and ⋄ϕ: A Festschrift for Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof, and Frank Veltman. https://www.boekenbestellen.nl/boek/festschrift-for-jeroen-groenendijk-martin-stokhof-and-frank-veltman/8507?lang=en.Search in Google Scholar

Dayal, Veneeta. 2016. Questions. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199281268.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Heim, Irene. 1990. Presupposition projection. In R. van der Sandt (ed.), Reader for the Nijmegen Workshop on Presupposition, Lexical Meaning, and Discourse Processes. Netherlands: University of Nijmegen Press.Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, Manfred. 1998. Additive particles under stress. SALT 8. 111–128. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, CLC Publications.10.3765/salt.v8i0.2799Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul A. 2009. Presupposition and anaphora: Remarks on the formulation of the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 40(3). 367–386.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730155.003.0012Search in Google Scholar

Mitrović, Moreno & Uli Sauerland. 2014. Decomposing coordination. NELS 44. 39–52.Search in Google Scholar

Nicolae, Andreea C. 2020. Negative polarity additive particles and their other uses. Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Logic, Language, and Meaning: Monotonicity in Logic and Language (in press).10.1007/978-3-662-62843-0_9Search in Google Scholar

Szabolcsi, Anna. 2017. Additive presuppositions are derived through activating focus alternatives. In A. Cremers et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium, 455–464. Amsterdam: ILLC.Search in Google Scholar