Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton August 24, 2016

When the “other” runs in front of the bull: a membership categorization analysis of a television news story

  • Carles Roca-Cuberes

    Carles Roca-Cuberes is Lecturer in the Department of Communication, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain, where he teaches Communication Theory and Social Research Methods. His research interests include communication theory, ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and interpersonal communication and social interaction in settings such as psychiatric and broadcast political interviews. He is currently investigating the representation of particular subcultures in the news media.

    EMAIL logo
    and Rafael Ventura

    Rafael Ventura (MA, Universitat Jaume I) is Trainee Research Fellow at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain, funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain. His research interests are in the role of the media in gender and sexual socialization, media effects and heteronormativity. He is currently investigating the representation of particular subcultures in the news media.

From the journal Text & Talk

Abstract

This article analyzes a television news story using a particular example. In line with the research tradition of the ethnomethodological approach of membership categorization analysis, our main analytical concerns are (i) to understand the logic of practical reasoning and intelligibility involved in the production of the news story; (ii) to examine how this intelligibility is generated and what resources – such as commonsense knowledge of the social structures – are used to make the news story communicable; and (iii) to explore how specific forms of categorization employed in the news story are used to induce certain readings or to promote certain worldviews. The news story analyzed describes the progressive increase of foreign participants at the San Fermín running of the bulls in Pamplona, Spain. It also highlights the still minority participation by women at this massive event. The results of the analysis show that both “foreigners” and “women” are presented as being in the wrong place. Through association with their typical predicates, both “foreigners” and “women” are construed in the news story as the “other.” A final reflection is made on the concept of identity, which is understood as a situated accomplishment.

Award Identifier / Grant number: CSO2011-23786

Funding statement: This work was supported by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación) for the research project “Analysis of audiovisual narratives on civilizations and cultures. Representations and interpretations of television news narratives” (grant number CSO2011-23786).

About the authors

Carles Roca-Cuberes

Carles Roca-Cuberes is Lecturer in the Department of Communication, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain, where he teaches Communication Theory and Social Research Methods. His research interests include communication theory, ethnomethodology, conversation analysis and interpersonal communication and social interaction in settings such as psychiatric and broadcast political interviews. He is currently investigating the representation of particular subcultures in the news media.

Rafael Ventura

Rafael Ventura (MA, Universitat Jaume I) is Trainee Research Fellow at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain, funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness of Spain. His research interests are in the role of the media in gender and sexual socialization, media effects and heteronormativity. He is currently investigating the representation of particular subcultures in the news media.

Appendix: transcription conventions

(0.5)

The number in brackets indicates a time gap in tenths of a second.

(.)

A dot enclosed in a bracket indicates a pause in the talk of less than two-tenths of a second.

((words))

A description enclosed in double brackets indicates a non-verbal activity. For example, “((banging sound)).” Alternatively, double brackets may enclose the transcriber’s comments on contextual or other features.

sou:::nd

Colons indicate that the speaker has stretched the preceding sound or letter. The more colons the greater the extent of the stretching.

word,

A comma indicates a “continuing” intonation.

a:

Less marked falls in pitch can be indicated by using underlining immediately preceding a colon.

a:

Less marked rises in pitch can be indicated using a colon which itself is underlined.

Under

Underlined fragments indicate speaker emphasis.

>words<

Inward chevrons indicate that the talk they encompass was produced noticeably quicker than the surrounding talk.

.h

A dot before an “h” indicates speaker in-breath. The more h’s, the longer the in-breath.

References

Anderson, Digby C. & Wesley W. Sharrock. 1979. Biasing the news: Technical issues in media studies. Sociology 13(3). 367–385.10.1177/003803857901300301Search in Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 1991. The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

De Beauvoir, Simone. 1949. Le deuxième sexe. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar

Dupret, Baudouin. 2011. Practices of truth: An ethnomethodological inquiry into Arab contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/pbns.214Search in Google Scholar

Eglin, Peter & Stephen Hester. 2003. The Montreal massacre: A story of membership categorization analysis. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fanon, Frantz. 1967. Black skin, white masks. New York: Grove Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, Richard & William Housley (eds.). 2015. Advances in membership categorization analysis. London: Sage.10.4135/9781473917873Search in Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, Richard, William Housley & Carly W. Butler. 2009. Omnirelevance and interactional context. Australian Journal of Communication 36(3). 45–64.Search in Google Scholar

Francis, David & Christopher Hart. 1997. Narrative intelligibility and membership categorization in a television commercial. In Stephen Hester & Peter Eglin (eds.), Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis, 123–151. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.Search in Google Scholar

Francis, David & Stephen Hester. 2004. An invitation to ethnomethodology: Language, society and interaction. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849208567Search in Google Scholar

Guillaume, Marc & Jean Baudrillard. 1994. Figures de l’altérité. Paris: Descartes & Cie.Search in Google Scholar

Goodman, Simon & Susan A. Speer. 2007. Category use in the construction of asylum seekers. Critical Discourse Studies 4(2). 165–185.10.1080/17405900701464832Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles & John Heritage. 1990. Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 19. 283–307.10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435Search in Google Scholar

Hester, Stephen. 2002. Bringing it all back home: Selecting topic, category and location in TV news programmes. In Stephen Hester & William Housley (eds.), Language, interaction, and national identity: Studies in the social organisation of national identity in talk-in-interaction, 38–59. Hants, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Hester, Stephen & Peter Eglin. 1997. Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. New York, Oxford: University Press of America.Search in Google Scholar

Jalbert, Paul L. (ed.). 1999. Media studies: Ethnomethodological approaches. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America.Search in Google Scholar

Jayyusi, Lena. 1984. Categorization and the moral order. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Jayyusi, Lena. 1988. Toward a socio-logic of the film text. Semiotica 68(3–4). 271–296.10.1515/semi.1988.68.3-4.271Search in Google Scholar

Jayyusi, Lena. 1991a. The equivocal text and the objective world. Continuum: The Australian Journal of Media and Culture 5. 166–90.10.1080/10304319109388220Search in Google Scholar

Jayyusi, Lena. 1991b. Values and moral judgment: Communicative praxis as moral order. In Graham Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences, 227–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611827.011Search in Google Scholar

Jayyusi, Lena. 2007. Between saying and showing: Making and contesting truth claims in the media. Ethnographic Studies 9. 19–43.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, John R. E. 1984. Innocent victims and evil-doers. Women’s studies international forum 7. 69–83.10.1016/0277-5395(84)90086-4Search in Google Scholar

Lepper, Georgia. 2000. Categories in text and talk: A practical introduction to categorization analysis. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849208727Search in Google Scholar

Malbois, Fabienne. 2007. Doing gender au journal télévisé: Approche ethnométhodologique d’un récit médiatique. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée 85. 203–221.Search in Google Scholar

Jiří Nekvapil & Ivan Leudar. 2006. Sequencing in media dialogical networks. Ethnographic Studies 8. 30–43.Search in Google Scholar

Rapley, Mark, David McCarthy & Alec McHoul. 2003. Mentality or morality? Membership categorization, multiple meanings and mass murder. British Journal of Social Psychology 42(3). 427–444.10.1348/014466603322438242Search in Google Scholar

Roca-Cuberes, Carles. 2008. Membership categorization and professional insanity ascription. Discourse Studies 10(4). 543–570.10.1177/1461445608091886Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1974. On the analyzability of stories by children. In Roy Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology, 216–232. Harmondsworth: Penguin. First published [1972] in John J. Gumperz & Dell Hymes (eds), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, 329–345. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1979. Hotrodder: A revolutionary category. In George Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 7–14. New York: Irvington.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation. 2 vols. Edited by Gail Jefferson with introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Schaeffer, Nora Cate & Douglas W. Maynard. 2005. From paradigm to prototype and back again: Interactive aspects of ‘cognitive processing’ in standardized survey interviews. In Hedwig te Molder & Jonathan Potter (eds.), Conversation and cognition, 114–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511489990.006Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emmanuel A. 2007. A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 39(3). 462–482.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.007Search in Google Scholar

Silverman, David. 2011. Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1999. A critique of postcolonial reason. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard university press.10.2307/j.ctvjsf541Search in Google Scholar

Stetson, Jeff. 1999. Victim, offender and witness in the emplotment of news stories. In Paul L. Jalbert (ed.), Media studies: Ethnomethodological approaches, 77–110. Lanham, New York, Oxford: University Press of America.Search in Google Scholar

Stokoe, Elizabeth. 2012. Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies 14(3). 277–303.10.1177/1461445612441534Search in Google Scholar

Stokoe, Elizabeth & Frederick Attenborough. 2015. Prospective and retrospective categorisation. In Richard Fitzgerald & William Housley (eds.), Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis, 51–70. London: Sage.10.4135/9781473917873.n3Search in Google Scholar

Taussig, Michael. 1993. Mimesis and alterity. New York: Routeledge.Search in Google Scholar

Thornborrow, Joanna & Richard Fitzgerald. 2004. Storying the news through category, action, and reason. The Communication Review 7(4). 345–352.10.1080/10714420490886943Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-8-24
Published in Print: 2016-9-1

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton

Downloaded on 30.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2016-0024/html
Scroll to top button