Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter April 7, 2016

Aging analysis of high voltage silicone rubber/silica nanocomposites under accelerated weathering conditions

  • Abraiz Khattak EMAIL logo , Muhammad Iqbal and Muhammad Amin

Abstract

Silicone rubber (SiR) is extensively used in outdoor insulation and other applications. However, like other polymers, SiR also degrades and lessens its performance in the exposition of environmental stresses. Nanofillers improve the aging behavior of polymeric insulating materials. To investigate the effect of nanosilica on the aging behavior of SiR, we fabricated nanocomposites of SiR with 2.5 wt.% nanosilica (SNC-2.5) and 5 wt.% nanosilica (SNC-5) by mechanical mixing and ultrasonication method. The prepared samples were subjected to uniform ultraviolet (UV) radiation, heat, humidity, salt fog, and acid rain along with neat SiR in cyclic manner at 2.5 kV for 5000 h in a specially fabricated weathering chamber. Neat SiR and both nanocomposites showed gradual decrease in transparency. Random loss and recovery in hydrophobicity and increase and decrease in leakage current (LC) were recorded for all samples, in which SNC-5 showed the best hydrophobic behavior and least LC. For SNC-5, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) results showed negligible reduction in absorption peaks at important wave-numbers and increase and intactness were observed at absorption peaks related to the hydrophobic methyl group. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results also concurred with FTIR, LC measurements, and hydrophobicity analysis.

1 Introduction

Polymeric insulators found rapid growth in their construction, design, and types, as they have a lot of advantages over conventional ceramic insulators, such as light weight, flexibility, easy installation, excellent performance in a contaminated environment, better dielectric strength, and one unit construction [1], [2], [3], [4]. However, due to their organic nature, polymeric materials have the issue of aging specifically in outdoor environment. Ultraviolet (UV) radiations, heat, humidity, acid rain, and fog are some of the examples of environmental stresses [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. These stresses affect the physical, chemical, electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties of composite insulators [9], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15].

Room temperature vulcanized silicone rubber (RTV-SiR) is a frequently recommended material for outdoor high-voltage (HV) insulator coatings in comparison to other polymeric insulators due to its excellent weathering and heat resistance. RTV-SiR is an elastomeric organosiloxane polymer that mainly consists of silicon with carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen. The presence of hydrocarbon groups makes RTV-SiR acceptable rubber, whereas the Si-O bond imparts its inorganic properties [16], [17], [18]. Due to this unique hybrid nature, RTV-SiR has excellent insulating properties and unique hydrophobic behavior [19], [20]. RTV-SiR finds applications in many fields, such as biomedical engineering, industrials rolls, and HV insulation [21], [22], [23], [24].

SiR is classified into two main classes, namely, high-temperature vulcanized SiR (HTV-SiR) and RTV-SiR. HTV-SiR is cured at high temperature and is used in almost 60% silicone products. Based on the degree of polymerization, HTV-SiR is further divided into liquid-type SiR (LSR) and milleable-type SiR. Milleable-type SiR is also known as high-consistency SiR (HCR). Due to better liquidity among rubber materials, LSR is used for automated injection molding. LSR is used in complex molds and severe tolerance. LSR is also free of volatility and residue, which provides its required inertness. HCR is obtained by catalyzing, pigmenting by roll, and then curing by molding and extrusion of the base compound. The base compound is mainly composed of silicone polymer and silica (SiO2) with different additives to achieve diversified properties [25], [26], [27].

As the name indicates, RTV-SiR is cured at room temperature. RTV-SiR is specifically fabricated to obtain SiR with special features such as high temperature and flame retardancy. RTV-SiR is prepared by two components, that is, base and curator [28]. RTV-SiR is not only a vital class of SiR for consideration of HV composite insulators but also used in coatings of ceramic insulators to minimize leakage current (LC) and enhance the hydrophobicity of overall insulator [29]. Although SiR is known for its better weather resistance among polymers and has also good insulating properties, it degrades in outdoor applications [30], [31]. One of the most efficient ways to improve the performance of SiR is the use of its nanocomposites or microcomposites.

The optimum performance of nanocomposites needs careful preparation [32]. Moreover, for the exploration of environmental degradation, these prepared nanocomposites need to be evaluated under uniform stresses along with neat SiR. In a review [8], the contribution of many authors on the aging of SiR was highlighted; also, the aging techniques for polymeric insulators were described. Accelerated multistress weathering is an efficient way of the assessment of polymeric insulators, which not only reduces operation time and cost but also is helpful to readily examine the insulators through different analysis techniques [33].

Different contributions were made by studying the characteristics of RTV-SiR and their improvements. However, there are still gaps in achieving optimum aging performance in SiR. In Ref. [34], only the improvement of hydrophobic behavior for RTV-SiR was discussed by adding aluminum trihydrate; also, stresses other than UV were not taken into account. In Ref. [35], hydrophobicity was reported with surface charge and flashover characteristics for only neat RTV-SiR.

There are many types of fillers that can be used for the property enhancements of SiR [36]. Fillers bring superior enhancements in the required properties of SiR insulators. Different types of reinforcing fillers can be used for this purpose. According to many researchers, nanocomposites and hybrid composites were proven for better performance compared to microcomposites [37], [38]. However, further studies on the type and concentration of fillers for SiR are still required. Among the wide range of nanofillers, SiO2 is an inorganic filler that provides resistance against thermal, mechanical, and electrical stresses and thus can slow the aging time and enhance the performance of SiR [12], [39], [40]. Du et al. [41] used up to 2 wt.% nanosilica, and only the electrical characteristics of RTV-SiR were analyzed, whereas the study should be conducted for higher concentration, covering the most important property of polymers (i.e. degradation). Other studies were conducted on RTV-SiR and its composites [42], [43], [44], [45]. However, they were specific to a particular property and also lacked the realistic practical conditions. Although previous work reported by many authors on RTV-SiR is a contribution towards its durability. However, as the degradation of RTV-SiR in outdoor applications is an important problem; therefore, SiR should be investigated under multistress weathering environment along with its nanocomposites for adequate time period.

This work explores the 5000 h accelerated aging performance of SiO2-based RTV-SiR nanocomposites with reference to the neat SiR, which has not been reported before. Samples are degraded through multiple environmental stresses in a specially fabricated environmental chamber. Furthermore, LC analysis, STRI hydrophobicity classification, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) are used along with critical visual inspection to timely analyze variations in the neat SiR and its nanocomposites.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

RTV SiR (RTV 615) was procured from Lanxess Chemicals (Germany), and nanosilica (12 nm) was procured from Degussa (USA).

2.2 Preparation

Nanocomposites of SiR were prepared according to the percentage weight (wt.%) of the fillers and polymer. For example, SNC-5 composites refer to samples that were made by mixing 5 g nanosilica and 95 g RTV 615 SiR [having 86.36 g RTV 615-A (base polymer) and 8.64 g RTV 615-B (curator)]. The ratio of base polymer to curator was kept at 10:1 in a sample. The maximum amount of nanofumed SiO2 loading was restricted to 5 wt.%. A high shear laboratory mixer with a sonicator was used for the preparation of the SiR composites.

The SiR composite samples were prepared in three steps. In the first step, dry fillers were gently added to RTV 615-A while keeping the mixing speed low to wet out the fillers. After the fillers got properly wet, the mixing speed was gradually increased to the maximum revolution per minute and was kept at the same maximum speed until the mixture did not show any visible signs of lumps. In the second step, after 2–3 min of cooling, RTV 615-B was added to the mixture and mixed at low speed for 2 min by a sonicator and then the mixture was degassed in a vacuum at 27 in Hg until the bubbles were completely removed. In the third step, the SiR mixture was discharged into molds and allowed to cure at room temperature for 24 h. Subsequently, the samples were postcured for 4 h in an oven at 90°C. The list of the prepared samples is given in Table 1. In comparison to microsilica, nanosilica interacts better at much lower concentration due to smaller size and fine dispersion. Many properties of polymeric materials decrease roughly below 1% and above 5%. Therefore, concentrations of nanosilica were taken at 5% and 2.5% to observe its optimum influence on the aging behavior of RTV-SiR, without compromising the other required insulating properties [32], [46], [47], [48].

Table 1:

Prepared SiR composite samples.

Sample nameSample codeFiller concentration (wt.%)
Neat SiRSiR0 wt.%
SiR nanocompositeSNC-2.52.5 wt.% nanosilica
SiR nanocompositeSNC-55 wt.% nanosilica

3 Instruments and conditions

3.1 Aging chamber

An environmental chamber with dimensions of 1×2×1 m3 was designed and fabricated in which prepared insulating materials were energized with a 2.5 kV voltage through 220 V/2.5 kV transformer having an output current capacity of nearly 100 mA. The accelerated weathering arrangement is shown in Figure 1. Different environmental stresses such as controlled UV-A, temperature, humidity, acid rain, and salt fog were applied timely along with the electrical stress. To include variable heating stress, 1500 W (max.) heater was used. For UV radiation, two UV lights (xenon lamps) were used, each of 15 W (15×2=30 W) to make luminous intensity as per IEC 61109 Annex-C. HCl dilute solution with pH 4.5 was used for acid rain purpose. Two accelerated weather cycles were followed during the experiment (i.e. summer cycle was 17 days and winter cycle was 11 days). During summer cycle, the temperature was kept at 47.3°C, and in winter cycle, the temperature was 35.2°C. The specifications of accelerated weather cycles are shown in Table 2.

Figure 1: Accelerated multistress environmental chamber.
Figure 1:

Accelerated multistress environmental chamber.

Table 2:

Summer and winter weather cycles.

Applied stressSummerWinter
Test voltage (kV)2.52.5
Length of cycle (days)1117
Temperature (°C)47.235.3
UV-A (h)108
Acid rain (4.5 pH)6 times2 times
Salt fog (6000 μS/cm)04 times
Relative humidity (%)8573

For the preparation of accelerated aging setup, the ASTM D4762-11a, ASTM D2865M-06, and IEC 62217 ed2.0, 61109 standards were used as guides.

3.2 Analysis techniques

3.2.1 Visual inspection

To check the insulators for major degradation or cracking, each sample was analyzed through a lens under circular lamp. To record the surface condition of samples, their photographs were taken in daylight through a high-resolution digital camera.

3.2.2 Hydrophobicity classification

To measure the degree of water repellency after both weather cycles, each sample was examined using the Swedish Transmission Research Institute (STRI) hydrophobicity classification method. Thus, a total of 16 hydrophobicity tests were performed. Each sample was sprayed for 20 s with tap water, and its hydrophobicity was evaluated within 10 s according to the STRI Guide using images of the samples against the standard images (HC1-HC7).

3.2.3 LC measurement

AC LC was measured using a precision microammeter (UT-70B) after each weather cycle. Thus, a total of 16 LC measurements were recorded during the 5000 h period.

3.3 Attenuated total reflectance-FTIR spectroscopy

FTIR spectroscopy was performed on each sample from 0 h (virgin) to 5000 h. For this purpose, spectrographs of samples were obtained through a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum 2000 FTIR spectrometer after each 1000 h. Thus, a total of six spectrographs were obtained for each sample during the 5000 h aging period. In all tests, potassium bromide (KBr) powder was used as a transparent material.

3.4 SEM

To investigate the surface morphology of virgin and aged samples at the microlevel, SEM was used. Before subjecting to SEM, the materials were gold coated. The images were taken at 1 μm scale by applying 15 kV voltage. SEM-Hitachi (SU-1500) was used for SEM analysis.

4 Results and discussion

4.1 Visual inspection

During periodic visual inspection after each weathering cycle, major degradation or cracking was not recorded. The SiR insulators remained in acceptable conditions. With the passage of time, the transparency of samples was reduced but at a low rate. However, this color fading phenomenon is common for polymeric insulators [12], [40], [41]. Photographs taken from virgin and 5000 h aged samples are given in Figures 2 and 3, respectively.

Figure 2: Photographs of virgin samples of neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5.
Figure 2:

Photographs of virgin samples of neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5.

Figure 3: Photographs of 5000 h aged samples of neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5.
Figure 3:

Photographs of 5000 h aged samples of neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5.

4.2 Hydrophobicity analysis

The hydrophobicity class of neat SiR and nanocomposites varied with the increase of aging period. This variation in hydrophobicity was also in unpredictable manner. Virgin samples of neat SiR, 2.5 wt.% nanosilica (SNC-2.5), and 5 wt.% nanosilica (SNC-5) showed hydrophobicity classes HC-2, HC-3, and HC-1, respectively, as shown from the photographs taken at the start of the experiment in Figure 4. However, both recovery and loss were seen during the 5000 h aging, where neat SiR remained at HC-2 most of the time and also touched HC-3 at nearly 2000 h aging. SNC-2.5 though had HC-3 at start but remained at HC-2 until 3000 h and then showed further increase in hydrophobicity, showed HC-1 at the second last test, and ended with HC-2 after 5000 h aging. SNC-5 remained at HC-1 most of the time and also showed HC-2 alternatively with HC-1 until 4000 h. However, the hydrophobicity of SNC-5 remained at HC-1 during the last four tests. Photographs taken for all three insulators after 5000 h aging are given in Figures 4 and 5, whereas the hydrophobicity variation in neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5 with aging is presented in Figure 6.

Figure 4: Photographs at the start of experiment for STRI hydrophobicity classification.
Figure 4:

Photographs at the start of experiment for STRI hydrophobicity classification.

Figure 5: Photographs taken after 5000 h for STRI hydrophobicity classification.
Figure 5:

Photographs taken after 5000 h for STRI hydrophobicity classification.

Figure 6: Hydrophobicity class variation in neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5 with aging.
Figure 6:

Hydrophobicity class variation in neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5 with aging.

The unpredictable loss and recovery for SiR was reported by many authors previously for SiR. This nature of SiR may be due to the rotation of backbone chain and transfer of hydrophobic molecular groups from the material bulk to the surface. The abundance of methyl groups on the surface of the SiR can be attributed to this unique nature, which can be further validated through FTIR analysis. The combined variation graph of neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5 given in Figure 6 shows that neat SiR is relatively more hydrophilic compared to nanocomposites and that SNC-5 has better hydrophobic behavior than SNC-2.5. However, the change in this behavior among these insulators was less and the hydrophobicity of all three samples remained in the acceptable limit.

4.3 LC analysis

Both nanocomposites in virgin form showed lesser LC than neat SiR. However, nanocomposite with SNC-2.5 showed a slightly greater value of LC than SNC-5. All three samples respond in pattern variation during the entire aging period. Decrease and increase in LC were recorded for all samples. Besides continuous increase in complex form, all samples showed decrease to initial values at 3624 h aging. For the next consecutive cycle, the LC of all samples showed sudden jump, and a maximum value of 1 μA was recorded for each sample. However, after 4000 h, LC recorded for all samples was <1 μA. The cause of this abrupt rise at some points in LC is not known and termed as saturation current by the authors [44]. At the end of experiment, neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5 showed LC of 0.9, 0.8, and 0.6 μA, respectively. All these samples have LC in acceptable limit and none of them crossed the unsafe limit of LC for an insulator. Figure 7 presents the combined graph of LC for neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5.

Figure 7: LC variation in neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5 with aging.
Figure 7:

LC variation in neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5 with aging.

4.4 FTIR spectroscopy

To investigate the structural changes in neat SiR and its nanocomposites and hybrid composites, FTIR spectroscopy in absorption form was used after each weather cycle. The important groups in SiR and relevant wave-numbers are given in Table 3.

Table 3:

Important groups in SiR and relevant absorption bands.

GroupWave number (cm-1)
Symmetric C-H stretching of CH3~2963–2960
Si-CH3 symmetric bending~1280–1255
Si-O-C stretching~1110–1050
Si-O-Si asymmetric stretching~1130–1000
Si-O of O-Si(CH3)3~870–850
Si-O of O-Si(CH3)2-O~840–790
Si- of Si-(CH3)3~700

Applications of cyclic stresses for 5000 h caused scission of main polymer groups, loss of molecules of low molecular weight (LMW), and oxidation. Thus, variations in all samples were observed at the structural level after each 1000 h aging.

In neat SiR, loss in absorption peaks of symmetric C-H stretching of CH3 and symmetric bending of Si-CH3 occurred at ~2963–2960 and ~1280–1255 cm-1, respectively. After 1000 h, absorption peak representing symmetric C-H stretching of CH3 decreased by 17.7% and remained at the same intensity until the end of test. Si-CH3 symmetric bending also showed decrease, and at the end of 2000 h, a maximum reduction of 27.1% was recorded. However, after 2000 h, this peak increased intensity to almost 86.5% of virgin and maintained this absorption until 5000 h. Similarly, absorption peaks representing other important groups also decreased. At the end of the test, absorption peaks of Si-O-C stretching at ~1110–1050 cm-1, Si-O-Si asymmetric stretching at ~1130–1000 cm-1, and Si-O of O-Si(CH3)3 decreased by 14.9%, 18.75%, and 25%, respectively. Table 4 shows the absorption peaks of different groups in neat SiR at relevant wave-numbers from 0 (virgin) to 5000 h.

Table 4:

Absorption peaks in neat SiR from virgin to 5000 h.

GroupWavebandAbsorbance
Virgin1000 h2000 h3000 h4000 h5000 h
Symmetric C-H stretching of CH3~2963–29600.060.050.0450.050.050.05
Si-CH3 symmetric bending~1280–12550.370.350.270.3250.320.32
Si-O-C stretching~1110–10500.470.420.40.450.40.4
Si-O-Si asymmetric stretching~1130–10000.80.80.720.820.70.65
Si-O of O-Si(CH3)3~870–8500.20.170.150.20.180.15
Si-O of O-Si(CH3)2-O~840–79011.050.9210.820.75
Si- of Si-(CH3)3~7000.250.20.150.20.220.15

Not only decrease at different wave-numbers occurred in neat SiR, but bond shifting was also recorded (i.e. after aging, molecules changed their vibrational frequency as can be observed from the absorption form spectrographs given in Figure 8A–F).

Figure 8: FTIR spectrographs of neat SiR: (A) virgin, (B) 1000 h aged, (C) 2000 h aged, (D) 3000 h aged, (E) 4000 h aged, and (F) 5000 h aged.
Figure 8:

FTIR spectrographs of neat SiR: (A) virgin, (B) 1000 h aged, (C) 2000 h aged, (D) 3000 h aged, (E) 4000 h aged, and (F) 5000 h aged.

The absorption peak of symmetric stretching of methyl increased at 4000 h in nanocomposite with SNC-2.5 but came down to same point of virgin sample, and 20.4% reduction in Si-CH3 was recorded after 5000 h aging. The absorption peaks of other important groups were also reduced. At the end of the test, the absorption peaks of Si-O-C stretching at ~1110–1050 cm-1, Si-O-Si asymmetric stretching at ~1130–1000 cm-1, and Si-O of O-Si(CH3)3 decreased by 11.8%, 25%, and 10.6%, respectively. Table 5 shows the absorption peaks of the different groups in SNC-2.5 at relevant wave-numbers from 0 (virgin) to 5000 h.

Table 5:

Absorption peaks in SNC-2.5 from virgin to 5000 h.

GroupWavebandAbsorbance
Virgin1000 h2000 h3000 h4000 h5000 h
Symmetric C-H stretching of CH3~2963–29600.050.050.070.070.080.05
Si-CH3 symmetric bending~1280–12550.320.350.320.320.350.255
Si-O-C stretching~1110–10500.450.50.450.450.470.352
Si-O-Si asymmetric stretching~1130–10000.80.80.770.80.80.6
Si-O of O-Si(CH3)3~870–8500.170.20.20.20.160.152
Si-O of O-Si(CH3)2-O~840–7900.9710.950.970.950.702
Si- of Si-(CH3)3~7000.20.220.210.20.220.157

Unlike neat SiR, less reduction in many absorption peaks occurred and no bond shifting took place, as given in the overlayered form FTIR spectrographs of SNC-2.5 in Figure 9A–F.

Figure 9: FTIR spectrographs of SNC-2.5: (A) virgin, (B) 1000 h aged, (C) 2000 h aged, (D) 3000 h aged, (E) 4000 h aged, and (F) 5000 h aged.
Figure 9:

FTIR spectrographs of SNC-2.5: (A) virgin, (B) 1000 h aged, (C) 2000 h aged, (D) 3000 h aged, (E) 4000 h aged, and (F) 5000 h aged.

Despite the initial decrease during 1000–3000 h, the absorption peak of symmetric C-H stretching of CH3 at wave number ~2963–2960 cm-1 remained intact in SNC-5 until the end. Symmetric bending of Si-CH3 at wave number ~1280–1255 cm-1 showed an increase of 6.75% after 5000 h aging. This increase and intactness of methyl group on the surface shows the transfer of methyl group from bulk to surface, which also contributed the excellent hydrophobic behavior to SNC-5, which was recorded during STRI hydrophobicity analysis. The peak representing Si-O-Si and Si-O of O-Si(CH3)2-O3 also increased in absorption, which may be due to the formation of 2D/3D Si-O bonds. This increase may be attributed due to the cross-linking of SiR either by Si-CH2-Si or by Si-O. The other absorption peaks also reduced lesser compared to SNC-2.5 and neat SiR. Si-O-C stretching at ~1110–1050 cm-1, Si-O of O-Si(CH3)3 at ~870–850 cm-1, and Si- of Si-(CH3)3 at ~700 cm-1 reduced only by 4.3%, 10%, and 4.8% at the end of 5000 h. Table 6 shows the absorption peaks of the different groups in SNC-5 at relevant wave-numbers from 0 (virgin) to 5000 h. The spectrographs of SNC-5 obtained after each 1000 h are given in Figure 10A–F.

Table 6:

Absorption peaks in SNC-5 from virgin to 5000 h.

GroupWavebandAbsorbance
Virgin1000 h2000 h3000 h4000 h5000 h
Symmetric C-H stretching of CH3~2963–29600.060.050.010.050.070.06
Si-CH3 symmetric bending~1280–12550.320.320.270.320.320.34
Si-O-C stretching~1110–10500.470.450.40.450.450.45
Si-O-Si asymmetric stretching~1130–10000.80.820.750.770.810.82
Si-O of O-Si(CH3)3~870–8500.20.210.150.20.20.18
Si-O of O-Si(CH3)2-O~840–7900.951.00.920.951.021.02
Si- of Si-(CH3)3~7000.210.20.150.210.210.2
Figure 10: FTIR spectrographs: of SNC-5: (A) virgin, (B) 1000 h aged, (C) 2000 h aged, (D) 3000 h aged, (E) 4000 h aged, and (F) 5000 h aged.
Figure 10:

FTIR spectrographs: of SNC-5: (A) virgin, (B) 1000 h aged, (C) 2000 h aged, (D) 3000 h aged, (E) 4000 h aged, and (F) 5000 h aged.

The reason for the least changes in SNC-5 is the optimum loading of SiO2. The nanosilica not only provides strength and improves other required properties but also the presence of silanol groups in SiO2 that interact with polymer matrix at the nanolevel. Therefore, scission and bond shifting occurred much lower in nanocomposites compared to neat RTV-SiR.

4.5 SEM

The surface study of an aged polymer insulating material at the microlevel is important to analyze the extent of degradation. Figure 11A shows the SEM images of virgin samples and Figure 11B shows the SEM images of 5000 h aged samples. The effect of surface degradation can be observed from these images. The surfaces of all samples were affected by the stresses applied. However, the level of degradation was much less in nanocomposites compared to neat SiR. After 5000 h aging, the surface of neat SiR was found more irregular and nonhomogenous accompanied with holes in comparison to virgin sample. From the SEM image taken after 5000 h aging in Figure 11B, loss of materials, erosion, and cracking were observed in neat SiR. At the end of the aging test, loss of materials and minor holes at microscale were also observed in SNC-2.5. As can be observed in Figure 11B, there were no prominent signs of cracking at the 1 μm scale. In Figure 11A and B, respectively, it is evident that SNC-5 showed less changes having better surface topography compared to neat SiR and SNC-2.5 at the microlevel, having only risings at some points.

Figure 11: SEM images virgin of 5000 h aged samples of neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5: (A) virgin and (B) 5000 h aged.
Figure 11:

SEM images virgin of 5000 h aged samples of neat SiR, SNC-2.5, and SNC-5: (A) virgin and (B) 5000 h aged.

The SEM results also almost matched with FTIR and hydrophobicity classification. The reason for better surface topography of SNC-5 is the presence of abundant silanol groups on the surface, which is the reason of the intactness/bonding of main polymer molecules. This is also evident from FTIR results in which the absorption peaks of methyl groups on the surface do not reduce with aging.

5 Conclusion

In this work, SiR nanocomposites with SNC-2.5 and SNC-5 prepared by mechanical mixing and ultrasonication method were subjected to 5000 h accelerated multistress aging in a specially fabricated accelerated weathering chamber along with neat RTV-SiR. Random variations in LC, hydrophobicity, and absorption peaks of important groups were recorded during the entire aging period. In comparison to neat SiR, nanocomposites showed better performance. During periodic visual inspection, increasing opacity was recorded in all samples. SNC-2.5 showed less LC, better hydrophobicity, smoother surface at the microlevel, and less loss in absorption peaks of important groups in comparison to neat SiR. In addition, nanocomposite with SNC-5 showed better performance compared to SNC-2.5. SNC-5 showed 0.6 μA LC and HC-1 at the end of 5000 h. FTIR results also showed increase and intactness of hydrophobic methyl groups. SEM studies also concurred with FTIR, LC analysis, and hydrophobicity analysis. The nanocomposite with SNC-5 showed better surface morphology at the microlevel in comparison to other SiR formulations. A 5% loading of nanosilica is optimum. At this concentration, SiO2 is abundant, and if it is finely dispersed, then the loss of LMWs and scission of polymer molecules from the surface is greatly decreased due to the strong bonding of silanol groups present on the surface of nanosilica with the siloxane chain of SiR. Therefore, for enhanced performance and lifetime, nanosilica (up to 5%) is recommended for RTV-SiR/SiO2 nanocomposites.

References

[1] Mackevich J, Shah M. IEEE Electr. Insul. Mag. 1997, 13, 5–12.10.1109/57.591510Search in Google Scholar

[2] Yang L, Hao Y, Li L. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2012, 19.10.1109/TDEI.2012.6311528Search in Google Scholar

[3] Ehsani M, Borsi H, Gockenbach E, Morshedian J, Bakhshandeh GR. Eur. Polym. J. 2004, 40, 2495–2503.10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.03.014Search in Google Scholar

[4] Nasrat LS, Hamed AF, Hamid MA, Mansour SH. Egypt. J. Petrol. 2013, 22, 1–8.10.1016/j.ejpe.2012.11.011Search in Google Scholar

[5] Tocháček J, Vrátníčková Z. Polym. Test. 2014, 36, 82–87.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.03.019Search in Google Scholar

[6] Li Z, Moon K-S, Yao Y, Hansen K, Watkins K, Morato L, Wong CP. Carbon 2013, 65, 71–79.10.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.105Search in Google Scholar

[7] Wang W, Yue CP, He DX, Yang K, Chen SK. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2014, 57, 738–746.10.1007/s11431-014-5481-9Search in Google Scholar

[8] Amin M, Amin S. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2014, 36, 29–39.10.17826/cutf.61744Search in Google Scholar

[9] Pickett JE, Coyle DJ. Polym. Degrad. Stabil. 2013, 98, 1311–1320.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.04.001Search in Google Scholar

[10] Amin M, Akbar M, Matsuoka R. In Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Properties and Application of Dielectric Materials, Bali, Indonesia, June 2006, pp. 611–614.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Deroiné M, Le Duigou A, Corre Y-M, Le Gac P-Y, Davies P, César G, Bruzaud S. Polym. Test. 2014, 39, 70–78.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.07.018Search in Google Scholar

[12] Cangialosi D, Boucher VM, Alegría A, Colmenero J. Soft Matter 2013, 9, 8619–8630.10.1039/c3sm51077hSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Marzec A, Laskowska A, Boiteux G, Zaborski M, Gain O, Serghei A. In Macromolecular Symposia, Wiley Blackwell: Salerno, Italy, vol. 342, 2014, pp. 25–34.10.1002/masy.201300231Search in Google Scholar

[14] Vilar G, Fernández-Rosas E, Puntes V, Jamier V, Aubouy L, Vázquez-Campos S. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 439, IOP Publishing, 2013, p 012044.10.1088/1742-6596/429/1/012044Search in Google Scholar

[15] Zhu YJ, Zhang J, Jing B, Tan YB. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 781, 431–435.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.781-784.431Search in Google Scholar

[16] Manfred W, Siegfried N. U.S. Patent 2,999,077, issued September 5, 1961.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Grill A, Patel VV, McConnell Gates S. U.S. Patent 6,479,110, issued November 12, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Braley S. Ann. NY. Acad. Sci. 1968, 146, 148–157.10.1111/j.1749-6632.1968.tb20279.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Reynders JP, Jandrell IR, Reynders SM. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 1999, 6, 620–631.10.1109/TDEI.1999.9286749Search in Google Scholar

[20] Meguriya N. U.S. Patent 6,552,096, issued April 22, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Nakamura T, Hirabayashi S. U.S. Patent 5,582,885, issued December 10, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Shimizu K, Watanabe T, Hamada M. U.S. Patent 4,360,566, issued November 23, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Brown JB, Fryer MP, Randall P, Lu M. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1953, 12, 374–376.10.1097/00006534-195311000-00007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Lothongkam C, Siebler D, Heidmann G, Plath R, Gockenbach R. In Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Electrical Insulating Materials (ISEIM), IEEE, 2014, pp. 346–349.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Locko GA, Frihart CR. U.S. Patent 4,703,070, issued October 27, 1987.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Pietsch H, Kartheus H, Holtzmann H-J, Sachau G, Reul H. U.S. Patent 4,778,461, issued October 18, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Lammers PC. U.S. Patent 3,542,900, issued November 24, 1970.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Bian S, Jayaram S, Cherney EA. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2012, 19, 777–785.10.1109/TDEI.2012.6215080Search in Google Scholar

[29] Kim SH, Cherney EA, Hackam R. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 1991, 6, 1549–1556.10.1109/61.97691Search in Google Scholar

[30] Vas JV, Venkatesulu B, Joy Thomas M. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2012, 19, 91–98.10.1109/TDEI.2012.6148506Search in Google Scholar

[31] Bian S, Jayaram SH, Cherney EA. In 2012 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena (CEIDP), IEEE, 2012, pp. 741–744.10.1109/CEIDP.2012.6378887Search in Google Scholar

[32] Amin M. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2013, 34, 173–184.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Saldivar-Guerrero R, Hernández-Corona R, Lopez-Gonzalez FA, Rejón-García L, Romero-Baizabal V. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2014, 117, 202–209.10.1016/j.epsr.2014.08.019Search in Google Scholar

[34] Seyedmehdi SA, Zhang H, Zhu J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 2972–2976.10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.11.020Search in Google Scholar

[35] Du B, Li Z. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2015, 22, 934–940.10.1109/TDEI.2015.7076794Search in Google Scholar

[36] Momen G, Farzaneh M. Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2011, 27, 1–13.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Fabiani D, Montanari GC, Krivda A, Schmidt LE, Hollertz R. In 2010 10th IEEE Int. Conf. Solid Dielectr., 2010, pp. 1–4.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Anhalt M, Weidenfeller B. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 119, 732–735.10.1002/app.32746Search in Google Scholar

[39] El-Hag AH, Jayaram SH, Cherney EA. In 2004 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, 2004. CEIDP’04, IEEE, 2004, pp. 385–388.Search in Google Scholar

[40] El-Hag AH, Simon LC, Jayaram SH, Cherney EA. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2006, 13, 122–128.10.1109/TDEI.2006.1593410Search in Google Scholar

[41] Du BX, Li ZL. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2014, 21, 2602–2610.10.1109/TDEI.2014.004521Search in Google Scholar

[42] Du B, Han T, Su JG. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2014, 21, 1880–1886.10.1109/TDEI.2014.004312Search in Google Scholar

[43] Du B, Han T, Su JG. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2014, 21, 503–510.10.1109/TDEI.2013.004140Search in Google Scholar

[44] Dimitropoulou M, Pylarinos D, Siderakis K, Thalassinakis E, Danikas M. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 2015, 5, 764.10.48084/etasr.545Search in Google Scholar

[45] Ansorge S, Schmuck F, Papailiou K. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2015, 22, 979–988.10.1109/TDEI.2015.7076799Search in Google Scholar

[46] Javni I, Zhang W, Karajkov V, Petrovic ZS, Divjakovic V. J. Cell. Plast. 2002, 38, 229–239.10.1177/0021955X02038003139Search in Google Scholar

[47] Singha S, Joy Thomas M. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2008, 15, 12–23.10.1109/T-DEI.2008.4446732Search in Google Scholar

[48] Schadler LS. Polymer-Based and Polymer-Filled Nanocomposites. In: Nanocomposite Science and Technology. Wiley Blackwell, 2003. Online ISBN: 9783527602124.10.1002/3527602127.ch2Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-7-23
Accepted: 2016-2-6
Published Online: 2016-4-7
Published in Print: 2017-9-26

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 1.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/secm-2015-0327/html
Scroll to top button