Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 5, 2021

Design of 320 Gbps hybrid AMI-PDM-WDM FSO link and its performance comparison with traditional models under diverse weather conditions

  • Ruhin Chowdhury and A. K. M. Sharoar Jahan Choyon ORCID logo EMAIL logo

Abstract

A comprehensive design is proposed for alternate mark inversion (AMI)-encoded free-space optical (FSO) communication system by hybridizing polarization division multiplexing (PDM) with wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) and its performance is investigated under diverse weather conditions. The WDM transmitter comprises eight channels transmitting 320 Gbps data over the atmospheric turbulent channel considering gamma–gamma (G–G) distribution for the FSO channel model. A PDM-WDM technique not only maximizes the link capacity of the FSO system but also enhances the spectral efficiency (SE) of the system. Besides, the proposed hybrid AMI-PDM-WDM FSO system performance is compared with the traditional AMI-WDM-PDM and AMI-WDM models to demonstrate the advantages of our proposed model for the design of FSO link. It is observed that our proposed hybrid system exhibits excellent performance under diverse weather conditions over the traditional models in terms of Q factor, received optical power, bit error rate (BER), eye diagrams and optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR).


Corresponding author: A. K. M. Sharoar Jahan Choyon, Department of EECE, Military Institute of Science & Technology (MIST), Dhaka, Bangladesh, E-mail:
Ruhin Chowdhury and A. K. M. Sharoar Jahan Choyon contributed equally.

Acknowledgment

This work did not get any special grant from funding authorities in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

  1. Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission. Both authors contributed equally.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.

References

1. Al-Gailani, S, Mohammad, AB, Shaddad, R. Enhancement of free space optical link in heavy rain attenuation using multiple beam concept. Int J Light Electron Opt 2013;124:4798–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.01.098.Search in Google Scholar

2. Choyon, AKMSJ, Chowdhury, R, Chowdhury, SMR. Optimum link distance and BER performance investigation for BPSK RF sub-carrier coherent FSO communication system under strong turbulence. Int J Sci Technol Res 2020;9:282–7. http://www.ijstr.org/paper-references.php?ref=IJSTR-0920-41792.Search in Google Scholar

3. Chaudhary, S, Amphawan, A. The role and challenges of free-space optical systems. J Opt Commun 2014;35:327–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2014-0004.Search in Google Scholar

4. Kaushal, H, Kaddoum, G. Free space optical communication: challenges and mitigation techniques. arXiv preprint. arXiv: 1506.04836, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

5. Sharma, V. High speed CO-OFDM-FSO transmission system. Optik 2014;125:1761–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.10.010.Search in Google Scholar

6. Jiang, T, Zhao, L, Liu, H, Deng, D, Luo, A, Wei, Z, et al.. Performance improvement for mixed RF-FSO communication system by adopting hybrid subcarrier intensity modulation. Appl Sci 2019;9:3724. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9183724.Search in Google Scholar

7. Kishore, K, Srivastava, S, Shukla, NK, Chaudhary, S. High-speed 120 Gbps AMI-WDM-PDM free space optical transmission system. J Opt Commun 2017;40:429–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2017-0086.Search in Google Scholar

8. Khalighi, MA, Uysal, M. Survey on free space optical communication: a communication theory perspective. IEEE Comm Surve Tut 2014;16:2231–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2014.2329501.Search in Google Scholar

9. Toyoshima, M, Leeb, WR, Kunimori, H, Takano, T. Comparison of microwave and light wave communication system in space applications. Opt Eng 2007;46:015003. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2432881.Search in Google Scholar

10. Chaudhary, S, Chaudhary, N, Sharma, S, Choudhary, BC. High speed inter-satellite communication system by incorporating hybrid polarization-wavelength division multiplexing scheme. J Opt Commun 2016;39:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2016-0107.Search in Google Scholar

11. Wang, J, Lv, J, Zhao, G, Wang, G. Free-space laser communication system with rapid acquisition based on astronomical telescopes. Optic Express 2015;23:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.23.020655.Search in Google Scholar

12. Sharma, V, Sushank, C. High speed CO-OFDM-FSO transmission system. Optik 2014;125:1761–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.10.010.Search in Google Scholar

13. Grover, M, Singh, P, Kaur, P, Madhu, C. Multibeam WDM-FSO system: an optimum solution for clear and hazy weather conditions. Wireless Pers Commun 2017;97:5783–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4810-2.Search in Google Scholar

14. Robinson, S, Jasmine, S. Performance analysis of hybrid WDM-FSO system under various weather conditions. Frequenz 2016;70:433–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/freq-2015-0287.Search in Google Scholar

15. Hossain, F. Impact of travelling wave semiconductor optical amplifier on WDM-FSO system under fog attenuation. Int J Sci Res 2014;3:235–8. https://www.ijsr.net/search_index_results_paperid.php?id=20131407.Search in Google Scholar

16. Parkash, S, Sharma, A, Singh, HP, Singh, H. Performance investigation of 40 GB/s DWDM over free space optical communication system using RZ modulation format. Adv Opt Technol 2016;2016:4217302–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4217302.Search in Google Scholar

17. Zhao, L, Chi, X, Li, P, Guan, L. A MPR optimization algorithm for FSO communication system with star topology. Optic Commun 2015;356:147–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2015.07.050.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kaur, G, Srivastava, D, Singh, P, Parasher, Y. Development of a novel hybrid PDM/OFDM technique for FSO system and its performance analysis. Optic Laser Technol 2019;109:256–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.08.008.Search in Google Scholar

19. Choyon, AKMSJ, Chowdhury, SMR, Majumder, SP. Performance of a CPDM QPSK coherent homodyne optical transmission system due to cross polarization effects. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer, Communication, Chemical. Materials & Electronic Engineering, Rajshahi; 2018, pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC4ME2.2018.8465664.Search in Google Scholar

20. Choyon, AKMSJ, Chowdhury, SMR, Chowdhury, R. Performance analysis of a CPDM-QPSK direct detection optical transmission system under the effects of cross-polarization. In:IEEE International Conference on Advances in Science. Engineering and Robotics Technology, Dhaka; 2019, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASERT.2019.8934494.Search in Google Scholar

21. Choyon, AKMSJ, Chowdhury, R, Chowdhury, SMR, Taher, KA. Cross-polarization induced crosstalk impact analysis on the BER performance of 100-Gbps CPDM 8-QAM CO-FOC system over unrepeatered 100-km SSMF link. Results Opt 2020;1:100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rio.2020.100012.Search in Google Scholar

22. Choyon, AKMSJ, Chowdhury, R, Chowdhury, SMR. Performance evaluation of CPDM 8-QAM for faster direct detection fiber optic communication system under the effects of cross-polarization. In: IEEE International conference on signal processing, information, communication and systems (SPICSCON). Dhaka; 2019:1–4 pp. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPICSCON48833.2019.9065096.Search in Google Scholar

23. Chaudhary, S, Sharma, A, Chaudhary, N. 6 × 20 Gbps Hybrid WDM–PI inter-satellite system under the influence of transmitting pointing errors. J Opt Commun 2016;37:345–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2015-0099.Search in Google Scholar

24. Bansal, U, Kaur, K, Chaudhary, S. Role of laser linewidth in high speed DWDM system by incorporating duo-binary modulation scheme. Int J Comput Appl 2015;109:30–2. https://doi.org/10.5120/19267-1042.Search in Google Scholar

25. Shatnawi, AA, Bin Mohd Warip, MN, Safar, AM. Influence of transmitting pointing errors on high speed WDM-AMI-Is-OWC transmission system. J Opt Commun 2016;39:123–8. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2016-0117.Search in Google Scholar

26. Mohammed, HA. 320 Gbps free space optic communication system deploying ultra dense wavelength division multiplexing and polarization mode division multiplexing. J Opt Commun 2022;43:137–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2018-0182.Search in Google Scholar

27. Alsemmeari, RA, Bakhsh, ST, Alsemmeari, H. Free space optics versus radio frequency wireless communication. Int J Infor Tech Comp Sci 2016;8:1–6. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2016.09.01.Search in Google Scholar

28. Andrews, LC, Phillips, RL. Laser beam propagation through random media. Bellingham: SPIE Press; 2005. p. 103–5.Search in Google Scholar

29. Choyon, AKMSJ, Chowdhury, R. Performance comparison of free-space optical (FSO) communication link under OOK, BPSK, DPSK, QPSK and 8-PSK modulation formats in the presence of strong atmospheric turbulence. J Opt Commun, 2023;44:s763–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/joc-2019-0250.Search in Google Scholar

30. Sackinger, E. Broadband circuits for optical fiber communication. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2005. p. 51–2.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-06-16
Accepted: 2020-09-23
Published Online: 2021-01-05

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 31.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2020-0135/html
Scroll to top button