Abstract
Clinical reasoning is the cognitive process that nurses use to gather and incorporate information into a larger bank of personal knowledge. This incorporated information guides therapeutic actions, and helps determine client care. Since the process guides therapeutic actions regarding client care, failure to use the process effectively leads to poor clinical decision-making, inappropriate actions, or inaction. Because of the criticality of this process, this paper presents an analysis of the literature that reveals the current state of the science of clinical reasoning, identifies gaps in knowledge, and elucidates areas for future research. A systematic review of the databases the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), PsychInfo, the Education Full Text (H.W. Wilson), and PubMed revealed 873 articles on the topic of clinical reasoning. Quality appraisal narrowed the field to 27 pieces of literature. Appendix A gives the State of the Science Coding Sheet used to identify the selections used in this research. Appendix B contains a summary of this literature. Although analysis of this literature shows that three theories exist on how to utilize most effectively the clinical reasoning process presently; a clear consistent definition is lacking. Additional research should focus on closing gaps that exist in defining the process, understanding the process, establishing linkages to non-clinical reasoning processes, and developing measures to both develop and accurately measure clinical reasoning.
References
Aiken, L., Clarke, S., Cheung, R., Sloan, D., & Silber, J. (2003). Educational levels of hospital nurses and surgical patient mortality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290, 1617–1623.10.1001/jama.290.12.1617Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
American Nurses Association (2015). Four health care trends that will affect American nurses. Retrieved from http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/Career-Center/Resources/4-Health-Care-Trends-That-Will-Affect-American-Nurses.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
Andersson, N., Klang, B., & Petersson, G. (2012). Differences in clinical reasoning among nurses working in highly specialised paediatric care. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21, 870–879. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03935.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Banning, M. (2008). Clinical reasoning and its application to nursing: Concepts and research studies. Nurse Education in Practice, 8, 177–183. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2007.06.004Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Bartlett, R., Rossen, E., & Benfield, S. (2008). Evaluation of the outcome - present state test model as a way to teach clinical reasoning. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(8), 337–344.10.3928/01484834-20080801-01Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Benner, P. (1982). From novice to expert. American Journal of Nursing, 82(3), 402–407.Search in Google Scholar
Benner, P., Sutphen, M., Leonard, V., & Day, L. (2010). Educating nurses: A call for radical transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar
Benner, P., & Tanner, C. (1987). Clinical judgment: How expert nurses use intuition. American Journal of Nursing, 87(1), 23–31.10.2307/3470396Search in Google Scholar
Bland, A., Rossen, E., Bartlett, R., Kautz, D., Carnevale, T., & Benfield, S. (2009). Implementation and testing of the OPT model as a teaching strategy in an undergraduate psychiatric nursing course. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(1), 14–21.Search in Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2016). Occupational outlook handbook. (2016–17 Registered Nurses ed.). Retrieved from. http://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/registered-nurses.htmSearch in Google Scholar
Clarke, S. P., & Aiken, L. H. (2003). Failure to rescue: Needless deaths are prime examples of the need for more nurses at the bedside. American Journal of Nursing, 103(1), 42–47.10.1097/00000446-200301000-00020Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Dawson, T., Comer, L., Kossick, M., & Neubrander, J. (2014). Can scripts concordance testing be used in nursing education to accurately assess clinical reasoning skills? Journal of Nursing Education, 53(5), 281–286. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/0148434-20140321-03Search in Google Scholar
Del Bueno, D. (2005). A crisis in critical thinking. Nursing Education Perspectives, 26(5), 278–282.Search in Google Scholar
Deschenes, M., Charlin, B., Ganong, R., & Goudreau, J. (2011). Use of a scripts concordance test to assess development of clinical reasoning in nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(7), 381–387. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-201110331-03Search in Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1985). Mind over machine: the power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York, NY: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar
Forsberg, E., Ziegert, K., Hult, H., & Fors, U. (2016). Assessing progression of clinical reasoning through virtual patients: An exploratory study. Nurse Education in Practice, 16, 97–103. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.09.0061471-5953/Search in Google Scholar
Greenwood, J. (1998). Theoretical approaches to the study of nurses’ clinical reasoning: Getting things clear. Contemporary Nurse, 7(3), 110–116. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5172/conu.1998.7.3.110Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Greenwood, J. (2000). Critical thinking and nursing scripts: The case for the development of both. Journal of Advance Nursing, 31(2), 428–436.10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01283.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Greenwood, J., & King, M. (1995). Some surprising similarities in the clinical reasoning of ’expert’ and ’novice’ orthopaedic [sic] nurses: Report of a study using verbal protocols and protocol analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22, 907–913.10.1111/j.1365-2648.1995.tb02642.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Greenwood, J., Sullivan, J., Spence, K., & McDonald, M. (2000). Nursing scripts and the organizational influences on critical thinking: Report of a study of neonatal nurses’ clinical reasoning. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(5), 1106–1114.10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01378.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Grobe, S., Drew, J., & Fonteyn, M. (1991). A descriptive analysis of experienced nurses’ clinical reasoning during a planning task. Research in Nursing and Health, 14, 305–314.10.1002/nur.4770140409Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Harmon, M., & Thompson, C. (2015). Clinical reasoning in pre-licensure nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 10, 63–70. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2014.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Hoffman, K., Dempsey, J., Levett-Jones, T., Noble, D., Hickey, N., Jeong, S., … Norton, C. (2011). The design and implementation of an Interactive Computerised [sic] Decision Support Framework (ICDSF) as a strategy to improve nursing students’ clinical reasoning skills. Nurse Education Today, 31, 587–594. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Jensen, R. (2013). Clinical reasoning during simulation: Comparison of student and faculty ratings. Nurse Education in Practice, 13, 23–28. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.07.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Kautz, D., Kuiper, R., Bartlett, R., Buck, R., Williams, R., & Knight-Brown, P. (2009). Building evidence for the development of clinical reasoning using a rating tool with the Outcome-Present State-Test (OPT) model. Southern Online Journal of Nursing Research, 9(1).Search in Google Scholar
Kautz, D. D., Kuiper, R. A., Pesut, D. J., Knight-Brown, P., & Daneker, D. (2005). Promoting clinical reasoning in undergraduate nursing students: Application and evaluation of the outcome present state test (OPT) model of clinical reasoning. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 2(1), 1–19.10.2202/1548-923X.1052Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Kirkevold, M. (1997). Integrative nursing research - an important strategy to further the development of nursing science and nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 977–984.10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025977.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Kuiper, R., Pesut, D., & Kautz, D. (2009). Promoting self-regulation of clinical reasoning skills in nursing students. The Open Nursing Journal, 3, 76–85.10.2174/1874434600903010076Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Kuiper, R. A. (2013). Integration of innovative clinical reasoning pedagogies into a Baccalaureate nursing curriculum. Creative Nursing, 19(3), 128–139. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1078-4535.19.3.12BSearch in Google Scholar
Kuiper, R. A., Heinrich, C., Matthias, A., Graham, M. J., & Bell-Kotwall, L. (2008). Debriefing with the OPT model of clinical reasoning during high fidelity patient simulation. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5(1), 1–14. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.1466Search in Google Scholar
Kuiper, R. A., & Pesut, D. J. (2004). Promoting cognitive and metacognitive reflective reasoning skills in nursing practice: Self-Regulated learning theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(4), 381–391.10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02921.xSearch in Google Scholar
Lapkin, S., Levett-Jones, T., Bellchambers, H., & Fernandez, R. (2010). Effectiveness of patient simulation manikins in teaching clinical reasoning skills to undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 6, e207e222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2010.05.005Search in Google Scholar
Lasater, K. (2007). Clinical judgment development: Using simulation to create an assessment rubric. Journal of Nursing Education, 46(11), 469–503.Search in Google Scholar
Levett-Jones, T., Hoffman, K., Dempsey, J., Jeong, S. Y., Noble, D., Norton, C. A., … Hickey, N. (2010). The ’five rights’ of clinical reasoning: An educational model to enhance nursing students’ ability to identify and manage clinically ’at risk’ patients. Nurse Education Today, 30, 515–520. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.10.020Search in Google Scholar
Liou, S., Liu, H., Tsai, H., Tsai, Y., Lin, Y., Chang, C., & Cheng, C. (2016). The development and psychometric testing of a theory-based instrument to evaluate nurses’ perception of clinical reasoning competence. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(3), 707–717. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jan.12831Search in Google Scholar
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar
Norman, G. (2005). Research in clinical reasoning: Past history and current trends. Medical Education, 39, 418–427.10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02127.xSearch in Google Scholar
Pesut, D., & Herman, J. (1998). OPT: Transformation of nursing process for contemporary practice. Nursing Outlook, 46(1), 29–35.10.1016/S0029-6554(98)90022-7Search in Google Scholar
Pesut, D., & Herman, J. (1999). Clinical reasoning the art and science of critical and creative thinking. Albany, NY: Delmar Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Purling, A., & King, L. (2012). A literature review: Graduate nurses’ prepardness for recognising and responding to the deteriorating patient. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21, 3451–3465. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04348.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Schweitzer, T. (2008). Thought processes and factors influencing recently graduated registered nurses’ clinical reasoning (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3332185).Search in Google Scholar
Sedgwick, M. G., Griggs, L., & Dersch, S. (2014). Deepening the quality of clinical reasoning and decision-making in rural hospital nursing practice. Rural and Remote Health, 14(3), 1–12.10.22605/RRH2858Search in Google Scholar
Simmons, B. (2010). Clinical reasoning: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1151–1158. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05262.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Simmons, B., Lanuza, D., Fonteyn, M., Hicks, F., & Holm, K. (2003). Clinical reasoning in experienced nurses. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(6), 701–719. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193945903253092Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Tanner, C. A. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research - based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 204–211.10.3928/01484834-20060601-04Search in Google Scholar PubMed
Taylor, C. (2000). Clinical problem-solving in nursing: Insights from the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(4), 842–849.10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01342.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Victor-Chmil, J. (2013). Critical thinking versus clinical reasoning versus clinical judgment: Differential diagnosis. Nurse Educator, 38(1), 34–36. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e318276dfbeSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
Whittemore, R. (2005). Combining evidence in nursing research: Methods and implications. Nursing Research, 54(1), 56–62.10.1097/00006199-200501000-00008Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
