Abstract
Issues of production, translation and transformation of texts are explored in the light of the differences between modern Western legal thought and Chinese views of legal rationality. Contemporary Chinese culture is often viewed with suspicion. On the one hand, Chinese thinking is mistrusted as influenced by the Confucian world view regarded as deeply irrational. On the other hand, China’s economical practises are often suspected of mere reproducing and copying. This paper is concerned neither with alleged or factual deficiencies of China’s legal rationality nor with violations of “intellectual property” or other rights or the governmental policies of the People’s Republic of China. My interest is the fact that accusation and concern for the Chinese practises of creation and transformation by copying and cloning seem to hit the nerve of Western modernity’s cult of authenticity. The very problem, the paper suggests, is our modern relation to the other and to the others. I will argue this in three steps: the first part starts from a discussion of ‘shanzhai’, the Chinese neologism pointing to alternative ways of production, before analysing the Western scandalization of plagiarism; drawing upon studies from various disciplines, specific aspects of writing and scripture, such as the the differentiation between real text and fiction, the idea of authentic speaking and the distinction between textual and functional equivalents, are explored. The second part is first about the role of truth and truthfulness in modern Western art and philosophy, then about the interpenetration of wisdom and cunning in ancient Greek and Chinese thought. The final part addresses the relation of reasonable knowledge and instrumental rationality in legal thinking. The Chinese notion of ‘quan’, law, is described as a jurisgenetic path of law. Against this background, open questions associated with legal “transplants” come to the fore.
About the author
Claudius Messner, Dr. iur et phil., is Associate Professor of the Philosophy of Law at the University of Salento, Lecce, Italy. He studied Philosophy, Psychology and Law in Saarbrücken (Germany) and Brno (Czechia). He has taught at the universities of Saarbrücken and Berne (Switzerland). He has widely published on various issues. His main areas of work are currently legal and social philosophy and issues of legal aesthetics.
References
Aristotle. 1980. The Nicomachean ethics. Oxford: Oxford UP.10.1093/oseo/instance.00258622Search in Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.Search in Google Scholar
Baxandall, Michael. 1972. Painting and experience in fifteenth century Italy. London Oxford: Oxford UP.Search in Google Scholar
Baxandall, Michael. 1985. Patterns of intention: On the historical explanation of pictures. New Haven: Yale UP.Search in Google Scholar
Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The wealth of networks how social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven and London: Yale UP.Search in Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2013. Jurisgenerative constitutionalism: Procedural principles for managing global legal pluralism. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2). 665–695. https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.20.2.665.Search in Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. 1979. Ausblick auf eine Theorie der Unbegrifflichkeit. In: Schiffbruch mit Zuschauer: Paradigma einer Daseinsmetapher, 75–93. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. 1998. Paradigmen zu einer Metaphorologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Cao, Deborah. 2008. Is the Chinese legal language more ambiguous and vaguer? In Anne Wagner & Sophie Cacciaguidi-Fahi (eds.), Obscurity and clarity in the law: Prospects and challenges, 109–125. Aldershot: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar
Celan, Paul. 2000. Der Meridian (1960). In Gesammelte Werke in sieben Bänden Dritter Band, 197–202. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre. 1968. Dictionnaire etymologique de la langue grecque. Histoire des mots. Paris: Klinksieck.Search in Google Scholar
Cooke, Elizabeth F. 2018. Peirce on musement. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy (X-2). Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/1370, https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.1370.Search in Google Scholar
Constable, Marianne. 2005. Just silences: The limits and possibilities of modern law. Princeton Oxford: Princeton UP.Search in Google Scholar
Courtois, Julie. 2018. La règle de droit en Chine: d’un concept hybride à une application judiciaire pragmatique. Lyon: Université Jean Moulin. Available at: http://www.theses.fr/2018LYSE3054.Search in Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M. 1983. The supreme court, 1982 term. Foreword: Nomos and narrative. Harvard Law Review 97(4). 4–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340787.Search in Google Scholar
Darrieussecq, Marie. 2010. Rapport de police: Accusations de plagiat et autres modes de surveillance de la fiction. Paris: P.O.L.Search in Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles. 1990. Post-scriptum sur les sociétés de contrôle. In Pourparlers 1972–1990, 240–247. Paris: Les éeditions de Minuit.Search in Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2007. Psyche: Inventions of the other. In Peggy Kamuf & Elizabeth Rottenberg (eds.), vol. I, 1–48. Stanford: Stanford UP. (or. Psyche: Inventions de l’autre, tomes I et II, Paris 1987).Search in Google Scholar
Détienne, Marcel & Jean-Pierre Vernant. 1974. Les ruses de l’intelligence. La mètis des Grecs. Paris: Flammarion.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1979. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana UP.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1995. The role of the reader. Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: Indiana UP.Search in Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 2003. Dire quasi la stessa cosa. Esperienze di traduzione. Milano: Bompiani.Search in Google Scholar
Eychenne, Fabien. 2012. Un écosytème d’innovation singulier: les Shan Zhai. http://www.internetactu.net/2012/07/04/un-ecosyteme-d%e2% 80%99innovation-singulier-les-shan-zhai/ (accessed 9 June 2020).Search in Google Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha M. 2018. Wars of law. Unintended consequences in the regulation of armed conflict. Ithaca and London: Cornell UP.10.1515/9781501719790Search in Google Scholar
Gearey, Adam. 2001. Law and aesthetics. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local knowledge. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
German dictionary by Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm. 1854. 16 volumes in 32 part-volumes. Leipzig 1854–1961. List of sources Leipzig 1971. Online version from 05.07.2020. vol. 13, col. 1882.Search in Google Scholar
Grünbein, D. 2012. Dichtung legt sich nicht mit der Realität an. FAZ, 25 May.Search in Google Scholar
Han, Byung-Chul. 2011. Shanzhai: Dekonstruktion auf Chinesisch. Berlin: Merve.Search in Google Scholar
Heffernan, James A. W. 1993. Museum of words: The poetics of ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery. Chicago: Chicago UP.Search in Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1970. Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte. In Eva Moldenhauer and K. M. Michel (eds.), Werke in zwanzig Bänden, vol. 12, 165. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Heine, Heinrich. 1979. Zur Geschichte der Religion und Philosophie in Deutschland (1834). In Manfred Windfuhr (ed.), Historisch-kritische Gesamtausgabe der Werke in 16 Bänden, vol. 8, 112. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.Search in Google Scholar
Hennessey, William. 2012. Deconstructing shanzhai – China’s copycat counter-culture: Catch me if you can. Campbell Law Review 34(3). 609–660.Search in Google Scholar
IfM Centre for International Manufacturing. 2009. Shan-Zhai: Alternative manufacturing – making the unaffordable affordable. CIM Briefing 1.Search in Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1988. Étrangers à nous-mêmes. Paris: Fayard.Search in Google Scholar
Lastowka, Greg. 2010. Property outlaws, rebel mythologies, and social bandits. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 20(2). 377–391.Search in Google Scholar
Ledderose, Lothar. 2000. Ten thousand things: Module and mass production in Chinese art. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton UP.10.1515/9780691252889Search in Google Scholar
Lin, Duan & Tsai, Po-Fang. 2013. Max Weber’s traditional Chinese law revisited: A poly-contextuality in the sociology of law. Taiwan Journal of East Asian Studies 10(2). 33–69.Search in Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. 1994. Legal reasoning and legal theory, 2nd ed. (1978). Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198763840.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Mao, LuMing. 2003. Reflective encounters: Illustrating comparative rhetoric. Style 37(4). 401–424.Search in Google Scholar
Messner, Claudius. 1998. Das Subjekt als Horizont. Zur Repräsentation von Individuum und Gesellschaft im philosophischen Diskurs. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Search in Google Scholar
Messner, Claudius. 2005. Übertragungen. Zum Staats- und der Familienroman der Modernen. Rechtsgeschichte. Zeitschrift des Max-Planck-Instituts für europäische Rechtsgeschichte 7. 62–73.10.12946/rg07/062-073Search in Google Scholar
Messner, Claudius. 2016. Orientamenti del diritto. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.Search in Google Scholar
Messner, Claudius. 2020. Listening to distant voices. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09735-4.Search in Google Scholar
Moritz, Karl Philipp. 1979. Götterlehre oder mythologische Dichtungen der Alten (1791). Frankfurt: Insel.Search in Google Scholar
Pang, Laikwan. 2012. Creativity and its discontents. China’s creative industries and intellectual property rights offenses. Durham and London: Duke UP.10.1215/9780822394587Search in Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall. 2011. The future of law in a multi-polar world: Toward a global new deal. In Sam Muller, Stavros Zouridis, Morly Frishman & Laura Kistemaker (eds.), The law of the future and the future of law, 43–56. Oslo: Torkel Opsahl Academic Epublisher.10.2139/ssrn.1846263Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1931–1958. The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard UP (cited as CP).Search in Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1992. The essential Peirce, vol. 1, Nathan Houser & Christian Kloesel (eds.). Bloomington: Indiana UP (cited as EP1).Search in Google Scholar
Puett, Michael. 2001. The ambivalence of creation: Debates concerning innova-tion and artifice in early China. Stanford: Stanford UP.Search in Google Scholar
Qian, Xiang-Yang. 2010. Traditional Chinese law v. Weberian legal rationality. Max Weber Studies 10(1). 29–45. https://doi.org/10.15543/mws/2010/1/5.Search in Google Scholar
Roszak, Theodore. 1969. The making of a counter culture: Reflections on the technocratic society and its youthful opposition. Garden City: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar
Sakai, Naoki. 2010. Theory and Asian humanity: On the question of humanitas and anthropos. Postcolonial Studies 13(4). 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2010.526539.Search in Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1922. Politische Theologie. Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveranität. Leipzig: München.Search in Google Scholar
Senger, Harro. 1996. Strategemische Weisheit: Chinesische Wörter im Sinnbezirk der List. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 39. 27–102.Search in Google Scholar
Siegert, Bernhard. 2003. (Nicht) Am Ort. Zum Raster als Kulturtechnik. Thesis. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Bauhaus-Universität Weimar 3. 92–104.Search in Google Scholar
Siems, Mathias. 2014. Comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, Georgr. 1975. After Babel. Aspects of language and translation. Oxford New York: Oxford UP.Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.Search in Google Scholar
Tse, Edward, Kevin Ma & Yu Huang. 2009. Knockoffs come of age. Consumer & Retail (56). Available at: https://www.strategy-business.com/article/09315.Search in Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen. 2008. Blind spot? Weber’s concept of expertise and the perplexing case of China. In Fanon Howell, Marisol Lopez Menendez, David Chalcraft (eds.), Max Weber matters: Interweaving past and present, 121–134. Aldershot: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar
Vasselin, Martine. 2008. Le corps dénudé de la Vérité. Rives nord-méditerranéennes 30. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4000/rives.2363.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, Xing. 2009. ‘Shanzhai’ culture now in crosshairs. China Daily. 18 May. Available at: http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bw/2009-5/18/connt_7785393.htm.Search in Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1980. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie (1922), 5th ed. Tübingen: Mohr.Search in Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1988. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie I (1920). Tübingen: Mohr.Search in Google Scholar
Weil, Simone. 1943. L’Iliade ou le poème de la force. Cahiers du Sud, juillet 1947.Search in Google Scholar
Winter, Steven L. 1991. Foreword: On building houses. Texas Law Review 69(7). 1595–1626.Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1977. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1997. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Werkausgabe, vol. 1. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, Kuang-Ming. 2010. “Let Chinese thinking be Chinese, not Western”: Sine Qua non to globalization. Dao. A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9(2). 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-010-9161-6.Search in Google Scholar
Zittrain, Jonathan. 2006. A history of online gatekeeping. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 19. 253–298.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
